Impact of Grazing Intensity during Drought in an Arizona Grassland
The ecological benefits of changing cattle grazing practices in the western United States remain controversial, due in part to a lack of experimentation. In 1997 we initiated an experimental study of two rangeland alternatives, cattle removal and high-impact grazing, and compared grassland community...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation biology 2007-02, Vol.21 (1), p.87-97 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 97 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 87 |
container_title | Conservation biology |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | LOESER, MATTHEW R. R. SISK, THOMAS D. CREWS, TIMOTHY E. |
description | The ecological benefits of changing cattle grazing practices in the western United States remain controversial, due in part to a lack of experimentation. In 1997 we initiated an experimental study of two rangeland alternatives, cattle removal and high-impact grazing, and compared grassland community responses with those with more conventional, moderate grazing practices. The study was conducted in a high-elevation, semiarid grassland near Flagstaff, Arizona (U.S.A.). We conducted annual plant surveys of modified Whittaker plots for 8 years and examined plant composition shifts among treatments and years. High-impact grazing had strong directional effects that led to a decline in perennial forb cover and an increase in annual plants, particularly the exotic cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.). A twofold increase in plant cover by exotic species followed a severe drought in the sixth year of the study, and this increase was greatest in the high-impact grazing plots, where native cover declined by one-half. Cattle removal resulted in little increase in native plant cover and reduced plant species richness relative to the moderate grazing control. Our results suggest that some intermediate level of cattle grazing may maintain greater levels of native plant diversity than the alternatives of cattle removal or high-density, short-duration grazing practices. Furthermore, episodic drought interacts with cattle grazing, leading to infrequent, but biologically important shifts in plant communities. Our results demonstrate the importance of climatic variation in determining ecological effects of grazing practices, and we recommend improving conservation efforts in arid rangelands by developing management plans that anticipate this variation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00606.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69006575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4124645</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4124645</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5146-155740ae0d94ece3a112c0725b1cee61c8ba7472d2ea95b2491f7510b0d63b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1PGzEQhi3UCgLlH6BqL-1tU39_HHogKaSpUOkBtUfL6_VSp5vdYO-KhF-Pl43CkVqyPfI8r2f0DgAZglOU1pfVFDFMciSImmII-TTtdG6PwOSQeAcmUEqZS6nwCTiNcQUhVAzRY3CCBFYyhRMwW643xnZZW2WLYJ58c58tm8410Xe7rOzD8PAttP393y7zTWaa7DL4p7YxAx5jbZryA3hfmTq68_19Bu6ur-7m3_Ob28VyfnmT21SJ54gxQaFxsFTUWUcMQthCgVmBrHMcWVkYQQUusTOKFZgqVAmGYAFLTgpBzsDn8dtNaB96Fzu99tG6OrXg2j5qrpIJTLA3QQwpUZTyN0FEJaRM4QTKEbShjTG4Sm-CX5uw0wjqYSB6pQff9eC7HgaiXwait0n6cV-jL9aufBXuJ5CAT3vARGvqKpjG-vjKSYaxEDJxX0fu0ddu998N6PntbJmipL8Y9avYteGgpwhTTgfT8jHtY-e2h7QJ_zQXRDD95-dCCzKDi98_uP5FngGZW7zG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14804592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Grazing Intensity during Drought in an Arizona Grassland</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>LOESER, MATTHEW R. R. ; SISK, THOMAS D. ; CREWS, TIMOTHY E.</creator><creatorcontrib>LOESER, MATTHEW R. R. ; SISK, THOMAS D. ; CREWS, TIMOTHY E.</creatorcontrib><description>The ecological benefits of changing cattle grazing practices in the western United States remain controversial, due in part to a lack of experimentation. In 1997 we initiated an experimental study of two rangeland alternatives, cattle removal and high-impact grazing, and compared grassland community responses with those with more conventional, moderate grazing practices. The study was conducted in a high-elevation, semiarid grassland near Flagstaff, Arizona (U.S.A.). We conducted annual plant surveys of modified Whittaker plots for 8 years and examined plant composition shifts among treatments and years. High-impact grazing had strong directional effects that led to a decline in perennial forb cover and an increase in annual plants, particularly the exotic cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.). A twofold increase in plant cover by exotic species followed a severe drought in the sixth year of the study, and this increase was greatest in the high-impact grazing plots, where native cover declined by one-half. Cattle removal resulted in little increase in native plant cover and reduced plant species richness relative to the moderate grazing control. Our results suggest that some intermediate level of cattle grazing may maintain greater levels of native plant diversity than the alternatives of cattle removal or high-density, short-duration grazing practices. Furthermore, episodic drought interacts with cattle grazing, leading to infrequent, but biologically important shifts in plant communities. Our results demonstrate the importance of climatic variation in determining ecological effects of grazing practices, and we recommend improving conservation efforts in arid rangelands by developing management plans that anticipate this variation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00606.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17298514</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CBIOEF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; Arizona ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bromus tectorum ; Cattle ; cheatgrass ; Climate ; climatic variation ; cobertura de plantas ; comunidad de plantas ; Conservation biology ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Disasters ; Drought ; exotic plants ; Feeding Behavior - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Grasses ; Grazing ; Grazing management ; Introduced species ; Livestock ; livestock grazing ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; pastoreo ; pastoreo de corta duración ; Pero ; Plant communities ; plant community ; plant cover ; Plant Development ; plantas exóticas ; Plants ; Population Density ; Population Dynamics ; short duration grazing</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2007-02, Vol.21 (1), p.87-97</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5146-155740ae0d94ece3a112c0725b1cee61c8ba7472d2ea95b2491f7510b0d63b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5146-155740ae0d94ece3a112c0725b1cee61c8ba7472d2ea95b2491f7510b0d63b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4124645$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4124645$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18522778$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17298514$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LOESER, MATTHEW R. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SISK, THOMAS D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CREWS, TIMOTHY E.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Grazing Intensity during Drought in an Arizona Grassland</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><description>The ecological benefits of changing cattle grazing practices in the western United States remain controversial, due in part to a lack of experimentation. In 1997 we initiated an experimental study of two rangeland alternatives, cattle removal and high-impact grazing, and compared grassland community responses with those with more conventional, moderate grazing practices. The study was conducted in a high-elevation, semiarid grassland near Flagstaff, Arizona (U.S.A.). We conducted annual plant surveys of modified Whittaker plots for 8 years and examined plant composition shifts among treatments and years. High-impact grazing had strong directional effects that led to a decline in perennial forb cover and an increase in annual plants, particularly the exotic cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.). A twofold increase in plant cover by exotic species followed a severe drought in the sixth year of the study, and this increase was greatest in the high-impact grazing plots, where native cover declined by one-half. Cattle removal resulted in little increase in native plant cover and reduced plant species richness relative to the moderate grazing control. Our results suggest that some intermediate level of cattle grazing may maintain greater levels of native plant diversity than the alternatives of cattle removal or high-density, short-duration grazing practices. Furthermore, episodic drought interacts with cattle grazing, leading to infrequent, but biologically important shifts in plant communities. Our results demonstrate the importance of climatic variation in determining ecological effects of grazing practices, and we recommend improving conservation efforts in arid rangelands by developing management plans that anticipate this variation.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Arizona</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bromus tectorum</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>cheatgrass</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>climatic variation</subject><subject>cobertura de plantas</subject><subject>comunidad de plantas</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Disasters</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>exotic plants</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Grazing management</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>livestock grazing</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>pastoreo</subject><subject>pastoreo de corta duración</subject><subject>Pero</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>plant community</subject><subject>plant cover</subject><subject>Plant Development</subject><subject>plantas exóticas</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>short duration grazing</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1PGzEQhi3UCgLlH6BqL-1tU39_HHogKaSpUOkBtUfL6_VSp5vdYO-KhF-Pl43CkVqyPfI8r2f0DgAZglOU1pfVFDFMciSImmII-TTtdG6PwOSQeAcmUEqZS6nwCTiNcQUhVAzRY3CCBFYyhRMwW643xnZZW2WLYJ58c58tm8410Xe7rOzD8PAttP393y7zTWaa7DL4p7YxAx5jbZryA3hfmTq68_19Bu6ur-7m3_Ob28VyfnmT21SJ54gxQaFxsFTUWUcMQthCgVmBrHMcWVkYQQUusTOKFZgqVAmGYAFLTgpBzsDn8dtNaB96Fzu99tG6OrXg2j5qrpIJTLA3QQwpUZTyN0FEJaRM4QTKEbShjTG4Sm-CX5uw0wjqYSB6pQff9eC7HgaiXwait0n6cV-jL9aufBXuJ5CAT3vARGvqKpjG-vjKSYaxEDJxX0fu0ddu998N6PntbJmipL8Y9avYteGgpwhTTgfT8jHtY-e2h7QJ_zQXRDD95-dCCzKDi98_uP5FngGZW7zG</recordid><startdate>200702</startdate><enddate>200702</enddate><creator>LOESER, MATTHEW R. R.</creator><creator>SISK, THOMAS D.</creator><creator>CREWS, TIMOTHY E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200702</creationdate><title>Impact of Grazing Intensity during Drought in an Arizona Grassland</title><author>LOESER, MATTHEW R. R. ; SISK, THOMAS D. ; CREWS, TIMOTHY E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5146-155740ae0d94ece3a112c0725b1cee61c8ba7472d2ea95b2491f7510b0d63b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Arizona</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bromus tectorum</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>cheatgrass</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>climatic variation</topic><topic>cobertura de plantas</topic><topic>comunidad de plantas</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Disasters</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>exotic plants</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Grazing management</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>livestock grazing</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>pastoreo</topic><topic>pastoreo de corta duración</topic><topic>Pero</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>plant community</topic><topic>plant cover</topic><topic>Plant Development</topic><topic>plantas exóticas</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>short duration grazing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LOESER, MATTHEW R. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SISK, THOMAS D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CREWS, TIMOTHY E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LOESER, MATTHEW R. R.</au><au>SISK, THOMAS D.</au><au>CREWS, TIMOTHY E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Grazing Intensity during Drought in an Arizona Grassland</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><date>2007-02</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>87-97</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><coden>CBIOEF</coden><abstract>The ecological benefits of changing cattle grazing practices in the western United States remain controversial, due in part to a lack of experimentation. In 1997 we initiated an experimental study of two rangeland alternatives, cattle removal and high-impact grazing, and compared grassland community responses with those with more conventional, moderate grazing practices. The study was conducted in a high-elevation, semiarid grassland near Flagstaff, Arizona (U.S.A.). We conducted annual plant surveys of modified Whittaker plots for 8 years and examined plant composition shifts among treatments and years. High-impact grazing had strong directional effects that led to a decline in perennial forb cover and an increase in annual plants, particularly the exotic cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.). A twofold increase in plant cover by exotic species followed a severe drought in the sixth year of the study, and this increase was greatest in the high-impact grazing plots, where native cover declined by one-half. Cattle removal resulted in little increase in native plant cover and reduced plant species richness relative to the moderate grazing control. Our results suggest that some intermediate level of cattle grazing may maintain greater levels of native plant diversity than the alternatives of cattle removal or high-density, short-duration grazing practices. Furthermore, episodic drought interacts with cattle grazing, leading to infrequent, but biologically important shifts in plant communities. Our results demonstrate the importance of climatic variation in determining ecological effects of grazing practices, and we recommend improving conservation efforts in arid rangelands by developing management plans that anticipate this variation.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>17298514</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00606.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-8892 |
ispartof | Conservation biology, 2007-02, Vol.21 (1), p.87-97 |
issn | 0888-8892 1523-1739 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69006575 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Agriculture Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Applied ecology Arizona Biodiversity Biological and medical sciences Bromus tectorum Cattle cheatgrass Climate climatic variation cobertura de plantas comunidad de plantas Conservation biology Conservation of Natural Resources Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Disasters Drought exotic plants Feeding Behavior - physiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Grasses Grazing Grazing management Introduced species Livestock livestock grazing Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking pastoreo pastoreo de corta duración Pero Plant communities plant community plant cover Plant Development plantas exóticas Plants Population Density Population Dynamics short duration grazing |
title | Impact of Grazing Intensity during Drought in an Arizona Grassland |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T03%3A09%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Grazing%20Intensity%20during%20Drought%20in%20an%20Arizona%20Grassland&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=LOESER,%20MATTHEW%20R.%20R.&rft.date=2007-02&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=87-97&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft.coden=CBIOEF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00606.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4124645%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14804592&rft_id=info:pmid/17298514&rft_jstor_id=4124645&rfr_iscdi=true |