Cell-surface density of complement restriction factors (CD46, CD55, and CD59): oral squamous cell carcinoma versus other solid tumors

Objective Complement restriction factors (CD46, membrane cofactor; CD55, decay accelerating factor; and CD59, protectin) are overexpressed on tumor cells, and they enable tumor cells to escape from complement-dependent and antibody-mediated killing. Cell-surface density of complement restriction fac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 2007-02, Vol.103 (2), p.231-239
Hauptverfasser: Ravindranath, Naren M.H., PhD, Shuler, Charles, DDS, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 239
container_issue 2
container_start_page 231
container_title Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics
container_volume 103
creator Ravindranath, Naren M.H., PhD
Shuler, Charles, DDS, PhD
description Objective Complement restriction factors (CD46, membrane cofactor; CD55, decay accelerating factor; and CD59, protectin) are overexpressed on tumor cells, and they enable tumor cells to escape from complement-dependent and antibody-mediated killing. Cell-surface density of complement restriction factors (CRFs) on oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is compared with that found on other solid tumors (breast, pancreas, colon carcinomas, and melanoma) to understand the significance of their diversity. Study design The cell-surface expression of CRFs on tumor cells was confirmed with confocal laser scan fluorescent microscopy. Cell suspension enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cs-ELISA), which measures the density of cell-surface antigens, was utilized to study CRFs on the cell surface of tumor cells (OSCC, 2 cell lines; breast, 5 cell lines; pancreas, 3 cell lines; colon, 3 cell lines; and melanoma, 9 cell lines). Results Confocal laser scan fluorescent microscopy confirmed the expression of CD46, CD55, and CD59 on the cell surface of OSCC cell lines SCC12 and SCC71. The relative densities of cell-surface expression obtained from cs-ELISAs of CRFs on OSCCs are as follows: CD59 > CD55 > CD46. The relative densities of the 3 CRFs in breast and pancreatic carcinomas were similar to those found in OSCCs, whereas the profile of CRFs in melanoma (CD59 > CD55 < CD46) and colon cancer (CD46 > CD55 > CD59) were different. Conclusions These findings indicate diverse strategies adopted by tumor types to resist antibody-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity; possibly the factors (exogenous and endogenous) in their respective microenvironments may play a role in the diversity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.05.028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68931809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1079210406004252</els_id><sourcerecordid>68931809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-a369c300cd84a609f856bcd60ff8c1044b32e12624a334c3b765c8e4b7ad422e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt2K1TAUhYsozjj6CEpuFIVpzf9JvFCk4x8MeKGCdyFNdzHHNjmTtAPnAXxvU05hwBuvsgnfXnvtxa6qpwQ3BBP5et_MyR9GiA3FWDZYNJiqe9U5EVTVTIuf90uNd7qmBPOz6lHOe1xApvXD6ozsKOOCk_PqTwvjWOclDdYB6iFkPx9RHJCLU1GfIMwoQS6z3OxjQAWbY8roZXvF5SVqr4S4RDb0a6VfvUEx2RHlm8VOccnIFXHkbHI-xMmiW0i5_Mb5FySU4-h7NC9TkXtcPRjsmOHJ9l5UPz5--N5-rq-_fvrSvr-uHedqri2T2jGMXa-4lVgPSsjO9RIPg3JlTd4xCoRKyi1j3LFuJ4VTwLud7TmlwC6qFyfdQ4o3S1nLTD6vJm2A4tdIpRlRWBdQnECXYs4JBnNIfrLpaAg2a_5mb7b8zZq_wcKU_Evfs23A0k3Q33VtgRfg-QbY7Ow4JBucz3ec1kpJxQr37sRBiePWQzLZeQgOep_AzaaP_r9W3v6j4EYffBn6G46Q93FJoWRtiMnUYPNtPZb1VrDEmFNB2V8uyrs-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68931809</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cell-surface density of complement restriction factors (CD46, CD55, and CD59): oral squamous cell carcinoma versus other solid tumors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Ravindranath, Naren M.H., PhD ; Shuler, Charles, DDS, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Ravindranath, Naren M.H., PhD ; Shuler, Charles, DDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Complement restriction factors (CD46, membrane cofactor; CD55, decay accelerating factor; and CD59, protectin) are overexpressed on tumor cells, and they enable tumor cells to escape from complement-dependent and antibody-mediated killing. Cell-surface density of complement restriction factors (CRFs) on oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is compared with that found on other solid tumors (breast, pancreas, colon carcinomas, and melanoma) to understand the significance of their diversity. Study design The cell-surface expression of CRFs on tumor cells was confirmed with confocal laser scan fluorescent microscopy. Cell suspension enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cs-ELISA), which measures the density of cell-surface antigens, was utilized to study CRFs on the cell surface of tumor cells (OSCC, 2 cell lines; breast, 5 cell lines; pancreas, 3 cell lines; colon, 3 cell lines; and melanoma, 9 cell lines). Results Confocal laser scan fluorescent microscopy confirmed the expression of CD46, CD55, and CD59 on the cell surface of OSCC cell lines SCC12 and SCC71. The relative densities of cell-surface expression obtained from cs-ELISAs of CRFs on OSCCs are as follows: CD59 &gt; CD55 &gt; CD46. The relative densities of the 3 CRFs in breast and pancreatic carcinomas were similar to those found in OSCCs, whereas the profile of CRFs in melanoma (CD59 &gt; CD55 &lt; CD46) and colon cancer (CD46 &gt; CD55 &gt; CD59) were different. Conclusions These findings indicate diverse strategies adopted by tumor types to resist antibody-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity; possibly the factors (exogenous and endogenous) in their respective microenvironments may play a role in the diversity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1079-2104</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-395X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.05.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17234541</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>St. Louis, MO: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm - analysis ; Antigens, Surface - analysis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast Neoplasms - immunology ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - immunology ; CD55 Antigens - analysis ; CD59 Antigens - analysis ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Colonic Neoplasms - immunology ; Complement Inactivator Proteins - analysis ; Dentistry ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; Female ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Melanoma - immunology ; Membrane Cofactor Protein - analysis ; Microscopy, Confocal ; Mouth Neoplasms - immunology ; Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects) ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - immunology ; Surgery ; Tumor Escape - immunology ; Tumors ; Upper respiratory tract, upper alimentary tract, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands: diseases, semeiology</subject><ispartof>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 2007-02, Vol.103 (2), p.231-239</ispartof><rights>Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2007 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-a369c300cd84a609f856bcd60ff8c1044b32e12624a334c3b765c8e4b7ad422e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-a369c300cd84a609f856bcd60ff8c1044b32e12624a334c3b765c8e4b7ad422e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.05.028$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19988683$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17234541$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ravindranath, Naren M.H., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuler, Charles, DDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Cell-surface density of complement restriction factors (CD46, CD55, and CD59): oral squamous cell carcinoma versus other solid tumors</title><title>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics</title><addtitle>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod</addtitle><description>Objective Complement restriction factors (CD46, membrane cofactor; CD55, decay accelerating factor; and CD59, protectin) are overexpressed on tumor cells, and they enable tumor cells to escape from complement-dependent and antibody-mediated killing. Cell-surface density of complement restriction factors (CRFs) on oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is compared with that found on other solid tumors (breast, pancreas, colon carcinomas, and melanoma) to understand the significance of their diversity. Study design The cell-surface expression of CRFs on tumor cells was confirmed with confocal laser scan fluorescent microscopy. Cell suspension enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cs-ELISA), which measures the density of cell-surface antigens, was utilized to study CRFs on the cell surface of tumor cells (OSCC, 2 cell lines; breast, 5 cell lines; pancreas, 3 cell lines; colon, 3 cell lines; and melanoma, 9 cell lines). Results Confocal laser scan fluorescent microscopy confirmed the expression of CD46, CD55, and CD59 on the cell surface of OSCC cell lines SCC12 and SCC71. The relative densities of cell-surface expression obtained from cs-ELISAs of CRFs on OSCCs are as follows: CD59 &gt; CD55 &gt; CD46. The relative densities of the 3 CRFs in breast and pancreatic carcinomas were similar to those found in OSCCs, whereas the profile of CRFs in melanoma (CD59 &gt; CD55 &lt; CD46) and colon cancer (CD46 &gt; CD55 &gt; CD59) were different. Conclusions These findings indicate diverse strategies adopted by tumor types to resist antibody-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity; possibly the factors (exogenous and endogenous) in their respective microenvironments may play a role in the diversity.</description><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm - analysis</subject><subject>Antigens, Surface - analysis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - immunology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - immunology</subject><subject>CD55 Antigens - analysis</subject><subject>CD59 Antigens - analysis</subject><subject>Cell Line, Tumor</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - immunology</subject><subject>Complement Inactivator Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Melanoma - immunology</subject><subject>Membrane Cofactor Protein - analysis</subject><subject>Microscopy, Confocal</subject><subject>Mouth Neoplasms - immunology</subject><subject>Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - immunology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tumor Escape - immunology</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Upper respiratory tract, upper alimentary tract, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands: diseases, semeiology</subject><issn>1079-2104</issn><issn>1528-395X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt2K1TAUhYsozjj6CEpuFIVpzf9JvFCk4x8MeKGCdyFNdzHHNjmTtAPnAXxvU05hwBuvsgnfXnvtxa6qpwQ3BBP5et_MyR9GiA3FWDZYNJiqe9U5EVTVTIuf90uNd7qmBPOz6lHOe1xApvXD6ozsKOOCk_PqTwvjWOclDdYB6iFkPx9RHJCLU1GfIMwoQS6z3OxjQAWbY8roZXvF5SVqr4S4RDb0a6VfvUEx2RHlm8VOccnIFXHkbHI-xMmiW0i5_Mb5FySU4-h7NC9TkXtcPRjsmOHJ9l5UPz5--N5-rq-_fvrSvr-uHedqri2T2jGMXa-4lVgPSsjO9RIPg3JlTd4xCoRKyi1j3LFuJ4VTwLud7TmlwC6qFyfdQ4o3S1nLTD6vJm2A4tdIpRlRWBdQnECXYs4JBnNIfrLpaAg2a_5mb7b8zZq_wcKU_Evfs23A0k3Q33VtgRfg-QbY7Ow4JBucz3ec1kpJxQr37sRBiePWQzLZeQgOep_AzaaP_r9W3v6j4EYffBn6G46Q93FJoWRtiMnUYPNtPZb1VrDEmFNB2V8uyrs-</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Ravindranath, Naren M.H., PhD</creator><creator>Shuler, Charles, DDS, PhD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>Cell-surface density of complement restriction factors (CD46, CD55, and CD59): oral squamous cell carcinoma versus other solid tumors</title><author>Ravindranath, Naren M.H., PhD ; Shuler, Charles, DDS, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-a369c300cd84a609f856bcd60ff8c1044b32e12624a334c3b765c8e4b7ad422e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Antigens, Neoplasm - analysis</topic><topic>Antigens, Surface - analysis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - immunology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - immunology</topic><topic>CD55 Antigens - analysis</topic><topic>CD59 Antigens - analysis</topic><topic>Cell Line, Tumor</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - immunology</topic><topic>Complement Inactivator Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Melanoma - immunology</topic><topic>Membrane Cofactor Protein - analysis</topic><topic>Microscopy, Confocal</topic><topic>Mouth Neoplasms - immunology</topic><topic>Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - immunology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tumor Escape - immunology</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Upper respiratory tract, upper alimentary tract, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands: diseases, semeiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ravindranath, Naren M.H., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuler, Charles, DDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ravindranath, Naren M.H., PhD</au><au>Shuler, Charles, DDS, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cell-surface density of complement restriction factors (CD46, CD55, and CD59): oral squamous cell carcinoma versus other solid tumors</atitle><jtitle>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod</addtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>231</spage><epage>239</epage><pages>231-239</pages><issn>1079-2104</issn><eissn>1528-395X</eissn><abstract>Objective Complement restriction factors (CD46, membrane cofactor; CD55, decay accelerating factor; and CD59, protectin) are overexpressed on tumor cells, and they enable tumor cells to escape from complement-dependent and antibody-mediated killing. Cell-surface density of complement restriction factors (CRFs) on oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is compared with that found on other solid tumors (breast, pancreas, colon carcinomas, and melanoma) to understand the significance of their diversity. Study design The cell-surface expression of CRFs on tumor cells was confirmed with confocal laser scan fluorescent microscopy. Cell suspension enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cs-ELISA), which measures the density of cell-surface antigens, was utilized to study CRFs on the cell surface of tumor cells (OSCC, 2 cell lines; breast, 5 cell lines; pancreas, 3 cell lines; colon, 3 cell lines; and melanoma, 9 cell lines). Results Confocal laser scan fluorescent microscopy confirmed the expression of CD46, CD55, and CD59 on the cell surface of OSCC cell lines SCC12 and SCC71. The relative densities of cell-surface expression obtained from cs-ELISAs of CRFs on OSCCs are as follows: CD59 &gt; CD55 &gt; CD46. The relative densities of the 3 CRFs in breast and pancreatic carcinomas were similar to those found in OSCCs, whereas the profile of CRFs in melanoma (CD59 &gt; CD55 &lt; CD46) and colon cancer (CD46 &gt; CD55 &gt; CD59) were different. Conclusions These findings indicate diverse strategies adopted by tumor types to resist antibody-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity; possibly the factors (exogenous and endogenous) in their respective microenvironments may play a role in the diversity.</abstract><cop>St. Louis, MO</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>17234541</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.05.028</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1079-2104
ispartof Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 2007-02, Vol.103 (2), p.231-239
issn 1079-2104
1528-395X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68931809
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Antigens, Neoplasm - analysis
Antigens, Surface - analysis
Biological and medical sciences
Breast Neoplasms - immunology
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - immunology
CD55 Antigens - analysis
CD59 Antigens - analysis
Cell Line, Tumor
Colonic Neoplasms - immunology
Complement Inactivator Proteins - analysis
Dentistry
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Female
Humans
Medical sciences
Melanoma - immunology
Membrane Cofactor Protein - analysis
Microscopy, Confocal
Mouth Neoplasms - immunology
Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology
Pancreatic Neoplasms - immunology
Surgery
Tumor Escape - immunology
Tumors
Upper respiratory tract, upper alimentary tract, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands: diseases, semeiology
title Cell-surface density of complement restriction factors (CD46, CD55, and CD59): oral squamous cell carcinoma versus other solid tumors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A30%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cell-surface%20density%20of%20complement%20restriction%20factors%20(CD46,%20CD55,%20and%20CD59):%20oral%20squamous%20cell%20carcinoma%20versus%20other%20solid%20tumors&rft.jtitle=Oral%20surgery,%20oral%20medicine,%20oral%20pathology,%20oral%20radiology%20and%20endodontics&rft.au=Ravindranath,%20Naren%20M.H.,%20PhD&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=231&rft.epage=239&rft.pages=231-239&rft.issn=1079-2104&rft.eissn=1528-395X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.05.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68931809%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68931809&rft_id=info:pmid/17234541&rft_els_id=S1079210406004252&rfr_iscdi=true