Correlation of invasive Doppler flow wire with renal duplex ultrasonography in the evaluation of renal artery stenosis: The Renal Artery Stenosis Invasive Doppler (RAIDER) study
Objective Determining renal resistive index (RI) in the setting of renal artery stenosis may predict which patients benefit from revascularization. Renal duplex ultrasonography (RDUS) is the traditional method of assessing RI, but it is not available in most invasive endovascular laboratories. Conve...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of vascular surgery 2007-02, Vol.45 (2), p.284-288 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 288 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 284 |
container_title | Journal of vascular surgery |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Duong, Michael H., MD Mackenzie, Todd A., PhD Zwolak, Robert M., MD, PhD Kaplan, Aaron V., MD Robb, John F., MD Thompson, Craig A., MD, MMSc |
description | Objective Determining renal resistive index (RI) in the setting of renal artery stenosis may predict which patients benefit from revascularization. Renal duplex ultrasonography (RDUS) is the traditional method of assessing RI, but it is not available in most invasive endovascular laboratories. Conversely, endovascular techniques to assess RI are available but not well validated. The primary goal was to determine if an invasive approach using an endovascular Doppler flow wire correlates with RI assessment using traditional noninvasive RDUS. Methods In a single-center prospective trial, patients were enrolled if they had known or suspected renovascular disease. A Doppler flow wire was placed in multiple segments of the renal artery, and peak (PSV) and end-diastolic velocities (EDV) were measured. RI was calculated using the formula: RI = [1 – (EDV/PSV)] × 100. Similarly, RI was also derived using standard RDUS. All patients underwent both RI techniques before any revascularization procedure. Secondary end points included assessing the correlation for pole-to-pole renal length assessment and PSV and EDV velocities using both invasive and noninvasive techniques. Pearson correlation coefficient calculations were used to determine degree of correlation. Results The study enrolled 20 patients, and 35 renal arteries were studied. Overall, Pearson correlation coefficient for invasive vs noninvasive RI assessment was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.93). The r values were 0.43 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.67) for pole-to-pole renal length, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.76) for PSV, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.72) for EDV determination. No major complications occurred during this study. Average time to perform invasive Doppler assessment was 10.4 ± 7.4 minutes per artery. Conclusions Invasive RI assessment using an endovascular flow wire technique correlates well with traditional noninvasive RDUS. A moderate statistical correlation also exists for pole-to-pole renal length, PSV, and EDV determinations. The procedure is safe and can be performed rapidly. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.041 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68962521</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0741521406017460</els_id><sourcerecordid>68962521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-599ab13d766fe08d5b1a1f14e390cdec719989645f8925656f5765febf32665c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksFuEzEQhlcIREPhAbggX0BwSJjZ7HrXRUKK0gKRKiGl5Ww53jFxcNbB3k3Zx-INcUhEpR64eA7_949H80-WvUSYICB_v5ls9nGSA_AJiAkU-CgbIYhqzGsQj7MRVAWOyxyLs-xZjBsAxLKunmZnWOW8AChG2e-5D4Gc6qxvmTfMtnsV7Z7Ypd_tHAVmnL9jdzZQero1C9Qqx5o-ab9Y77qgom_996B26yGZWbcmRnvl-n8djw4VOgoDix21Ptp4wW4TuPwrzY7SzUlii4cjvF3OFpdXy3fJ3TfD8-yJUS7Si1M9z759urqdfxlff_28mM-ux7qoRDcuhVArnDYV54agbsoVKjRY0FSAbkhXKEQteFGaWuQlL7kpK14aWplpznmpp-fZm2PfXfA_e4qd3NqoyTnVku-j5Mmdp-UmEI-gDj7GQEbugt2qMEgEechJbmTKSR5ykiBkyil5Xp2a96stNfeOUzAJeH0CVNTKmaBabeM9VwvMa6wS9-HIUVrF3lKQUVtqNTUpMt3Jxtv_jvHxgVs729r04Q8aKG58H1JCUaKMuQR5cziowz0BB6wKDtM_W5bINQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68962521</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation of invasive Doppler flow wire with renal duplex ultrasonography in the evaluation of renal artery stenosis: The Renal Artery Stenosis Invasive Doppler (RAIDER) study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Duong, Michael H., MD ; Mackenzie, Todd A., PhD ; Zwolak, Robert M., MD, PhD ; Kaplan, Aaron V., MD ; Robb, John F., MD ; Thompson, Craig A., MD, MMSc</creator><creatorcontrib>Duong, Michael H., MD ; Mackenzie, Todd A., PhD ; Zwolak, Robert M., MD, PhD ; Kaplan, Aaron V., MD ; Robb, John F., MD ; Thompson, Craig A., MD, MMSc</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Determining renal resistive index (RI) in the setting of renal artery stenosis may predict which patients benefit from revascularization. Renal duplex ultrasonography (RDUS) is the traditional method of assessing RI, but it is not available in most invasive endovascular laboratories. Conversely, endovascular techniques to assess RI are available but not well validated. The primary goal was to determine if an invasive approach using an endovascular Doppler flow wire correlates with RI assessment using traditional noninvasive RDUS. Methods In a single-center prospective trial, patients were enrolled if they had known or suspected renovascular disease. A Doppler flow wire was placed in multiple segments of the renal artery, and peak (PSV) and end-diastolic velocities (EDV) were measured. RI was calculated using the formula: RI = [1 – (EDV/PSV)] × 100. Similarly, RI was also derived using standard RDUS. All patients underwent both RI techniques before any revascularization procedure. Secondary end points included assessing the correlation for pole-to-pole renal length assessment and PSV and EDV velocities using both invasive and noninvasive techniques. Pearson correlation coefficient calculations were used to determine degree of correlation. Results The study enrolled 20 patients, and 35 renal arteries were studied. Overall, Pearson correlation coefficient for invasive vs noninvasive RI assessment was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.93). The r values were 0.43 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.67) for pole-to-pole renal length, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.76) for PSV, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.72) for EDV determination. No major complications occurred during this study. Average time to perform invasive Doppler assessment was 10.4 ± 7.4 minutes per artery. Conclusions Invasive RI assessment using an endovascular flow wire technique correlates well with traditional noninvasive RDUS. A moderate statistical correlation also exists for pole-to-pole renal length, PSV, and EDV determinations. The procedure is safe and can be performed rapidly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17264004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JVSUES</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angiography, Digital Subtraction ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Flow Velocity ; Endosonography - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Nephropathies. Renovascular diseases. Renal failure ; Prospective Studies ; Renal Artery Obstruction - diagnostic imaging ; Renal Artery Obstruction - physiopathology ; Renovascular diseases ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the urinary system ; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex - methods ; United States ; Vascular Resistance ; Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2007-02, Vol.45 (2), p.284-288</ispartof><rights>The Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2007 The Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-599ab13d766fe08d5b1a1f14e390cdec719989645f8925656f5765febf32665c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-599ab13d766fe08d5b1a1f14e390cdec719989645f8925656f5765febf32665c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.041$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18912817$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17264004$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duong, Michael H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Todd A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwolak, Robert M., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Aaron V., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robb, John F., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Craig A., MD, MMSc</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation of invasive Doppler flow wire with renal duplex ultrasonography in the evaluation of renal artery stenosis: The Renal Artery Stenosis Invasive Doppler (RAIDER) study</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Objective Determining renal resistive index (RI) in the setting of renal artery stenosis may predict which patients benefit from revascularization. Renal duplex ultrasonography (RDUS) is the traditional method of assessing RI, but it is not available in most invasive endovascular laboratories. Conversely, endovascular techniques to assess RI are available but not well validated. The primary goal was to determine if an invasive approach using an endovascular Doppler flow wire correlates with RI assessment using traditional noninvasive RDUS. Methods In a single-center prospective trial, patients were enrolled if they had known or suspected renovascular disease. A Doppler flow wire was placed in multiple segments of the renal artery, and peak (PSV) and end-diastolic velocities (EDV) were measured. RI was calculated using the formula: RI = [1 – (EDV/PSV)] × 100. Similarly, RI was also derived using standard RDUS. All patients underwent both RI techniques before any revascularization procedure. Secondary end points included assessing the correlation for pole-to-pole renal length assessment and PSV and EDV velocities using both invasive and noninvasive techniques. Pearson correlation coefficient calculations were used to determine degree of correlation. Results The study enrolled 20 patients, and 35 renal arteries were studied. Overall, Pearson correlation coefficient for invasive vs noninvasive RI assessment was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.93). The r values were 0.43 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.67) for pole-to-pole renal length, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.76) for PSV, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.72) for EDV determination. No major complications occurred during this study. Average time to perform invasive Doppler assessment was 10.4 ± 7.4 minutes per artery. Conclusions Invasive RI assessment using an endovascular flow wire technique correlates well with traditional noninvasive RDUS. A moderate statistical correlation also exists for pole-to-pole renal length, PSV, and EDV determinations. The procedure is safe and can be performed rapidly.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angiography, Digital Subtraction</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity</subject><subject>Endosonography - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Nephropathies. Renovascular diseases. Renal failure</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Renal Artery Obstruction - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Renal Artery Obstruction - physiopathology</subject><subject>Renovascular diseases</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the urinary system</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex - methods</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vascular Resistance</subject><subject>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksFuEzEQhlcIREPhAbggX0BwSJjZ7HrXRUKK0gKRKiGl5Ww53jFxcNbB3k3Zx-INcUhEpR64eA7_949H80-WvUSYICB_v5ls9nGSA_AJiAkU-CgbIYhqzGsQj7MRVAWOyxyLs-xZjBsAxLKunmZnWOW8AChG2e-5D4Gc6qxvmTfMtnsV7Z7Ypd_tHAVmnL9jdzZQero1C9Qqx5o-ab9Y77qgom_996B26yGZWbcmRnvl-n8djw4VOgoDix21Ptp4wW4TuPwrzY7SzUlii4cjvF3OFpdXy3fJ3TfD8-yJUS7Si1M9z759urqdfxlff_28mM-ux7qoRDcuhVArnDYV54agbsoVKjRY0FSAbkhXKEQteFGaWuQlL7kpK14aWplpznmpp-fZm2PfXfA_e4qd3NqoyTnVku-j5Mmdp-UmEI-gDj7GQEbugt2qMEgEechJbmTKSR5ykiBkyil5Xp2a96stNfeOUzAJeH0CVNTKmaBabeM9VwvMa6wS9-HIUVrF3lKQUVtqNTUpMt3Jxtv_jvHxgVs729r04Q8aKG58H1JCUaKMuQR5cziowz0BB6wKDtM_W5bINQ</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Duong, Michael H., MD</creator><creator>Mackenzie, Todd A., PhD</creator><creator>Zwolak, Robert M., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Kaplan, Aaron V., MD</creator><creator>Robb, John F., MD</creator><creator>Thompson, Craig A., MD, MMSc</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>Correlation of invasive Doppler flow wire with renal duplex ultrasonography in the evaluation of renal artery stenosis: The Renal Artery Stenosis Invasive Doppler (RAIDER) study</title><author>Duong, Michael H., MD ; Mackenzie, Todd A., PhD ; Zwolak, Robert M., MD, PhD ; Kaplan, Aaron V., MD ; Robb, John F., MD ; Thompson, Craig A., MD, MMSc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-599ab13d766fe08d5b1a1f14e390cdec719989645f8925656f5765febf32665c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angiography, Digital Subtraction</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity</topic><topic>Endosonography - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Nephropathies. Renovascular diseases. Renal failure</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Renal Artery Obstruction - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Renal Artery Obstruction - physiopathology</topic><topic>Renovascular diseases</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the urinary system</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex - methods</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vascular Resistance</topic><topic>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duong, Michael H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Todd A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwolak, Robert M., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Aaron V., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robb, John F., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Craig A., MD, MMSc</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duong, Michael H., MD</au><au>Mackenzie, Todd A., PhD</au><au>Zwolak, Robert M., MD, PhD</au><au>Kaplan, Aaron V., MD</au><au>Robb, John F., MD</au><au>Thompson, Craig A., MD, MMSc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation of invasive Doppler flow wire with renal duplex ultrasonography in the evaluation of renal artery stenosis: The Renal Artery Stenosis Invasive Doppler (RAIDER) study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>284</spage><epage>288</epage><pages>284-288</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><coden>JVSUES</coden><abstract>Objective Determining renal resistive index (RI) in the setting of renal artery stenosis may predict which patients benefit from revascularization. Renal duplex ultrasonography (RDUS) is the traditional method of assessing RI, but it is not available in most invasive endovascular laboratories. Conversely, endovascular techniques to assess RI are available but not well validated. The primary goal was to determine if an invasive approach using an endovascular Doppler flow wire correlates with RI assessment using traditional noninvasive RDUS. Methods In a single-center prospective trial, patients were enrolled if they had known or suspected renovascular disease. A Doppler flow wire was placed in multiple segments of the renal artery, and peak (PSV) and end-diastolic velocities (EDV) were measured. RI was calculated using the formula: RI = [1 – (EDV/PSV)] × 100. Similarly, RI was also derived using standard RDUS. All patients underwent both RI techniques before any revascularization procedure. Secondary end points included assessing the correlation for pole-to-pole renal length assessment and PSV and EDV velocities using both invasive and noninvasive techniques. Pearson correlation coefficient calculations were used to determine degree of correlation. Results The study enrolled 20 patients, and 35 renal arteries were studied. Overall, Pearson correlation coefficient for invasive vs noninvasive RI assessment was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.93). The r values were 0.43 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.67) for pole-to-pole renal length, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.76) for PSV, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.72) for EDV determination. No major complications occurred during this study. Average time to perform invasive Doppler assessment was 10.4 ± 7.4 minutes per artery. Conclusions Invasive RI assessment using an endovascular flow wire technique correlates well with traditional noninvasive RDUS. A moderate statistical correlation also exists for pole-to-pole renal length, PSV, and EDV determinations. The procedure is safe and can be performed rapidly.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>17264004</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.041</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0741-5214 |
ispartof | Journal of vascular surgery, 2007-02, Vol.45 (2), p.284-288 |
issn | 0741-5214 1097-6809 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68962521 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Aged Angiography, Digital Subtraction Biological and medical sciences Blood Flow Velocity Endosonography - methods Female Humans Linear Models Male Medical sciences Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases Nephropathies. Renovascular diseases. Renal failure Prospective Studies Renal Artery Obstruction - diagnostic imaging Renal Artery Obstruction - physiopathology Renovascular diseases Severity of Illness Index Surgery Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the urinary system Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex - methods United States Vascular Resistance Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels |
title | Correlation of invasive Doppler flow wire with renal duplex ultrasonography in the evaluation of renal artery stenosis: The Renal Artery Stenosis Invasive Doppler (RAIDER) study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T19%3A55%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20of%20invasive%20Doppler%20flow%20wire%20with%20renal%20duplex%20ultrasonography%20in%20the%20evaluation%20of%20renal%20artery%20stenosis:%20The%20Renal%20Artery%20Stenosis%20Invasive%20Doppler%20(RAIDER)%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Duong,%20Michael%20H.,%20MD&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=284&rft.epage=288&rft.pages=284-288&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft.coden=JVSUES&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68962521%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68962521&rft_id=info:pmid/17264004&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0741521406017460&rfr_iscdi=true |