Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair : 14 years of patient data accrual
The purpose of this study was to analyze the published perioperative results and outcomes of laparoscopic (LVHR) and open (OVHR) ventral hernia repair focusing on complications and hernia recurrences. Data were compiled from all English-language reports of LVHR published from 1996 through January 20...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2007-03, Vol.21 (3), p.378-386 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 386 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 378 |
| container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | PIERCE, Richard A SPITLER, Jennifer A FRISELLA, Margaret M MATTHEWS, Brent D BRUNT, L. Michael |
| description | The purpose of this study was to analyze the published perioperative results and outcomes of laparoscopic (LVHR) and open (OVHR) ventral hernia repair focusing on complications and hernia recurrences.
Data were compiled from all English-language reports of LVHR published from 1996 through January 2006. Series with fewer than 20 cases of LVHR, insufficient details of complications, or those part of a larger series were excluded. Data were derived from 31 reports of LVHR alone (unpaired studies) and 14 that directly compared LVHR to OVHR (paired studies). Chi-squared analysis, Fisher's exact test, and two-tailed t-test analysis were used.
Forty-five published series were included, representing 5340 patients (4582 LVHR, 758 OVHR). In the pooled analysis (combined paired and unpaired studies), LVHR was associated with significantly fewer wound complications (3.8% vs. 16.8%, p < 0.0001), total complications (22.7% vs. 41.7%, p < 0.0001), hernia recurrences (4.3% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.0001), and a shorter length of stay (2.4 vs. 4.3 days, p = 0.0004). These outcomes maintained statistical significance when only the paired studies were analyzed. In the pooled analysis, LVHR was associated with fewer gastrointestinal (2.6% vs. 5.9%, p < 0.0001), pulmonary (0.6% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.0013), and miscellaneous (0.7% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.0011) complications, but a higher incidence of prolonged procedure site pain (1.96% vs. 0.92%, p = 0.0469); none of these outcomes was significant in the paired study analysis. No differences in cardiac, neurologic, septic, genitourinary, or thromboembolic complications were found. The mortality rate was 0.13% with LVHR and 0.26% with OVHR (p = NS). Trends toward larger hernia defects and larger mesh sizes were observed for LVHR.
The published literature indicates fewer wound-related and overall complications and a lower rate of hernia recurrence for LVHR compared to OVHR. Further controlled trials are necessary to substantiate these findings and to assess the health care economic impact of this approach. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-006-9115-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69038830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1222227851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-a0372259f4814dc9548e2a587806af57f9cb29e13b7d62a76e6625b0fa0150743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10UuLFDEUBeAgitOO_gA3EhTd1XiTynN2MviCAV3oOtxOJVhDulImVQP9703bBQOCq2y-c0JyCHnJ4IoB6PcVQCjRAajOMiY79YjsmOh5xzkzj8kObA8d11ZckGe13kHjlsmn5IJpZoArtiPxe84pDHTABSlOmI51rDRHmnDGkqvP8-jpfb2ieQ4TvQ_TUjDRX6FMI9ISZhwLvaZM0GPA8jc54zI2tlV6X1ZMz8mTiKmGF9t5SX5--vjj5kt3--3z15sPt50XEpYOodecSxuFYWLwVgoTOEqjDSiMUkfr99wG1u_1oDhqFZTicg8RgUnQor8k7869c8m_11AXdxirDynhFPJanbLQG9NDg2_-gXd5Le391XGlBAfNjWzq9X8Vs8IYJk93sjPy7b9qCdHNZTxgOToG7rSTO-_k2k7utJNTLfNqK173hzA8JLZhGni7AaweUyw4-bE-OCOtVRr6P5Bil88</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219488154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair : 14 years of patient data accrual</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>PIERCE, Richard A ; SPITLER, Jennifer A ; FRISELLA, Margaret M ; MATTHEWS, Brent D ; BRUNT, L. Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>PIERCE, Richard A ; SPITLER, Jennifer A ; FRISELLA, Margaret M ; MATTHEWS, Brent D ; BRUNT, L. Michael</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to analyze the published perioperative results and outcomes of laparoscopic (LVHR) and open (OVHR) ventral hernia repair focusing on complications and hernia recurrences.
Data were compiled from all English-language reports of LVHR published from 1996 through January 2006. Series with fewer than 20 cases of LVHR, insufficient details of complications, or those part of a larger series were excluded. Data were derived from 31 reports of LVHR alone (unpaired studies) and 14 that directly compared LVHR to OVHR (paired studies). Chi-squared analysis, Fisher's exact test, and two-tailed t-test analysis were used.
Forty-five published series were included, representing 5340 patients (4582 LVHR, 758 OVHR). In the pooled analysis (combined paired and unpaired studies), LVHR was associated with significantly fewer wound complications (3.8% vs. 16.8%, p < 0.0001), total complications (22.7% vs. 41.7%, p < 0.0001), hernia recurrences (4.3% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.0001), and a shorter length of stay (2.4 vs. 4.3 days, p = 0.0004). These outcomes maintained statistical significance when only the paired studies were analyzed. In the pooled analysis, LVHR was associated with fewer gastrointestinal (2.6% vs. 5.9%, p < 0.0001), pulmonary (0.6% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.0013), and miscellaneous (0.7% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.0011) complications, but a higher incidence of prolonged procedure site pain (1.96% vs. 0.92%, p = 0.0469); none of these outcomes was significant in the paired study analysis. No differences in cardiac, neurologic, septic, genitourinary, or thromboembolic complications were found. The mortality rate was 0.13% with LVHR and 0.26% with OVHR (p = NS). Trends toward larger hernia defects and larger mesh sizes were observed for LVHR.
The published literature indicates fewer wound-related and overall complications and a lower rate of hernia recurrence for LVHR compared to OVHR. Further controlled trials are necessary to substantiate these findings and to assess the health care economic impact of this approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9115-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17180261</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SUREEX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Springer</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Hernia, Ventral - epidemiology ; Hernia, Ventral - surgery ; Hernias ; Humans ; Incidence ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - statistics & numerical data ; Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Meta-analysis ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Recurrence ; Statistical Distributions ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2007-03, Vol.21 (3), p.378-386</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-a0372259f4814dc9548e2a587806af57f9cb29e13b7d62a76e6625b0fa0150743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-a0372259f4814dc9548e2a587806af57f9cb29e13b7d62a76e6625b0fa0150743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18599670$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17180261$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PIERCE, Richard A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SPITLER, Jennifer A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRISELLA, Margaret M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MATTHEWS, Brent D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRUNT, L. Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair : 14 years of patient data accrual</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to analyze the published perioperative results and outcomes of laparoscopic (LVHR) and open (OVHR) ventral hernia repair focusing on complications and hernia recurrences.
Data were compiled from all English-language reports of LVHR published from 1996 through January 2006. Series with fewer than 20 cases of LVHR, insufficient details of complications, or those part of a larger series were excluded. Data were derived from 31 reports of LVHR alone (unpaired studies) and 14 that directly compared LVHR to OVHR (paired studies). Chi-squared analysis, Fisher's exact test, and two-tailed t-test analysis were used.
Forty-five published series were included, representing 5340 patients (4582 LVHR, 758 OVHR). In the pooled analysis (combined paired and unpaired studies), LVHR was associated with significantly fewer wound complications (3.8% vs. 16.8%, p < 0.0001), total complications (22.7% vs. 41.7%, p < 0.0001), hernia recurrences (4.3% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.0001), and a shorter length of stay (2.4 vs. 4.3 days, p = 0.0004). These outcomes maintained statistical significance when only the paired studies were analyzed. In the pooled analysis, LVHR was associated with fewer gastrointestinal (2.6% vs. 5.9%, p < 0.0001), pulmonary (0.6% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.0013), and miscellaneous (0.7% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.0011) complications, but a higher incidence of prolonged procedure site pain (1.96% vs. 0.92%, p = 0.0469); none of these outcomes was significant in the paired study analysis. No differences in cardiac, neurologic, septic, genitourinary, or thromboembolic complications were found. The mortality rate was 0.13% with LVHR and 0.26% with OVHR (p = NS). Trends toward larger hernia defects and larger mesh sizes were observed for LVHR.
The published literature indicates fewer wound-related and overall complications and a lower rate of hernia recurrence for LVHR compared to OVHR. Further controlled trials are necessary to substantiate these findings and to assess the health care economic impact of this approach.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hernia, Ventral - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hernia, Ventral - surgery</subject><subject>Hernias</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Statistical Distributions</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp10UuLFDEUBeAgitOO_gA3EhTd1XiTynN2MviCAV3oOtxOJVhDulImVQP9703bBQOCq2y-c0JyCHnJ4IoB6PcVQCjRAajOMiY79YjsmOh5xzkzj8kObA8d11ZckGe13kHjlsmn5IJpZoArtiPxe84pDHTABSlOmI51rDRHmnDGkqvP8-jpfb2ieQ4TvQ_TUjDRX6FMI9ISZhwLvaZM0GPA8jc54zI2tlV6X1ZMz8mTiKmGF9t5SX5--vjj5kt3--3z15sPt50XEpYOodecSxuFYWLwVgoTOEqjDSiMUkfr99wG1u_1oDhqFZTicg8RgUnQor8k7869c8m_11AXdxirDynhFPJanbLQG9NDg2_-gXd5Le391XGlBAfNjWzq9X8Vs8IYJk93sjPy7b9qCdHNZTxgOToG7rSTO-_k2k7utJNTLfNqK173hzA8JLZhGni7AaweUyw4-bE-OCOtVRr6P5Bil88</recordid><startdate>20070301</startdate><enddate>20070301</enddate><creator>PIERCE, Richard A</creator><creator>SPITLER, Jennifer A</creator><creator>FRISELLA, Margaret M</creator><creator>MATTHEWS, Brent D</creator><creator>BRUNT, L. Michael</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070301</creationdate><title>Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair : 14 years of patient data accrual</title><author>PIERCE, Richard A ; SPITLER, Jennifer A ; FRISELLA, Margaret M ; MATTHEWS, Brent D ; BRUNT, L. Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-a0372259f4814dc9548e2a587806af57f9cb29e13b7d62a76e6625b0fa0150743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hernia, Ventral - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hernia, Ventral - surgery</topic><topic>Hernias</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Statistical Distributions</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PIERCE, Richard A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SPITLER, Jennifer A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRISELLA, Margaret M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MATTHEWS, Brent D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRUNT, L. Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PIERCE, Richard A</au><au>SPITLER, Jennifer A</au><au>FRISELLA, Margaret M</au><au>MATTHEWS, Brent D</au><au>BRUNT, L. Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair : 14 years of patient data accrual</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2007-03-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>378</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>378-386</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><coden>SUREEX</coden><abstract>The purpose of this study was to analyze the published perioperative results and outcomes of laparoscopic (LVHR) and open (OVHR) ventral hernia repair focusing on complications and hernia recurrences.
Data were compiled from all English-language reports of LVHR published from 1996 through January 2006. Series with fewer than 20 cases of LVHR, insufficient details of complications, or those part of a larger series were excluded. Data were derived from 31 reports of LVHR alone (unpaired studies) and 14 that directly compared LVHR to OVHR (paired studies). Chi-squared analysis, Fisher's exact test, and two-tailed t-test analysis were used.
Forty-five published series were included, representing 5340 patients (4582 LVHR, 758 OVHR). In the pooled analysis (combined paired and unpaired studies), LVHR was associated with significantly fewer wound complications (3.8% vs. 16.8%, p < 0.0001), total complications (22.7% vs. 41.7%, p < 0.0001), hernia recurrences (4.3% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.0001), and a shorter length of stay (2.4 vs. 4.3 days, p = 0.0004). These outcomes maintained statistical significance when only the paired studies were analyzed. In the pooled analysis, LVHR was associated with fewer gastrointestinal (2.6% vs. 5.9%, p < 0.0001), pulmonary (0.6% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.0013), and miscellaneous (0.7% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.0011) complications, but a higher incidence of prolonged procedure site pain (1.96% vs. 0.92%, p = 0.0469); none of these outcomes was significant in the paired study analysis. No differences in cardiac, neurologic, septic, genitourinary, or thromboembolic complications were found. The mortality rate was 0.13% with LVHR and 0.26% with OVHR (p = NS). Trends toward larger hernia defects and larger mesh sizes were observed for LVHR.
The published literature indicates fewer wound-related and overall complications and a lower rate of hernia recurrence for LVHR compared to OVHR. Further controlled trials are necessary to substantiate these findings and to assess the health care economic impact of this approach.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>17180261</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-006-9115-6</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
| ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2007-03, Vol.21 (3), p.378-386 |
| issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69038830 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Digestive system. Abdomen Endoscopy Female Hernia, Ventral - epidemiology Hernia, Ventral - surgery Hernias Humans Incidence Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Laparoscopy Laparoscopy - statistics & numerical data Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data Male Medical sciences Meta-analysis Middle Aged Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Recurrence Statistical Distributions Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology Treatment Outcome |
| title | Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair : 14 years of patient data accrual |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T17%3A18%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pooled%20data%20analysis%20of%20laparoscopic%20vs.%20open%20ventral%20hernia%20repair%20:%2014%20years%20of%20patient%20data%20accrual&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=PIERCE,%20Richard%20A&rft.date=2007-03-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=378&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=378-386&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft.coden=SUREEX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-006-9115-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1222227851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219488154&rft_id=info:pmid/17180261&rfr_iscdi=true |