Response of Broilers to Feeding Low-Calcium and Phosphorus Diets Plus Phytase Under Different Environmental Conditions: Body Weight and Tibiotarsus Mineralization
Three experiments on Ross broiler chickens were conducted in 3 locations: cages (Experiment 1), floor pens (Experiment 2), and commercial farms (Experiment 3). The effect of low-total P (TP) wheat-soybean based diets plus microbial phytase (Natuphos) was evaluated. Four experimental starter and fini...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Poultry science 2006-11, Vol.85 (11), p.1923-1931 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1931 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1923 |
container_title | Poultry science |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Catala-Gregori, P Garcia, V Hernandez, F Madrid, J Ceron, J.J |
description | Three experiments on Ross broiler chickens were conducted in 3 locations: cages (Experiment 1), floor pens (Experiment 2), and commercial farms (Experiment 3). The effect of low-total P (TP) wheat-soybean based diets plus microbial phytase (Natuphos) was evaluated. Four experimental starter and finisher diets were used in a 2-phase feeding program, as follows: control diet (SC until 21 d, FC from 22 to 42 d); 2 diets (SL400 and SL600 until 21 d, FL400 and FL600 from 22 to 42 d) with low TP (0.61% for starter and 0.54% for finisher), including 400 and 600 U/kg of phytase, respectively; and a very low-TP (0.52% for starter and 0.44% for finisher) diet (SVL600 until 21 d, FVL600 from 22 to 42 d) with 600 U/kg of phytase. In Experiment 1 (broilers in cages had movement limitation and no access to litter), no differences in BW, tibiotarsus mineralization, or mineral metabolism were observed among diets. In Experiment 2 (broilers in floor pens had movement limitation and access to litter), at 21 d of age, the lowest tibiotarsus ash percentage and BW were shown by birds fed the SVL600 diet. At 42 d of age, broilers fed the FC diet were the lightest. For the rest of the parameters of tibiotarsus mineralization and mineral metabolism measured in Experiment 2, no differences were shown. In Experiment 3 (broilers in commercial farms had access to litter without movement limitation), the BW of broilers fed the SC diet was the highest at 21 d of age. At 42 d of age, the broilers fed FL400 and FL600 diets were the heaviest. At the end of Experiment 3, broilers fed the FC diet had the highest dry litter Ca and P, whereas broilers fed the FVL600 diet had the lowest values. In conclusion, the very low-TP wheat-soybean based diet supplemented with 600 U/kg of phytase was sufficient to optimize all the parameters measured in Experiment 1 but not in Experiments 2 and 3. Therefore, when evaluating Ca and P in phytase-supplemented diets for broilers, it is necessary to bear in mind the environmental conditions of experimentation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ps/85.11.1923 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68952451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ps/85.11.1923</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1156039911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-db8216fbe379e552ebf610adb9a9a794c4dac848b6c85119a6d27bb79fdd0ae83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcGO0zAQhiMEYsvCkStYHBCXdD1OnNjc2LILSEVUsBVHy4knrVepHexkV-VxeFJcWgmJC6cZaT59M6M_y54DnQOVxcUQLwSfA8xBsuJBNgPOeF5ADQ-zGaUFy3kt4Sx7EuMtpQyqqn6cnUGdJoLxWfbrK8bBu4jEd-QyeNtjiGT05BrRWLchS3-fL3Tf2mlHtDNktfVx2PowRfLe4hjJqk_tarsfdZKsncGQBl2HAd1IrtydDd7tUq97svDO2NGmdW_JpTd78h3tZjv-8d7YxvpRh5hsn63DoHv7Ux_gp9mjTvcRn53qeba-vrpZfMyXXz58Wrxb5m0p6JibRqT3ugaLWiLnDJuuAqpNI7XUtSzb0uhWlKKpWsEBpK4Mq5umlp0xVKMozrPXR-8Q_I8J46h2NrbY99qhn6KqhOSs5JDAV_-At34KLt2mGCuAg5QHKD9CbfAxBuzUEOxOh70Cqg7JqSEqwRWAOiSX-Bcn6dTs0PylT1El4M0R8NPwX9fLI9ppr_Qm2KjW3xiFggJAxURd_AZN4K1K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223151991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response of Broilers to Feeding Low-Calcium and Phosphorus Diets Plus Phytase Under Different Environmental Conditions: Body Weight and Tibiotarsus Mineralization</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Catala-Gregori, P ; Garcia, V ; Hernandez, F ; Madrid, J ; Ceron, J.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Catala-Gregori, P ; Garcia, V ; Hernandez, F ; Madrid, J ; Ceron, J.J</creatorcontrib><description>Three experiments on Ross broiler chickens were conducted in 3 locations: cages (Experiment 1), floor pens (Experiment 2), and commercial farms (Experiment 3). The effect of low-total P (TP) wheat-soybean based diets plus microbial phytase (Natuphos) was evaluated. Four experimental starter and finisher diets were used in a 2-phase feeding program, as follows: control diet (SC until 21 d, FC from 22 to 42 d); 2 diets (SL400 and SL600 until 21 d, FL400 and FL600 from 22 to 42 d) with low TP (0.61% for starter and 0.54% for finisher), including 400 and 600 U/kg of phytase, respectively; and a very low-TP (0.52% for starter and 0.44% for finisher) diet (SVL600 until 21 d, FVL600 from 22 to 42 d) with 600 U/kg of phytase. In Experiment 1 (broilers in cages had movement limitation and no access to litter), no differences in BW, tibiotarsus mineralization, or mineral metabolism were observed among diets. In Experiment 2 (broilers in floor pens had movement limitation and access to litter), at 21 d of age, the lowest tibiotarsus ash percentage and BW were shown by birds fed the SVL600 diet. At 42 d of age, broilers fed the FC diet were the lightest. For the rest of the parameters of tibiotarsus mineralization and mineral metabolism measured in Experiment 2, no differences were shown. In Experiment 3 (broilers in commercial farms had access to litter without movement limitation), the BW of broilers fed the SC diet was the highest at 21 d of age. At 42 d of age, the broilers fed FL400 and FL600 diets were the heaviest. At the end of Experiment 3, broilers fed the FC diet had the highest dry litter Ca and P, whereas broilers fed the FVL600 diet had the lowest values. In conclusion, the very low-TP wheat-soybean based diet supplemented with 600 U/kg of phytase was sufficient to optimize all the parameters measured in Experiment 1 but not in Experiments 2 and 3. Therefore, when evaluating Ca and P in phytase-supplemented diets for broilers, it is necessary to bear in mind the environmental conditions of experimentation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ps/85.11.1923</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17032825</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>6-Phytase - administration & dosage ; alkaline phosphatase ; Animal Feed ; Animal Husbandry - methods ; Animals ; blood chemistry ; body weight ; bone density ; Bone Density - drug effects ; Bone Density - physiology ; Bone Density Conservation Agents - administration & dosage ; broiler chickens ; broiler feeding ; cages ; Calcium, Dietary - administration & dosage ; Chickens - growth & development ; Chickens - metabolism ; dietary minerals ; dose response ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; enzyme activity ; feed additives ; finishing ; liveweight gain ; Male ; mineral metabolism ; nutrient deficiencies ; pens ; Phosphorus, Dietary - administration & dosage ; phytases ; poultry industry ; Random Allocation ; starter diets ; Tarsus, Animal - metabolism ; Tarsus, Animal - physiology ; Tibia - metabolism ; Tibia - physiology ; Weight Gain - drug effects ; Weight Gain - physiology</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 2006-11, Vol.85 (11), p.1923-1931</ispartof><rights>2006 Poultry Science Association, Inc. 2006</rights><rights>Copyright Poultry Science Association Nov 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-db8216fbe379e552ebf610adb9a9a794c4dac848b6c85119a6d27bb79fdd0ae83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-db8216fbe379e552ebf610adb9a9a794c4dac848b6c85119a6d27bb79fdd0ae83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17032825$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Catala-Gregori, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madrid, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceron, J.J</creatorcontrib><title>Response of Broilers to Feeding Low-Calcium and Phosphorus Diets Plus Phytase Under Different Environmental Conditions: Body Weight and Tibiotarsus Mineralization</title><title>Poultry science</title><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><description>Three experiments on Ross broiler chickens were conducted in 3 locations: cages (Experiment 1), floor pens (Experiment 2), and commercial farms (Experiment 3). The effect of low-total P (TP) wheat-soybean based diets plus microbial phytase (Natuphos) was evaluated. Four experimental starter and finisher diets were used in a 2-phase feeding program, as follows: control diet (SC until 21 d, FC from 22 to 42 d); 2 diets (SL400 and SL600 until 21 d, FL400 and FL600 from 22 to 42 d) with low TP (0.61% for starter and 0.54% for finisher), including 400 and 600 U/kg of phytase, respectively; and a very low-TP (0.52% for starter and 0.44% for finisher) diet (SVL600 until 21 d, FVL600 from 22 to 42 d) with 600 U/kg of phytase. In Experiment 1 (broilers in cages had movement limitation and no access to litter), no differences in BW, tibiotarsus mineralization, or mineral metabolism were observed among diets. In Experiment 2 (broilers in floor pens had movement limitation and access to litter), at 21 d of age, the lowest tibiotarsus ash percentage and BW were shown by birds fed the SVL600 diet. At 42 d of age, broilers fed the FC diet were the lightest. For the rest of the parameters of tibiotarsus mineralization and mineral metabolism measured in Experiment 2, no differences were shown. In Experiment 3 (broilers in commercial farms had access to litter without movement limitation), the BW of broilers fed the SC diet was the highest at 21 d of age. At 42 d of age, the broilers fed FL400 and FL600 diets were the heaviest. At the end of Experiment 3, broilers fed the FC diet had the highest dry litter Ca and P, whereas broilers fed the FVL600 diet had the lowest values. In conclusion, the very low-TP wheat-soybean based diet supplemented with 600 U/kg of phytase was sufficient to optimize all the parameters measured in Experiment 1 but not in Experiments 2 and 3. Therefore, when evaluating Ca and P in phytase-supplemented diets for broilers, it is necessary to bear in mind the environmental conditions of experimentation.</description><subject>6-Phytase - administration & dosage</subject><subject>alkaline phosphatase</subject><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>blood chemistry</subject><subject>body weight</subject><subject>bone density</subject><subject>Bone Density - drug effects</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Density Conservation Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>broiler chickens</subject><subject>broiler feeding</subject><subject>cages</subject><subject>Calcium, Dietary - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Chickens - growth & development</subject><subject>Chickens - metabolism</subject><subject>dietary minerals</subject><subject>dose response</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>enzyme activity</subject><subject>feed additives</subject><subject>finishing</subject><subject>liveweight gain</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>mineral metabolism</subject><subject>nutrient deficiencies</subject><subject>pens</subject><subject>Phosphorus, Dietary - administration & dosage</subject><subject>phytases</subject><subject>poultry industry</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>starter diets</subject><subject>Tarsus, Animal - metabolism</subject><subject>Tarsus, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Tibia - metabolism</subject><subject>Tibia - physiology</subject><subject>Weight Gain - drug effects</subject><subject>Weight Gain - physiology</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcGO0zAQhiMEYsvCkStYHBCXdD1OnNjc2LILSEVUsBVHy4knrVepHexkV-VxeFJcWgmJC6cZaT59M6M_y54DnQOVxcUQLwSfA8xBsuJBNgPOeF5ADQ-zGaUFy3kt4Sx7EuMtpQyqqn6cnUGdJoLxWfbrK8bBu4jEd-QyeNtjiGT05BrRWLchS3-fL3Tf2mlHtDNktfVx2PowRfLe4hjJqk_tarsfdZKsncGQBl2HAd1IrtydDd7tUq97svDO2NGmdW_JpTd78h3tZjv-8d7YxvpRh5hsn63DoHv7Ux_gp9mjTvcRn53qeba-vrpZfMyXXz58Wrxb5m0p6JibRqT3ugaLWiLnDJuuAqpNI7XUtSzb0uhWlKKpWsEBpK4Mq5umlp0xVKMozrPXR-8Q_I8J46h2NrbY99qhn6KqhOSs5JDAV_-At34KLt2mGCuAg5QHKD9CbfAxBuzUEOxOh70Cqg7JqSEqwRWAOiSX-Bcn6dTs0PylT1El4M0R8NPwX9fLI9ppr_Qm2KjW3xiFggJAxURd_AZN4K1K</recordid><startdate>20061101</startdate><enddate>20061101</enddate><creator>Catala-Gregori, P</creator><creator>Garcia, V</creator><creator>Hernandez, F</creator><creator>Madrid, J</creator><creator>Ceron, J.J</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061101</creationdate><title>Response of Broilers to Feeding Low-Calcium and Phosphorus Diets Plus Phytase Under Different Environmental Conditions: Body Weight and Tibiotarsus Mineralization</title><author>Catala-Gregori, P ; Garcia, V ; Hernandez, F ; Madrid, J ; Ceron, J.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-db8216fbe379e552ebf610adb9a9a794c4dac848b6c85119a6d27bb79fdd0ae83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>6-Phytase - administration & dosage</topic><topic>alkaline phosphatase</topic><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry - methods</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>blood chemistry</topic><topic>body weight</topic><topic>bone density</topic><topic>Bone Density - drug effects</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Density Conservation Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>broiler chickens</topic><topic>broiler feeding</topic><topic>cages</topic><topic>Calcium, Dietary - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Chickens - growth & development</topic><topic>Chickens - metabolism</topic><topic>dietary minerals</topic><topic>dose response</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>enzyme activity</topic><topic>feed additives</topic><topic>finishing</topic><topic>liveweight gain</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>mineral metabolism</topic><topic>nutrient deficiencies</topic><topic>pens</topic><topic>Phosphorus, Dietary - administration & dosage</topic><topic>phytases</topic><topic>poultry industry</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>starter diets</topic><topic>Tarsus, Animal - metabolism</topic><topic>Tarsus, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Tibia - metabolism</topic><topic>Tibia - physiology</topic><topic>Weight Gain - drug effects</topic><topic>Weight Gain - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Catala-Gregori, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madrid, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceron, J.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Catala-Gregori, P</au><au>Garcia, V</au><au>Hernandez, F</au><au>Madrid, J</au><au>Ceron, J.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response of Broilers to Feeding Low-Calcium and Phosphorus Diets Plus Phytase Under Different Environmental Conditions: Body Weight and Tibiotarsus Mineralization</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><date>2006-11-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1923</spage><epage>1931</epage><pages>1923-1931</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><eissn>1525-3171</eissn><abstract>Three experiments on Ross broiler chickens were conducted in 3 locations: cages (Experiment 1), floor pens (Experiment 2), and commercial farms (Experiment 3). The effect of low-total P (TP) wheat-soybean based diets plus microbial phytase (Natuphos) was evaluated. Four experimental starter and finisher diets were used in a 2-phase feeding program, as follows: control diet (SC until 21 d, FC from 22 to 42 d); 2 diets (SL400 and SL600 until 21 d, FL400 and FL600 from 22 to 42 d) with low TP (0.61% for starter and 0.54% for finisher), including 400 and 600 U/kg of phytase, respectively; and a very low-TP (0.52% for starter and 0.44% for finisher) diet (SVL600 until 21 d, FVL600 from 22 to 42 d) with 600 U/kg of phytase. In Experiment 1 (broilers in cages had movement limitation and no access to litter), no differences in BW, tibiotarsus mineralization, or mineral metabolism were observed among diets. In Experiment 2 (broilers in floor pens had movement limitation and access to litter), at 21 d of age, the lowest tibiotarsus ash percentage and BW were shown by birds fed the SVL600 diet. At 42 d of age, broilers fed the FC diet were the lightest. For the rest of the parameters of tibiotarsus mineralization and mineral metabolism measured in Experiment 2, no differences were shown. In Experiment 3 (broilers in commercial farms had access to litter without movement limitation), the BW of broilers fed the SC diet was the highest at 21 d of age. At 42 d of age, the broilers fed FL400 and FL600 diets were the heaviest. At the end of Experiment 3, broilers fed the FC diet had the highest dry litter Ca and P, whereas broilers fed the FVL600 diet had the lowest values. In conclusion, the very low-TP wheat-soybean based diet supplemented with 600 U/kg of phytase was sufficient to optimize all the parameters measured in Experiment 1 but not in Experiments 2 and 3. Therefore, when evaluating Ca and P in phytase-supplemented diets for broilers, it is necessary to bear in mind the environmental conditions of experimentation.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>17032825</pmid><doi>10.1093/ps/85.11.1923</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-5791 |
ispartof | Poultry science, 2006-11, Vol.85 (11), p.1923-1931 |
issn | 0032-5791 1525-3171 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68952451 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | 6-Phytase - administration & dosage alkaline phosphatase Animal Feed Animal Husbandry - methods Animals blood chemistry body weight bone density Bone Density - drug effects Bone Density - physiology Bone Density Conservation Agents - administration & dosage broiler chickens broiler feeding cages Calcium, Dietary - administration & dosage Chickens - growth & development Chickens - metabolism dietary minerals dose response Dose-Response Relationship, Drug enzyme activity feed additives finishing liveweight gain Male mineral metabolism nutrient deficiencies pens Phosphorus, Dietary - administration & dosage phytases poultry industry Random Allocation starter diets Tarsus, Animal - metabolism Tarsus, Animal - physiology Tibia - metabolism Tibia - physiology Weight Gain - drug effects Weight Gain - physiology |
title | Response of Broilers to Feeding Low-Calcium and Phosphorus Diets Plus Phytase Under Different Environmental Conditions: Body Weight and Tibiotarsus Mineralization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T21%3A17%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20of%20Broilers%20to%20Feeding%20Low-Calcium%20and%20Phosphorus%20Diets%20Plus%20Phytase%20Under%20Different%20Environmental%20Conditions:%20Body%20Weight%20and%20Tibiotarsus%20Mineralization&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Catala-Gregori,%20P&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1923&rft.epage=1931&rft.pages=1923-1931&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft.eissn=1525-3171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ps/85.11.1923&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1156039911%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223151991&rft_id=info:pmid/17032825&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ps/85.11.1923&rfr_iscdi=true |