Osmotic adjustment in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) results in no yield benefit under terminal drought

Variation in osmotic adjustment (OA) among chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars has been observed when exposed to terminal drought, but some studies suggest that this benefits yield while others suggest it does not benefit yield in water-limited environments. In the present study, parents differi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental botany 2007-01, Vol.58 (2), p.187-194
Hauptverfasser: Turner, Neil C, Abbo, Shahal, Berger, Jens D, Chaturvedi, SK, French, Robert J, Ludwig, Christiane, Mannur, DM, Singh, SJ, Yadava, HS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 194
container_issue 2
container_start_page 187
container_title Journal of experimental botany
container_volume 58
creator Turner, Neil C
Abbo, Shahal
Berger, Jens D
Chaturvedi, SK
French, Robert J
Ludwig, Christiane
Mannur, DM
Singh, SJ
Yadava, HS
description Variation in osmotic adjustment (OA) among chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars has been observed when exposed to terminal drought, but some studies suggest that this benefits yield while others suggest it does not benefit yield in water-limited environments. In the present study, parents differing in OA were crossed and a set of advanced breeding lines (ABLs) developed for yield testing. The variation in OA during podding was measured under terminal drought in the F2, F3, F7, and F8 progeny and in the parents by either rehydrating the leaves before sampling for osmotic potential (OP) or by measuring the relative water content (RWC) and OP on adjacent leaves for the calculation of the OP at full turgor. Yields were measured in the F8 progeny under terminal drought in Australia and India. While differences in OA were measured in the chickpea lines and parents, OA varied from year to year and did not consistently benefit yield when measured in the field under terminal drought. In Australia, differences in OA were not associated with any yield benefit in any year, while in India early flowering resulted in higher yields at three of the four sites, and OA had an inconsistent effect on seed yields. A comparison of OP at full turgor measured after rehydration and from measurements of RWC and OP showed that the rehydration technique underestimated OA. The lack of contribution of OA to yield of chickpea is discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jxb/erl192
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68957889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24036474</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/jxb/erl192</oup_id><sourcerecordid>24036474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-cc6c1b03f1491f3158533c552c158e916c02579eb6c87fc31445b516202412023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1rFDEUAPAgil2rF-9qEBQVps33zBxlUVdYLagF6SVkMpk205nJNh_Q_vdmmKULHvSSBN6P9_LeA-A5RicY1fS0v21OjR9wTR6AFWYCFYRR_BCsECKkQDUvj8CTEHqEEEecPwZHuERVRQVdge4sjC5aDVXbpxBHM0VoJ6ivrL7eGQXfra02HipvTbRTGuH25D30JqQhhhlODt5ZM7SwMZPpbIRparOPxo92UgNsvUuXV_EpeNSpIZhn-_sYnH_-9Gu9KbZnX76uP24LzQmNhdZC4wbRDrMadxTzilOqOSc6P02NhUaEl7VphK7KTlPMGG84FgQRhvNBj8HbJe_Ou5tkQpSjDdoMg5qMS0GKKk-jqur_QlxzRhia4eu_YO-Sz60FSShHWJRiLvthQdq7ELzp5M7bUfk7iZGcdyTzjuSyo4xf7jOmZjTtge6XksGbPVBBq6HzatI2HFweCs6dH5xLu38XfLG4PkTn72VujwpWznmKJW5DNLf3ceWvpShpyeXm94Xk9ffN-gf-Ji-yf7X4TjmpLn3-2_lPgjBFKGejjNM_x5_Gog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235016762</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Osmotic adjustment in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) results in no yield benefit under terminal drought</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Turner, Neil C ; Abbo, Shahal ; Berger, Jens D ; Chaturvedi, SK ; French, Robert J ; Ludwig, Christiane ; Mannur, DM ; Singh, SJ ; Yadava, HS</creator><creatorcontrib>Turner, Neil C ; Abbo, Shahal ; Berger, Jens D ; Chaturvedi, SK ; French, Robert J ; Ludwig, Christiane ; Mannur, DM ; Singh, SJ ; Yadava, HS</creatorcontrib><description>Variation in osmotic adjustment (OA) among chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars has been observed when exposed to terminal drought, but some studies suggest that this benefits yield while others suggest it does not benefit yield in water-limited environments. In the present study, parents differing in OA were crossed and a set of advanced breeding lines (ABLs) developed for yield testing. The variation in OA during podding was measured under terminal drought in the F2, F3, F7, and F8 progeny and in the parents by either rehydrating the leaves before sampling for osmotic potential (OP) or by measuring the relative water content (RWC) and OP on adjacent leaves for the calculation of the OP at full turgor. Yields were measured in the F8 progeny under terminal drought in Australia and India. While differences in OA were measured in the chickpea lines and parents, OA varied from year to year and did not consistently benefit yield when measured in the field under terminal drought. In Australia, differences in OA were not associated with any yield benefit in any year, while in India early flowering resulted in higher yields at three of the four sites, and OA had an inconsistent effect on seed yields. A comparison of OP at full turgor measured after rehydration and from measurements of RWC and OP showed that the rehydration technique underestimated OA. The lack of contribution of OA to yield of chickpea is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0957</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2431</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erl192</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17088363</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEBOA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Advanced breeding lines ; Agriculture ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Australia ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breeding ; Chickpeas ; Cicer - genetics ; Cicer - physiology ; Disasters ; Drought ; early flowering ; Economic plant physiology ; Environment, Controlled ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genotypes ; India ; Osmotic Pressure ; Phenology ; Plant Leaves - physiology ; Plants ; Rain ; Seed productivity ; Seeds - physiology ; Soil water ; Solutes ; SPECIAL ISSUE PAPER ; terminal drought ; Water - metabolism ; Water relations, transpiration, stomata ; yield components</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental botany, 2007-01, Vol.58 (2), p.187-194</ispartof><rights>Society for Experimental Biology 2007</rights><rights>The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2007</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Jan 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-cc6c1b03f1491f3158533c552c158e916c02579eb6c87fc31445b516202412023</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24036474$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24036474$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>310,311,315,782,786,791,792,805,1586,23937,23938,25147,27931,27932,58024,58257</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18531144$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17088363$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turner, Neil C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbo, Shahal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Jens D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaturvedi, SK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mannur, DM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, SJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadava, HS</creatorcontrib><title>Osmotic adjustment in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) results in no yield benefit under terminal drought</title><title>Journal of experimental botany</title><addtitle>J Exp Bot</addtitle><description>Variation in osmotic adjustment (OA) among chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars has been observed when exposed to terminal drought, but some studies suggest that this benefits yield while others suggest it does not benefit yield in water-limited environments. In the present study, parents differing in OA were crossed and a set of advanced breeding lines (ABLs) developed for yield testing. The variation in OA during podding was measured under terminal drought in the F2, F3, F7, and F8 progeny and in the parents by either rehydrating the leaves before sampling for osmotic potential (OP) or by measuring the relative water content (RWC) and OP on adjacent leaves for the calculation of the OP at full turgor. Yields were measured in the F8 progeny under terminal drought in Australia and India. While differences in OA were measured in the chickpea lines and parents, OA varied from year to year and did not consistently benefit yield when measured in the field under terminal drought. In Australia, differences in OA were not associated with any yield benefit in any year, while in India early flowering resulted in higher yields at three of the four sites, and OA had an inconsistent effect on seed yields. A comparison of OP at full turgor measured after rehydration and from measurements of RWC and OP showed that the rehydration technique underestimated OA. The lack of contribution of OA to yield of chickpea is discussed.</description><subject>Advanced breeding lines</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Chickpeas</subject><subject>Cicer - genetics</subject><subject>Cicer - physiology</subject><subject>Disasters</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>early flowering</subject><subject>Economic plant physiology</subject><subject>Environment, Controlled</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Osmotic Pressure</subject><subject>Phenology</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - physiology</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Seed productivity</subject><subject>Seeds - physiology</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Solutes</subject><subject>SPECIAL ISSUE PAPER</subject><subject>terminal drought</subject><subject>Water - metabolism</subject><subject>Water relations, transpiration, stomata</subject><subject>yield components</subject><issn>0022-0957</issn><issn>1460-2431</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c1rFDEUAPAgil2rF-9qEBQVps33zBxlUVdYLagF6SVkMpk205nJNh_Q_vdmmKULHvSSBN6P9_LeA-A5RicY1fS0v21OjR9wTR6AFWYCFYRR_BCsECKkQDUvj8CTEHqEEEecPwZHuERVRQVdge4sjC5aDVXbpxBHM0VoJ6ivrL7eGQXfra02HipvTbRTGuH25D30JqQhhhlODt5ZM7SwMZPpbIRparOPxo92UgNsvUuXV_EpeNSpIZhn-_sYnH_-9Gu9KbZnX76uP24LzQmNhdZC4wbRDrMadxTzilOqOSc6P02NhUaEl7VphK7KTlPMGG84FgQRhvNBj8HbJe_Ou5tkQpSjDdoMg5qMS0GKKk-jqur_QlxzRhia4eu_YO-Sz60FSShHWJRiLvthQdq7ELzp5M7bUfk7iZGcdyTzjuSyo4xf7jOmZjTtge6XksGbPVBBq6HzatI2HFweCs6dH5xLu38XfLG4PkTn72VujwpWznmKJW5DNLf3ceWvpShpyeXm94Xk9ffN-gf-Ji-yf7X4TjmpLn3-2_lPgjBFKGejjNM_x5_Gog</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Turner, Neil C</creator><creator>Abbo, Shahal</creator><creator>Berger, Jens D</creator><creator>Chaturvedi, SK</creator><creator>French, Robert J</creator><creator>Ludwig, Christiane</creator><creator>Mannur, DM</creator><creator>Singh, SJ</creator><creator>Yadava, HS</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>Osmotic adjustment in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) results in no yield benefit under terminal drought</title><author>Turner, Neil C ; Abbo, Shahal ; Berger, Jens D ; Chaturvedi, SK ; French, Robert J ; Ludwig, Christiane ; Mannur, DM ; Singh, SJ ; Yadava, HS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-cc6c1b03f1491f3158533c552c158e916c02579eb6c87fc31445b516202412023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Advanced breeding lines</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Chickpeas</topic><topic>Cicer - genetics</topic><topic>Cicer - physiology</topic><topic>Disasters</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>early flowering</topic><topic>Economic plant physiology</topic><topic>Environment, Controlled</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Osmotic Pressure</topic><topic>Phenology</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - physiology</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Seed productivity</topic><topic>Seeds - physiology</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Solutes</topic><topic>SPECIAL ISSUE PAPER</topic><topic>terminal drought</topic><topic>Water - metabolism</topic><topic>Water relations, transpiration, stomata</topic><topic>yield components</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turner, Neil C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbo, Shahal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Jens D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaturvedi, SK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mannur, DM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, SJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadava, HS</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turner, Neil C</au><au>Abbo, Shahal</au><au>Berger, Jens D</au><au>Chaturvedi, SK</au><au>French, Robert J</au><au>Ludwig, Christiane</au><au>Mannur, DM</au><au>Singh, SJ</au><au>Yadava, HS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Osmotic adjustment in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) results in no yield benefit under terminal drought</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental botany</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Bot</addtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>187-194</pages><issn>0022-0957</issn><eissn>1460-2431</eissn><coden>JEBOA6</coden><abstract>Variation in osmotic adjustment (OA) among chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars has been observed when exposed to terminal drought, but some studies suggest that this benefits yield while others suggest it does not benefit yield in water-limited environments. In the present study, parents differing in OA were crossed and a set of advanced breeding lines (ABLs) developed for yield testing. The variation in OA during podding was measured under terminal drought in the F2, F3, F7, and F8 progeny and in the parents by either rehydrating the leaves before sampling for osmotic potential (OP) or by measuring the relative water content (RWC) and OP on adjacent leaves for the calculation of the OP at full turgor. Yields were measured in the F8 progeny under terminal drought in Australia and India. While differences in OA were measured in the chickpea lines and parents, OA varied from year to year and did not consistently benefit yield when measured in the field under terminal drought. In Australia, differences in OA were not associated with any yield benefit in any year, while in India early flowering resulted in higher yields at three of the four sites, and OA had an inconsistent effect on seed yields. A comparison of OP at full turgor measured after rehydration and from measurements of RWC and OP showed that the rehydration technique underestimated OA. The lack of contribution of OA to yield of chickpea is discussed.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>17088363</pmid><doi>10.1093/jxb/erl192</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0957
ispartof Journal of experimental botany, 2007-01, Vol.58 (2), p.187-194
issn 0022-0957
1460-2431
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68957889
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Advanced breeding lines
Agriculture
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Australia
Biological and medical sciences
Breeding
Chickpeas
Cicer - genetics
Cicer - physiology
Disasters
Drought
early flowering
Economic plant physiology
Environment, Controlled
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genotypes
India
Osmotic Pressure
Phenology
Plant Leaves - physiology
Plants
Rain
Seed productivity
Seeds - physiology
Soil water
Solutes
SPECIAL ISSUE PAPER
terminal drought
Water - metabolism
Water relations, transpiration, stomata
yield components
title Osmotic adjustment in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) results in no yield benefit under terminal drought
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T19%3A38%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Osmotic%20adjustment%20in%20chickpea%20(Cicer%20arietinum%20L.)%20results%20in%20no%20yield%20benefit%20under%20terminal%20drought&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20botany&rft.au=Turner,%20Neil%20C&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=187-194&rft.issn=0022-0957&rft.eissn=1460-2431&rft.coden=JEBOA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jxb/erl192&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24036474%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235016762&rft_id=info:pmid/17088363&rft_jstor_id=24036474&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jxb/erl192&rfr_iscdi=true