Posturography and Risk of Recurrent Falls in Healthy Non-Institutionalized Persons Aged Over 65

Background: A poor postural stability in older people is associated with an increased risk of falling. The posturographic tool has widely been used to assess balance control; however, its value in predicting falls remains unclear. Objective: The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gerontology (Basel) 2006-01, Vol.52 (6), p.345-352
Hauptverfasser: Buatois, Séverine, Gueguen, René, Gauchard, Gérome C., Benetos, Athanase, Perrin, Philippe P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 352
container_issue 6
container_start_page 345
container_title Gerontology (Basel)
container_volume 52
creator Buatois, Séverine
Gueguen, René
Gauchard, Gérome C.
Benetos, Athanase
Perrin, Philippe P.
description Background: A poor postural stability in older people is associated with an increased risk of falling. The posturographic tool has widely been used to assess balance control; however, its value in predicting falls remains unclear. Objective: The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the predictive value of posturography in the estimation of the risk of recurrent falls, including a comparison with standard clinical balance tests, in healthy non-institutionalized persons aged over 65. Methods: Two hundred and six healthy non-institutionalized volunteers aged over 65 were tested. Postural control was evaluated by posturographic tests, performed on static, dynamic and dynamized platforms (static test, slow dynamic test and Sensory Organization Test [SOT]) and clinical balance tests (Timed ‘Up & Go’ test, One-Leg Balance, Sit-to-Stand-test). Subsequent falls were monitored prospectively with self-questionnaire sent every 4 months for a period of 16 months after the balance testing. Subjects were classified prospectively in three groups of Non-Fallers (0 fall), Single-Fallers (1 fall) and Multi-Fallers (more than 2 falls). Results: Loss of balance during the last trial of the SOT sensory conflicting condition, when visual and somatosensory inputs were distorted, was the best factor to predict the risk of recurrent falls (OR = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.3–10.11). Multi-Fallers showed no postural adaptation during the repetitive trials of this sensory condition, contrary to Non-Fallers and Single-Fallers. The Multi-Fallers showed significantly more sway when visual inputs were occluded. The clinical balance tests, the static test and the slow dynamic test revealed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: In a sample of non-institutionalized older persons aged over 65, posturographic evaluation by the SOT, especially with repetition of the same task in sensory conflicting condition, compared to the clinical tests and the static and dynamic posturographic test, appears to be a more sensitive tool to identify those at high-risk of recurrent falls.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000094983
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69026694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69026694</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-57c9216462ccb9321d4bff5f34046c62dcc7d82fc3cf5aa0df3d9491bee1ca793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9LwzAUB_Agis7pwbMgQVDwUM2vps1RxLmBuCEK3kqWJrPaJTNphfnXm9Gi4MVcwgsf3uObB8ARRpcYp-IKxSOYyOkWGGBGaBJrug0GiCKWUMJe9sB-CG_xERGMdsEe5gKlec4HoJi50LTeLbxcva6htCV8rMI7dAY-atV6r20DR7KuA6wsHGtZN5E9OJtMbGiqpm0qZ2VdfekSzrQPzgZ4vYjF9FN7yNMDsGNkHfRhfw_B8-j26Wac3E_vJjfX94liadYkaaYEwZxxotRcUIJLNjcmNZQhxhUnpVJZmROjqDKplKg0tIyJ8VxrrGQm6BCcd31X3n20OjTFsgpK17W02rWhiIEJ54L9CwliLP5MFuHpH_jmWh-zRpOxDAmKcUQXHVLeheC1KVa-Wkq_LjAqNrspfnYT7UnfsJ0vdfkr-2VEcNYDGZSsjZdWVeHX5YRxmm2GHnfuXfqF9j-gG_MNUx6eLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>274709311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Posturography and Risk of Recurrent Falls in Healthy Non-Institutionalized Persons Aged Over 65</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Buatois, Séverine ; Gueguen, René ; Gauchard, Gérome C. ; Benetos, Athanase ; Perrin, Philippe P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buatois, Séverine ; Gueguen, René ; Gauchard, Gérome C. ; Benetos, Athanase ; Perrin, Philippe P.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: A poor postural stability in older people is associated with an increased risk of falling. The posturographic tool has widely been used to assess balance control; however, its value in predicting falls remains unclear. Objective: The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the predictive value of posturography in the estimation of the risk of recurrent falls, including a comparison with standard clinical balance tests, in healthy non-institutionalized persons aged over 65. Methods: Two hundred and six healthy non-institutionalized volunteers aged over 65 were tested. Postural control was evaluated by posturographic tests, performed on static, dynamic and dynamized platforms (static test, slow dynamic test and Sensory Organization Test [SOT]) and clinical balance tests (Timed ‘Up &amp; Go’ test, One-Leg Balance, Sit-to-Stand-test). Subsequent falls were monitored prospectively with self-questionnaire sent every 4 months for a period of 16 months after the balance testing. Subjects were classified prospectively in three groups of Non-Fallers (0 fall), Single-Fallers (1 fall) and Multi-Fallers (more than 2 falls). Results: Loss of balance during the last trial of the SOT sensory conflicting condition, when visual and somatosensory inputs were distorted, was the best factor to predict the risk of recurrent falls (OR = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.3–10.11). Multi-Fallers showed no postural adaptation during the repetitive trials of this sensory condition, contrary to Non-Fallers and Single-Fallers. The Multi-Fallers showed significantly more sway when visual inputs were occluded. The clinical balance tests, the static test and the slow dynamic test revealed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: In a sample of non-institutionalized older persons aged over 65, posturographic evaluation by the SOT, especially with repetition of the same task in sensory conflicting condition, compared to the clinical tests and the static and dynamic posturographic test, appears to be a more sensitive tool to identify those at high-risk of recurrent falls.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-324X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0003</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000094983</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16905886</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GERNDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: Karger</publisher><subject>Accidental Falls ; Activities of Daily Living ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Section ; Comparative studies ; Development. Metamorphosis. Moult. Ageing ; Diagnostic tests ; Falls ; Female ; France ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gerontology ; Humans ; Male ; Odds Ratio ; Older people ; Postural Balance - physiology ; Posture ; Posture - physiology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Risk assessment ; Risk Factors ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems ; Vestibular Function Tests</subject><ispartof>Gerontology (Basel), 2006-01, Vol.52 (6), p.345-352</ispartof><rights>2006 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-57c9216462ccb9321d4bff5f34046c62dcc7d82fc3cf5aa0df3d9491bee1ca793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-57c9216462ccb9321d4bff5f34046c62dcc7d82fc3cf5aa0df3d9491bee1ca793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2429,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18246371$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16905886$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buatois, Séverine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gueguen, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gauchard, Gérome C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benetos, Athanase</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Philippe P.</creatorcontrib><title>Posturography and Risk of Recurrent Falls in Healthy Non-Institutionalized Persons Aged Over 65</title><title>Gerontology (Basel)</title><addtitle>Gerontology</addtitle><description>Background: A poor postural stability in older people is associated with an increased risk of falling. The posturographic tool has widely been used to assess balance control; however, its value in predicting falls remains unclear. Objective: The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the predictive value of posturography in the estimation of the risk of recurrent falls, including a comparison with standard clinical balance tests, in healthy non-institutionalized persons aged over 65. Methods: Two hundred and six healthy non-institutionalized volunteers aged over 65 were tested. Postural control was evaluated by posturographic tests, performed on static, dynamic and dynamized platforms (static test, slow dynamic test and Sensory Organization Test [SOT]) and clinical balance tests (Timed ‘Up &amp; Go’ test, One-Leg Balance, Sit-to-Stand-test). Subsequent falls were monitored prospectively with self-questionnaire sent every 4 months for a period of 16 months after the balance testing. Subjects were classified prospectively in three groups of Non-Fallers (0 fall), Single-Fallers (1 fall) and Multi-Fallers (more than 2 falls). Results: Loss of balance during the last trial of the SOT sensory conflicting condition, when visual and somatosensory inputs were distorted, was the best factor to predict the risk of recurrent falls (OR = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.3–10.11). Multi-Fallers showed no postural adaptation during the repetitive trials of this sensory condition, contrary to Non-Fallers and Single-Fallers. The Multi-Fallers showed significantly more sway when visual inputs were occluded. The clinical balance tests, the static test and the slow dynamic test revealed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: In a sample of non-institutionalized older persons aged over 65, posturographic evaluation by the SOT, especially with repetition of the same task in sensory conflicting condition, compared to the clinical tests and the static and dynamic posturographic test, appears to be a more sensitive tool to identify those at high-risk of recurrent falls.</description><subject>Accidental Falls</subject><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Section</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Development. Metamorphosis. Moult. Ageing</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Falls</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gerontology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Postural Balance - physiology</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Posture - physiology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><subject>Vestibular Function Tests</subject><issn>0304-324X</issn><issn>1423-0003</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c9LwzAUB_Agis7pwbMgQVDwUM2vps1RxLmBuCEK3kqWJrPaJTNphfnXm9Gi4MVcwgsf3uObB8ARRpcYp-IKxSOYyOkWGGBGaBJrug0GiCKWUMJe9sB-CG_xERGMdsEe5gKlec4HoJi50LTeLbxcva6htCV8rMI7dAY-atV6r20DR7KuA6wsHGtZN5E9OJtMbGiqpm0qZ2VdfekSzrQPzgZ4vYjF9FN7yNMDsGNkHfRhfw_B8-j26Wac3E_vJjfX94liadYkaaYEwZxxotRcUIJLNjcmNZQhxhUnpVJZmROjqDKplKg0tIyJ8VxrrGQm6BCcd31X3n20OjTFsgpK17W02rWhiIEJ54L9CwliLP5MFuHpH_jmWh-zRpOxDAmKcUQXHVLeheC1KVa-Wkq_LjAqNrspfnYT7UnfsJ0vdfkr-2VEcNYDGZSsjZdWVeHX5YRxmm2GHnfuXfqF9j-gG_MNUx6eLw</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Buatois, Séverine</creator><creator>Gueguen, René</creator><creator>Gauchard, Gérome C.</creator><creator>Benetos, Athanase</creator><creator>Perrin, Philippe P.</creator><general>Karger</general><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Posturography and Risk of Recurrent Falls in Healthy Non-Institutionalized Persons Aged Over 65</title><author>Buatois, Séverine ; Gueguen, René ; Gauchard, Gérome C. ; Benetos, Athanase ; Perrin, Philippe P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-57c9216462ccb9321d4bff5f34046c62dcc7d82fc3cf5aa0df3d9491bee1ca793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Accidental Falls</topic><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Section</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Development. Metamorphosis. Moult. Ageing</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Falls</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gerontology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Postural Balance - physiology</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Posture - physiology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><topic>Vestibular Function Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buatois, Séverine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gueguen, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gauchard, Gérome C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benetos, Athanase</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Philippe P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gerontology (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buatois, Séverine</au><au>Gueguen, René</au><au>Gauchard, Gérome C.</au><au>Benetos, Athanase</au><au>Perrin, Philippe P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Posturography and Risk of Recurrent Falls in Healthy Non-Institutionalized Persons Aged Over 65</atitle><jtitle>Gerontology (Basel)</jtitle><addtitle>Gerontology</addtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>345-352</pages><issn>0304-324X</issn><eissn>1423-0003</eissn><coden>GERNDJ</coden><abstract>Background: A poor postural stability in older people is associated with an increased risk of falling. The posturographic tool has widely been used to assess balance control; however, its value in predicting falls remains unclear. Objective: The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the predictive value of posturography in the estimation of the risk of recurrent falls, including a comparison with standard clinical balance tests, in healthy non-institutionalized persons aged over 65. Methods: Two hundred and six healthy non-institutionalized volunteers aged over 65 were tested. Postural control was evaluated by posturographic tests, performed on static, dynamic and dynamized platforms (static test, slow dynamic test and Sensory Organization Test [SOT]) and clinical balance tests (Timed ‘Up &amp; Go’ test, One-Leg Balance, Sit-to-Stand-test). Subsequent falls were monitored prospectively with self-questionnaire sent every 4 months for a period of 16 months after the balance testing. Subjects were classified prospectively in three groups of Non-Fallers (0 fall), Single-Fallers (1 fall) and Multi-Fallers (more than 2 falls). Results: Loss of balance during the last trial of the SOT sensory conflicting condition, when visual and somatosensory inputs were distorted, was the best factor to predict the risk of recurrent falls (OR = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.3–10.11). Multi-Fallers showed no postural adaptation during the repetitive trials of this sensory condition, contrary to Non-Fallers and Single-Fallers. The Multi-Fallers showed significantly more sway when visual inputs were occluded. The clinical balance tests, the static test and the slow dynamic test revealed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: In a sample of non-institutionalized older persons aged over 65, posturographic evaluation by the SOT, especially with repetition of the same task in sensory conflicting condition, compared to the clinical tests and the static and dynamic posturographic test, appears to be a more sensitive tool to identify those at high-risk of recurrent falls.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>Karger</pub><pmid>16905886</pmid><doi>10.1159/000094983</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0304-324X
ispartof Gerontology (Basel), 2006-01, Vol.52 (6), p.345-352
issn 0304-324X
1423-0003
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69026694
source MEDLINE; Karger Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accidental Falls
Activities of Daily Living
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Clinical Section
Comparative studies
Development. Metamorphosis. Moult. Ageing
Diagnostic tests
Falls
Female
France
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gerontology
Humans
Male
Odds Ratio
Older people
Postural Balance - physiology
Posture
Posture - physiology
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Risk assessment
Risk Factors
Sensitivity and Specificity
Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems
Vestibular Function Tests
title Posturography and Risk of Recurrent Falls in Healthy Non-Institutionalized Persons Aged Over 65
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T03%3A04%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Posturography%20and%20Risk%20of%20Recurrent%20Falls%20in%20Healthy%20Non-Institutionalized%20Persons%20Aged%20Over%2065&rft.jtitle=Gerontology%20(Basel)&rft.au=Buatois,%20S%C3%A9verine&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=345-352&rft.issn=0304-324X&rft.eissn=1423-0003&rft.coden=GERNDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000094983&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69026694%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=274709311&rft_id=info:pmid/16905886&rfr_iscdi=true