Steal-induction after clonidine premedication: a comparison of the oral and nasal route

Summary Background:  Clonidine premedication in children reliably provides preoperative sedation and anxiolysis, but onset of oral clonidine is known to be slow. Nasal clonidine has been shown to reach peak plasma levels within 10 min in rodents. The aim of the present study was to compare clinical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric anesthesia 2007-03, Vol.17 (3), p.230-234
Hauptverfasser: ALMENRADER, NICOLE, PASSARIELLO, MAURIZIO, COCCETTI, BRUNO, HAIBERGER, ROBERTA, PIETROPAOLI, PAOLO
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 234
container_issue 3
container_start_page 230
container_title Pediatric anesthesia
container_volume 17
creator ALMENRADER, NICOLE
PASSARIELLO, MAURIZIO
COCCETTI, BRUNO
HAIBERGER, ROBERTA
PIETROPAOLI, PAOLO
description Summary Background:  Clonidine premedication in children reliably provides preoperative sedation and anxiolysis, but onset of oral clonidine is known to be slow. Nasal clonidine has been shown to reach peak plasma levels within 10 min in rodents. The aim of the present study was to compare clinical effects and percentage of steal‐induction after clonidine premedication by the oral and nasal route. Methods:  Forty children, aged 1–6 years, scheduled for minor infraumbilical surgery, were randomly assigned to receive either pure clonidine 4 μg·kg−1 intranasally (group CN, n = 20) or clonidine 4 μg·kg−1 orally in syrup (group CO, n = 20) prior to mask induction. Drug acceptance, preoperative sedation and anxiolysis, quality of mask acceptance, recovery profile and parents’ satisfaction were evaluated. Results:  Drug acceptance was similar between groups, but quality of taste was significantly better in the oral group. There was no significant difference of preoperative anxiolysis and sedation. The onset of sedative effect was after 38.3 min for oral clonidine and 47.5 min for nasal clonidine. A steal‐induction could be performed in 60% of children in each group. Emergence from anesthesia and parents’ satisfaction were comparable. Conclusions:  Intranasal clonidine administration has no advantage over the oral route. Clinical effects were similar with both routes; there was a trend towards a faster onset of sedation with oral clonidine. Clonidine premedication causes light sleep, which allows a steal‐induction in 60% of patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02080.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68960561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68960561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4050-84c26bd46d137af39d3125ab1ad8a9e5d13bc4ef93b1644ae86220bd1aebe6303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkN2L1DAUxYMo7rr6L0iefGvNR5O2gg_LsB_CMgq7MuBLuE1uMWOnGZOWnf3vTZ1hffW-3EPuOSfwI4RyVvI8H7clrzQrWtWKUjCmSyZYw8rDC3L-fHiZNVeqULpSZ-RNSlvGuBRavCZnvBZa1rI-J5v7CWEo_OhmO_kwUugnjNQOYfTOj0j3EXfovIXl-okCtWG3h-hT9oaeTj-RhggDhdHREVJWMcwTviWvehgSvjvtC_L9-uphdVvcfb35srq8K2zFFCuaygrduUo7LmvoZeskFwo6Dq6BFlV-7myFfSs7rqsKsNFCsM5xwA61ZPKCfDj27mP4PWOazM4ni8MAI4Y5Gd20minNs7E5Gm0MKUXszT76HcQnw5lZoJqtWdiZhZ1ZoJq_UM0hR9-f_pi7zOJf8EQxGz4fDY9-wKf_LjbfLteLyvnimPdpwsNzHuIvo3O_Mpv1jRHrFd_c1tz8kH8Axb2VMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68960561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Steal-induction after clonidine premedication: a comparison of the oral and nasal route</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>ALMENRADER, NICOLE ; PASSARIELLO, MAURIZIO ; COCCETTI, BRUNO ; HAIBERGER, ROBERTA ; PIETROPAOLI, PAOLO</creator><creatorcontrib>ALMENRADER, NICOLE ; PASSARIELLO, MAURIZIO ; COCCETTI, BRUNO ; HAIBERGER, ROBERTA ; PIETROPAOLI, PAOLO</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background:  Clonidine premedication in children reliably provides preoperative sedation and anxiolysis, but onset of oral clonidine is known to be slow. Nasal clonidine has been shown to reach peak plasma levels within 10 min in rodents. The aim of the present study was to compare clinical effects and percentage of steal‐induction after clonidine premedication by the oral and nasal route. Methods:  Forty children, aged 1–6 years, scheduled for minor infraumbilical surgery, were randomly assigned to receive either pure clonidine 4 μg·kg−1 intranasally (group CN, n = 20) or clonidine 4 μg·kg−1 orally in syrup (group CO, n = 20) prior to mask induction. Drug acceptance, preoperative sedation and anxiolysis, quality of mask acceptance, recovery profile and parents’ satisfaction were evaluated. Results:  Drug acceptance was similar between groups, but quality of taste was significantly better in the oral group. There was no significant difference of preoperative anxiolysis and sedation. The onset of sedative effect was after 38.3 min for oral clonidine and 47.5 min for nasal clonidine. A steal‐induction could be performed in 60% of children in each group. Emergence from anesthesia and parents’ satisfaction were comparable. Conclusions:  Intranasal clonidine administration has no advantage over the oral route. Clinical effects were similar with both routes; there was a trend towards a faster onset of sedation with oral clonidine. Clonidine premedication causes light sleep, which allows a steal‐induction in 60% of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1155-5645</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-9592</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02080.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17263737</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anesthesia - methods ; Anesthesia Recovery Period ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Child, Preschool ; clonidine ; Clonidine - administration &amp; dosage ; Drug Administration Routes ; Female ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration &amp; dosage ; Infant ; Male ; Premedication ; steal-induction</subject><ispartof>Pediatric anesthesia, 2007-03, Vol.17 (3), p.230-234</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4050-84c26bd46d137af39d3125ab1ad8a9e5d13bc4ef93b1644ae86220bd1aebe6303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4050-84c26bd46d137af39d3125ab1ad8a9e5d13bc4ef93b1644ae86220bd1aebe6303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1460-9592.2006.02080.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1460-9592.2006.02080.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17263737$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ALMENRADER, NICOLE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PASSARIELLO, MAURIZIO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COCCETTI, BRUNO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAIBERGER, ROBERTA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PIETROPAOLI, PAOLO</creatorcontrib><title>Steal-induction after clonidine premedication: a comparison of the oral and nasal route</title><title>Pediatric anesthesia</title><addtitle>Paediatr Anaesth</addtitle><description>Summary Background:  Clonidine premedication in children reliably provides preoperative sedation and anxiolysis, but onset of oral clonidine is known to be slow. Nasal clonidine has been shown to reach peak plasma levels within 10 min in rodents. The aim of the present study was to compare clinical effects and percentage of steal‐induction after clonidine premedication by the oral and nasal route. Methods:  Forty children, aged 1–6 years, scheduled for minor infraumbilical surgery, were randomly assigned to receive either pure clonidine 4 μg·kg−1 intranasally (group CN, n = 20) or clonidine 4 μg·kg−1 orally in syrup (group CO, n = 20) prior to mask induction. Drug acceptance, preoperative sedation and anxiolysis, quality of mask acceptance, recovery profile and parents’ satisfaction were evaluated. Results:  Drug acceptance was similar between groups, but quality of taste was significantly better in the oral group. There was no significant difference of preoperative anxiolysis and sedation. The onset of sedative effect was after 38.3 min for oral clonidine and 47.5 min for nasal clonidine. A steal‐induction could be performed in 60% of children in each group. Emergence from anesthesia and parents’ satisfaction were comparable. Conclusions:  Intranasal clonidine administration has no advantage over the oral route. Clinical effects were similar with both routes; there was a trend towards a faster onset of sedation with oral clonidine. Clonidine premedication causes light sleep, which allows a steal‐induction in 60% of patients.</description><subject>Anesthesia - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesia Recovery Period</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>clonidine</subject><subject>Clonidine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Drug Administration Routes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Premedication</subject><subject>steal-induction</subject><issn>1155-5645</issn><issn>1460-9592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkN2L1DAUxYMo7rr6L0iefGvNR5O2gg_LsB_CMgq7MuBLuE1uMWOnGZOWnf3vTZ1hffW-3EPuOSfwI4RyVvI8H7clrzQrWtWKUjCmSyZYw8rDC3L-fHiZNVeqULpSZ-RNSlvGuBRavCZnvBZa1rI-J5v7CWEo_OhmO_kwUugnjNQOYfTOj0j3EXfovIXl-okCtWG3h-hT9oaeTj-RhggDhdHREVJWMcwTviWvehgSvjvtC_L9-uphdVvcfb35srq8K2zFFCuaygrduUo7LmvoZeskFwo6Dq6BFlV-7myFfSs7rqsKsNFCsM5xwA61ZPKCfDj27mP4PWOazM4ni8MAI4Y5Gd20minNs7E5Gm0MKUXszT76HcQnw5lZoJqtWdiZhZ1ZoJq_UM0hR9-f_pi7zOJf8EQxGz4fDY9-wKf_LjbfLteLyvnimPdpwsNzHuIvo3O_Mpv1jRHrFd_c1tz8kH8Axb2VMA</recordid><startdate>200703</startdate><enddate>200703</enddate><creator>ALMENRADER, NICOLE</creator><creator>PASSARIELLO, MAURIZIO</creator><creator>COCCETTI, BRUNO</creator><creator>HAIBERGER, ROBERTA</creator><creator>PIETROPAOLI, PAOLO</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200703</creationdate><title>Steal-induction after clonidine premedication: a comparison of the oral and nasal route</title><author>ALMENRADER, NICOLE ; PASSARIELLO, MAURIZIO ; COCCETTI, BRUNO ; HAIBERGER, ROBERTA ; PIETROPAOLI, PAOLO</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4050-84c26bd46d137af39d3125ab1ad8a9e5d13bc4ef93b1644ae86220bd1aebe6303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesia Recovery Period</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>clonidine</topic><topic>Clonidine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Drug Administration Routes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Premedication</topic><topic>steal-induction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ALMENRADER, NICOLE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PASSARIELLO, MAURIZIO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COCCETTI, BRUNO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAIBERGER, ROBERTA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PIETROPAOLI, PAOLO</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ALMENRADER, NICOLE</au><au>PASSARIELLO, MAURIZIO</au><au>COCCETTI, BRUNO</au><au>HAIBERGER, ROBERTA</au><au>PIETROPAOLI, PAOLO</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Steal-induction after clonidine premedication: a comparison of the oral and nasal route</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Paediatr Anaesth</addtitle><date>2007-03</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>230</spage><epage>234</epage><pages>230-234</pages><issn>1155-5645</issn><eissn>1460-9592</eissn><abstract>Summary Background:  Clonidine premedication in children reliably provides preoperative sedation and anxiolysis, but onset of oral clonidine is known to be slow. Nasal clonidine has been shown to reach peak plasma levels within 10 min in rodents. The aim of the present study was to compare clinical effects and percentage of steal‐induction after clonidine premedication by the oral and nasal route. Methods:  Forty children, aged 1–6 years, scheduled for minor infraumbilical surgery, were randomly assigned to receive either pure clonidine 4 μg·kg−1 intranasally (group CN, n = 20) or clonidine 4 μg·kg−1 orally in syrup (group CO, n = 20) prior to mask induction. Drug acceptance, preoperative sedation and anxiolysis, quality of mask acceptance, recovery profile and parents’ satisfaction were evaluated. Results:  Drug acceptance was similar between groups, but quality of taste was significantly better in the oral group. There was no significant difference of preoperative anxiolysis and sedation. The onset of sedative effect was after 38.3 min for oral clonidine and 47.5 min for nasal clonidine. A steal‐induction could be performed in 60% of children in each group. Emergence from anesthesia and parents’ satisfaction were comparable. Conclusions:  Intranasal clonidine administration has no advantage over the oral route. Clinical effects were similar with both routes; there was a trend towards a faster onset of sedation with oral clonidine. Clonidine premedication causes light sleep, which allows a steal‐induction in 60% of patients.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>17263737</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02080.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1155-5645
ispartof Pediatric anesthesia, 2007-03, Vol.17 (3), p.230-234
issn 1155-5645
1460-9592
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68960561
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects Anesthesia - methods
Anesthesia Recovery Period
Chi-Square Distribution
Child, Preschool
clonidine
Clonidine - administration & dosage
Drug Administration Routes
Female
Humans
Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration & dosage
Infant
Male
Premedication
steal-induction
title Steal-induction after clonidine premedication: a comparison of the oral and nasal route
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T12%3A36%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Steal-induction%20after%20clonidine%20premedication:%20a%20comparison%20of%20the%20oral%20and%20nasal%20route&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20anesthesia&rft.au=ALMENRADER,%20NICOLE&rft.date=2007-03&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=230&rft.epage=234&rft.pages=230-234&rft.issn=1155-5645&rft.eissn=1460-9592&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02080.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68960561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68960561&rft_id=info:pmid/17263737&rfr_iscdi=true