Fecal NIRS: Detection of tick infestations in cattle and horses
Anti-tick treatments are often applied concurrent to routine livestock management practices with little regard to actual infestation levels. Prescription treatments against ticks on grazing cattle would be facilitated by non-invasive detection methods. One such method is fecal near infrared spectros...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary parasitology 2007-03, Vol.144 (1), p.146-152 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 152 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 146 |
container_title | Veterinary parasitology |
container_volume | 144 |
creator | Tolleson, D.R. Teel, P.D. Stuth, J.W. Strey, O.F. Welsh, T.H. Carstens, G.E. |
description | Anti-tick treatments are often applied concurrent to routine livestock management practices with little regard to actual infestation levels. Prescription treatments against ticks on grazing cattle would be facilitated by non-invasive detection methods. One such method is fecal near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Four studies utilizing cattle (
Bos spp.) and one with horses (
Equus caballus) fed varying diets and infested with either
Amblyomma americanum,
A. maculatum,
A. cajennense or
Dermacentor albipictus were conducted to determine the ability of fecal NIRS to identify samples from animals with (High stress) and without (Low stress) a tick burden. Discriminant analysis of each individual trial resulted in
R
2
>
0.80. Similar analyses utilizing all combinations of four studies, predicting group membership in the remaining study, yielded
R
2
>
0.80, but correct determinations for Low and High tick stress samples of only 53.4 and 60.1%, respectively. All five trials were combined and a random 10 or 25% of the samples were removed from the calibration. As in the previous calibrations, a high degree of discrimination was achieved (
R
2
>
0.89). The validation samples were correctly identified at 91.7% for Low stress and 96.3% for High stress, respectively. Difficulties in detecting differences in fecal samples due to confounding effects of trial were overcome by combining calibration sets. Overall, differences in fecal NIR spectra apparently due to tick stress were accurately detected across diet, host species, and tick species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68985681</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304401706005358</els_id><sourcerecordid>19622747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-ec775a08ca207506d8c1481ca47e32dc5145a3b2ccc14f75befcf860bbbbd4c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtv1EAMgEeIii6Ff4Agp96SeibzCgeqqtCHVBWJ0vNo1nHobLPJdiZbqf-eWWUlbtQXy9Zny_4Y-8Sh4sD1yap6pmnjYyUAdAVNBdy-YQtuTV0KpeAtW0ANspTAzSF7n9IKACRo844dcgONsdAs2OkFoe-L2-tfd1-L7zQRTmEcirErpoCPRRg6SpPf9VIuCvTT1FPhh7Z4GGOi9IEddL5P9HGfj9j9xY_f51flzc_L6_OzmxIlV1NJaIzyYNELMAp0a5FLy9FLQ7VoUXGpfL0UiLnfGbWkDjurYZmjlQj1ETue927i-LTNN7l1SEh97wcat8lp21ilLX8V5I0WwkiTQTmDGMeUInVuE8PaxxfHwe0Mu5WbDbudYQeNy4bz2Of9_u1yTe2_ob3SDHyZgc6Pzv-JIbn7OwG8ht3nQulMfJsJysKeA0WXMNCA1IaY_bt2DP-_4S99oJcH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19622747</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fecal NIRS: Detection of tick infestations in cattle and horses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Tolleson, D.R. ; Teel, P.D. ; Stuth, J.W. ; Strey, O.F. ; Welsh, T.H. ; Carstens, G.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tolleson, D.R. ; Teel, P.D. ; Stuth, J.W. ; Strey, O.F. ; Welsh, T.H. ; Carstens, G.E.</creatorcontrib><description>Anti-tick treatments are often applied concurrent to routine livestock management practices with little regard to actual infestation levels. Prescription treatments against ticks on grazing cattle would be facilitated by non-invasive detection methods. One such method is fecal near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Four studies utilizing cattle (
Bos spp.) and one with horses (
Equus caballus) fed varying diets and infested with either
Amblyomma americanum,
A. maculatum,
A. cajennense or
Dermacentor albipictus were conducted to determine the ability of fecal NIRS to identify samples from animals with (High stress) and without (Low stress) a tick burden. Discriminant analysis of each individual trial resulted in
R
2
>
0.80. Similar analyses utilizing all combinations of four studies, predicting group membership in the remaining study, yielded
R
2
>
0.80, but correct determinations for Low and High tick stress samples of only 53.4 and 60.1%, respectively. All five trials were combined and a random 10 or 25% of the samples were removed from the calibration. As in the previous calibrations, a high degree of discrimination was achieved (
R
2
>
0.89). The validation samples were correctly identified at 91.7% for Low stress and 96.3% for High stress, respectively. Difficulties in detecting differences in fecal samples due to confounding effects of trial were overcome by combining calibration sets. Overall, differences in fecal NIR spectra apparently due to tick stress were accurately detected across diet, host species, and tick species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-4017</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17097809</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Amblyomma ; Amblyomma americanum ; Animals ; Bos ; Calibration ; Cattle ; Cattle Diseases - diagnosis ; Dermacentor albipictus ; detection ; Discriminant analyses ; Discriminant Analysis ; Equus caballus ; Fecal NIRS ; feces ; Feces - chemistry ; Female ; Horse Diseases - diagnosis ; Horses ; IPM ; Ixodidae ; Male ; model validation ; near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy ; prediction ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Species Specificity ; spectral analysis ; Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods ; Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - standards ; Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - veterinary ; tick burden ; tick infestations ; Tick Infestations - diagnosis ; Tick Infestations - veterinary ; Tick stress ; Validation</subject><ispartof>Veterinary parasitology, 2007-03, Vol.144 (1), p.146-152</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-ec775a08ca207506d8c1481ca47e32dc5145a3b2ccc14f75befcf860bbbbd4c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-ec775a08ca207506d8c1481ca47e32dc5145a3b2ccc14f75befcf860bbbbd4c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17097809$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tolleson, D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teel, P.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuth, J.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strey, O.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsh, T.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carstens, G.E.</creatorcontrib><title>Fecal NIRS: Detection of tick infestations in cattle and horses</title><title>Veterinary parasitology</title><addtitle>Vet Parasitol</addtitle><description>Anti-tick treatments are often applied concurrent to routine livestock management practices with little regard to actual infestation levels. Prescription treatments against ticks on grazing cattle would be facilitated by non-invasive detection methods. One such method is fecal near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Four studies utilizing cattle (
Bos spp.) and one with horses (
Equus caballus) fed varying diets and infested with either
Amblyomma americanum,
A. maculatum,
A. cajennense or
Dermacentor albipictus were conducted to determine the ability of fecal NIRS to identify samples from animals with (High stress) and without (Low stress) a tick burden. Discriminant analysis of each individual trial resulted in
R
2
>
0.80. Similar analyses utilizing all combinations of four studies, predicting group membership in the remaining study, yielded
R
2
>
0.80, but correct determinations for Low and High tick stress samples of only 53.4 and 60.1%, respectively. All five trials were combined and a random 10 or 25% of the samples were removed from the calibration. As in the previous calibrations, a high degree of discrimination was achieved (
R
2
>
0.89). The validation samples were correctly identified at 91.7% for Low stress and 96.3% for High stress, respectively. Difficulties in detecting differences in fecal samples due to confounding effects of trial were overcome by combining calibration sets. Overall, differences in fecal NIR spectra apparently due to tick stress were accurately detected across diet, host species, and tick species.</description><subject>Amblyomma</subject><subject>Amblyomma americanum</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bos</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dermacentor albipictus</subject><subject>detection</subject><subject>Discriminant analyses</subject><subject>Discriminant Analysis</subject><subject>Equus caballus</subject><subject>Fecal NIRS</subject><subject>feces</subject><subject>Feces - chemistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Horse Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Horses</subject><subject>IPM</subject><subject>Ixodidae</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>model validation</subject><subject>near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>spectral analysis</subject><subject>Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods</subject><subject>Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - standards</subject><subject>Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - veterinary</subject><subject>tick burden</subject><subject>tick infestations</subject><subject>Tick Infestations - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tick Infestations - veterinary</subject><subject>Tick stress</subject><subject>Validation</subject><issn>0304-4017</issn><issn>1873-2550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtv1EAMgEeIii6Ff4Agp96SeibzCgeqqtCHVBWJ0vNo1nHobLPJdiZbqf-eWWUlbtQXy9Zny_4Y-8Sh4sD1yap6pmnjYyUAdAVNBdy-YQtuTV0KpeAtW0ANspTAzSF7n9IKACRo844dcgONsdAs2OkFoe-L2-tfd1-L7zQRTmEcirErpoCPRRg6SpPf9VIuCvTT1FPhh7Z4GGOi9IEddL5P9HGfj9j9xY_f51flzc_L6_OzmxIlV1NJaIzyYNELMAp0a5FLy9FLQ7VoUXGpfL0UiLnfGbWkDjurYZmjlQj1ETue927i-LTNN7l1SEh97wcat8lp21ilLX8V5I0WwkiTQTmDGMeUInVuE8PaxxfHwe0Mu5WbDbudYQeNy4bz2Of9_u1yTe2_ob3SDHyZgc6Pzv-JIbn7OwG8ht3nQulMfJsJysKeA0WXMNCA1IaY_bt2DP-_4S99oJcH</recordid><startdate>20070315</startdate><enddate>20070315</enddate><creator>Tolleson, D.R.</creator><creator>Teel, P.D.</creator><creator>Stuth, J.W.</creator><creator>Strey, O.F.</creator><creator>Welsh, T.H.</creator><creator>Carstens, G.E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070315</creationdate><title>Fecal NIRS: Detection of tick infestations in cattle and horses</title><author>Tolleson, D.R. ; Teel, P.D. ; Stuth, J.W. ; Strey, O.F. ; Welsh, T.H. ; Carstens, G.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-ec775a08ca207506d8c1481ca47e32dc5145a3b2ccc14f75befcf860bbbbd4c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Amblyomma</topic><topic>Amblyomma americanum</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bos</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dermacentor albipictus</topic><topic>detection</topic><topic>Discriminant analyses</topic><topic>Discriminant Analysis</topic><topic>Equus caballus</topic><topic>Fecal NIRS</topic><topic>feces</topic><topic>Feces - chemistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Horse Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Horses</topic><topic>IPM</topic><topic>Ixodidae</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>model validation</topic><topic>near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>spectral analysis</topic><topic>Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods</topic><topic>Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - standards</topic><topic>Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - veterinary</topic><topic>tick burden</topic><topic>tick infestations</topic><topic>Tick Infestations - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tick Infestations - veterinary</topic><topic>Tick stress</topic><topic>Validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tolleson, D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teel, P.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuth, J.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strey, O.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsh, T.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carstens, G.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary parasitology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tolleson, D.R.</au><au>Teel, P.D.</au><au>Stuth, J.W.</au><au>Strey, O.F.</au><au>Welsh, T.H.</au><au>Carstens, G.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fecal NIRS: Detection of tick infestations in cattle and horses</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary parasitology</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Parasitol</addtitle><date>2007-03-15</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>146</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>146-152</pages><issn>0304-4017</issn><eissn>1873-2550</eissn><abstract>Anti-tick treatments are often applied concurrent to routine livestock management practices with little regard to actual infestation levels. Prescription treatments against ticks on grazing cattle would be facilitated by non-invasive detection methods. One such method is fecal near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Four studies utilizing cattle (
Bos spp.) and one with horses (
Equus caballus) fed varying diets and infested with either
Amblyomma americanum,
A. maculatum,
A. cajennense or
Dermacentor albipictus were conducted to determine the ability of fecal NIRS to identify samples from animals with (High stress) and without (Low stress) a tick burden. Discriminant analysis of each individual trial resulted in
R
2
>
0.80. Similar analyses utilizing all combinations of four studies, predicting group membership in the remaining study, yielded
R
2
>
0.80, but correct determinations for Low and High tick stress samples of only 53.4 and 60.1%, respectively. All five trials were combined and a random 10 or 25% of the samples were removed from the calibration. As in the previous calibrations, a high degree of discrimination was achieved (
R
2
>
0.89). The validation samples were correctly identified at 91.7% for Low stress and 96.3% for High stress, respectively. Difficulties in detecting differences in fecal samples due to confounding effects of trial were overcome by combining calibration sets. Overall, differences in fecal NIR spectra apparently due to tick stress were accurately detected across diet, host species, and tick species.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>17097809</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.018</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0304-4017 |
ispartof | Veterinary parasitology, 2007-03, Vol.144 (1), p.146-152 |
issn | 0304-4017 1873-2550 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68985681 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Amblyomma Amblyomma americanum Animals Bos Calibration Cattle Cattle Diseases - diagnosis Dermacentor albipictus detection Discriminant analyses Discriminant Analysis Equus caballus Fecal NIRS feces Feces - chemistry Female Horse Diseases - diagnosis Horses IPM Ixodidae Male model validation near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy prediction Predictive Value of Tests Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Species Specificity spectral analysis Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - standards Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - veterinary tick burden tick infestations Tick Infestations - diagnosis Tick Infestations - veterinary Tick stress Validation |
title | Fecal NIRS: Detection of tick infestations in cattle and horses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T14%3A49%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fecal%20NIRS:%20Detection%20of%20tick%20infestations%20in%20cattle%20and%20horses&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20parasitology&rft.au=Tolleson,%20D.R.&rft.date=2007-03-15&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=146&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=146-152&rft.issn=0304-4017&rft.eissn=1873-2550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19622747%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19622747&rft_id=info:pmid/17097809&rft_els_id=S0304401706005358&rfr_iscdi=true |