Epidermal growth factor receptor analyses in colorectal cancer : A comparison of methods
EGFR immunohistochemistry (IHC) status is not a reliable predictive marker for response to EGFR-targeted therapies. The present study compares the EGFR status at DNA, RNA and protein level. Blood samples, corresponding normal colon and colorectal cancer tissue were collected from 199 colorectal canc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of oncology 2006-11, Vol.29 (5), p.1159-1165 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1165 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1159 |
container_title | International journal of oncology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | SPINDLER, Karen-Lise Garm LINDEBJERG, Jan NIELSEN, Jens Nederby OLSEN, Dorte Aalund BISGARD, Claus BRANDSLUND, Ivan JAKOBSEN, Anders |
description | EGFR immunohistochemistry (IHC) status is not a reliable predictive marker for response to EGFR-targeted therapies. The present study compares the EGFR status at DNA, RNA and protein level. Blood samples, corresponding normal colon and colorectal cancer tissue were collected from 199 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. EGFR status was evaluated by FISH analysis, real-time RT-PCR, ELISA and IHC. A polymorphism in the EGFR promoter was evaluated by PCR analysis. The EGFR levels by different methods were mutually compared. Seventy-eight percent of primary tumours and corresponding lymph nodes had equivalent EGFR status (28/34). There was a tendency to higher median protein level (by ELISA) in IHC positive patients compared to IHC negative patients (p=0.086). The median EGFR gene expression level was significantly lower in tumours than in the normal colon with no difference according to IHC status. No tumours had increased gene copy number by FISH. EGFR Sp1-216 polymorphism analysis showed a tendency for different EGFR tumour protein levels and gene expression levels according to the different genotypes. The results show a poor correlation between EGFR status at DNA, RNA and protein level. The predictive value of a combination of methods needs further evaluation in the clinical setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3892/ijo.29.5.1159 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68916882</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19695219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-8c1f2eb711b9b0721a2150ed09e71696ee4f5380a9d0dcf934876db241d7dbf83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1rFTEUgOFQlLZWl24lG93NNSeZfBx3pVRbKLix0F3I5MNOmZmMyVyk_95ceqFLVznkPJzFS8hHYDthkH8dn_KO407uACSekHPQCB3vuXjTZgbYqV7gGXlX6xNjXEoGp-QMNAOlen1OHq7XMcQyu4n-Lvnv9kiT81sutEQf18PgFjc911jpuFCfp9wWW9PeLT4W-o1ett95dWWseaE50TlujznU9-RtclONH47vBbn_fv3r6qa7-_nj9uryrvMCYeuMh8TjoAEGHJjm4DhIFgPDqEGhirFPUhjmMLDgE4reaBUG3kPQYUhGXJAvL3fXkv_sY93sPFYfp8ktMe-rVQZBGcP_CwEVSg7YYPcCfcm1lpjsWsbZlWcLzB6a29bccrTSHpo3_-l4eD_MMbzqY-QGPh-Bq95NqbR0Y311hnMpuBb_ADpYiiM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19695219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidermal growth factor receptor analyses in colorectal cancer : A comparison of methods</title><source>Spandidos Publications Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>SPINDLER, Karen-Lise Garm ; LINDEBJERG, Jan ; NIELSEN, Jens Nederby ; OLSEN, Dorte Aalund ; BISGARD, Claus ; BRANDSLUND, Ivan ; JAKOBSEN, Anders</creator><creatorcontrib>SPINDLER, Karen-Lise Garm ; LINDEBJERG, Jan ; NIELSEN, Jens Nederby ; OLSEN, Dorte Aalund ; BISGARD, Claus ; BRANDSLUND, Ivan ; JAKOBSEN, Anders</creatorcontrib><description>EGFR immunohistochemistry (IHC) status is not a reliable predictive marker for response to EGFR-targeted therapies. The present study compares the EGFR status at DNA, RNA and protein level. Blood samples, corresponding normal colon and colorectal cancer tissue were collected from 199 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. EGFR status was evaluated by FISH analysis, real-time RT-PCR, ELISA and IHC. A polymorphism in the EGFR promoter was evaluated by PCR analysis. The EGFR levels by different methods were mutually compared. Seventy-eight percent of primary tumours and corresponding lymph nodes had equivalent EGFR status (28/34). There was a tendency to higher median protein level (by ELISA) in IHC positive patients compared to IHC negative patients (p=0.086). The median EGFR gene expression level was significantly lower in tumours than in the normal colon with no difference according to IHC status. No tumours had increased gene copy number by FISH. EGFR Sp1-216 polymorphism analysis showed a tendency for different EGFR tumour protein levels and gene expression levels according to the different genotypes. The results show a poor correlation between EGFR status at DNA, RNA and protein level. The predictive value of a combination of methods needs further evaluation in the clinical setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1019-6439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1791-2423</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3892/ijo.29.5.1159</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17016647</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Athens: Editorial Academy of the International Journal of Oncology</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis ; Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Gene Dosage ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry - methods ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Molecular Diagnostic Techniques ; Polymorphism, Genetic ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - analysis ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics ; RNA, Messenger - analysis ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>International journal of oncology, 2006-11, Vol.29 (5), p.1159-1165</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-8c1f2eb711b9b0721a2150ed09e71696ee4f5380a9d0dcf934876db241d7dbf83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18225327$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17016647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SPINDLER, Karen-Lise Garm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LINDEBJERG, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIELSEN, Jens Nederby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OLSEN, Dorte Aalund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BISGARD, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRANDSLUND, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAKOBSEN, Anders</creatorcontrib><title>Epidermal growth factor receptor analyses in colorectal cancer : A comparison of methods</title><title>International journal of oncology</title><addtitle>Int J Oncol</addtitle><description>EGFR immunohistochemistry (IHC) status is not a reliable predictive marker for response to EGFR-targeted therapies. The present study compares the EGFR status at DNA, RNA and protein level. Blood samples, corresponding normal colon and colorectal cancer tissue were collected from 199 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. EGFR status was evaluated by FISH analysis, real-time RT-PCR, ELISA and IHC. A polymorphism in the EGFR promoter was evaluated by PCR analysis. The EGFR levels by different methods were mutually compared. Seventy-eight percent of primary tumours and corresponding lymph nodes had equivalent EGFR status (28/34). There was a tendency to higher median protein level (by ELISA) in IHC positive patients compared to IHC negative patients (p=0.086). The median EGFR gene expression level was significantly lower in tumours than in the normal colon with no difference according to IHC status. No tumours had increased gene copy number by FISH. EGFR Sp1-216 polymorphism analysis showed a tendency for different EGFR tumour protein levels and gene expression levels according to the different genotypes. The results show a poor correlation between EGFR status at DNA, RNA and protein level. The predictive value of a combination of methods needs further evaluation in the clinical setting.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Gene Dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Molecular Diagnostic Techniques</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Genetic</subject><subject>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - analysis</subject><subject>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics</subject><subject>RNA, Messenger - analysis</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1019-6439</issn><issn>1791-2423</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1rFTEUgOFQlLZWl24lG93NNSeZfBx3pVRbKLix0F3I5MNOmZmMyVyk_95ceqFLVznkPJzFS8hHYDthkH8dn_KO407uACSekHPQCB3vuXjTZgbYqV7gGXlX6xNjXEoGp-QMNAOlen1OHq7XMcQyu4n-Lvnv9kiT81sutEQf18PgFjc911jpuFCfp9wWW9PeLT4W-o1ett95dWWseaE50TlujznU9-RtclONH47vBbn_fv3r6qa7-_nj9uryrvMCYeuMh8TjoAEGHJjm4DhIFgPDqEGhirFPUhjmMLDgE4reaBUG3kPQYUhGXJAvL3fXkv_sY93sPFYfp8ktMe-rVQZBGcP_CwEVSg7YYPcCfcm1lpjsWsbZlWcLzB6a29bccrTSHpo3_-l4eD_MMbzqY-QGPh-Bq95NqbR0Y311hnMpuBb_ADpYiiM</recordid><startdate>20061101</startdate><enddate>20061101</enddate><creator>SPINDLER, Karen-Lise Garm</creator><creator>LINDEBJERG, Jan</creator><creator>NIELSEN, Jens Nederby</creator><creator>OLSEN, Dorte Aalund</creator><creator>BISGARD, Claus</creator><creator>BRANDSLUND, Ivan</creator><creator>JAKOBSEN, Anders</creator><general>Editorial Academy of the International Journal of Oncology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061101</creationdate><title>Epidermal growth factor receptor analyses in colorectal cancer : A comparison of methods</title><author>SPINDLER, Karen-Lise Garm ; LINDEBJERG, Jan ; NIELSEN, Jens Nederby ; OLSEN, Dorte Aalund ; BISGARD, Claus ; BRANDSLUND, Ivan ; JAKOBSEN, Anders</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-8c1f2eb711b9b0721a2150ed09e71696ee4f5380a9d0dcf934876db241d7dbf83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Gene Dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Molecular Diagnostic Techniques</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Genetic</topic><topic>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - analysis</topic><topic>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics</topic><topic>RNA, Messenger - analysis</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SPINDLER, Karen-Lise Garm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LINDEBJERG, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIELSEN, Jens Nederby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OLSEN, Dorte Aalund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BISGARD, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRANDSLUND, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAKOBSEN, Anders</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SPINDLER, Karen-Lise Garm</au><au>LINDEBJERG, Jan</au><au>NIELSEN, Jens Nederby</au><au>OLSEN, Dorte Aalund</au><au>BISGARD, Claus</au><au>BRANDSLUND, Ivan</au><au>JAKOBSEN, Anders</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidermal growth factor receptor analyses in colorectal cancer : A comparison of methods</atitle><jtitle>International journal of oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Oncol</addtitle><date>2006-11-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1159</spage><epage>1165</epage><pages>1159-1165</pages><issn>1019-6439</issn><eissn>1791-2423</eissn><abstract>EGFR immunohistochemistry (IHC) status is not a reliable predictive marker for response to EGFR-targeted therapies. The present study compares the EGFR status at DNA, RNA and protein level. Blood samples, corresponding normal colon and colorectal cancer tissue were collected from 199 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. EGFR status was evaluated by FISH analysis, real-time RT-PCR, ELISA and IHC. A polymorphism in the EGFR promoter was evaluated by PCR analysis. The EGFR levels by different methods were mutually compared. Seventy-eight percent of primary tumours and corresponding lymph nodes had equivalent EGFR status (28/34). There was a tendency to higher median protein level (by ELISA) in IHC positive patients compared to IHC negative patients (p=0.086). The median EGFR gene expression level was significantly lower in tumours than in the normal colon with no difference according to IHC status. No tumours had increased gene copy number by FISH. EGFR Sp1-216 polymorphism analysis showed a tendency for different EGFR tumour protein levels and gene expression levels according to the different genotypes. The results show a poor correlation between EGFR status at DNA, RNA and protein level. The predictive value of a combination of methods needs further evaluation in the clinical setting.</abstract><cop>Athens</cop><pub>Editorial Academy of the International Journal of Oncology</pub><pmid>17016647</pmid><doi>10.3892/ijo.29.5.1159</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1019-6439 |
ispartof | International journal of oncology, 2006-11, Vol.29 (5), p.1159-1165 |
issn | 1019-6439 1791-2423 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68916882 |
source | Spandidos Publications Journals; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis Biological and medical sciences Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis Female Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Gene Dosage Humans Immunohistochemistry - methods Male Medical sciences Molecular Diagnostic Techniques Polymorphism, Genetic Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - analysis Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics RNA, Messenger - analysis Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus Tumors |
title | Epidermal growth factor receptor analyses in colorectal cancer : A comparison of methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T07%3A03%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidermal%20growth%20factor%20receptor%20analyses%20in%20colorectal%20cancer%20:%20A%20comparison%20of%20methods&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20oncology&rft.au=SPINDLER,%20Karen-Lise%20Garm&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1159&rft.epage=1165&rft.pages=1159-1165&rft.issn=1019-6439&rft.eissn=1791-2423&rft_id=info:doi/10.3892/ijo.29.5.1159&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19695219%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19695219&rft_id=info:pmid/17016647&rfr_iscdi=true |