What Is the Impact of Shared Decision Making on Treatment and Outcomes for Older Women With Breast Cancer?

Shared decision making (SDM) has been recommended as a standard of care, especially when there are treatment alternatives or uncertainty in outcomes. However, we know little about use of SDM in cancer care, and even less is known about SDM in older patients. We describe patient and physician determi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 2006-10, Vol.24 (30), p.4908-4913
Hauptverfasser: MANDELBLATT, Jeanne, KRELING, Barbara, FIGEURIEDO, Melissa, SHIBAO FENG
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4913
container_issue 30
container_start_page 4908
container_title Journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 24
creator MANDELBLATT, Jeanne
KRELING, Barbara
FIGEURIEDO, Melissa
SHIBAO FENG
description Shared decision making (SDM) has been recommended as a standard of care, especially when there are treatment alternatives or uncertainty in outcomes. However, we know little about use of SDM in cancer care, and even less is known about SDM in older patients. We describe patient and physician determinants of SDM in older women with breast cancer and evaluate whether SDM is associated with treatment patterns or short-term outcomes of care. Women age 67 or older treated for early stage breast cancer in 29 sites from five geographic regions comprise the study sample (N = 718). Data were obtained from patients by in-person and telephone interviews. Physician data were collected via survey, and medical records were reviewed to ascertain comorbidity and tumor characteristics. Random effects and logistic regression models were used to assess associations between SDM and other factors. Women who were age 67 to 74 years (v 75 or older) were accompanied to consultation and who sought information reported the highest SDM, after considering covariates. While SDM was not associated with surgical treatment, greater SDM was associated with higher odds of having adjuvant treatment, controlling for clinical factors. Greater SDM was also associated with improved short-term satisfaction. SDM plays an important role in the process of care for older women with breast cancer. Physicians treating this growing population have a simple, but powerful tool for improving outcomes within their grasp-spending time to engage and involve older women in their breast cancer care.
doi_str_mv 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.1159
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68967688</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68967688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-97f9f156f1a7c65826aecc136d5a309487a3195af98c917ee6d8a2ce1e9733fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEmPEzEQRi0EYjIDd07IF5hTBy_dXk5oCFvQoBwYFG5W4S5Pd-gl2I4Q_x6HRJpTVUnv-6R6hLzgbMkFY2--rDbLMtWS6SXnjX1EFrwRutK6aR6TBdNSVNzIHxfkMqUdY7w2snlKLriyRnImFmS37SDTdaK5Q7oe9-AznQP91kHElr5H36d-nuhX-NVP97RsdxEhjzhlClNLN4fs5xETDXOkm6HFSLflnui2zx19V9iU6Qomj_HtM_IkwJDw-Xleke8fP9ytPle3m0_r1c1t5WvGc2V1sIE3KnDQXjVGKEDvuVRtA5LZ2miQ3DYQrPGWa0TVGhAeOVotZUB5RV6fevdx_n3AlN3YJ4_DABPOh-SUsUorYwrITqCPc0oRg9vHfoT413Hmjn5d8euOfh3T7ui3RF6euw8_R2wfAmehBXh1BiB5GEIsv_fpgTNCivp_0fWJ6_r77k8f0aURhqHUCrfzs6idZK62zMh_KjWPYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68967688</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Is the Impact of Shared Decision Making on Treatment and Outcomes for Older Women With Breast Cancer?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>MANDELBLATT, Jeanne ; KRELING, Barbara ; FIGEURIEDO, Melissa ; SHIBAO FENG</creator><creatorcontrib>MANDELBLATT, Jeanne ; KRELING, Barbara ; FIGEURIEDO, Melissa ; SHIBAO FENG</creatorcontrib><description>Shared decision making (SDM) has been recommended as a standard of care, especially when there are treatment alternatives or uncertainty in outcomes. However, we know little about use of SDM in cancer care, and even less is known about SDM in older patients. We describe patient and physician determinants of SDM in older women with breast cancer and evaluate whether SDM is associated with treatment patterns or short-term outcomes of care. Women age 67 or older treated for early stage breast cancer in 29 sites from five geographic regions comprise the study sample (N = 718). Data were obtained from patients by in-person and telephone interviews. Physician data were collected via survey, and medical records were reviewed to ascertain comorbidity and tumor characteristics. Random effects and logistic regression models were used to assess associations between SDM and other factors. Women who were age 67 to 74 years (v 75 or older) were accompanied to consultation and who sought information reported the highest SDM, after considering covariates. While SDM was not associated with surgical treatment, greater SDM was associated with higher odds of having adjuvant treatment, controlling for clinical factors. Greater SDM was also associated with improved short-term satisfaction. SDM plays an important role in the process of care for older women with breast cancer. Physicians treating this growing population have a simple, but powerful tool for improving outcomes within their grasp-spending time to engage and involve older women in their breast cancer care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.1159</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16983102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore, MD: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Decision Making ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Patient Satisfaction ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2006-10, Vol.24 (30), p.4908-4913</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-97f9f156f1a7c65826aecc136d5a309487a3195af98c917ee6d8a2ce1e9733fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-97f9f156f1a7c65826aecc136d5a309487a3195af98c917ee6d8a2ce1e9733fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3728,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18232459$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16983102$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MANDELBLATT, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRELING, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FIGEURIEDO, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHIBAO FENG</creatorcontrib><title>What Is the Impact of Shared Decision Making on Treatment and Outcomes for Older Women With Breast Cancer?</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Shared decision making (SDM) has been recommended as a standard of care, especially when there are treatment alternatives or uncertainty in outcomes. However, we know little about use of SDM in cancer care, and even less is known about SDM in older patients. We describe patient and physician determinants of SDM in older women with breast cancer and evaluate whether SDM is associated with treatment patterns or short-term outcomes of care. Women age 67 or older treated for early stage breast cancer in 29 sites from five geographic regions comprise the study sample (N = 718). Data were obtained from patients by in-person and telephone interviews. Physician data were collected via survey, and medical records were reviewed to ascertain comorbidity and tumor characteristics. Random effects and logistic regression models were used to assess associations between SDM and other factors. Women who were age 67 to 74 years (v 75 or older) were accompanied to consultation and who sought information reported the highest SDM, after considering covariates. While SDM was not associated with surgical treatment, greater SDM was associated with higher odds of having adjuvant treatment, controlling for clinical factors. Greater SDM was also associated with improved short-term satisfaction. SDM plays an important role in the process of care for older women with breast cancer. Physicians treating this growing population have a simple, but powerful tool for improving outcomes within their grasp-spending time to engage and involve older women in their breast cancer care.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEmPEzEQRi0EYjIDd07IF5hTBy_dXk5oCFvQoBwYFG5W4S5Pd-gl2I4Q_x6HRJpTVUnv-6R6hLzgbMkFY2--rDbLMtWS6SXnjX1EFrwRutK6aR6TBdNSVNzIHxfkMqUdY7w2snlKLriyRnImFmS37SDTdaK5Q7oe9-AznQP91kHElr5H36d-nuhX-NVP97RsdxEhjzhlClNLN4fs5xETDXOkm6HFSLflnui2zx19V9iU6Qomj_HtM_IkwJDw-Xleke8fP9ytPle3m0_r1c1t5WvGc2V1sIE3KnDQXjVGKEDvuVRtA5LZ2miQ3DYQrPGWa0TVGhAeOVotZUB5RV6fevdx_n3AlN3YJ4_DABPOh-SUsUorYwrITqCPc0oRg9vHfoT413Hmjn5d8euOfh3T7ui3RF6euw8_R2wfAmehBXh1BiB5GEIsv_fpgTNCivp_0fWJ6_r77k8f0aURhqHUCrfzs6idZK62zMh_KjWPYA</recordid><startdate>20061020</startdate><enddate>20061020</enddate><creator>MANDELBLATT, Jeanne</creator><creator>KRELING, Barbara</creator><creator>FIGEURIEDO, Melissa</creator><creator>SHIBAO FENG</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061020</creationdate><title>What Is the Impact of Shared Decision Making on Treatment and Outcomes for Older Women With Breast Cancer?</title><author>MANDELBLATT, Jeanne ; KRELING, Barbara ; FIGEURIEDO, Melissa ; SHIBAO FENG</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-97f9f156f1a7c65826aecc136d5a309487a3195af98c917ee6d8a2ce1e9733fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MANDELBLATT, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRELING, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FIGEURIEDO, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHIBAO FENG</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MANDELBLATT, Jeanne</au><au>KRELING, Barbara</au><au>FIGEURIEDO, Melissa</au><au>SHIBAO FENG</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Is the Impact of Shared Decision Making on Treatment and Outcomes for Older Women With Breast Cancer?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2006-10-20</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>30</issue><spage>4908</spage><epage>4913</epage><pages>4908-4913</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>Shared decision making (SDM) has been recommended as a standard of care, especially when there are treatment alternatives or uncertainty in outcomes. However, we know little about use of SDM in cancer care, and even less is known about SDM in older patients. We describe patient and physician determinants of SDM in older women with breast cancer and evaluate whether SDM is associated with treatment patterns or short-term outcomes of care. Women age 67 or older treated for early stage breast cancer in 29 sites from five geographic regions comprise the study sample (N = 718). Data were obtained from patients by in-person and telephone interviews. Physician data were collected via survey, and medical records were reviewed to ascertain comorbidity and tumor characteristics. Random effects and logistic regression models were used to assess associations between SDM and other factors. Women who were age 67 to 74 years (v 75 or older) were accompanied to consultation and who sought information reported the highest SDM, after considering covariates. While SDM was not associated with surgical treatment, greater SDM was associated with higher odds of having adjuvant treatment, controlling for clinical factors. Greater SDM was also associated with improved short-term satisfaction. SDM plays an important role in the process of care for older women with breast cancer. Physicians treating this growing population have a simple, but powerful tool for improving outcomes within their grasp-spending time to engage and involve older women in their breast cancer care.</abstract><cop>Baltimore, MD</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>16983102</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.2006.07.1159</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-183X
ispartof Journal of clinical oncology, 2006-10, Vol.24 (30), p.4908-4913
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68967688
source MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Age Factors
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Breast Neoplasms - therapy
Decision Making
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Mammary gland diseases
Medical sciences
Patient Satisfaction
Physician-Patient Relations
Prospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Tumors
title What Is the Impact of Shared Decision Making on Treatment and Outcomes for Older Women With Breast Cancer?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T01%3A24%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Is%20the%20Impact%20of%20Shared%20Decision%20Making%20on%20Treatment%20and%20Outcomes%20for%20Older%20Women%20With%20Breast%20Cancer?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=MANDELBLATT,%20Jeanne&rft.date=2006-10-20&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=30&rft.spage=4908&rft.epage=4913&rft.pages=4908-4913&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2006.07.1159&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68967688%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68967688&rft_id=info:pmid/16983102&rfr_iscdi=true