Evaluation of monolithic C18 HPLC columns for the fast analysis of pilocarpine hydrochloride in the presence of its degradation products
Monolithic Performance C18 HPLC columns (Chromolith Performance RP-18e, Merck) were applied for the determination of pilocarpine hydrochloride in the presence of its degradation products isopilocarpine, pilocarpic acid and isopilocarpic acid. The method was validated using a set of six monolithic co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pharmazie 2006-09, Vol.61 (9), p.751-756 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 756 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 751 |
container_title | Pharmazie |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | El Deeb, S. Schepers, U. Wätzig, H. |
description | Monolithic Performance C18 HPLC columns (Chromolith Performance RP-18e, Merck) were applied for the determination of pilocarpine hydrochloride in the presence of its degradation products isopilocarpine, pilocarpic acid and isopilocarpic acid. The method was validated using a set of
six monolithic columns and compared to a conventional C18 column. The separation of pilocarpine from its degradation products was investigated on monolithic columns at different flow rates from 1 to 9 ml/min. Superior resolution was obtained using monolithic columns over the conventional C18
column at the same flow rate of 1 ml/min with a total run time of 9 min compared to 13.5 min for the conventional C18 column. Comparable resolution to that obtained in the C18 column (but with better peak symmetry) was obtained at a flow rate of 4 ml/min, although the total run time was reduced
to 3.5 min. The precision for both retention time and peak area was investigated over a wide concentration range and found to be equal, or slightly better on Chromolith Performance compared to the conventional column. The overall RSDs% ranged from 0.5% to 1.16% for the
conventional column, while for monolithic columns ranged from 0.38% to 0.87% at a flow rate of 1 ml/min and from 0.38% to 0.89% at a flow rate of 4 ml/min. Monolithic column to column reproducibility (n = 6) was measured. The RSDs% ranged from 0.34%
to 0.68% for retention time and from 0.3% to 0.94% for peak areas. The detection and quantitation limits on monolithic columns at both flow rates (1 and 4 ml/min) were found to be 0.17 μg/ml and 0.5 μg/ml, compared to 0.31 μg/ml and 1 μg/ml on the conventional
column. Monolithic silica rods have also shown the advantage of reducing the time to wash and to re-equilibrate the column. The method showed good linearity and recovery and was found to be suitable for the analysis of pilocarpine hydrochloride formulations. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubtec_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68927728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>govi/pharmaz/2006/00000061/00000009/art00004</ingid><sourcerecordid>govi/pharmaz/2006/00000061/00000009/art00004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i256t-26ff470ec1a34688a71cfbb75098e3e782fb8b1a74c0a1556ea2298f3cadd493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kb9u2zAQhzW0aNK0r1BwymaApGiSGgs3aQIYaYfsxIl_LAYUqZKUAecJ-tiVYnfMLXfD9_sOuPvQXGPcko0gjF01n0t5wZhyyuWn5ooITDFh3XXz9-4IYYbqU0TJoTHFFHwdvEY7ItHD7_0O6RTmMRbkUkZ1sMhBqQgihFPxZQ1NPiQNefLRouFkctJDSNkbi3x8S0zZFhu1XWFfCzL2kMGcl045mVnX8qX56CAU-_XSb5rn-7vn3cNm_-vn4-77fuPpltcN5c4xga0m0DIuJQiiXd-LLe6kba2Q1PWyJyCYxkC2W26B0k66VoMxrGtvmtuzdtn7Z7alqtEXbUOAaNNcFJcdFYLKBfx2Aed-tEZN2Y-QT-r_6Rbgxxnw8WBjBfWS5rxcpahDOno1DZBHeFUUY67wW3FyGXCnINd1YIvm6R2N12fT-sX1ierISewWISVYklaRJa-MdTCHqipkdXhVhbX_AE-tm_U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68927728</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of monolithic C18 HPLC columns for the fast analysis of pilocarpine hydrochloride in the presence of its degradation products</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><creator>El Deeb, S. ; Schepers, U. ; Wätzig, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>El Deeb, S. ; Schepers, U. ; Wätzig, H.</creatorcontrib><description>Monolithic Performance C18 HPLC columns (Chromolith Performance RP-18e, Merck) were applied for the determination of pilocarpine hydrochloride in the presence of its degradation products isopilocarpine, pilocarpic acid and isopilocarpic acid. The method was validated using a set of
six monolithic columns and compared to a conventional C18 column. The separation of pilocarpine from its degradation products was investigated on monolithic columns at different flow rates from 1 to 9 ml/min. Superior resolution was obtained using monolithic columns over the conventional C18
column at the same flow rate of 1 ml/min with a total run time of 9 min compared to 13.5 min for the conventional C18 column. Comparable resolution to that obtained in the C18 column (but with better peak symmetry) was obtained at a flow rate of 4 ml/min, although the total run time was reduced
to 3.5 min. The precision for both retention time and peak area was investigated over a wide concentration range and found to be equal, or slightly better on Chromolith Performance compared to the conventional column. The overall RSDs% ranged from 0.5% to 1.16% for the
conventional column, while for monolithic columns ranged from 0.38% to 0.87% at a flow rate of 1 ml/min and from 0.38% to 0.89% at a flow rate of 4 ml/min. Monolithic column to column reproducibility (n = 6) was measured. The RSDs% ranged from 0.34%
to 0.68% for retention time and from 0.3% to 0.94% for peak areas. The detection and quantitation limits on monolithic columns at both flow rates (1 and 4 ml/min) were found to be 0.17 μg/ml and 0.5 μg/ml, compared to 0.31 μg/ml and 1 μg/ml on the conventional
column. Monolithic silica rods have also shown the advantage of reducing the time to wash and to re-equilibrate the column. The method showed good linearity and recovery and was found to be suitable for the analysis of pilocarpine hydrochloride formulations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-7144</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17020149</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Govi-Verlag</publisher><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid ; Excipients ; Indicators and Reagents ; Miotics - analysis ; Miotics - chemistry ; Ophthalmic Solutions ; Pilocarpine - analogs & derivatives ; Pilocarpine - analysis ; Pilocarpine - chemistry ; Reference Standards ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Pharmazie, 2006-09, Vol.61 (9), p.751-756</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>288,314,778,782</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17020149$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>El Deeb, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schepers, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wätzig, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of monolithic C18 HPLC columns for the fast analysis of pilocarpine hydrochloride in the presence of its degradation products</title><title>Pharmazie</title><addtitle>Pharmazie</addtitle><description>Monolithic Performance C18 HPLC columns (Chromolith Performance RP-18e, Merck) were applied for the determination of pilocarpine hydrochloride in the presence of its degradation products isopilocarpine, pilocarpic acid and isopilocarpic acid. The method was validated using a set of
six monolithic columns and compared to a conventional C18 column. The separation of pilocarpine from its degradation products was investigated on monolithic columns at different flow rates from 1 to 9 ml/min. Superior resolution was obtained using monolithic columns over the conventional C18
column at the same flow rate of 1 ml/min with a total run time of 9 min compared to 13.5 min for the conventional C18 column. Comparable resolution to that obtained in the C18 column (but with better peak symmetry) was obtained at a flow rate of 4 ml/min, although the total run time was reduced
to 3.5 min. The precision for both retention time and peak area was investigated over a wide concentration range and found to be equal, or slightly better on Chromolith Performance compared to the conventional column. The overall RSDs% ranged from 0.5% to 1.16% for the
conventional column, while for monolithic columns ranged from 0.38% to 0.87% at a flow rate of 1 ml/min and from 0.38% to 0.89% at a flow rate of 4 ml/min. Monolithic column to column reproducibility (n = 6) was measured. The RSDs% ranged from 0.34%
to 0.68% for retention time and from 0.3% to 0.94% for peak areas. The detection and quantitation limits on monolithic columns at both flow rates (1 and 4 ml/min) were found to be 0.17 μg/ml and 0.5 μg/ml, compared to 0.31 μg/ml and 1 μg/ml on the conventional
column. Monolithic silica rods have also shown the advantage of reducing the time to wash and to re-equilibrate the column. The method showed good linearity and recovery and was found to be suitable for the analysis of pilocarpine hydrochloride formulations.</description><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid</subject><subject>Excipients</subject><subject>Indicators and Reagents</subject><subject>Miotics - analysis</subject><subject>Miotics - chemistry</subject><subject>Ophthalmic Solutions</subject><subject>Pilocarpine - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Pilocarpine - analysis</subject><subject>Pilocarpine - chemistry</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>0031-7144</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kb9u2zAQhzW0aNK0r1BwymaApGiSGgs3aQIYaYfsxIl_LAYUqZKUAecJ-tiVYnfMLXfD9_sOuPvQXGPcko0gjF01n0t5wZhyyuWn5ooITDFh3XXz9-4IYYbqU0TJoTHFFHwdvEY7ItHD7_0O6RTmMRbkUkZ1sMhBqQgihFPxZQ1NPiQNefLRouFkctJDSNkbi3x8S0zZFhu1XWFfCzL2kMGcl045mVnX8qX56CAU-_XSb5rn-7vn3cNm_-vn4-77fuPpltcN5c4xga0m0DIuJQiiXd-LLe6kba2Q1PWyJyCYxkC2W26B0k66VoMxrGtvmtuzdtn7Z7alqtEXbUOAaNNcFJcdFYLKBfx2Aed-tEZN2Y-QT-r_6Rbgxxnw8WBjBfWS5rxcpahDOno1DZBHeFUUY67wW3FyGXCnINd1YIvm6R2N12fT-sX1ierISewWISVYklaRJa-MdTCHqipkdXhVhbX_AE-tm_U</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>El Deeb, S.</creator><creator>Schepers, U.</creator><creator>Wätzig, H.</creator><general>Govi-Verlag</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>Evaluation of monolithic C18 HPLC columns for the fast analysis of pilocarpine hydrochloride in the presence of its degradation products</title><author>El Deeb, S. ; Schepers, U. ; Wätzig, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i256t-26ff470ec1a34688a71cfbb75098e3e782fb8b1a74c0a1556ea2298f3cadd493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid</topic><topic>Excipients</topic><topic>Indicators and Reagents</topic><topic>Miotics - analysis</topic><topic>Miotics - chemistry</topic><topic>Ophthalmic Solutions</topic><topic>Pilocarpine - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Pilocarpine - analysis</topic><topic>Pilocarpine - chemistry</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>El Deeb, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schepers, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wätzig, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pharmazie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>El Deeb, S.</au><au>Schepers, U.</au><au>Wätzig, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of monolithic C18 HPLC columns for the fast analysis of pilocarpine hydrochloride in the presence of its degradation products</atitle><jtitle>Pharmazie</jtitle><addtitle>Pharmazie</addtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>751</spage><epage>756</epage><pages>751-756</pages><issn>0031-7144</issn><abstract>Monolithic Performance C18 HPLC columns (Chromolith Performance RP-18e, Merck) were applied for the determination of pilocarpine hydrochloride in the presence of its degradation products isopilocarpine, pilocarpic acid and isopilocarpic acid. The method was validated using a set of
six monolithic columns and compared to a conventional C18 column. The separation of pilocarpine from its degradation products was investigated on monolithic columns at different flow rates from 1 to 9 ml/min. Superior resolution was obtained using monolithic columns over the conventional C18
column at the same flow rate of 1 ml/min with a total run time of 9 min compared to 13.5 min for the conventional C18 column. Comparable resolution to that obtained in the C18 column (but with better peak symmetry) was obtained at a flow rate of 4 ml/min, although the total run time was reduced
to 3.5 min. The precision for both retention time and peak area was investigated over a wide concentration range and found to be equal, or slightly better on Chromolith Performance compared to the conventional column. The overall RSDs% ranged from 0.5% to 1.16% for the
conventional column, while for monolithic columns ranged from 0.38% to 0.87% at a flow rate of 1 ml/min and from 0.38% to 0.89% at a flow rate of 4 ml/min. Monolithic column to column reproducibility (n = 6) was measured. The RSDs% ranged from 0.34%
to 0.68% for retention time and from 0.3% to 0.94% for peak areas. The detection and quantitation limits on monolithic columns at both flow rates (1 and 4 ml/min) were found to be 0.17 μg/ml and 0.5 μg/ml, compared to 0.31 μg/ml and 1 μg/ml on the conventional
column. Monolithic silica rods have also shown the advantage of reducing the time to wash and to re-equilibrate the column. The method showed good linearity and recovery and was found to be suitable for the analysis of pilocarpine hydrochloride formulations.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Govi-Verlag</pub><pmid>17020149</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-7144 |
ispartof | Pharmazie, 2006-09, Vol.61 (9), p.751-756 |
issn | 0031-7144 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68927728 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals |
subjects | Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid Excipients Indicators and Reagents Miotics - analysis Miotics - chemistry Ophthalmic Solutions Pilocarpine - analogs & derivatives Pilocarpine - analysis Pilocarpine - chemistry Reference Standards Reproducibility of Results |
title | Evaluation of monolithic C18 HPLC columns for the fast analysis of pilocarpine hydrochloride in the presence of its degradation products |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T08%3A06%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubtec_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20monolithic%20C18%20HPLC%20columns%20for%20the%20fast%20analysis%20of%20pilocarpine%20hydrochloride%20in%20the%20presence%20of%20its%20degradation%20products&rft.jtitle=Pharmazie&rft.au=El%20Deeb,%20S.&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=751&rft.epage=756&rft.pages=751-756&rft.issn=0031-7144&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubtec_proqu%3Egovi/pharmaz/2006/00000061/00000009/art00004%3C/pubtec_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68927728&rft_id=info:pmid/17020149&rft_ingid=govi/pharmaz/2006/00000061/00000009/art00004&rfr_iscdi=true |