Subfascial transaxillary breast augmentation without endoscopic assistance: technical aspects and outcome
Although transaxillary breast augmentation (TBA) is a well-studied procedure, few previous reports exist concerning the subfascial technique, especially without endoscopic assistance. This study aimed to analyze the feasibility of the technique after breast augmentation in terms of its indication, s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aesthetic plastic surgery 2006-10, Vol.30 (5), p.503-512 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 512 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 503 |
container_title | Aesthetic plastic surgery |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Munhoz, Alexandre M Fells, Klaus Arruda, Eduardo Montag, Eduardo Okada, Alberto Aldrighi, Claudia Aldrighi, José M Gemperli, Rolf Ferreira, Marcus C |
description | Although transaxillary breast augmentation (TBA) is a well-studied procedure, few previous reports exist concerning the subfascial technique, especially without endoscopic assistance. This study aimed to analyze the feasibility of the technique after breast augmentation in terms of its indication, surgical technique, limitations, and clinical outcome.
For this study, 42 patients underwent TBA without endoscopic assistance. The technique was indicated for patients with breasts of small or moderate volume without ptosis, patients who wanted no breast scars, and patients who had a poorly defined inframammary fold. The mean follow-up period was 16 months. Implant and incision approach complications were evaluated. Information on patient satisfaction was collected.
A total of 14 complications occurred in 42 patients, all of them minor. Axillary incision-related complications occurred in 26% of the patients, as represented by a late axillary subcutaneous band (119%), sensory loss in the inner aspect of the arm (71%), and a hypertrophic scar and small wound dehiscence (71%). No patient presented with capsular contracture, visible rippling, or infection. Most of the patients (93%) were either very satisfied or satisfied with their result, and none regretted the surgery.
The TBA procedure without endoscopic assistance is a simple and reliable technique for breast augmentation. Most of the complications in this study were minor and predictable. They did not interfere with the aesthetic outcome nor the normal postoperative recovery. With TBA, success depends on patient selection as well as careful intra- and postoperative management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00266-006-0017-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68963664</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2221568031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-24c4e96bb410e774cdbda035ae43dceae71701174a8eefaa208545955368b7053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9LHEEQxZugxNX4AXKRxkNuE_vfdM_mFiSJgQUPKuTW1PTUxpad7nWqB5Nvby-7IFhQ1OX3HlX1GPssxVcphLsiIZS1jRC7lq7pPrCFNFo1rTLyiC2EtqZR0v45YadET5VRzpmP7ETapXPa6gWLd3O_BgoRNrxMkAj-xc0Gpv-8nxCocJj_jpgKlJgTf4nlMc-FYxoyhbyNgQNRpAIp4DdeMDymGKoV0BZDIQ5p4FUQ8oif2PEaNoTnh3nGHn7-uL--aVa3v35ff181QStbGmWCwaXteyMF1m3D0A8gdAto9BAQ0EknpHQGOsQ1gBJda9pl22rb9U60-ox92ftup_w8IxU_RgpYj0qYZ_K2W1ptrang5TvwKc9Tqrv5TslaRrgKyT0Upkw04dpvpzjW_3gp_C4Evw_B1xD8LgTfVc3FwXjuRxzeFIev61f_M4Q0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821111407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subfascial transaxillary breast augmentation without endoscopic assistance: technical aspects and outcome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Munhoz, Alexandre M ; Fells, Klaus ; Arruda, Eduardo ; Montag, Eduardo ; Okada, Alberto ; Aldrighi, Claudia ; Aldrighi, José M ; Gemperli, Rolf ; Ferreira, Marcus C</creator><creatorcontrib>Munhoz, Alexandre M ; Fells, Klaus ; Arruda, Eduardo ; Montag, Eduardo ; Okada, Alberto ; Aldrighi, Claudia ; Aldrighi, José M ; Gemperli, Rolf ; Ferreira, Marcus C</creatorcontrib><description>Although transaxillary breast augmentation (TBA) is a well-studied procedure, few previous reports exist concerning the subfascial technique, especially without endoscopic assistance. This study aimed to analyze the feasibility of the technique after breast augmentation in terms of its indication, surgical technique, limitations, and clinical outcome.
For this study, 42 patients underwent TBA without endoscopic assistance. The technique was indicated for patients with breasts of small or moderate volume without ptosis, patients who wanted no breast scars, and patients who had a poorly defined inframammary fold. The mean follow-up period was 16 months. Implant and incision approach complications were evaluated. Information on patient satisfaction was collected.
A total of 14 complications occurred in 42 patients, all of them minor. Axillary incision-related complications occurred in 26% of the patients, as represented by a late axillary subcutaneous band (119%), sensory loss in the inner aspect of the arm (71%), and a hypertrophic scar and small wound dehiscence (71%). No patient presented with capsular contracture, visible rippling, or infection. Most of the patients (93%) were either very satisfied or satisfied with their result, and none regretted the surgery.
The TBA procedure without endoscopic assistance is a simple and reliable technique for breast augmentation. Most of the complications in this study were minor and predictable. They did not interfere with the aesthetic outcome nor the normal postoperative recovery. With TBA, success depends on patient selection as well as careful intra- and postoperative management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-216X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-5241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00266-006-0017-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16977363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Axilla - surgery ; Breast Implantation ; Endoscopy ; Esthetics ; Fasciotomy ; Female ; Humans ; Mammaplasty - methods ; Patient satisfaction ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Surgery ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2006-10, Vol.30 (5), p.503-512</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-24c4e96bb410e774cdbda035ae43dceae71701174a8eefaa208545955368b7053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-24c4e96bb410e774cdbda035ae43dceae71701174a8eefaa208545955368b7053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16977363$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Munhoz, Alexandre M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fells, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arruda, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montag, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldrighi, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldrighi, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gemperli, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Marcus C</creatorcontrib><title>Subfascial transaxillary breast augmentation without endoscopic assistance: technical aspects and outcome</title><title>Aesthetic plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><description>Although transaxillary breast augmentation (TBA) is a well-studied procedure, few previous reports exist concerning the subfascial technique, especially without endoscopic assistance. This study aimed to analyze the feasibility of the technique after breast augmentation in terms of its indication, surgical technique, limitations, and clinical outcome.
For this study, 42 patients underwent TBA without endoscopic assistance. The technique was indicated for patients with breasts of small or moderate volume without ptosis, patients who wanted no breast scars, and patients who had a poorly defined inframammary fold. The mean follow-up period was 16 months. Implant and incision approach complications were evaluated. Information on patient satisfaction was collected.
A total of 14 complications occurred in 42 patients, all of them minor. Axillary incision-related complications occurred in 26% of the patients, as represented by a late axillary subcutaneous band (119%), sensory loss in the inner aspect of the arm (71%), and a hypertrophic scar and small wound dehiscence (71%). No patient presented with capsular contracture, visible rippling, or infection. Most of the patients (93%) were either very satisfied or satisfied with their result, and none regretted the surgery.
The TBA procedure without endoscopic assistance is a simple and reliable technique for breast augmentation. Most of the complications in this study were minor and predictable. They did not interfere with the aesthetic outcome nor the normal postoperative recovery. With TBA, success depends on patient selection as well as careful intra- and postoperative management.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Axilla - surgery</subject><subject>Breast Implantation</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Fasciotomy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - methods</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0364-216X</issn><issn>1432-5241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9LHEEQxZugxNX4AXKRxkNuE_vfdM_mFiSJgQUPKuTW1PTUxpad7nWqB5Nvby-7IFhQ1OX3HlX1GPssxVcphLsiIZS1jRC7lq7pPrCFNFo1rTLyiC2EtqZR0v45YadET5VRzpmP7ETapXPa6gWLd3O_BgoRNrxMkAj-xc0Gpv-8nxCocJj_jpgKlJgTf4nlMc-FYxoyhbyNgQNRpAIp4DdeMDymGKoV0BZDIQ5p4FUQ8oif2PEaNoTnh3nGHn7-uL--aVa3v35ff181QStbGmWCwaXteyMF1m3D0A8gdAto9BAQ0EknpHQGOsQ1gBJda9pl22rb9U60-ox92ftup_w8IxU_RgpYj0qYZ_K2W1ptrang5TvwKc9Tqrv5TslaRrgKyT0Upkw04dpvpzjW_3gp_C4Evw_B1xD8LgTfVc3FwXjuRxzeFIev61f_M4Q0</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Munhoz, Alexandre M</creator><creator>Fells, Klaus</creator><creator>Arruda, Eduardo</creator><creator>Montag, Eduardo</creator><creator>Okada, Alberto</creator><creator>Aldrighi, Claudia</creator><creator>Aldrighi, José M</creator><creator>Gemperli, Rolf</creator><creator>Ferreira, Marcus C</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>Subfascial transaxillary breast augmentation without endoscopic assistance: technical aspects and outcome</title><author>Munhoz, Alexandre M ; Fells, Klaus ; Arruda, Eduardo ; Montag, Eduardo ; Okada, Alberto ; Aldrighi, Claudia ; Aldrighi, José M ; Gemperli, Rolf ; Ferreira, Marcus C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-24c4e96bb410e774cdbda035ae43dceae71701174a8eefaa208545955368b7053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Axilla - surgery</topic><topic>Breast Implantation</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Fasciotomy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - methods</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Munhoz, Alexandre M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fells, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arruda, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montag, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldrighi, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldrighi, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gemperli, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Marcus C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Munhoz, Alexandre M</au><au>Fells, Klaus</au><au>Arruda, Eduardo</au><au>Montag, Eduardo</au><au>Okada, Alberto</au><au>Aldrighi, Claudia</au><au>Aldrighi, José M</au><au>Gemperli, Rolf</au><au>Ferreira, Marcus C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Subfascial transaxillary breast augmentation without endoscopic assistance: technical aspects and outcome</atitle><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>512</epage><pages>503-512</pages><issn>0364-216X</issn><eissn>1432-5241</eissn><abstract>Although transaxillary breast augmentation (TBA) is a well-studied procedure, few previous reports exist concerning the subfascial technique, especially without endoscopic assistance. This study aimed to analyze the feasibility of the technique after breast augmentation in terms of its indication, surgical technique, limitations, and clinical outcome.
For this study, 42 patients underwent TBA without endoscopic assistance. The technique was indicated for patients with breasts of small or moderate volume without ptosis, patients who wanted no breast scars, and patients who had a poorly defined inframammary fold. The mean follow-up period was 16 months. Implant and incision approach complications were evaluated. Information on patient satisfaction was collected.
A total of 14 complications occurred in 42 patients, all of them minor. Axillary incision-related complications occurred in 26% of the patients, as represented by a late axillary subcutaneous band (119%), sensory loss in the inner aspect of the arm (71%), and a hypertrophic scar and small wound dehiscence (71%). No patient presented with capsular contracture, visible rippling, or infection. Most of the patients (93%) were either very satisfied or satisfied with their result, and none regretted the surgery.
The TBA procedure without endoscopic assistance is a simple and reliable technique for breast augmentation. Most of the complications in this study were minor and predictable. They did not interfere with the aesthetic outcome nor the normal postoperative recovery. With TBA, success depends on patient selection as well as careful intra- and postoperative management.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>16977363</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00266-006-0017-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-216X |
ispartof | Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2006-10, Vol.30 (5), p.503-512 |
issn | 0364-216X 1432-5241 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68963664 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Axilla - surgery Breast Implantation Endoscopy Esthetics Fasciotomy Female Humans Mammaplasty - methods Patient satisfaction Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Surgery Surveys and Questionnaires Treatment Outcome |
title | Subfascial transaxillary breast augmentation without endoscopic assistance: technical aspects and outcome |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T17%3A47%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subfascial%20transaxillary%20breast%20augmentation%20without%20endoscopic%20assistance:%20technical%20aspects%20and%20outcome&rft.jtitle=Aesthetic%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Munhoz,%20Alexandre%20M&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=512&rft.pages=503-512&rft.issn=0364-216X&rft.eissn=1432-5241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00266-006-0017-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2221568031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821111407&rft_id=info:pmid/16977363&rfr_iscdi=true |