Resolution recovery in pinhole SPECT based on multi-ray projections: a phantom study
Low sensitivity can become a major problem when very small pinholes are used in SPECT imaging. Although a larger pinhole aperture will improve the sensitivity, this will be at the cost of the spatial resolution. With a view to improving the resolution-sensitivity trade-off, this paper explores an it...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2007-02, Vol.34 (2), p.170-180 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 180 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 170 |
container_title | European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Vanhove, Christian Andreyev, Andriy Defrise, Michel Nuyts, Johan Bossuyt, Axel |
description | Low sensitivity can become a major problem when very small pinholes are used in SPECT imaging. Although a larger pinhole aperture will improve the sensitivity, this will be at the cost of the spatial resolution. With a view to improving the resolution-sensitivity trade-off, this paper explores an iterative reconstruction algorithm that models the pinhole aperture based on multi-ray projections.
This new implementation was validated using simulated data and phantom experiments. Two approaches were investigated. Firstly, the pinhole aperture was modelled in both the forward and the back projector. Secondly, the dual matrix implementation was investigated by modelling the pinhole aperture only in the forward projector. The systematic error, the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) and the statistical error were quantified using the simulated data. Experimental phantom data were acquired for visual comparison with the reconstructions obtained from the simulated data.
For a predefined number of iterations, the systematic error, the FWHM and the statistical error could be decreased when the pinhole aperture was modelled during iterative reconstruction. For a fixed, predefined statistical error of +/-10%, smaller systematic errors and smaller FWHM were obtained when modelling the pinhole opening. When the dual matrix implementation was used, equivalent results could be obtained as when modelling the pinhole opening in both the forward and the back projector.
The multi-ray method to accomplish resolution recovery during the reconstruction of pinhole SPECT projection images offers a better trade-off between spatial resolution and noise compared with a reconstruction which does not model the pinhole aperture. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00259-006-0225-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68936075</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68936075</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-fd02d22faf4fcc415b2501d1eb57ca5969fdbb132621696a57938370dc4f857f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9r2zAUx8XYaNKsf8AuQ-zQm9f3ZEuyehsh_QGBjjY7C1mWiINtpZI9yH8_h4QVetlO7x0-3_eDDyFfEL4jgLxJAIyrDEBkwBjP4AOZo0CVSSjVx7-9hBm5TGkHgCUr1QWZoVA8LwDmZPPsUmjHoQk9jc6G3y4eaNPTfdNvQ-voy8_VckMrk1xNJ6Qb26HJojnQfQw7Z4-5dEsN3W9NP4SOpmGsD5_JJ2_a5K7OdUF-3a02y4ds_XT_uPyxzmzBiyHzNbCaMW984a0tkFeMA9boKi6t4UooX1cV5kyw6WBhuFR5mUuobeFLLn2-INenudMxr6NLg-6aZF3bmt6FMWlRqlyA5P8EUUnFkON_glBM4Ld34C6MsZ--1QwLwRXCcS2eIBtDStF5vY9NZ-JBI-ijQX0yqCeD-mhQw5T5eh48Vp2r3xJnZfkf_zeVKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214659105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resolution recovery in pinhole SPECT based on multi-ray projections: a phantom study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Vanhove, Christian ; Andreyev, Andriy ; Defrise, Michel ; Nuyts, Johan ; Bossuyt, Axel</creator><creatorcontrib>Vanhove, Christian ; Andreyev, Andriy ; Defrise, Michel ; Nuyts, Johan ; Bossuyt, Axel</creatorcontrib><description>Low sensitivity can become a major problem when very small pinholes are used in SPECT imaging. Although a larger pinhole aperture will improve the sensitivity, this will be at the cost of the spatial resolution. With a view to improving the resolution-sensitivity trade-off, this paper explores an iterative reconstruction algorithm that models the pinhole aperture based on multi-ray projections.
This new implementation was validated using simulated data and phantom experiments. Two approaches were investigated. Firstly, the pinhole aperture was modelled in both the forward and the back projector. Secondly, the dual matrix implementation was investigated by modelling the pinhole aperture only in the forward projector. The systematic error, the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) and the statistical error were quantified using the simulated data. Experimental phantom data were acquired for visual comparison with the reconstructions obtained from the simulated data.
For a predefined number of iterations, the systematic error, the FWHM and the statistical error could be decreased when the pinhole aperture was modelled during iterative reconstruction. For a fixed, predefined statistical error of +/-10%, smaller systematic errors and smaller FWHM were obtained when modelling the pinhole opening. When the dual matrix implementation was used, equivalent results could be obtained as when modelling the pinhole opening in both the forward and the back projector.
The multi-ray method to accomplish resolution recovery during the reconstruction of pinhole SPECT projection images offers a better trade-off between spatial resolution and noise compared with a reconstruction which does not model the pinhole aperture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1619-7070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1619-7089</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00259-006-0225-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16953400</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Design optimization ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Medical imaging ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - instrumentation ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods</subject><ispartof>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2007-02, Vol.34 (2), p.170-180</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-fd02d22faf4fcc415b2501d1eb57ca5969fdbb132621696a57938370dc4f857f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-fd02d22faf4fcc415b2501d1eb57ca5969fdbb132621696a57938370dc4f857f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16953400$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vanhove, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreyev, Andriy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Defrise, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuyts, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossuyt, Axel</creatorcontrib><title>Resolution recovery in pinhole SPECT based on multi-ray projections: a phantom study</title><title>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</title><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><description>Low sensitivity can become a major problem when very small pinholes are used in SPECT imaging. Although a larger pinhole aperture will improve the sensitivity, this will be at the cost of the spatial resolution. With a view to improving the resolution-sensitivity trade-off, this paper explores an iterative reconstruction algorithm that models the pinhole aperture based on multi-ray projections.
This new implementation was validated using simulated data and phantom experiments. Two approaches were investigated. Firstly, the pinhole aperture was modelled in both the forward and the back projector. Secondly, the dual matrix implementation was investigated by modelling the pinhole aperture only in the forward projector. The systematic error, the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) and the statistical error were quantified using the simulated data. Experimental phantom data were acquired for visual comparison with the reconstructions obtained from the simulated data.
For a predefined number of iterations, the systematic error, the FWHM and the statistical error could be decreased when the pinhole aperture was modelled during iterative reconstruction. For a fixed, predefined statistical error of +/-10%, smaller systematic errors and smaller FWHM were obtained when modelling the pinhole opening. When the dual matrix implementation was used, equivalent results could be obtained as when modelling the pinhole opening in both the forward and the back projector.
The multi-ray method to accomplish resolution recovery during the reconstruction of pinhole SPECT projection images offers a better trade-off between spatial resolution and noise compared with a reconstruction which does not model the pinhole aperture.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods</subject><issn>1619-7070</issn><issn>1619-7089</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9r2zAUx8XYaNKsf8AuQ-zQm9f3ZEuyehsh_QGBjjY7C1mWiINtpZI9yH8_h4QVetlO7x0-3_eDDyFfEL4jgLxJAIyrDEBkwBjP4AOZo0CVSSjVx7-9hBm5TGkHgCUr1QWZoVA8LwDmZPPsUmjHoQk9jc6G3y4eaNPTfdNvQ-voy8_VckMrk1xNJ6Qb26HJojnQfQw7Z4-5dEsN3W9NP4SOpmGsD5_JJ2_a5K7OdUF-3a02y4ds_XT_uPyxzmzBiyHzNbCaMW984a0tkFeMA9boKi6t4UooX1cV5kyw6WBhuFR5mUuobeFLLn2-INenudMxr6NLg-6aZF3bmt6FMWlRqlyA5P8EUUnFkON_glBM4Ld34C6MsZ--1QwLwRXCcS2eIBtDStF5vY9NZ-JBI-ijQX0yqCeD-mhQw5T5eh48Vp2r3xJnZfkf_zeVKA</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Vanhove, Christian</creator><creator>Andreyev, Andriy</creator><creator>Defrise, Michel</creator><creator>Nuyts, Johan</creator><creator>Bossuyt, Axel</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>Resolution recovery in pinhole SPECT based on multi-ray projections: a phantom study</title><author>Vanhove, Christian ; Andreyev, Andriy ; Defrise, Michel ; Nuyts, Johan ; Bossuyt, Axel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-fd02d22faf4fcc415b2501d1eb57ca5969fdbb132621696a57938370dc4f857f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vanhove, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreyev, Andriy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Defrise, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuyts, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossuyt, Axel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vanhove, Christian</au><au>Andreyev, Andriy</au><au>Defrise, Michel</au><au>Nuyts, Johan</au><au>Bossuyt, Axel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resolution recovery in pinhole SPECT based on multi-ray projections: a phantom study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>170</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>170-180</pages><issn>1619-7070</issn><eissn>1619-7089</eissn><abstract>Low sensitivity can become a major problem when very small pinholes are used in SPECT imaging. Although a larger pinhole aperture will improve the sensitivity, this will be at the cost of the spatial resolution. With a view to improving the resolution-sensitivity trade-off, this paper explores an iterative reconstruction algorithm that models the pinhole aperture based on multi-ray projections.
This new implementation was validated using simulated data and phantom experiments. Two approaches were investigated. Firstly, the pinhole aperture was modelled in both the forward and the back projector. Secondly, the dual matrix implementation was investigated by modelling the pinhole aperture only in the forward projector. The systematic error, the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) and the statistical error were quantified using the simulated data. Experimental phantom data were acquired for visual comparison with the reconstructions obtained from the simulated data.
For a predefined number of iterations, the systematic error, the FWHM and the statistical error could be decreased when the pinhole aperture was modelled during iterative reconstruction. For a fixed, predefined statistical error of +/-10%, smaller systematic errors and smaller FWHM were obtained when modelling the pinhole opening. When the dual matrix implementation was used, equivalent results could be obtained as when modelling the pinhole opening in both the forward and the back projector.
The multi-ray method to accomplish resolution recovery during the reconstruction of pinhole SPECT projection images offers a better trade-off between spatial resolution and noise compared with a reconstruction which does not model the pinhole aperture.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>16953400</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00259-006-0225-0</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1619-7070 |
ispartof | European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2007-02, Vol.34 (2), p.170-180 |
issn | 1619-7070 1619-7089 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68936075 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Algorithms Design optimization Image Enhancement - methods Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Medical imaging Phantoms, Imaging Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - instrumentation Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods |
title | Resolution recovery in pinhole SPECT based on multi-ray projections: a phantom study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T12%3A45%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resolution%20recovery%20in%20pinhole%20SPECT%20based%20on%20multi-ray%20projections:%20a%20phantom%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20and%20molecular%20imaging&rft.au=Vanhove,%20Christian&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=170&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=170-180&rft.issn=1619-7070&rft.eissn=1619-7089&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00259-006-0225-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68936075%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214659105&rft_id=info:pmid/16953400&rfr_iscdi=true |