Self-Efficacy and Work-Related Performance: The Integral Role of Individual Differences

The present study estimated the unique contribution of self-efficacy to work-related performance controlling for personality (the Big 5 traits), intelligence or general mental ability, and job or task experience. Results, based on a meta-analysis of the relevant literatures, revealed that overall, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied psychology 2007-01, Vol.92 (1), p.107-127
Hauptverfasser: Judge, Timothy A, Jackson, Christine L, Shaw, John C, Scott, Brent A, Rich, Bruce L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 127
container_issue 1
container_start_page 107
container_title Journal of applied psychology
container_volume 92
creator Judge, Timothy A
Jackson, Christine L
Shaw, John C
Scott, Brent A
Rich, Bruce L
description The present study estimated the unique contribution of self-efficacy to work-related performance controlling for personality (the Big 5 traits), intelligence or general mental ability, and job or task experience. Results, based on a meta-analysis of the relevant literatures, revealed that overall, across all studies and moderator conditions, the contribution of self-efficacy relative to purportedly more distal variables is relatively small. Within moderator categories, there were several cases in which self-efficacy made unique contributions to work-related performance. For example, self-efficacy predicted performance in jobs or tasks of low complexity but not those of medium or high complexity, and self-efficacy predicted performance for task but not job performance. Overall, results suggest that the predictive validity of self-efficacy is attenuated in the presence of individual differences, though this attenuation does depend on the context.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68921818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1196383831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a578t-fbf5a28df19941a2e5724ac3c8ddc1e3ec81783cae9eecaca490180bd7c51bc33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0Utr3DAQB3ARGppt2i_QQ1lK00OKU40elnQsIX1AIKEPehSz8gicem1Hsg_77aNll6YppTkJDb-Zkfgz9hL4GXBp3nMuoHK8XJ04g1IzB2wBTroKrFZP2OI3OGLPcr7hHJR0_Ck7AiOEAa0X7PQbdbG6iLENGDZL7JvlzyH9qr5ShxM1y2tKcUhr7AM9Z4cRu0wv9ucx-_Hx4vv55-ry6tOX8w-XFWpjpyquokZhmwjOKUBB2giFQQbbNAFIUrBgrAxIjqgsRVVeaPmqMUHDKkh5zN7u5o5puJ0pT37d5kBdhz0Nc_a1dQIs2EehNlBrKetHoay10UrzAl__BW-GOfXlt74GpeoaOPwPCZBOWmtMQWKHQhpyThT9mNo1po0H7rfp-W04fhuOd8JDqW2bXu0nz6s1Nfct-7gKONkDzAG7mEoubb53VinQxhX3budwRD_mTcA0taGjHOaUqJ88jt2fa9_8Wz9kdz8Xusw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614466101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self-Efficacy and Work-Related Performance: The Integral Role of Individual Differences</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Judge, Timothy A ; Jackson, Christine L ; Shaw, John C ; Scott, Brent A ; Rich, Bruce L</creator><contributor>Zedeck, Sheldon</contributor><creatorcontrib>Judge, Timothy A ; Jackson, Christine L ; Shaw, John C ; Scott, Brent A ; Rich, Bruce L ; Zedeck, Sheldon</creatorcontrib><description>The present study estimated the unique contribution of self-efficacy to work-related performance controlling for personality (the Big 5 traits), intelligence or general mental ability, and job or task experience. Results, based on a meta-analysis of the relevant literatures, revealed that overall, across all studies and moderator conditions, the contribution of self-efficacy relative to purportedly more distal variables is relatively small. Within moderator categories, there were several cases in which self-efficacy made unique contributions to work-related performance. For example, self-efficacy predicted performance in jobs or tasks of low complexity but not those of medium or high complexity, and self-efficacy predicted performance for task but not job performance. Overall, results suggest that the predictive validity of self-efficacy is attenuated in the presence of individual differences, though this attenuation does depend on the context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17227155</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPGBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Cognitive abilities ; Cognitive Ability ; Employee Performance Appraisal ; Employment - psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Individual Differences ; Individuals ; Interpersonal Relations ; Job Performance ; Job Satisfaction ; Meta-analysis ; Miscellaneous ; Motivation ; Occupational psychology ; Organizational behavior ; Organizational Culture ; Personality ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Self ; Self Efficacy ; Selfefficacy ; Studies ; Systematic review ; Working conditions ; Working life ; Workplace - psychology</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 2007-01, Vol.92 (1), p.107-127</ispartof><rights>2007 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2007 APA, all rights reserved</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2007</rights><rights>2007, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a578t-fbf5a28df19941a2e5724ac3c8ddc1e3ec81783cae9eecaca490180bd7c51bc33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a578t-fbf5a28df19941a2e5724ac3c8ddc1e3ec81783cae9eecaca490180bd7c51bc33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18441579$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17227155$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Zedeck, Sheldon</contributor><creatorcontrib>Judge, Timothy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Christine L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Brent A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rich, Bruce L</creatorcontrib><title>Self-Efficacy and Work-Related Performance: The Integral Role of Individual Differences</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><description>The present study estimated the unique contribution of self-efficacy to work-related performance controlling for personality (the Big 5 traits), intelligence or general mental ability, and job or task experience. Results, based on a meta-analysis of the relevant literatures, revealed that overall, across all studies and moderator conditions, the contribution of self-efficacy relative to purportedly more distal variables is relatively small. Within moderator categories, there were several cases in which self-efficacy made unique contributions to work-related performance. For example, self-efficacy predicted performance in jobs or tasks of low complexity but not those of medium or high complexity, and self-efficacy predicted performance for task but not job performance. Overall, results suggest that the predictive validity of self-efficacy is attenuated in the presence of individual differences, though this attenuation does depend on the context.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive abilities</subject><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Employee Performance Appraisal</subject><subject>Employment - psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Individuals</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Job Performance</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Self</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Selfefficacy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><subject>Working life</subject><subject>Workplace - psychology</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0Utr3DAQB3ARGppt2i_QQ1lK00OKU40elnQsIX1AIKEPehSz8gicem1Hsg_77aNll6YppTkJDb-Zkfgz9hL4GXBp3nMuoHK8XJ04g1IzB2wBTroKrFZP2OI3OGLPcr7hHJR0_Ck7AiOEAa0X7PQbdbG6iLENGDZL7JvlzyH9qr5ShxM1y2tKcUhr7AM9Z4cRu0wv9ucx-_Hx4vv55-ry6tOX8w-XFWpjpyquokZhmwjOKUBB2giFQQbbNAFIUrBgrAxIjqgsRVVeaPmqMUHDKkh5zN7u5o5puJ0pT37d5kBdhz0Nc_a1dQIs2EehNlBrKetHoay10UrzAl__BW-GOfXlt74GpeoaOPwPCZBOWmtMQWKHQhpyThT9mNo1po0H7rfp-W04fhuOd8JDqW2bXu0nz6s1Nfct-7gKONkDzAG7mEoubb53VinQxhX3budwRD_mTcA0taGjHOaUqJ88jt2fa9_8Wz9kdz8Xusw</recordid><startdate>200701</startdate><enddate>200701</enddate><creator>Judge, Timothy A</creator><creator>Jackson, Christine L</creator><creator>Shaw, John C</creator><creator>Scott, Brent A</creator><creator>Rich, Bruce L</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200701</creationdate><title>Self-Efficacy and Work-Related Performance</title><author>Judge, Timothy A ; Jackson, Christine L ; Shaw, John C ; Scott, Brent A ; Rich, Bruce L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a578t-fbf5a28df19941a2e5724ac3c8ddc1e3ec81783cae9eecaca490180bd7c51bc33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive abilities</topic><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Employee Performance Appraisal</topic><topic>Employment - psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Individuals</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Job Performance</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Self</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Selfefficacy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><topic>Working life</topic><topic>Workplace - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Judge, Timothy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Christine L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Brent A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rich, Bruce L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Judge, Timothy A</au><au>Jackson, Christine L</au><au>Shaw, John C</au><au>Scott, Brent A</au><au>Rich, Bruce L</au><au>Zedeck, Sheldon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self-Efficacy and Work-Related Performance: The Integral Role of Individual Differences</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><date>2007-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>127</epage><pages>107-127</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><coden>JAPGBP</coden><abstract>The present study estimated the unique contribution of self-efficacy to work-related performance controlling for personality (the Big 5 traits), intelligence or general mental ability, and job or task experience. Results, based on a meta-analysis of the relevant literatures, revealed that overall, across all studies and moderator conditions, the contribution of self-efficacy relative to purportedly more distal variables is relatively small. Within moderator categories, there were several cases in which self-efficacy made unique contributions to work-related performance. For example, self-efficacy predicted performance in jobs or tasks of low complexity but not those of medium or high complexity, and self-efficacy predicted performance for task but not job performance. Overall, results suggest that the predictive validity of self-efficacy is attenuated in the presence of individual differences, though this attenuation does depend on the context.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>17227155</pmid><doi>10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9010
ispartof Journal of applied psychology, 2007-01, Vol.92 (1), p.107-127
issn 0021-9010
1939-1854
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68921818
source APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cognition
Cognitive abilities
Cognitive Ability
Employee Performance Appraisal
Employment - psychology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Individual Differences
Individuals
Interpersonal Relations
Job Performance
Job Satisfaction
Meta-analysis
Miscellaneous
Motivation
Occupational psychology
Organizational behavior
Organizational Culture
Personality
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Self
Self Efficacy
Selfefficacy
Studies
Systematic review
Working conditions
Working life
Workplace - psychology
title Self-Efficacy and Work-Related Performance: The Integral Role of Individual Differences
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T11%3A52%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self-Efficacy%20and%20Work-Related%20Performance:%20The%20Integral%20Role%20of%20Individual%20Differences&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Judge,%20Timothy%20A&rft.date=2007-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=127&rft.pages=107-127&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft.coden=JAPGBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1196383831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614466101&rft_id=info:pmid/17227155&rfr_iscdi=true