Measurement of single kidney function using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Comparison of two models in human subjects

Purpose To compare two methods for assessing the single kidney glomerular filtration rate (SK‐GFR) in humans using dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE)‐MRI. Materials and Methods Images were acquired from 39 separate MR studies of patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD). Data from the k...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2006-11, Vol.24 (5), p.1117-1123
Hauptverfasser: Buckley, David L., Shurrab, Ala'a E., Cheung, Ching M., Jones, Andrew P., Mamtora, Hari, Kalra, Philip A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1123
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1117
container_title Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
container_volume 24
creator Buckley, David L.
Shurrab, Ala'a E.
Cheung, Ching M.
Jones, Andrew P.
Mamtora, Hari
Kalra, Philip A.
description Purpose To compare two methods for assessing the single kidney glomerular filtration rate (SK‐GFR) in humans using dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE)‐MRI. Materials and Methods Images were acquired from 39 separate MR studies of patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD). Data from the kidneys and descending aorta were analyzed using both a Rutland‐Patlak plot and a compartmental model. MR estimates of the SK‐GFR were compared with standard radioisotope measures in a total of 75 kidneys. Results Estimates of renal function using both techniques correlated well with radioisotope‐assessed SK‐GFR (Spearman's ρ = 0.81, Rutland‐Patlak; ρ = 0.71, compartmental model). The Rutland‐Patlak approach provided a near one‐to‐one correspondence, while the compartmental method tended to overestimate SK‐GFR. However, the compartmental model fits to the experimental data were significantly better than those obtained using the Rutland‐Patlak approach. Conclusion DCE‐MRI of the kidneys provides data that correlate well with reference measures of SK‐GFR. However, further work, including image registration, is needed to isolate measurement of glomerular filtration to the level of the renal cortex. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jmri.20699
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69010267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69010267</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4989-be2322560cb99b646444e758e8e46142c3b1d557a8a7770fe31f4ed1cf0ff6353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EoqVw4QcgnzggpfjbMTcUQVvUhYoPcbQcZ0K9TZytHavdf0-WXeAGpxmNnnmkmReh55ScUkLY6_WYwikjypgH6JhKxioma_Vw6YnkFa2JPkJPcl4TQowR8jE6osoIqog6RmUFLpcEI8QZTz3OIf4YAN-ELsIW9yX6OUwRl90cd9voxuCxn-KcXJ4riNcueujw6vPFG9xM48alkBd-Mc13Ex6nDoaMQ8TXZXQR59Kuwc_5KXrUuyHDs0M9Qd_ev_vanFeXn84umreXlRemNlULjDMmFfGtMa0SSggBWtZQg1BUMM9b2kmpXe201qQHTnsBHfU96XvFJT9BL_feTZpuC-TZjiF7GAYXYSrZKkMoYUr_F6RG1ZzUO-OrPejTlHOC3m5SGF3aWkrsLg27S8P-SmOBXxyspR2h-4se3r8AdA_chQG2_1DZD8uHf0ur_U7IM9z_2XHpxi6HaGm_fzyzV1fNF6GbleX8J_HDpUE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19683085</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measurement of single kidney function using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Comparison of two models in human subjects</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Buckley, David L. ; Shurrab, Ala'a E. ; Cheung, Ching M. ; Jones, Andrew P. ; Mamtora, Hari ; Kalra, Philip A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buckley, David L. ; Shurrab, Ala'a E. ; Cheung, Ching M. ; Jones, Andrew P. ; Mamtora, Hari ; Kalra, Philip A.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To compare two methods for assessing the single kidney glomerular filtration rate (SK‐GFR) in humans using dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE)‐MRI. Materials and Methods Images were acquired from 39 separate MR studies of patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD). Data from the kidneys and descending aorta were analyzed using both a Rutland‐Patlak plot and a compartmental model. MR estimates of the SK‐GFR were compared with standard radioisotope measures in a total of 75 kidneys. Results Estimates of renal function using both techniques correlated well with radioisotope‐assessed SK‐GFR (Spearman's ρ = 0.81, Rutland‐Patlak; ρ = 0.71, compartmental model). The Rutland‐Patlak approach provided a near one‐to‐one correspondence, while the compartmental method tended to overestimate SK‐GFR. However, the compartmental model fits to the experimental data were significantly better than those obtained using the Rutland‐Patlak approach. Conclusion DCE‐MRI of the kidneys provides data that correlate well with reference measures of SK‐GFR. However, further work, including image registration, is needed to isolate measurement of glomerular filtration to the level of the renal cortex. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20699</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16941606</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Algorithms ; Computer Simulation ; Contrast Media ; Female ; gadolinium ; Gadolinium DTPA - metabolism ; Gadolinium DTPA - pharmacokinetics ; glomerular filtration ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; kidney ; Kidney - pathology ; Kidney - physiopathology ; Kidney Diseases - diagnosis ; Kidney Diseases - physiopathology ; Kidney Function Tests - methods ; Kinetics ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Biological ; perfusion ; renovascular disease ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; tracer kinetics</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2006-11, Vol.24 (5), p.1117-1123</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4989-be2322560cb99b646444e758e8e46142c3b1d557a8a7770fe31f4ed1cf0ff6353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4989-be2322560cb99b646444e758e8e46142c3b1d557a8a7770fe31f4ed1cf0ff6353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmri.20699$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmri.20699$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,1435,27931,27932,45581,45582,46416,46840</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16941606$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buckley, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shurrab, Ala'a E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Ching M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamtora, Hari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalra, Philip A.</creatorcontrib><title>Measurement of single kidney function using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Comparison of two models in human subjects</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><description>Purpose To compare two methods for assessing the single kidney glomerular filtration rate (SK‐GFR) in humans using dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE)‐MRI. Materials and Methods Images were acquired from 39 separate MR studies of patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD). Data from the kidneys and descending aorta were analyzed using both a Rutland‐Patlak plot and a compartmental model. MR estimates of the SK‐GFR were compared with standard radioisotope measures in a total of 75 kidneys. Results Estimates of renal function using both techniques correlated well with radioisotope‐assessed SK‐GFR (Spearman's ρ = 0.81, Rutland‐Patlak; ρ = 0.71, compartmental model). The Rutland‐Patlak approach provided a near one‐to‐one correspondence, while the compartmental method tended to overestimate SK‐GFR. However, the compartmental model fits to the experimental data were significantly better than those obtained using the Rutland‐Patlak approach. Conclusion DCE‐MRI of the kidneys provides data that correlate well with reference measures of SK‐GFR. However, further work, including image registration, is needed to isolate measurement of glomerular filtration to the level of the renal cortex. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>gadolinium</subject><subject>Gadolinium DTPA - metabolism</subject><subject>Gadolinium DTPA - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>glomerular filtration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>kidney</subject><subject>Kidney - pathology</subject><subject>Kidney - physiopathology</subject><subject>Kidney Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Kidney Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Kidney Function Tests - methods</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>perfusion</subject><subject>renovascular disease</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>tracer kinetics</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EoqVw4QcgnzggpfjbMTcUQVvUhYoPcbQcZ0K9TZytHavdf0-WXeAGpxmNnnmkmReh55ScUkLY6_WYwikjypgH6JhKxioma_Vw6YnkFa2JPkJPcl4TQowR8jE6osoIqog6RmUFLpcEI8QZTz3OIf4YAN-ELsIW9yX6OUwRl90cd9voxuCxn-KcXJ4riNcueujw6vPFG9xM48alkBd-Mc13Ex6nDoaMQ8TXZXQR59Kuwc_5KXrUuyHDs0M9Qd_ev_vanFeXn84umreXlRemNlULjDMmFfGtMa0SSggBWtZQg1BUMM9b2kmpXe201qQHTnsBHfU96XvFJT9BL_feTZpuC-TZjiF7GAYXYSrZKkMoYUr_F6RG1ZzUO-OrPejTlHOC3m5SGF3aWkrsLg27S8P-SmOBXxyspR2h-4se3r8AdA_chQG2_1DZD8uHf0ur_U7IM9z_2XHpxi6HaGm_fzyzV1fNF6GbleX8J_HDpUE</recordid><startdate>200611</startdate><enddate>200611</enddate><creator>Buckley, David L.</creator><creator>Shurrab, Ala'a E.</creator><creator>Cheung, Ching M.</creator><creator>Jones, Andrew P.</creator><creator>Mamtora, Hari</creator><creator>Kalra, Philip A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200611</creationdate><title>Measurement of single kidney function using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Comparison of two models in human subjects</title><author>Buckley, David L. ; Shurrab, Ala'a E. ; Cheung, Ching M. ; Jones, Andrew P. ; Mamtora, Hari ; Kalra, Philip A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4989-be2322560cb99b646444e758e8e46142c3b1d557a8a7770fe31f4ed1cf0ff6353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>gadolinium</topic><topic>Gadolinium DTPA - metabolism</topic><topic>Gadolinium DTPA - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>glomerular filtration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>kidney</topic><topic>Kidney - pathology</topic><topic>Kidney - physiopathology</topic><topic>Kidney Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Kidney Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Kidney Function Tests - methods</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>perfusion</topic><topic>renovascular disease</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>tracer kinetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buckley, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shurrab, Ala'a E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Ching M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamtora, Hari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalra, Philip A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buckley, David L.</au><au>Shurrab, Ala'a E.</au><au>Cheung, Ching M.</au><au>Jones, Andrew P.</au><au>Mamtora, Hari</au><au>Kalra, Philip A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measurement of single kidney function using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Comparison of two models in human subjects</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><date>2006-11</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1117</spage><epage>1123</epage><pages>1117-1123</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>Purpose To compare two methods for assessing the single kidney glomerular filtration rate (SK‐GFR) in humans using dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE)‐MRI. Materials and Methods Images were acquired from 39 separate MR studies of patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD). Data from the kidneys and descending aorta were analyzed using both a Rutland‐Patlak plot and a compartmental model. MR estimates of the SK‐GFR were compared with standard radioisotope measures in a total of 75 kidneys. Results Estimates of renal function using both techniques correlated well with radioisotope‐assessed SK‐GFR (Spearman's ρ = 0.81, Rutland‐Patlak; ρ = 0.71, compartmental model). The Rutland‐Patlak approach provided a near one‐to‐one correspondence, while the compartmental method tended to overestimate SK‐GFR. However, the compartmental model fits to the experimental data were significantly better than those obtained using the Rutland‐Patlak approach. Conclusion DCE‐MRI of the kidneys provides data that correlate well with reference measures of SK‐GFR. However, further work, including image registration, is needed to isolate measurement of glomerular filtration to the level of the renal cortex. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>16941606</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.20699</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-1807
ispartof Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2006-11, Vol.24 (5), p.1117-1123
issn 1053-1807
1522-2586
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69010267
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Computer Simulation
Contrast Media
Female
gadolinium
Gadolinium DTPA - metabolism
Gadolinium DTPA - pharmacokinetics
glomerular filtration
Humans
Image Enhancement - methods
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
kidney
Kidney - pathology
Kidney - physiopathology
Kidney Diseases - diagnosis
Kidney Diseases - physiopathology
Kidney Function Tests - methods
Kinetics
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Biological
perfusion
renovascular disease
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
tracer kinetics
title Measurement of single kidney function using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Comparison of two models in human subjects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T21%3A20%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measurement%20of%20single%20kidney%20function%20using%20dynamic%20contrast-enhanced%20MRI:%20Comparison%20of%20two%20models%20in%20human%20subjects&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Buckley,%20David%20L.&rft.date=2006-11&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1117&rft.epage=1123&rft.pages=1117-1123&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.20699&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69010267%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19683085&rft_id=info:pmid/16941606&rfr_iscdi=true