Correlation of invasive Doppler flow wire with renal duplex ultrasonography in the evaluation of renal artery stenosis: The Renal Artery Stenosis Invasive Doppler (RAIDER) study

Objective Determining renal resistive index (RI) in the setting of renal artery stenosis may predict which patients benefit from revascularization. Renal duplex ultrasonography (RDUS) is the traditional method of assessing RI, but it is not available in most invasive endovascular laboratories. Conve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vascular surgery 2007-02, Vol.45 (2), p.284-288
Hauptverfasser: Duong, Michael H., MD, Mackenzie, Todd A., PhD, Zwolak, Robert M., MD, PhD, Kaplan, Aaron V., MD, Robb, John F., MD, Thompson, Craig A., MD, MMSc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 288
container_issue 2
container_start_page 284
container_title Journal of vascular surgery
container_volume 45
creator Duong, Michael H., MD
Mackenzie, Todd A., PhD
Zwolak, Robert M., MD, PhD
Kaplan, Aaron V., MD
Robb, John F., MD
Thompson, Craig A., MD, MMSc
description Objective Determining renal resistive index (RI) in the setting of renal artery stenosis may predict which patients benefit from revascularization. Renal duplex ultrasonography (RDUS) is the traditional method of assessing RI, but it is not available in most invasive endovascular laboratories. Conversely, endovascular techniques to assess RI are available but not well validated. The primary goal was to determine if an invasive approach using an endovascular Doppler flow wire correlates with RI assessment using traditional noninvasive RDUS. Methods In a single-center prospective trial, patients were enrolled if they had known or suspected renovascular disease. A Doppler flow wire was placed in multiple segments of the renal artery, and peak (PSV) and end-diastolic velocities (EDV) were measured. RI was calculated using the formula: RI = [1 – (EDV/PSV)] × 100. Similarly, RI was also derived using standard RDUS. All patients underwent both RI techniques before any revascularization procedure. Secondary end points included assessing the correlation for pole-to-pole renal length assessment and PSV and EDV velocities using both invasive and noninvasive techniques. Pearson correlation coefficient calculations were used to determine degree of correlation. Results The study enrolled 20 patients, and 35 renal arteries were studied. Overall, Pearson correlation coefficient for invasive vs noninvasive RI assessment was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.93). The r values were 0.43 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.67) for pole-to-pole renal length, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.76) for PSV, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.72) for EDV determination. No major complications occurred during this study. Average time to perform invasive Doppler assessment was 10.4 ± 7.4 minutes per artery. Conclusions Invasive RI assessment using an endovascular flow wire technique correlates well with traditional noninvasive RDUS. A moderate statistical correlation also exists for pole-to-pole renal length, PSV, and EDV determinations. The procedure is safe and can be performed rapidly.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.041
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68962521</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0741521406017460</els_id><sourcerecordid>68962521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-599ab13d766fe08d5b1a1f14e390cdec719989645f8925656f5765febf32665c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksFuEzEQhlcIREPhAbggX0BwSJjZ7HrXRUKK0gKRKiGl5Ww53jFxcNbB3k3Zx-INcUhEpR64eA7_949H80-WvUSYICB_v5ls9nGSA_AJiAkU-CgbIYhqzGsQj7MRVAWOyxyLs-xZjBsAxLKunmZnWOW8AChG2e-5D4Gc6qxvmTfMtnsV7Z7Ypd_tHAVmnL9jdzZQero1C9Qqx5o-ab9Y77qgom_996B26yGZWbcmRnvl-n8djw4VOgoDix21Ptp4wW4TuPwrzY7SzUlii4cjvF3OFpdXy3fJ3TfD8-yJUS7Si1M9z759urqdfxlff_28mM-ux7qoRDcuhVArnDYV54agbsoVKjRY0FSAbkhXKEQteFGaWuQlL7kpK14aWplpznmpp-fZm2PfXfA_e4qd3NqoyTnVku-j5Mmdp-UmEI-gDj7GQEbugt2qMEgEechJbmTKSR5ykiBkyil5Xp2a96stNfeOUzAJeH0CVNTKmaBabeM9VwvMa6wS9-HIUVrF3lKQUVtqNTUpMt3Jxtv_jvHxgVs729r04Q8aKG58H1JCUaKMuQR5cziowz0BB6wKDtM_W5bINQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68962521</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation of invasive Doppler flow wire with renal duplex ultrasonography in the evaluation of renal artery stenosis: The Renal Artery Stenosis Invasive Doppler (RAIDER) study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Duong, Michael H., MD ; Mackenzie, Todd A., PhD ; Zwolak, Robert M., MD, PhD ; Kaplan, Aaron V., MD ; Robb, John F., MD ; Thompson, Craig A., MD, MMSc</creator><creatorcontrib>Duong, Michael H., MD ; Mackenzie, Todd A., PhD ; Zwolak, Robert M., MD, PhD ; Kaplan, Aaron V., MD ; Robb, John F., MD ; Thompson, Craig A., MD, MMSc</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Determining renal resistive index (RI) in the setting of renal artery stenosis may predict which patients benefit from revascularization. Renal duplex ultrasonography (RDUS) is the traditional method of assessing RI, but it is not available in most invasive endovascular laboratories. Conversely, endovascular techniques to assess RI are available but not well validated. The primary goal was to determine if an invasive approach using an endovascular Doppler flow wire correlates with RI assessment using traditional noninvasive RDUS. Methods In a single-center prospective trial, patients were enrolled if they had known or suspected renovascular disease. A Doppler flow wire was placed in multiple segments of the renal artery, and peak (PSV) and end-diastolic velocities (EDV) were measured. RI was calculated using the formula: RI = [1 – (EDV/PSV)] × 100. Similarly, RI was also derived using standard RDUS. All patients underwent both RI techniques before any revascularization procedure. Secondary end points included assessing the correlation for pole-to-pole renal length assessment and PSV and EDV velocities using both invasive and noninvasive techniques. Pearson correlation coefficient calculations were used to determine degree of correlation. Results The study enrolled 20 patients, and 35 renal arteries were studied. Overall, Pearson correlation coefficient for invasive vs noninvasive RI assessment was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.93). The r values were 0.43 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.67) for pole-to-pole renal length, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.76) for PSV, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.72) for EDV determination. No major complications occurred during this study. Average time to perform invasive Doppler assessment was 10.4 ± 7.4 minutes per artery. Conclusions Invasive RI assessment using an endovascular flow wire technique correlates well with traditional noninvasive RDUS. A moderate statistical correlation also exists for pole-to-pole renal length, PSV, and EDV determinations. The procedure is safe and can be performed rapidly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17264004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JVSUES</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angiography, Digital Subtraction ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Flow Velocity ; Endosonography - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Nephropathies. Renovascular diseases. Renal failure ; Prospective Studies ; Renal Artery Obstruction - diagnostic imaging ; Renal Artery Obstruction - physiopathology ; Renovascular diseases ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the urinary system ; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex - methods ; United States ; Vascular Resistance ; Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2007-02, Vol.45 (2), p.284-288</ispartof><rights>The Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2007 The Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-599ab13d766fe08d5b1a1f14e390cdec719989645f8925656f5765febf32665c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-599ab13d766fe08d5b1a1f14e390cdec719989645f8925656f5765febf32665c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.041$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18912817$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17264004$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duong, Michael H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Todd A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwolak, Robert M., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Aaron V., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robb, John F., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Craig A., MD, MMSc</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation of invasive Doppler flow wire with renal duplex ultrasonography in the evaluation of renal artery stenosis: The Renal Artery Stenosis Invasive Doppler (RAIDER) study</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Objective Determining renal resistive index (RI) in the setting of renal artery stenosis may predict which patients benefit from revascularization. Renal duplex ultrasonography (RDUS) is the traditional method of assessing RI, but it is not available in most invasive endovascular laboratories. Conversely, endovascular techniques to assess RI are available but not well validated. The primary goal was to determine if an invasive approach using an endovascular Doppler flow wire correlates with RI assessment using traditional noninvasive RDUS. Methods In a single-center prospective trial, patients were enrolled if they had known or suspected renovascular disease. A Doppler flow wire was placed in multiple segments of the renal artery, and peak (PSV) and end-diastolic velocities (EDV) were measured. RI was calculated using the formula: RI = [1 – (EDV/PSV)] × 100. Similarly, RI was also derived using standard RDUS. All patients underwent both RI techniques before any revascularization procedure. Secondary end points included assessing the correlation for pole-to-pole renal length assessment and PSV and EDV velocities using both invasive and noninvasive techniques. Pearson correlation coefficient calculations were used to determine degree of correlation. Results The study enrolled 20 patients, and 35 renal arteries were studied. Overall, Pearson correlation coefficient for invasive vs noninvasive RI assessment was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.93). The r values were 0.43 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.67) for pole-to-pole renal length, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.76) for PSV, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.72) for EDV determination. No major complications occurred during this study. Average time to perform invasive Doppler assessment was 10.4 ± 7.4 minutes per artery. Conclusions Invasive RI assessment using an endovascular flow wire technique correlates well with traditional noninvasive RDUS. A moderate statistical correlation also exists for pole-to-pole renal length, PSV, and EDV determinations. The procedure is safe and can be performed rapidly.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angiography, Digital Subtraction</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity</subject><subject>Endosonography - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Nephropathies. Renovascular diseases. Renal failure</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Renal Artery Obstruction - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Renal Artery Obstruction - physiopathology</subject><subject>Renovascular diseases</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the urinary system</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex - methods</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vascular Resistance</subject><subject>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksFuEzEQhlcIREPhAbggX0BwSJjZ7HrXRUKK0gKRKiGl5Ww53jFxcNbB3k3Zx-INcUhEpR64eA7_949H80-WvUSYICB_v5ls9nGSA_AJiAkU-CgbIYhqzGsQj7MRVAWOyxyLs-xZjBsAxLKunmZnWOW8AChG2e-5D4Gc6qxvmTfMtnsV7Z7Ypd_tHAVmnL9jdzZQero1C9Qqx5o-ab9Y77qgom_996B26yGZWbcmRnvl-n8djw4VOgoDix21Ptp4wW4TuPwrzY7SzUlii4cjvF3OFpdXy3fJ3TfD8-yJUS7Si1M9z759urqdfxlff_28mM-ux7qoRDcuhVArnDYV54agbsoVKjRY0FSAbkhXKEQteFGaWuQlL7kpK14aWplpznmpp-fZm2PfXfA_e4qd3NqoyTnVku-j5Mmdp-UmEI-gDj7GQEbugt2qMEgEechJbmTKSR5ykiBkyil5Xp2a96stNfeOUzAJeH0CVNTKmaBabeM9VwvMa6wS9-HIUVrF3lKQUVtqNTUpMt3Jxtv_jvHxgVs729r04Q8aKG58H1JCUaKMuQR5cziowz0BB6wKDtM_W5bINQ</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Duong, Michael H., MD</creator><creator>Mackenzie, Todd A., PhD</creator><creator>Zwolak, Robert M., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Kaplan, Aaron V., MD</creator><creator>Robb, John F., MD</creator><creator>Thompson, Craig A., MD, MMSc</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>Correlation of invasive Doppler flow wire with renal duplex ultrasonography in the evaluation of renal artery stenosis: The Renal Artery Stenosis Invasive Doppler (RAIDER) study</title><author>Duong, Michael H., MD ; Mackenzie, Todd A., PhD ; Zwolak, Robert M., MD, PhD ; Kaplan, Aaron V., MD ; Robb, John F., MD ; Thompson, Craig A., MD, MMSc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-599ab13d766fe08d5b1a1f14e390cdec719989645f8925656f5765febf32665c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angiography, Digital Subtraction</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity</topic><topic>Endosonography - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Nephropathies. Renovascular diseases. Renal failure</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Renal Artery Obstruction - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Renal Artery Obstruction - physiopathology</topic><topic>Renovascular diseases</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the urinary system</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex - methods</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vascular Resistance</topic><topic>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duong, Michael H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Todd A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwolak, Robert M., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Aaron V., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robb, John F., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Craig A., MD, MMSc</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duong, Michael H., MD</au><au>Mackenzie, Todd A., PhD</au><au>Zwolak, Robert M., MD, PhD</au><au>Kaplan, Aaron V., MD</au><au>Robb, John F., MD</au><au>Thompson, Craig A., MD, MMSc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation of invasive Doppler flow wire with renal duplex ultrasonography in the evaluation of renal artery stenosis: The Renal Artery Stenosis Invasive Doppler (RAIDER) study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>284</spage><epage>288</epage><pages>284-288</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><coden>JVSUES</coden><abstract>Objective Determining renal resistive index (RI) in the setting of renal artery stenosis may predict which patients benefit from revascularization. Renal duplex ultrasonography (RDUS) is the traditional method of assessing RI, but it is not available in most invasive endovascular laboratories. Conversely, endovascular techniques to assess RI are available but not well validated. The primary goal was to determine if an invasive approach using an endovascular Doppler flow wire correlates with RI assessment using traditional noninvasive RDUS. Methods In a single-center prospective trial, patients were enrolled if they had known or suspected renovascular disease. A Doppler flow wire was placed in multiple segments of the renal artery, and peak (PSV) and end-diastolic velocities (EDV) were measured. RI was calculated using the formula: RI = [1 – (EDV/PSV)] × 100. Similarly, RI was also derived using standard RDUS. All patients underwent both RI techniques before any revascularization procedure. Secondary end points included assessing the correlation for pole-to-pole renal length assessment and PSV and EDV velocities using both invasive and noninvasive techniques. Pearson correlation coefficient calculations were used to determine degree of correlation. Results The study enrolled 20 patients, and 35 renal arteries were studied. Overall, Pearson correlation coefficient for invasive vs noninvasive RI assessment was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.93). The r values were 0.43 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.67) for pole-to-pole renal length, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.76) for PSV, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.72) for EDV determination. No major complications occurred during this study. Average time to perform invasive Doppler assessment was 10.4 ± 7.4 minutes per artery. Conclusions Invasive RI assessment using an endovascular flow wire technique correlates well with traditional noninvasive RDUS. A moderate statistical correlation also exists for pole-to-pole renal length, PSV, and EDV determinations. The procedure is safe and can be performed rapidly.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>17264004</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.041</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-5214
ispartof Journal of vascular surgery, 2007-02, Vol.45 (2), p.284-288
issn 0741-5214
1097-6809
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68962521
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Aged
Angiography, Digital Subtraction
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Flow Velocity
Endosonography - methods
Female
Humans
Linear Models
Male
Medical sciences
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
Nephropathies. Renovascular diseases. Renal failure
Prospective Studies
Renal Artery Obstruction - diagnostic imaging
Renal Artery Obstruction - physiopathology
Renovascular diseases
Severity of Illness Index
Surgery
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the urinary system
Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex - methods
United States
Vascular Resistance
Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels
title Correlation of invasive Doppler flow wire with renal duplex ultrasonography in the evaluation of renal artery stenosis: The Renal Artery Stenosis Invasive Doppler (RAIDER) study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T19%3A55%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20of%20invasive%20Doppler%20flow%20wire%20with%20renal%20duplex%20ultrasonography%20in%20the%20evaluation%20of%20renal%20artery%20stenosis:%20The%20Renal%20Artery%20Stenosis%20Invasive%20Doppler%20(RAIDER)%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Duong,%20Michael%20H.,%20MD&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=284&rft.epage=288&rft.pages=284-288&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft.coden=JVSUES&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68962521%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68962521&rft_id=info:pmid/17264004&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0741521406017460&rfr_iscdi=true