Response of Broilers to Feeding Low-Calcium and Phosphorus Diets Plus Phytase Under Different Environmental Conditions: Body Weight and Tibiotarsus Mineralization

Three experiments on Ross broiler chickens were conducted in 3 locations: cages (Experiment 1), floor pens (Experiment 2), and commercial farms (Experiment 3). The effect of low-total P (TP) wheat-soybean based diets plus microbial phytase (Natuphos) was evaluated. Four experimental starter and fini...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Poultry science 2006-11, Vol.85 (11), p.1923-1931
Hauptverfasser: Catala-Gregori, P, Garcia, V, Hernandez, F, Madrid, J, Ceron, J.J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1931
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1923
container_title Poultry science
container_volume 85
creator Catala-Gregori, P
Garcia, V
Hernandez, F
Madrid, J
Ceron, J.J
description Three experiments on Ross broiler chickens were conducted in 3 locations: cages (Experiment 1), floor pens (Experiment 2), and commercial farms (Experiment 3). The effect of low-total P (TP) wheat-soybean based diets plus microbial phytase (Natuphos) was evaluated. Four experimental starter and finisher diets were used in a 2-phase feeding program, as follows: control diet (SC until 21 d, FC from 22 to 42 d); 2 diets (SL400 and SL600 until 21 d, FL400 and FL600 from 22 to 42 d) with low TP (0.61% for starter and 0.54% for finisher), including 400 and 600 U/kg of phytase, respectively; and a very low-TP (0.52% for starter and 0.44% for finisher) diet (SVL600 until 21 d, FVL600 from 22 to 42 d) with 600 U/kg of phytase. In Experiment 1 (broilers in cages had movement limitation and no access to litter), no differences in BW, tibiotarsus mineralization, or mineral metabolism were observed among diets. In Experiment 2 (broilers in floor pens had movement limitation and access to litter), at 21 d of age, the lowest tibiotarsus ash percentage and BW were shown by birds fed the SVL600 diet. At 42 d of age, broilers fed the FC diet were the lightest. For the rest of the parameters of tibiotarsus mineralization and mineral metabolism measured in Experiment 2, no differences were shown. In Experiment 3 (broilers in commercial farms had access to litter without movement limitation), the BW of broilers fed the SC diet was the highest at 21 d of age. At 42 d of age, the broilers fed FL400 and FL600 diets were the heaviest. At the end of Experiment 3, broilers fed the FC diet had the highest dry litter Ca and P, whereas broilers fed the FVL600 diet had the lowest values. In conclusion, the very low-TP wheat-soybean based diet supplemented with 600 U/kg of phytase was sufficient to optimize all the parameters measured in Experiment 1 but not in Experiments 2 and 3. Therefore, when evaluating Ca and P in phytase-supplemented diets for broilers, it is necessary to bear in mind the environmental conditions of experimentation.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ps/85.11.1923
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68952451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ps/85.11.1923</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1156039911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-db8216fbe379e552ebf610adb9a9a794c4dac848b6c85119a6d27bb79fdd0ae83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcGO0zAQhiMEYsvCkStYHBCXdD1OnNjc2LILSEVUsBVHy4knrVepHexkV-VxeFJcWgmJC6cZaT59M6M_y54DnQOVxcUQLwSfA8xBsuJBNgPOeF5ADQ-zGaUFy3kt4Sx7EuMtpQyqqn6cnUGdJoLxWfbrK8bBu4jEd-QyeNtjiGT05BrRWLchS3-fL3Tf2mlHtDNktfVx2PowRfLe4hjJqk_tarsfdZKsncGQBl2HAd1IrtydDd7tUq97svDO2NGmdW_JpTd78h3tZjv-8d7YxvpRh5hsn63DoHv7Ux_gp9mjTvcRn53qeba-vrpZfMyXXz58Wrxb5m0p6JibRqT3ugaLWiLnDJuuAqpNI7XUtSzb0uhWlKKpWsEBpK4Mq5umlp0xVKMozrPXR-8Q_I8J46h2NrbY99qhn6KqhOSs5JDAV_-At34KLt2mGCuAg5QHKD9CbfAxBuzUEOxOh70Cqg7JqSEqwRWAOiSX-Bcn6dTs0PylT1El4M0R8NPwX9fLI9ppr_Qm2KjW3xiFggJAxURd_AZN4K1K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223151991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response of Broilers to Feeding Low-Calcium and Phosphorus Diets Plus Phytase Under Different Environmental Conditions: Body Weight and Tibiotarsus Mineralization</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Catala-Gregori, P ; Garcia, V ; Hernandez, F ; Madrid, J ; Ceron, J.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Catala-Gregori, P ; Garcia, V ; Hernandez, F ; Madrid, J ; Ceron, J.J</creatorcontrib><description>Three experiments on Ross broiler chickens were conducted in 3 locations: cages (Experiment 1), floor pens (Experiment 2), and commercial farms (Experiment 3). The effect of low-total P (TP) wheat-soybean based diets plus microbial phytase (Natuphos) was evaluated. Four experimental starter and finisher diets were used in a 2-phase feeding program, as follows: control diet (SC until 21 d, FC from 22 to 42 d); 2 diets (SL400 and SL600 until 21 d, FL400 and FL600 from 22 to 42 d) with low TP (0.61% for starter and 0.54% for finisher), including 400 and 600 U/kg of phytase, respectively; and a very low-TP (0.52% for starter and 0.44% for finisher) diet (SVL600 until 21 d, FVL600 from 22 to 42 d) with 600 U/kg of phytase. In Experiment 1 (broilers in cages had movement limitation and no access to litter), no differences in BW, tibiotarsus mineralization, or mineral metabolism were observed among diets. In Experiment 2 (broilers in floor pens had movement limitation and access to litter), at 21 d of age, the lowest tibiotarsus ash percentage and BW were shown by birds fed the SVL600 diet. At 42 d of age, broilers fed the FC diet were the lightest. For the rest of the parameters of tibiotarsus mineralization and mineral metabolism measured in Experiment 2, no differences were shown. In Experiment 3 (broilers in commercial farms had access to litter without movement limitation), the BW of broilers fed the SC diet was the highest at 21 d of age. At 42 d of age, the broilers fed FL400 and FL600 diets were the heaviest. At the end of Experiment 3, broilers fed the FC diet had the highest dry litter Ca and P, whereas broilers fed the FVL600 diet had the lowest values. In conclusion, the very low-TP wheat-soybean based diet supplemented with 600 U/kg of phytase was sufficient to optimize all the parameters measured in Experiment 1 but not in Experiments 2 and 3. Therefore, when evaluating Ca and P in phytase-supplemented diets for broilers, it is necessary to bear in mind the environmental conditions of experimentation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ps/85.11.1923</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17032825</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>6-Phytase - administration &amp; dosage ; alkaline phosphatase ; Animal Feed ; Animal Husbandry - methods ; Animals ; blood chemistry ; body weight ; bone density ; Bone Density - drug effects ; Bone Density - physiology ; Bone Density Conservation Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; broiler chickens ; broiler feeding ; cages ; Calcium, Dietary - administration &amp; dosage ; Chickens - growth &amp; development ; Chickens - metabolism ; dietary minerals ; dose response ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; enzyme activity ; feed additives ; finishing ; liveweight gain ; Male ; mineral metabolism ; nutrient deficiencies ; pens ; Phosphorus, Dietary - administration &amp; dosage ; phytases ; poultry industry ; Random Allocation ; starter diets ; Tarsus, Animal - metabolism ; Tarsus, Animal - physiology ; Tibia - metabolism ; Tibia - physiology ; Weight Gain - drug effects ; Weight Gain - physiology</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 2006-11, Vol.85 (11), p.1923-1931</ispartof><rights>2006 Poultry Science Association, Inc. 2006</rights><rights>Copyright Poultry Science Association Nov 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-db8216fbe379e552ebf610adb9a9a794c4dac848b6c85119a6d27bb79fdd0ae83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-db8216fbe379e552ebf610adb9a9a794c4dac848b6c85119a6d27bb79fdd0ae83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17032825$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Catala-Gregori, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madrid, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceron, J.J</creatorcontrib><title>Response of Broilers to Feeding Low-Calcium and Phosphorus Diets Plus Phytase Under Different Environmental Conditions: Body Weight and Tibiotarsus Mineralization</title><title>Poultry science</title><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><description>Three experiments on Ross broiler chickens were conducted in 3 locations: cages (Experiment 1), floor pens (Experiment 2), and commercial farms (Experiment 3). The effect of low-total P (TP) wheat-soybean based diets plus microbial phytase (Natuphos) was evaluated. Four experimental starter and finisher diets were used in a 2-phase feeding program, as follows: control diet (SC until 21 d, FC from 22 to 42 d); 2 diets (SL400 and SL600 until 21 d, FL400 and FL600 from 22 to 42 d) with low TP (0.61% for starter and 0.54% for finisher), including 400 and 600 U/kg of phytase, respectively; and a very low-TP (0.52% for starter and 0.44% for finisher) diet (SVL600 until 21 d, FVL600 from 22 to 42 d) with 600 U/kg of phytase. In Experiment 1 (broilers in cages had movement limitation and no access to litter), no differences in BW, tibiotarsus mineralization, or mineral metabolism were observed among diets. In Experiment 2 (broilers in floor pens had movement limitation and access to litter), at 21 d of age, the lowest tibiotarsus ash percentage and BW were shown by birds fed the SVL600 diet. At 42 d of age, broilers fed the FC diet were the lightest. For the rest of the parameters of tibiotarsus mineralization and mineral metabolism measured in Experiment 2, no differences were shown. In Experiment 3 (broilers in commercial farms had access to litter without movement limitation), the BW of broilers fed the SC diet was the highest at 21 d of age. At 42 d of age, the broilers fed FL400 and FL600 diets were the heaviest. At the end of Experiment 3, broilers fed the FC diet had the highest dry litter Ca and P, whereas broilers fed the FVL600 diet had the lowest values. In conclusion, the very low-TP wheat-soybean based diet supplemented with 600 U/kg of phytase was sufficient to optimize all the parameters measured in Experiment 1 but not in Experiments 2 and 3. Therefore, when evaluating Ca and P in phytase-supplemented diets for broilers, it is necessary to bear in mind the environmental conditions of experimentation.</description><subject>6-Phytase - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>alkaline phosphatase</subject><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>blood chemistry</subject><subject>body weight</subject><subject>bone density</subject><subject>Bone Density - drug effects</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Density Conservation Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>broiler chickens</subject><subject>broiler feeding</subject><subject>cages</subject><subject>Calcium, Dietary - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Chickens - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Chickens - metabolism</subject><subject>dietary minerals</subject><subject>dose response</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>enzyme activity</subject><subject>feed additives</subject><subject>finishing</subject><subject>liveweight gain</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>mineral metabolism</subject><subject>nutrient deficiencies</subject><subject>pens</subject><subject>Phosphorus, Dietary - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>phytases</subject><subject>poultry industry</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>starter diets</subject><subject>Tarsus, Animal - metabolism</subject><subject>Tarsus, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Tibia - metabolism</subject><subject>Tibia - physiology</subject><subject>Weight Gain - drug effects</subject><subject>Weight Gain - physiology</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcGO0zAQhiMEYsvCkStYHBCXdD1OnNjc2LILSEVUsBVHy4knrVepHexkV-VxeFJcWgmJC6cZaT59M6M_y54DnQOVxcUQLwSfA8xBsuJBNgPOeF5ADQ-zGaUFy3kt4Sx7EuMtpQyqqn6cnUGdJoLxWfbrK8bBu4jEd-QyeNtjiGT05BrRWLchS3-fL3Tf2mlHtDNktfVx2PowRfLe4hjJqk_tarsfdZKsncGQBl2HAd1IrtydDd7tUq97svDO2NGmdW_JpTd78h3tZjv-8d7YxvpRh5hsn63DoHv7Ux_gp9mjTvcRn53qeba-vrpZfMyXXz58Wrxb5m0p6JibRqT3ugaLWiLnDJuuAqpNI7XUtSzb0uhWlKKpWsEBpK4Mq5umlp0xVKMozrPXR-8Q_I8J46h2NrbY99qhn6KqhOSs5JDAV_-At34KLt2mGCuAg5QHKD9CbfAxBuzUEOxOh70Cqg7JqSEqwRWAOiSX-Bcn6dTs0PylT1El4M0R8NPwX9fLI9ppr_Qm2KjW3xiFggJAxURd_AZN4K1K</recordid><startdate>20061101</startdate><enddate>20061101</enddate><creator>Catala-Gregori, P</creator><creator>Garcia, V</creator><creator>Hernandez, F</creator><creator>Madrid, J</creator><creator>Ceron, J.J</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061101</creationdate><title>Response of Broilers to Feeding Low-Calcium and Phosphorus Diets Plus Phytase Under Different Environmental Conditions: Body Weight and Tibiotarsus Mineralization</title><author>Catala-Gregori, P ; Garcia, V ; Hernandez, F ; Madrid, J ; Ceron, J.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-db8216fbe379e552ebf610adb9a9a794c4dac848b6c85119a6d27bb79fdd0ae83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>6-Phytase - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>alkaline phosphatase</topic><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry - methods</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>blood chemistry</topic><topic>body weight</topic><topic>bone density</topic><topic>Bone Density - drug effects</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Density Conservation Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>broiler chickens</topic><topic>broiler feeding</topic><topic>cages</topic><topic>Calcium, Dietary - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Chickens - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Chickens - metabolism</topic><topic>dietary minerals</topic><topic>dose response</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>enzyme activity</topic><topic>feed additives</topic><topic>finishing</topic><topic>liveweight gain</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>mineral metabolism</topic><topic>nutrient deficiencies</topic><topic>pens</topic><topic>Phosphorus, Dietary - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>phytases</topic><topic>poultry industry</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>starter diets</topic><topic>Tarsus, Animal - metabolism</topic><topic>Tarsus, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Tibia - metabolism</topic><topic>Tibia - physiology</topic><topic>Weight Gain - drug effects</topic><topic>Weight Gain - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Catala-Gregori, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madrid, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceron, J.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Catala-Gregori, P</au><au>Garcia, V</au><au>Hernandez, F</au><au>Madrid, J</au><au>Ceron, J.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response of Broilers to Feeding Low-Calcium and Phosphorus Diets Plus Phytase Under Different Environmental Conditions: Body Weight and Tibiotarsus Mineralization</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><date>2006-11-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1923</spage><epage>1931</epage><pages>1923-1931</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><eissn>1525-3171</eissn><abstract>Three experiments on Ross broiler chickens were conducted in 3 locations: cages (Experiment 1), floor pens (Experiment 2), and commercial farms (Experiment 3). The effect of low-total P (TP) wheat-soybean based diets plus microbial phytase (Natuphos) was evaluated. Four experimental starter and finisher diets were used in a 2-phase feeding program, as follows: control diet (SC until 21 d, FC from 22 to 42 d); 2 diets (SL400 and SL600 until 21 d, FL400 and FL600 from 22 to 42 d) with low TP (0.61% for starter and 0.54% for finisher), including 400 and 600 U/kg of phytase, respectively; and a very low-TP (0.52% for starter and 0.44% for finisher) diet (SVL600 until 21 d, FVL600 from 22 to 42 d) with 600 U/kg of phytase. In Experiment 1 (broilers in cages had movement limitation and no access to litter), no differences in BW, tibiotarsus mineralization, or mineral metabolism were observed among diets. In Experiment 2 (broilers in floor pens had movement limitation and access to litter), at 21 d of age, the lowest tibiotarsus ash percentage and BW were shown by birds fed the SVL600 diet. At 42 d of age, broilers fed the FC diet were the lightest. For the rest of the parameters of tibiotarsus mineralization and mineral metabolism measured in Experiment 2, no differences were shown. In Experiment 3 (broilers in commercial farms had access to litter without movement limitation), the BW of broilers fed the SC diet was the highest at 21 d of age. At 42 d of age, the broilers fed FL400 and FL600 diets were the heaviest. At the end of Experiment 3, broilers fed the FC diet had the highest dry litter Ca and P, whereas broilers fed the FVL600 diet had the lowest values. In conclusion, the very low-TP wheat-soybean based diet supplemented with 600 U/kg of phytase was sufficient to optimize all the parameters measured in Experiment 1 but not in Experiments 2 and 3. Therefore, when evaluating Ca and P in phytase-supplemented diets for broilers, it is necessary to bear in mind the environmental conditions of experimentation.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>17032825</pmid><doi>10.1093/ps/85.11.1923</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5791
ispartof Poultry science, 2006-11, Vol.85 (11), p.1923-1931
issn 0032-5791
1525-3171
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68952451
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects 6-Phytase - administration & dosage
alkaline phosphatase
Animal Feed
Animal Husbandry - methods
Animals
blood chemistry
body weight
bone density
Bone Density - drug effects
Bone Density - physiology
Bone Density Conservation Agents - administration & dosage
broiler chickens
broiler feeding
cages
Calcium, Dietary - administration & dosage
Chickens - growth & development
Chickens - metabolism
dietary minerals
dose response
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
enzyme activity
feed additives
finishing
liveweight gain
Male
mineral metabolism
nutrient deficiencies
pens
Phosphorus, Dietary - administration & dosage
phytases
poultry industry
Random Allocation
starter diets
Tarsus, Animal - metabolism
Tarsus, Animal - physiology
Tibia - metabolism
Tibia - physiology
Weight Gain - drug effects
Weight Gain - physiology
title Response of Broilers to Feeding Low-Calcium and Phosphorus Diets Plus Phytase Under Different Environmental Conditions: Body Weight and Tibiotarsus Mineralization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T21%3A17%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20of%20Broilers%20to%20Feeding%20Low-Calcium%20and%20Phosphorus%20Diets%20Plus%20Phytase%20Under%20Different%20Environmental%20Conditions:%20Body%20Weight%20and%20Tibiotarsus%20Mineralization&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Catala-Gregori,%20P&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1923&rft.epage=1931&rft.pages=1923-1931&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft.eissn=1525-3171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ps/85.11.1923&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1156039911%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223151991&rft_id=info:pmid/17032825&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ps/85.11.1923&rfr_iscdi=true