An in vitro quantitative antibacterial analysis of amalgam and composite resins

Abstract Objectives Antibacterial properties of restorative dental materials such as amalgam and composite resins may improve the restorative treatment outcome. This study evaluates the antibacterial properties of three composite resins: Z250, Tetric Ceram, P60 and a dental amalgam in vitro. Methods...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dentistry 2007-03, Vol.35 (3), p.201-206
Hauptverfasser: Beyth, Nurit, Domb, Abraham J, Weiss, Ervin I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 206
container_issue 3
container_start_page 201
container_title Journal of dentistry
container_volume 35
creator Beyth, Nurit
Domb, Abraham J
Weiss, Ervin I
description Abstract Objectives Antibacterial properties of restorative dental materials such as amalgam and composite resins may improve the restorative treatment outcome. This study evaluates the antibacterial properties of three composite resins: Z250, Tetric Ceram, P60 and a dental amalgam in vitro. Methods Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces viscosus served as test microorganisms. Three quantitative microtiter spectrophotometric assays were used to evaluate the effect of the restorative materials on: (i) early-stage biofilm using a direct contact test (DCT); (ii) planktonic bacterial growth; (iii) bacterial growth in the materials’ elute. For comparison purposes, agar diffusion test (ADT) was also performed. Results The effect of the composite resins on bacterial growth was minimal and limited to a few days only. One-week-aged composites promoted growth of S. mutans and A. viscosus . The antibacterial properties in direct contact were more potent than in planktonic bacterial growth. Amalgam showed complete inhibition of both bacteria in all phases, and the effect lasted for at least 1 week. The materials’ elute had no effect on both bacterial growth with the exception of complete inhibition of S. mutans in amalgam. The later results correlated with the ADT. Conclusions The present findings demonstrate potent and lasting antibacterial properties of amalgam, which are lacking in composite resins. This may explain the clinical observation of biofilm accumulated more on composites compared to amalgams. It follows that the assessment of antibacterial properties of poorly-soluble materials has to employ more than one assay.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.07.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68986963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0300571206001527</els_id><sourcerecordid>2720855561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-aa096b325c95e02d15d7b8b87aa36db8c9d4e7c96d334d67c42bf20cf284128f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2L1TAUhoMozp3RXyBIQXDXepK0SbNQGAYdhYFZqOAupMmppPbjTpJeuP_e1HthYDau8sHznvA-IeQNhYoCFR-GanA4p4oBiApkBaCekR1tpSqpFL-ekx1wgLKRlF2QyxgHAKiBqZfkggqlhJD1jtxfz4Wfi4NPYSkeVjMnn0zyByy2bWdswuDNmE9mPEYfi6UvzGTG32bKd66wy7Rfok9YBIx-jq_Ii96MEV-f1yvy88vnHzdfy7v7228313elbUCk0hhQouOssapBYI42TnZt10pjuHBda5WrUVolHOe1E9LWrOsZ2J61NWVtz6_I-9PcfVgeVoxJTz5aHEcz47JGLVrVCiV4Bt89AYdlDblN1HTz0zacqUzxE2XDEmPAXu-Dn0w4ZkhvtvWg_9nWm20NUmfbOfX2PHvtJnSPmbPeDHw8AZhVHDwGHa3H2aLzAW3SbvH_eeDTk7wd_eytGf_gEeNjEx2ZBv19K7T9NwgA2jDJ_wJ5naZt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1030085329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An in vitro quantitative antibacterial analysis of amalgam and composite resins</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Beyth, Nurit ; Domb, Abraham J ; Weiss, Ervin I</creator><creatorcontrib>Beyth, Nurit ; Domb, Abraham J ; Weiss, Ervin I</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives Antibacterial properties of restorative dental materials such as amalgam and composite resins may improve the restorative treatment outcome. This study evaluates the antibacterial properties of three composite resins: Z250, Tetric Ceram, P60 and a dental amalgam in vitro. Methods Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces viscosus served as test microorganisms. Three quantitative microtiter spectrophotometric assays were used to evaluate the effect of the restorative materials on: (i) early-stage biofilm using a direct contact test (DCT); (ii) planktonic bacterial growth; (iii) bacterial growth in the materials’ elute. For comparison purposes, agar diffusion test (ADT) was also performed. Results The effect of the composite resins on bacterial growth was minimal and limited to a few days only. One-week-aged composites promoted growth of S. mutans and A. viscosus . The antibacterial properties in direct contact were more potent than in planktonic bacterial growth. Amalgam showed complete inhibition of both bacteria in all phases, and the effect lasted for at least 1 week. The materials’ elute had no effect on both bacterial growth with the exception of complete inhibition of S. mutans in amalgam. The later results correlated with the ADT. Conclusions The present findings demonstrate potent and lasting antibacterial properties of amalgam, which are lacking in composite resins. This may explain the clinical observation of biofilm accumulated more on composites compared to amalgams. It follows that the assessment of antibacterial properties of poorly-soluble materials has to employ more than one assay.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5712</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-176X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.07.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16996674</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Actinomyces viscosus - drug effects ; Actinomyces viscosus - growth &amp; development ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Antibacterial activity ; Bacteria ; Bacteriology ; Biofilms - drug effects ; Composite resins ; Composite Resins - pharmacology ; Dental amalgam ; Dental Amalgam - pharmacology ; Dental Materials - pharmacology ; Dentistry ; Direct contact test ; Humans ; Immunodiffusion ; Microbiology ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Solubility ; Spectrophotometry ; Streptococcus mutans - drug effects ; Streptococcus mutans - growth &amp; development ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of dentistry, 2007-03, Vol.35 (3), p.201-206</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-aa096b325c95e02d15d7b8b87aa36db8c9d4e7c96d334d67c42bf20cf284128f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-aa096b325c95e02d15d7b8b87aa36db8c9d4e7c96d334d67c42bf20cf284128f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.07.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16996674$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beyth, Nurit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domb, Abraham J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Ervin I</creatorcontrib><title>An in vitro quantitative antibacterial analysis of amalgam and composite resins</title><title>Journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives Antibacterial properties of restorative dental materials such as amalgam and composite resins may improve the restorative treatment outcome. This study evaluates the antibacterial properties of three composite resins: Z250, Tetric Ceram, P60 and a dental amalgam in vitro. Methods Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces viscosus served as test microorganisms. Three quantitative microtiter spectrophotometric assays were used to evaluate the effect of the restorative materials on: (i) early-stage biofilm using a direct contact test (DCT); (ii) planktonic bacterial growth; (iii) bacterial growth in the materials’ elute. For comparison purposes, agar diffusion test (ADT) was also performed. Results The effect of the composite resins on bacterial growth was minimal and limited to a few days only. One-week-aged composites promoted growth of S. mutans and A. viscosus . The antibacterial properties in direct contact were more potent than in planktonic bacterial growth. Amalgam showed complete inhibition of both bacteria in all phases, and the effect lasted for at least 1 week. The materials’ elute had no effect on both bacterial growth with the exception of complete inhibition of S. mutans in amalgam. The later results correlated with the ADT. Conclusions The present findings demonstrate potent and lasting antibacterial properties of amalgam, which are lacking in composite resins. This may explain the clinical observation of biofilm accumulated more on composites compared to amalgams. It follows that the assessment of antibacterial properties of poorly-soluble materials has to employ more than one assay.</description><subject>Actinomyces viscosus - drug effects</subject><subject>Actinomyces viscosus - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antibacterial activity</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Biofilms - drug effects</subject><subject>Composite resins</subject><subject>Composite Resins - pharmacology</subject><subject>Dental amalgam</subject><subject>Dental Amalgam - pharmacology</subject><subject>Dental Materials - pharmacology</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Direct contact test</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunodiffusion</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Solubility</subject><subject>Spectrophotometry</subject><subject>Streptococcus mutans - drug effects</subject><subject>Streptococcus mutans - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0300-5712</issn><issn>1879-176X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2L1TAUhoMozp3RXyBIQXDXepK0SbNQGAYdhYFZqOAupMmppPbjTpJeuP_e1HthYDau8sHznvA-IeQNhYoCFR-GanA4p4oBiApkBaCekR1tpSqpFL-ekx1wgLKRlF2QyxgHAKiBqZfkggqlhJD1jtxfz4Wfi4NPYSkeVjMnn0zyByy2bWdswuDNmE9mPEYfi6UvzGTG32bKd66wy7Rfok9YBIx-jq_Ii96MEV-f1yvy88vnHzdfy7v7228313elbUCk0hhQouOssapBYI42TnZt10pjuHBda5WrUVolHOe1E9LWrOsZ2J61NWVtz6_I-9PcfVgeVoxJTz5aHEcz47JGLVrVCiV4Bt89AYdlDblN1HTz0zacqUzxE2XDEmPAXu-Dn0w4ZkhvtvWg_9nWm20NUmfbOfX2PHvtJnSPmbPeDHw8AZhVHDwGHa3H2aLzAW3SbvH_eeDTk7wd_eytGf_gEeNjEx2ZBv19K7T9NwgA2jDJ_wJ5naZt</recordid><startdate>20070301</startdate><enddate>20070301</enddate><creator>Beyth, Nurit</creator><creator>Domb, Abraham J</creator><creator>Weiss, Ervin I</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070301</creationdate><title>An in vitro quantitative antibacterial analysis of amalgam and composite resins</title><author>Beyth, Nurit ; Domb, Abraham J ; Weiss, Ervin I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-aa096b325c95e02d15d7b8b87aa36db8c9d4e7c96d334d67c42bf20cf284128f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Actinomyces viscosus - drug effects</topic><topic>Actinomyces viscosus - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antibacterial activity</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Biofilms - drug effects</topic><topic>Composite resins</topic><topic>Composite Resins - pharmacology</topic><topic>Dental amalgam</topic><topic>Dental Amalgam - pharmacology</topic><topic>Dental Materials - pharmacology</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Direct contact test</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunodiffusion</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Solubility</topic><topic>Spectrophotometry</topic><topic>Streptococcus mutans - drug effects</topic><topic>Streptococcus mutans - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beyth, Nurit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domb, Abraham J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Ervin I</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beyth, Nurit</au><au>Domb, Abraham J</au><au>Weiss, Ervin I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An in vitro quantitative antibacterial analysis of amalgam and composite resins</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><date>2007-03-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>201-206</pages><issn>0300-5712</issn><eissn>1879-176X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives Antibacterial properties of restorative dental materials such as amalgam and composite resins may improve the restorative treatment outcome. This study evaluates the antibacterial properties of three composite resins: Z250, Tetric Ceram, P60 and a dental amalgam in vitro. Methods Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces viscosus served as test microorganisms. Three quantitative microtiter spectrophotometric assays were used to evaluate the effect of the restorative materials on: (i) early-stage biofilm using a direct contact test (DCT); (ii) planktonic bacterial growth; (iii) bacterial growth in the materials’ elute. For comparison purposes, agar diffusion test (ADT) was also performed. Results The effect of the composite resins on bacterial growth was minimal and limited to a few days only. One-week-aged composites promoted growth of S. mutans and A. viscosus . The antibacterial properties in direct contact were more potent than in planktonic bacterial growth. Amalgam showed complete inhibition of both bacteria in all phases, and the effect lasted for at least 1 week. The materials’ elute had no effect on both bacterial growth with the exception of complete inhibition of S. mutans in amalgam. The later results correlated with the ADT. Conclusions The present findings demonstrate potent and lasting antibacterial properties of amalgam, which are lacking in composite resins. This may explain the clinical observation of biofilm accumulated more on composites compared to amalgams. It follows that the assessment of antibacterial properties of poorly-soluble materials has to employ more than one assay.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16996674</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jdent.2006.07.009</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-5712
ispartof Journal of dentistry, 2007-03, Vol.35 (3), p.201-206
issn 0300-5712
1879-176X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68986963
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Actinomyces viscosus - drug effects
Actinomyces viscosus - growth & development
Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology
Antibacterial activity
Bacteria
Bacteriology
Biofilms - drug effects
Composite resins
Composite Resins - pharmacology
Dental amalgam
Dental Amalgam - pharmacology
Dental Materials - pharmacology
Dentistry
Direct contact test
Humans
Immunodiffusion
Microbiology
Scanning electron microscopy
Solubility
Spectrophotometry
Streptococcus mutans - drug effects
Streptococcus mutans - growth & development
Time Factors
title An in vitro quantitative antibacterial analysis of amalgam and composite resins
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T09%3A59%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20in%20vitro%20quantitative%20antibacterial%20analysis%20of%20amalgam%20and%20composite%20resins&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Beyth,%20Nurit&rft.date=2007-03-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=201-206&rft.issn=0300-5712&rft.eissn=1879-176X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.07.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2720855561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1030085329&rft_id=info:pmid/16996674&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0300571206001527&rfr_iscdi=true