What Is the Impact of Shared Decision Making on Treatment and Outcomes for Older Women With Breast Cancer?
Shared decision making (SDM) has been recommended as a standard of care, especially when there are treatment alternatives or uncertainty in outcomes. However, we know little about use of SDM in cancer care, and even less is known about SDM in older patients. We describe patient and physician determi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical oncology 2006-10, Vol.24 (30), p.4908-4913 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4913 |
---|---|
container_issue | 30 |
container_start_page | 4908 |
container_title | Journal of clinical oncology |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | MANDELBLATT, Jeanne KRELING, Barbara FIGEURIEDO, Melissa SHIBAO FENG |
description | Shared decision making (SDM) has been recommended as a standard of care, especially when there are treatment alternatives or uncertainty in outcomes. However, we know little about use of SDM in cancer care, and even less is known about SDM in older patients. We describe patient and physician determinants of SDM in older women with breast cancer and evaluate whether SDM is associated with treatment patterns or short-term outcomes of care.
Women age 67 or older treated for early stage breast cancer in 29 sites from five geographic regions comprise the study sample (N = 718). Data were obtained from patients by in-person and telephone interviews. Physician data were collected via survey, and medical records were reviewed to ascertain comorbidity and tumor characteristics. Random effects and logistic regression models were used to assess associations between SDM and other factors.
Women who were age 67 to 74 years (v 75 or older) were accompanied to consultation and who sought information reported the highest SDM, after considering covariates. While SDM was not associated with surgical treatment, greater SDM was associated with higher odds of having adjuvant treatment, controlling for clinical factors. Greater SDM was also associated with improved short-term satisfaction.
SDM plays an important role in the process of care for older women with breast cancer. Physicians treating this growing population have a simple, but powerful tool for improving outcomes within their grasp-spending time to engage and involve older women in their breast cancer care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.1159 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68967688</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68967688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-97f9f156f1a7c65826aecc136d5a309487a3195af98c917ee6d8a2ce1e9733fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEmPEzEQRi0EYjIDd07IF5hTBy_dXk5oCFvQoBwYFG5W4S5Pd-gl2I4Q_x6HRJpTVUnv-6R6hLzgbMkFY2--rDbLMtWS6SXnjX1EFrwRutK6aR6TBdNSVNzIHxfkMqUdY7w2snlKLriyRnImFmS37SDTdaK5Q7oe9-AznQP91kHElr5H36d-nuhX-NVP97RsdxEhjzhlClNLN4fs5xETDXOkm6HFSLflnui2zx19V9iU6Qomj_HtM_IkwJDw-Xleke8fP9ytPle3m0_r1c1t5WvGc2V1sIE3KnDQXjVGKEDvuVRtA5LZ2miQ3DYQrPGWa0TVGhAeOVotZUB5RV6fevdx_n3AlN3YJ4_DABPOh-SUsUorYwrITqCPc0oRg9vHfoT413Hmjn5d8euOfh3T7ui3RF6euw8_R2wfAmehBXh1BiB5GEIsv_fpgTNCivp_0fWJ6_r77k8f0aURhqHUCrfzs6idZK62zMh_KjWPYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68967688</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Is the Impact of Shared Decision Making on Treatment and Outcomes for Older Women With Breast Cancer?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>MANDELBLATT, Jeanne ; KRELING, Barbara ; FIGEURIEDO, Melissa ; SHIBAO FENG</creator><creatorcontrib>MANDELBLATT, Jeanne ; KRELING, Barbara ; FIGEURIEDO, Melissa ; SHIBAO FENG</creatorcontrib><description>Shared decision making (SDM) has been recommended as a standard of care, especially when there are treatment alternatives or uncertainty in outcomes. However, we know little about use of SDM in cancer care, and even less is known about SDM in older patients. We describe patient and physician determinants of SDM in older women with breast cancer and evaluate whether SDM is associated with treatment patterns or short-term outcomes of care.
Women age 67 or older treated for early stage breast cancer in 29 sites from five geographic regions comprise the study sample (N = 718). Data were obtained from patients by in-person and telephone interviews. Physician data were collected via survey, and medical records were reviewed to ascertain comorbidity and tumor characteristics. Random effects and logistic regression models were used to assess associations between SDM and other factors.
Women who were age 67 to 74 years (v 75 or older) were accompanied to consultation and who sought information reported the highest SDM, after considering covariates. While SDM was not associated with surgical treatment, greater SDM was associated with higher odds of having adjuvant treatment, controlling for clinical factors. Greater SDM was also associated with improved short-term satisfaction.
SDM plays an important role in the process of care for older women with breast cancer. Physicians treating this growing population have a simple, but powerful tool for improving outcomes within their grasp-spending time to engage and involve older women in their breast cancer care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.1159</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16983102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore, MD: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Decision Making ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Patient Satisfaction ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2006-10, Vol.24 (30), p.4908-4913</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-97f9f156f1a7c65826aecc136d5a309487a3195af98c917ee6d8a2ce1e9733fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-97f9f156f1a7c65826aecc136d5a309487a3195af98c917ee6d8a2ce1e9733fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3728,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18232459$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16983102$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MANDELBLATT, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRELING, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FIGEURIEDO, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHIBAO FENG</creatorcontrib><title>What Is the Impact of Shared Decision Making on Treatment and Outcomes for Older Women With Breast Cancer?</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Shared decision making (SDM) has been recommended as a standard of care, especially when there are treatment alternatives or uncertainty in outcomes. However, we know little about use of SDM in cancer care, and even less is known about SDM in older patients. We describe patient and physician determinants of SDM in older women with breast cancer and evaluate whether SDM is associated with treatment patterns or short-term outcomes of care.
Women age 67 or older treated for early stage breast cancer in 29 sites from five geographic regions comprise the study sample (N = 718). Data were obtained from patients by in-person and telephone interviews. Physician data were collected via survey, and medical records were reviewed to ascertain comorbidity and tumor characteristics. Random effects and logistic regression models were used to assess associations between SDM and other factors.
Women who were age 67 to 74 years (v 75 or older) were accompanied to consultation and who sought information reported the highest SDM, after considering covariates. While SDM was not associated with surgical treatment, greater SDM was associated with higher odds of having adjuvant treatment, controlling for clinical factors. Greater SDM was also associated with improved short-term satisfaction.
SDM plays an important role in the process of care for older women with breast cancer. Physicians treating this growing population have a simple, but powerful tool for improving outcomes within their grasp-spending time to engage and involve older women in their breast cancer care.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEmPEzEQRi0EYjIDd07IF5hTBy_dXk5oCFvQoBwYFG5W4S5Pd-gl2I4Q_x6HRJpTVUnv-6R6hLzgbMkFY2--rDbLMtWS6SXnjX1EFrwRutK6aR6TBdNSVNzIHxfkMqUdY7w2snlKLriyRnImFmS37SDTdaK5Q7oe9-AznQP91kHElr5H36d-nuhX-NVP97RsdxEhjzhlClNLN4fs5xETDXOkm6HFSLflnui2zx19V9iU6Qomj_HtM_IkwJDw-Xleke8fP9ytPle3m0_r1c1t5WvGc2V1sIE3KnDQXjVGKEDvuVRtA5LZ2miQ3DYQrPGWa0TVGhAeOVotZUB5RV6fevdx_n3AlN3YJ4_DABPOh-SUsUorYwrITqCPc0oRg9vHfoT413Hmjn5d8euOfh3T7ui3RF6euw8_R2wfAmehBXh1BiB5GEIsv_fpgTNCivp_0fWJ6_r77k8f0aURhqHUCrfzs6idZK62zMh_KjWPYA</recordid><startdate>20061020</startdate><enddate>20061020</enddate><creator>MANDELBLATT, Jeanne</creator><creator>KRELING, Barbara</creator><creator>FIGEURIEDO, Melissa</creator><creator>SHIBAO FENG</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061020</creationdate><title>What Is the Impact of Shared Decision Making on Treatment and Outcomes for Older Women With Breast Cancer?</title><author>MANDELBLATT, Jeanne ; KRELING, Barbara ; FIGEURIEDO, Melissa ; SHIBAO FENG</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-97f9f156f1a7c65826aecc136d5a309487a3195af98c917ee6d8a2ce1e9733fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MANDELBLATT, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRELING, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FIGEURIEDO, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHIBAO FENG</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MANDELBLATT, Jeanne</au><au>KRELING, Barbara</au><au>FIGEURIEDO, Melissa</au><au>SHIBAO FENG</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Is the Impact of Shared Decision Making on Treatment and Outcomes for Older Women With Breast Cancer?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2006-10-20</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>30</issue><spage>4908</spage><epage>4913</epage><pages>4908-4913</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>Shared decision making (SDM) has been recommended as a standard of care, especially when there are treatment alternatives or uncertainty in outcomes. However, we know little about use of SDM in cancer care, and even less is known about SDM in older patients. We describe patient and physician determinants of SDM in older women with breast cancer and evaluate whether SDM is associated with treatment patterns or short-term outcomes of care.
Women age 67 or older treated for early stage breast cancer in 29 sites from five geographic regions comprise the study sample (N = 718). Data were obtained from patients by in-person and telephone interviews. Physician data were collected via survey, and medical records were reviewed to ascertain comorbidity and tumor characteristics. Random effects and logistic regression models were used to assess associations between SDM and other factors.
Women who were age 67 to 74 years (v 75 or older) were accompanied to consultation and who sought information reported the highest SDM, after considering covariates. While SDM was not associated with surgical treatment, greater SDM was associated with higher odds of having adjuvant treatment, controlling for clinical factors. Greater SDM was also associated with improved short-term satisfaction.
SDM plays an important role in the process of care for older women with breast cancer. Physicians treating this growing population have a simple, but powerful tool for improving outcomes within their grasp-spending time to engage and involve older women in their breast cancer care.</abstract><cop>Baltimore, MD</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>16983102</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.2006.07.1159</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0732-183X |
ispartof | Journal of clinical oncology, 2006-10, Vol.24 (30), p.4908-4913 |
issn | 0732-183X 1527-7755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68967688 |
source | MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Age Factors Aged Biological and medical sciences Breast Neoplasms - therapy Decision Making Female Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Mammary gland diseases Medical sciences Patient Satisfaction Physician-Patient Relations Prospective Studies Treatment Outcome Tumors |
title | What Is the Impact of Shared Decision Making on Treatment and Outcomes for Older Women With Breast Cancer? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T01%3A24%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Is%20the%20Impact%20of%20Shared%20Decision%20Making%20on%20Treatment%20and%20Outcomes%20for%20Older%20Women%20With%20Breast%20Cancer?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=MANDELBLATT,%20Jeanne&rft.date=2006-10-20&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=30&rft.spage=4908&rft.epage=4913&rft.pages=4908-4913&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2006.07.1159&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68967688%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68967688&rft_id=info:pmid/16983102&rfr_iscdi=true |