Lateral Trans-Biceps Popliteal Block for Elective Foot and Ankle Surgery Performed after Induction of General Anesthesia
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine safety and efficacy of lateral transtendinous popliteal blocks performed after induction of general anesthesia for intraoperative and postoperative pain control in elective foot and ankle surgery. Methods: The charts of 475 consecutive patients...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Foot & ankle international 2006-09, Vol.27 (9), p.667-671 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 671 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 667 |
| container_title | Foot & ankle international |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | Herr, Mark J. Keyarash, Ario B. Muir, Jesse J. Kile, Todd A. Claridge, Richard J. |
| description | Background: The purpose of this study was to determine safety and efficacy of lateral transtendinous popliteal blocks performed after induction of general anesthesia for intraoperative and postoperative pain control in elective foot and ankle surgery. Methods: The charts of 475 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. The technique was a lateral transtendinous popliteal block under nerve stimulator direction (described in the text). Patient records were retrospectively evaluated from the postanesthesia care unit, as well as at followup on postoperative day 1 and weeks 2, 6, and 12. Results: The block was complete in 398 patients (83.7%). An incomplete block was found in 77 patients (16.2%). In the incomplete category, 21 patients (4.4%) had no pain but some motor function, 32 patients (6.5%) reported mild to moderate pain, and 24 patients (5.3%) had severe pain. The average block duration was 16.5 hours. There were no adverse effects documented in any patient at followup. Conclusions: Lateral popliteal nerve block after induction of general anesthesia appears to be safe and effective for intraoperative and postoperative pain control in elective foot and ankle surgery. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/107110070602700902 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68955138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_107110070602700902</sage_id><sourcerecordid>68955138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d61b1aa7c6bb7a899a1e4f03e9cc259b1ee565d19907e609cce02d04ed664c703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LxDAQxYMofqz-Ax4kJ2_VmX4kzXGV9QMWFNRzSdOpVrvJmrSi_71Zd8GD4GmG4ffe8B5jxwhniFKeI0hEAAkCUgmgIN1i-6jyPJGlFNtxj0CyIvbYQQivACgzVLtsDyVkZSqLffY51wN53fNHr21ILjpDy8Dv3bLvBorni96ZN946z2c9maH7IH7l3MC1bfjUvvXEH0b_TP6L35OP2IIarttoyW9tM0aBs9y1_Jrsz5eppTC8UOj0IdtpdR_oaDMn7Olq9nh5k8zvrm8vp_PEZDkOSSOwRq2lEXUtdamURspbyEgZkxaqRqJCFA0qBZIExCtB2kBOjRC5iTEn7HTtu_TufYzfq0UXDPW9tuTGUIlSFQVmZQTTNWi8C8FTWy19t9D-q0KoVn1Xf_uOopON-1jH6L-STcEROF8DQT9T9epGb2Pa_yy_AQAoiOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68955138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lateral Trans-Biceps Popliteal Block for Elective Foot and Ankle Surgery Performed after Induction of General Anesthesia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Herr, Mark J. ; Keyarash, Ario B. ; Muir, Jesse J. ; Kile, Todd A. ; Claridge, Richard J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Herr, Mark J. ; Keyarash, Ario B. ; Muir, Jesse J. ; Kile, Todd A. ; Claridge, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The purpose of this study was to determine safety and efficacy of lateral transtendinous popliteal blocks performed after induction of general anesthesia for intraoperative and postoperative pain control in elective foot and ankle surgery. Methods: The charts of 475 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. The technique was a lateral transtendinous popliteal block under nerve stimulator direction (described in the text). Patient records were retrospectively evaluated from the postanesthesia care unit, as well as at followup on postoperative day 1 and weeks 2, 6, and 12. Results: The block was complete in 398 patients (83.7%). An incomplete block was found in 77 patients (16.2%). In the incomplete category, 21 patients (4.4%) had no pain but some motor function, 32 patients (6.5%) reported mild to moderate pain, and 24 patients (5.3%) had severe pain. The average block duration was 16.5 hours. There were no adverse effects documented in any patient at followup. Conclusions: Lateral popliteal nerve block after induction of general anesthesia appears to be safe and effective for intraoperative and postoperative pain control in elective foot and ankle surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-1007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7876</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/107110070602700902</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17038275</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Anesthesia, General ; Ankle - surgery ; Elective Surgical Procedures ; Female ; Foot - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Nerve Block - methods ; Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Foot & ankle international, 2006-09, Vol.27 (9), p.667-671</ispartof><rights>2006 American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d61b1aa7c6bb7a899a1e4f03e9cc259b1ee565d19907e609cce02d04ed664c703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d61b1aa7c6bb7a899a1e4f03e9cc259b1ee565d19907e609cce02d04ed664c703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/107110070602700902$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/107110070602700902$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17038275$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herr, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keyarash, Ario B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muir, Jesse J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kile, Todd A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claridge, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><title>Lateral Trans-Biceps Popliteal Block for Elective Foot and Ankle Surgery Performed after Induction of General Anesthesia</title><title>Foot & ankle international</title><addtitle>Foot Ankle Int</addtitle><description>Background: The purpose of this study was to determine safety and efficacy of lateral transtendinous popliteal blocks performed after induction of general anesthesia for intraoperative and postoperative pain control in elective foot and ankle surgery. Methods: The charts of 475 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. The technique was a lateral transtendinous popliteal block under nerve stimulator direction (described in the text). Patient records were retrospectively evaluated from the postanesthesia care unit, as well as at followup on postoperative day 1 and weeks 2, 6, and 12. Results: The block was complete in 398 patients (83.7%). An incomplete block was found in 77 patients (16.2%). In the incomplete category, 21 patients (4.4%) had no pain but some motor function, 32 patients (6.5%) reported mild to moderate pain, and 24 patients (5.3%) had severe pain. The average block duration was 16.5 hours. There were no adverse effects documented in any patient at followup. Conclusions: Lateral popliteal nerve block after induction of general anesthesia appears to be safe and effective for intraoperative and postoperative pain control in elective foot and ankle surgery.</description><subject>Anesthesia, General</subject><subject>Ankle - surgery</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foot - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nerve Block - methods</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1071-1007</issn><issn>1944-7876</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LxDAQxYMofqz-Ax4kJ2_VmX4kzXGV9QMWFNRzSdOpVrvJmrSi_71Zd8GD4GmG4ffe8B5jxwhniFKeI0hEAAkCUgmgIN1i-6jyPJGlFNtxj0CyIvbYQQivACgzVLtsDyVkZSqLffY51wN53fNHr21ILjpDy8Dv3bLvBorni96ZN946z2c9maH7IH7l3MC1bfjUvvXEH0b_TP6L35OP2IIarttoyW9tM0aBs9y1_Jrsz5eppTC8UOj0IdtpdR_oaDMn7Olq9nh5k8zvrm8vp_PEZDkOSSOwRq2lEXUtdamURspbyEgZkxaqRqJCFA0qBZIExCtB2kBOjRC5iTEn7HTtu_TufYzfq0UXDPW9tuTGUIlSFQVmZQTTNWi8C8FTWy19t9D-q0KoVn1Xf_uOopON-1jH6L-STcEROF8DQT9T9epGb2Pa_yy_AQAoiOw</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>Herr, Mark J.</creator><creator>Keyarash, Ario B.</creator><creator>Muir, Jesse J.</creator><creator>Kile, Todd A.</creator><creator>Claridge, Richard J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>Lateral Trans-Biceps Popliteal Block for Elective Foot and Ankle Surgery Performed after Induction of General Anesthesia</title><author>Herr, Mark J. ; Keyarash, Ario B. ; Muir, Jesse J. ; Kile, Todd A. ; Claridge, Richard J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d61b1aa7c6bb7a899a1e4f03e9cc259b1ee565d19907e609cce02d04ed664c703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia, General</topic><topic>Ankle - surgery</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foot - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nerve Block - methods</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herr, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keyarash, Ario B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muir, Jesse J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kile, Todd A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claridge, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Foot & ankle international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herr, Mark J.</au><au>Keyarash, Ario B.</au><au>Muir, Jesse J.</au><au>Kile, Todd A.</au><au>Claridge, Richard J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lateral Trans-Biceps Popliteal Block for Elective Foot and Ankle Surgery Performed after Induction of General Anesthesia</atitle><jtitle>Foot & ankle international</jtitle><addtitle>Foot Ankle Int</addtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>667</spage><epage>671</epage><pages>667-671</pages><issn>1071-1007</issn><eissn>1944-7876</eissn><abstract>Background: The purpose of this study was to determine safety and efficacy of lateral transtendinous popliteal blocks performed after induction of general anesthesia for intraoperative and postoperative pain control in elective foot and ankle surgery. Methods: The charts of 475 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. The technique was a lateral transtendinous popliteal block under nerve stimulator direction (described in the text). Patient records were retrospectively evaluated from the postanesthesia care unit, as well as at followup on postoperative day 1 and weeks 2, 6, and 12. Results: The block was complete in 398 patients (83.7%). An incomplete block was found in 77 patients (16.2%). In the incomplete category, 21 patients (4.4%) had no pain but some motor function, 32 patients (6.5%) reported mild to moderate pain, and 24 patients (5.3%) had severe pain. The average block duration was 16.5 hours. There were no adverse effects documented in any patient at followup. Conclusions: Lateral popliteal nerve block after induction of general anesthesia appears to be safe and effective for intraoperative and postoperative pain control in elective foot and ankle surgery.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>17038275</pmid><doi>10.1177/107110070602700902</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1071-1007 |
| ispartof | Foot & ankle international, 2006-09, Vol.27 (9), p.667-671 |
| issn | 1071-1007 1944-7876 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68955138 |
| source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
| subjects | Anesthesia, General Ankle - surgery Elective Surgical Procedures Female Foot - surgery Humans Male Nerve Block - methods Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control Retrospective Studies |
| title | Lateral Trans-Biceps Popliteal Block for Elective Foot and Ankle Surgery Performed after Induction of General Anesthesia |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A45%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lateral%20Trans-Biceps%20Popliteal%20Block%20for%20Elective%20Foot%20and%20Ankle%20Surgery%20Performed%20after%20Induction%20of%20General%20Anesthesia&rft.jtitle=Foot%20&%20ankle%20international&rft.au=Herr,%20Mark%20J.&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=667&rft.epage=671&rft.pages=667-671&rft.issn=1071-1007&rft.eissn=1944-7876&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/107110070602700902&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68955138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68955138&rft_id=info:pmid/17038275&rft_sage_id=10.1177_107110070602700902&rfr_iscdi=true |