Epidermal growth factor receptor analyses in colorectal cancer : A comparison of methods

EGFR immunohistochemistry (IHC) status is not a reliable predictive marker for response to EGFR-targeted therapies. The present study compares the EGFR status at DNA, RNA and protein level. Blood samples, corresponding normal colon and colorectal cancer tissue were collected from 199 colorectal canc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of oncology 2006-11, Vol.29 (5), p.1159-1165
Hauptverfasser: SPINDLER, Karen-Lise Garm, LINDEBJERG, Jan, NIELSEN, Jens Nederby, OLSEN, Dorte Aalund, BISGARD, Claus, BRANDSLUND, Ivan, JAKOBSEN, Anders
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1165
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1159
container_title International journal of oncology
container_volume 29
creator SPINDLER, Karen-Lise Garm
LINDEBJERG, Jan
NIELSEN, Jens Nederby
OLSEN, Dorte Aalund
BISGARD, Claus
BRANDSLUND, Ivan
JAKOBSEN, Anders
description EGFR immunohistochemistry (IHC) status is not a reliable predictive marker for response to EGFR-targeted therapies. The present study compares the EGFR status at DNA, RNA and protein level. Blood samples, corresponding normal colon and colorectal cancer tissue were collected from 199 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. EGFR status was evaluated by FISH analysis, real-time RT-PCR, ELISA and IHC. A polymorphism in the EGFR promoter was evaluated by PCR analysis. The EGFR levels by different methods were mutually compared. Seventy-eight percent of primary tumours and corresponding lymph nodes had equivalent EGFR status (28/34). There was a tendency to higher median protein level (by ELISA) in IHC positive patients compared to IHC negative patients (p=0.086). The median EGFR gene expression level was significantly lower in tumours than in the normal colon with no difference according to IHC status. No tumours had increased gene copy number by FISH. EGFR Sp1-216 polymorphism analysis showed a tendency for different EGFR tumour protein levels and gene expression levels according to the different genotypes. The results show a poor correlation between EGFR status at DNA, RNA and protein level. The predictive value of a combination of methods needs further evaluation in the clinical setting.
doi_str_mv 10.3892/ijo.29.5.1159
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68916882</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19695219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-8c1f2eb711b9b0721a2150ed09e71696ee4f5380a9d0dcf934876db241d7dbf83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1rFTEUgOFQlLZWl24lG93NNSeZfBx3pVRbKLix0F3I5MNOmZmMyVyk_95ceqFLVznkPJzFS8hHYDthkH8dn_KO407uACSekHPQCB3vuXjTZgbYqV7gGXlX6xNjXEoGp-QMNAOlen1OHq7XMcQyu4n-Lvnv9kiT81sutEQf18PgFjc911jpuFCfp9wWW9PeLT4W-o1ett95dWWseaE50TlujznU9-RtclONH47vBbn_fv3r6qa7-_nj9uryrvMCYeuMh8TjoAEGHJjm4DhIFgPDqEGhirFPUhjmMLDgE4reaBUG3kPQYUhGXJAvL3fXkv_sY93sPFYfp8ktMe-rVQZBGcP_CwEVSg7YYPcCfcm1lpjsWsbZlWcLzB6a29bccrTSHpo3_-l4eD_MMbzqY-QGPh-Bq95NqbR0Y311hnMpuBb_ADpYiiM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19695219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidermal growth factor receptor analyses in colorectal cancer : A comparison of methods</title><source>Spandidos Publications Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>SPINDLER, Karen-Lise Garm ; LINDEBJERG, Jan ; NIELSEN, Jens Nederby ; OLSEN, Dorte Aalund ; BISGARD, Claus ; BRANDSLUND, Ivan ; JAKOBSEN, Anders</creator><creatorcontrib>SPINDLER, Karen-Lise Garm ; LINDEBJERG, Jan ; NIELSEN, Jens Nederby ; OLSEN, Dorte Aalund ; BISGARD, Claus ; BRANDSLUND, Ivan ; JAKOBSEN, Anders</creatorcontrib><description>EGFR immunohistochemistry (IHC) status is not a reliable predictive marker for response to EGFR-targeted therapies. The present study compares the EGFR status at DNA, RNA and protein level. Blood samples, corresponding normal colon and colorectal cancer tissue were collected from 199 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. EGFR status was evaluated by FISH analysis, real-time RT-PCR, ELISA and IHC. A polymorphism in the EGFR promoter was evaluated by PCR analysis. The EGFR levels by different methods were mutually compared. Seventy-eight percent of primary tumours and corresponding lymph nodes had equivalent EGFR status (28/34). There was a tendency to higher median protein level (by ELISA) in IHC positive patients compared to IHC negative patients (p=0.086). The median EGFR gene expression level was significantly lower in tumours than in the normal colon with no difference according to IHC status. No tumours had increased gene copy number by FISH. EGFR Sp1-216 polymorphism analysis showed a tendency for different EGFR tumour protein levels and gene expression levels according to the different genotypes. The results show a poor correlation between EGFR status at DNA, RNA and protein level. The predictive value of a combination of methods needs further evaluation in the clinical setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1019-6439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1791-2423</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3892/ijo.29.5.1159</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17016647</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Athens: Editorial Academy of the International Journal of Oncology</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis ; Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Gene Dosage ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry - methods ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Molecular Diagnostic Techniques ; Polymorphism, Genetic ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - analysis ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics ; RNA, Messenger - analysis ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>International journal of oncology, 2006-11, Vol.29 (5), p.1159-1165</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-8c1f2eb711b9b0721a2150ed09e71696ee4f5380a9d0dcf934876db241d7dbf83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18225327$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17016647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SPINDLER, Karen-Lise Garm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LINDEBJERG, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIELSEN, Jens Nederby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OLSEN, Dorte Aalund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BISGARD, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRANDSLUND, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAKOBSEN, Anders</creatorcontrib><title>Epidermal growth factor receptor analyses in colorectal cancer : A comparison of methods</title><title>International journal of oncology</title><addtitle>Int J Oncol</addtitle><description>EGFR immunohistochemistry (IHC) status is not a reliable predictive marker for response to EGFR-targeted therapies. The present study compares the EGFR status at DNA, RNA and protein level. Blood samples, corresponding normal colon and colorectal cancer tissue were collected from 199 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. EGFR status was evaluated by FISH analysis, real-time RT-PCR, ELISA and IHC. A polymorphism in the EGFR promoter was evaluated by PCR analysis. The EGFR levels by different methods were mutually compared. Seventy-eight percent of primary tumours and corresponding lymph nodes had equivalent EGFR status (28/34). There was a tendency to higher median protein level (by ELISA) in IHC positive patients compared to IHC negative patients (p=0.086). The median EGFR gene expression level was significantly lower in tumours than in the normal colon with no difference according to IHC status. No tumours had increased gene copy number by FISH. EGFR Sp1-216 polymorphism analysis showed a tendency for different EGFR tumour protein levels and gene expression levels according to the different genotypes. The results show a poor correlation between EGFR status at DNA, RNA and protein level. The predictive value of a combination of methods needs further evaluation in the clinical setting.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Gene Dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Molecular Diagnostic Techniques</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Genetic</subject><subject>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - analysis</subject><subject>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics</subject><subject>RNA, Messenger - analysis</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1019-6439</issn><issn>1791-2423</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1rFTEUgOFQlLZWl24lG93NNSeZfBx3pVRbKLix0F3I5MNOmZmMyVyk_95ceqFLVznkPJzFS8hHYDthkH8dn_KO407uACSekHPQCB3vuXjTZgbYqV7gGXlX6xNjXEoGp-QMNAOlen1OHq7XMcQyu4n-Lvnv9kiT81sutEQf18PgFjc911jpuFCfp9wWW9PeLT4W-o1ett95dWWseaE50TlujznU9-RtclONH47vBbn_fv3r6qa7-_nj9uryrvMCYeuMh8TjoAEGHJjm4DhIFgPDqEGhirFPUhjmMLDgE4reaBUG3kPQYUhGXJAvL3fXkv_sY93sPFYfp8ktMe-rVQZBGcP_CwEVSg7YYPcCfcm1lpjsWsbZlWcLzB6a29bccrTSHpo3_-l4eD_MMbzqY-QGPh-Bq95NqbR0Y311hnMpuBb_ADpYiiM</recordid><startdate>20061101</startdate><enddate>20061101</enddate><creator>SPINDLER, Karen-Lise Garm</creator><creator>LINDEBJERG, Jan</creator><creator>NIELSEN, Jens Nederby</creator><creator>OLSEN, Dorte Aalund</creator><creator>BISGARD, Claus</creator><creator>BRANDSLUND, Ivan</creator><creator>JAKOBSEN, Anders</creator><general>Editorial Academy of the International Journal of Oncology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061101</creationdate><title>Epidermal growth factor receptor analyses in colorectal cancer : A comparison of methods</title><author>SPINDLER, Karen-Lise Garm ; LINDEBJERG, Jan ; NIELSEN, Jens Nederby ; OLSEN, Dorte Aalund ; BISGARD, Claus ; BRANDSLUND, Ivan ; JAKOBSEN, Anders</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-8c1f2eb711b9b0721a2150ed09e71696ee4f5380a9d0dcf934876db241d7dbf83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Gene Dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Molecular Diagnostic Techniques</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Genetic</topic><topic>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - analysis</topic><topic>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics</topic><topic>RNA, Messenger - analysis</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SPINDLER, Karen-Lise Garm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LINDEBJERG, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIELSEN, Jens Nederby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OLSEN, Dorte Aalund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BISGARD, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRANDSLUND, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAKOBSEN, Anders</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SPINDLER, Karen-Lise Garm</au><au>LINDEBJERG, Jan</au><au>NIELSEN, Jens Nederby</au><au>OLSEN, Dorte Aalund</au><au>BISGARD, Claus</au><au>BRANDSLUND, Ivan</au><au>JAKOBSEN, Anders</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidermal growth factor receptor analyses in colorectal cancer : A comparison of methods</atitle><jtitle>International journal of oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Oncol</addtitle><date>2006-11-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1159</spage><epage>1165</epage><pages>1159-1165</pages><issn>1019-6439</issn><eissn>1791-2423</eissn><abstract>EGFR immunohistochemistry (IHC) status is not a reliable predictive marker for response to EGFR-targeted therapies. The present study compares the EGFR status at DNA, RNA and protein level. Blood samples, corresponding normal colon and colorectal cancer tissue were collected from 199 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. EGFR status was evaluated by FISH analysis, real-time RT-PCR, ELISA and IHC. A polymorphism in the EGFR promoter was evaluated by PCR analysis. The EGFR levels by different methods were mutually compared. Seventy-eight percent of primary tumours and corresponding lymph nodes had equivalent EGFR status (28/34). There was a tendency to higher median protein level (by ELISA) in IHC positive patients compared to IHC negative patients (p=0.086). The median EGFR gene expression level was significantly lower in tumours than in the normal colon with no difference according to IHC status. No tumours had increased gene copy number by FISH. EGFR Sp1-216 polymorphism analysis showed a tendency for different EGFR tumour protein levels and gene expression levels according to the different genotypes. The results show a poor correlation between EGFR status at DNA, RNA and protein level. The predictive value of a combination of methods needs further evaluation in the clinical setting.</abstract><cop>Athens</cop><pub>Editorial Academy of the International Journal of Oncology</pub><pmid>17016647</pmid><doi>10.3892/ijo.29.5.1159</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1019-6439
ispartof International journal of oncology, 2006-11, Vol.29 (5), p.1159-1165
issn 1019-6439
1791-2423
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68916882
source Spandidos Publications Journals; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis
Biological and medical sciences
Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis
Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics
Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Female
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Gene Dosage
Humans
Immunohistochemistry - methods
Male
Medical sciences
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques
Polymorphism, Genetic
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - analysis
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics
RNA, Messenger - analysis
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
Tumors
title Epidermal growth factor receptor analyses in colorectal cancer : A comparison of methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T07%3A03%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidermal%20growth%20factor%20receptor%20analyses%20in%20colorectal%20cancer%20:%20A%20comparison%20of%20methods&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20oncology&rft.au=SPINDLER,%20Karen-Lise%20Garm&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1159&rft.epage=1165&rft.pages=1159-1165&rft.issn=1019-6439&rft.eissn=1791-2423&rft_id=info:doi/10.3892/ijo.29.5.1159&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19695219%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19695219&rft_id=info:pmid/17016647&rfr_iscdi=true