Patient preference for once-monthly ibandronate versus once-weekly alendronate in a randomized, open-label, cross-over trial: the Boniva Alendronate Trial in Osteoporosis (BALTO)

ABSTRACT Objective: Ibandronate, a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, can be administered with extended interval dosing. Patient preferences were assessed for once-monthly versus once-weekly bisphosphonate treatment using a previously developed, open-label, cross-over trial design. Research...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current medical research and opinion 2005-12, Vol.21 (12), p.1895-1903
Hauptverfasser: Emkey, Ronald, Koltun, William, Beusterien, Kathleen, Seidman, Larry, Kivitz, Alan, Devas, Vipul, Masanauskaite, Daiva
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1903
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1895
container_title Current medical research and opinion
container_volume 21
creator Emkey, Ronald
Koltun, William
Beusterien, Kathleen
Seidman, Larry
Kivitz, Alan
Devas, Vipul
Masanauskaite, Daiva
description ABSTRACT Objective: Ibandronate, a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, can be administered with extended interval dosing. Patient preferences were assessed for once-monthly versus once-weekly bisphosphonate treatment using a previously developed, open-label, cross-over trial design. Research design and methods: This was a 6‐month, prospective, randomized, open-label, multi-center study with a two-period and two-sequence cross-over treatment design. After screening, eligible patients (postmenopausal women with osteoporosis) were randomized to once-monthly ibandronate 150 mg followed by once-weekly alendronate 70 mg for a total of 6 months (Sequence A) or once-weekly alendronate followed by once-monthly ibandronate for a total of 6 months (Sequence B). The primary objective was to evaluate patient-reported preference for either the once-monthly ibandronate regimen or the once-weekly alendronate regimen based on responses to a preference questionnaire. Results: A total of 342 patients were enrolled into this study (Sequence A, 170; Sequence B, 172). In the primary analysis of patient preference, 71.4% of women selected once-monthly ibandronate and 28.6% of women selected once-weekly alendronate. Overall, 66.1% preferred the once-monthly ibandronate regimen to the once-weekly alendronate regimen (26.5%) and 7.4% of participants stated no preference for either regimen. The preference rate for once-monthly ibandronate was statistically significant ( p < 0.0001). ‘Ease of following a treatment regimen for a long time’ was the most common reason given for patient preference for both the once-monthly ibandronate (61%, 169/276) and once-weekly alendronate (25%, 70/276) regimens. Additionally, 17% (47/276) of patients who preferred once-monthly ibandronate chose ‘it is easier to tolerate side effects’ as did 4.3% (12/276) of patients who preferred alendronate. Significantly more women found once-monthly ibandronate to be more convenient ( p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Significantly more women with postmenopausal osteoporosis preferred once-monthly ibandronate therapy to once-weekly alendronate therapy, and found the once-monthly regimen to be more convenient. Ease of following a treatment regimen for a long time was the most common reason given for the patients’ preferences.
doi_str_mv 10.1185/030079905X74862
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68915475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68915475</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-3671bc7634b40891b4f1cc09bc8756b5e52e1ec1c69890d88c34fe28ca2509a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURi0EokNhzQ5ZLBBIDbXjOLG7m1b8SSMNi1mwixznRuPi2IPttBoeiyfEYUYUKnVlS9-5R1f3Q-glJe8pFfycMEIaKQn_1lSiLh-hBa0aVlSiaR6jxZwWOeYn6FmM14TQUkj5FJ3QmtWCMLFAv76qZMAlvAswQACnAQ8-YJ8_xehd2to9Np1yffBOJcA3EOIUD_ktwPccKwt_Y-OwwiHjfjQ_oT_DfgeusKoDe4Z18DEWPitwCkbZC5y2gC-9MzcKL_-xbOZ0dq1jAr_zec5E_PZyudqs3z1HTwZlI7w4vqdo8_HD5upzsVp_-nK1XBWa0yoVrG5op5uaVV1FhKRdNVCtiey0aHjdceAlUNBU11JI0guhWTVAKbQqOZGKnaI3B-0u-B8TxNSOJmqwVjnwU2zr7ORVwzP4-h547afg8mptOZfDJJcZOj9Af26Qb93ughlV2LeUtHOV7b0q88Sro3bqRujv-GN3Gbg4AMblxkZ164Pt26T21ochV6BNbNnDdvnf8BaUTVutAtxt_9Dsb9JXwIc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>207993959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient preference for once-monthly ibandronate versus once-weekly alendronate in a randomized, open-label, cross-over trial: the Boniva Alendronate Trial in Osteoporosis (BALTO)</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><creator>Emkey, Ronald ; Koltun, William ; Beusterien, Kathleen ; Seidman, Larry ; Kivitz, Alan ; Devas, Vipul ; Masanauskaite, Daiva</creator><creatorcontrib>Emkey, Ronald ; Koltun, William ; Beusterien, Kathleen ; Seidman, Larry ; Kivitz, Alan ; Devas, Vipul ; Masanauskaite, Daiva</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objective: Ibandronate, a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, can be administered with extended interval dosing. Patient preferences were assessed for once-monthly versus once-weekly bisphosphonate treatment using a previously developed, open-label, cross-over trial design. Research design and methods: This was a 6‐month, prospective, randomized, open-label, multi-center study with a two-period and two-sequence cross-over treatment design. After screening, eligible patients (postmenopausal women with osteoporosis) were randomized to once-monthly ibandronate 150 mg followed by once-weekly alendronate 70 mg for a total of 6 months (Sequence A) or once-weekly alendronate followed by once-monthly ibandronate for a total of 6 months (Sequence B). The primary objective was to evaluate patient-reported preference for either the once-monthly ibandronate regimen or the once-weekly alendronate regimen based on responses to a preference questionnaire. Results: A total of 342 patients were enrolled into this study (Sequence A, 170; Sequence B, 172). In the primary analysis of patient preference, 71.4% of women selected once-monthly ibandronate and 28.6% of women selected once-weekly alendronate. Overall, 66.1% preferred the once-monthly ibandronate regimen to the once-weekly alendronate regimen (26.5%) and 7.4% of participants stated no preference for either regimen. The preference rate for once-monthly ibandronate was statistically significant ( p &lt; 0.0001). ‘Ease of following a treatment regimen for a long time’ was the most common reason given for patient preference for both the once-monthly ibandronate (61%, 169/276) and once-weekly alendronate (25%, 70/276) regimens. Additionally, 17% (47/276) of patients who preferred once-monthly ibandronate chose ‘it is easier to tolerate side effects’ as did 4.3% (12/276) of patients who preferred alendronate. Significantly more women found once-monthly ibandronate to be more convenient ( p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions: Significantly more women with postmenopausal osteoporosis preferred once-monthly ibandronate therapy to once-weekly alendronate therapy, and found the once-monthly regimen to be more convenient. Ease of following a treatment regimen for a long time was the most common reason given for the patients’ preferences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-7995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-4877</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1185/030079905X74862</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16368038</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMROCX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Alendronate ; Alendronate - administration &amp; dosage ; Convenience ; Cross-Over Studies ; Diphosphonates - administration &amp; dosage ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Humans ; Ibandronate ; Middle Aged ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - drug therapy ; Patient Satisfaction ; Preference ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Current medical research and opinion, 2005-12, Vol.21 (12), p.1895-1903</ispartof><rights>2005 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2005</rights><rights>Copyright Librapharm Dec 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-3671bc7634b40891b4f1cc09bc8756b5e52e1ec1c69890d88c34fe28ca2509a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-3671bc7634b40891b4f1cc09bc8756b5e52e1ec1c69890d88c34fe28ca2509a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1185/030079905X74862$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1185/030079905X74862$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,59726,60409,60515,61194,61229,61375,61410</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16368038$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Emkey, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koltun, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beusterien, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidman, Larry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivitz, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devas, Vipul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masanauskaite, Daiva</creatorcontrib><title>Patient preference for once-monthly ibandronate versus once-weekly alendronate in a randomized, open-label, cross-over trial: the Boniva Alendronate Trial in Osteoporosis (BALTO)</title><title>Current medical research and opinion</title><addtitle>Curr Med Res Opin</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Objective: Ibandronate, a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, can be administered with extended interval dosing. Patient preferences were assessed for once-monthly versus once-weekly bisphosphonate treatment using a previously developed, open-label, cross-over trial design. Research design and methods: This was a 6‐month, prospective, randomized, open-label, multi-center study with a two-period and two-sequence cross-over treatment design. After screening, eligible patients (postmenopausal women with osteoporosis) were randomized to once-monthly ibandronate 150 mg followed by once-weekly alendronate 70 mg for a total of 6 months (Sequence A) or once-weekly alendronate followed by once-monthly ibandronate for a total of 6 months (Sequence B). The primary objective was to evaluate patient-reported preference for either the once-monthly ibandronate regimen or the once-weekly alendronate regimen based on responses to a preference questionnaire. Results: A total of 342 patients were enrolled into this study (Sequence A, 170; Sequence B, 172). In the primary analysis of patient preference, 71.4% of women selected once-monthly ibandronate and 28.6% of women selected once-weekly alendronate. Overall, 66.1% preferred the once-monthly ibandronate regimen to the once-weekly alendronate regimen (26.5%) and 7.4% of participants stated no preference for either regimen. The preference rate for once-monthly ibandronate was statistically significant ( p &lt; 0.0001). ‘Ease of following a treatment regimen for a long time’ was the most common reason given for patient preference for both the once-monthly ibandronate (61%, 169/276) and once-weekly alendronate (25%, 70/276) regimens. Additionally, 17% (47/276) of patients who preferred once-monthly ibandronate chose ‘it is easier to tolerate side effects’ as did 4.3% (12/276) of patients who preferred alendronate. Significantly more women found once-monthly ibandronate to be more convenient ( p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions: Significantly more women with postmenopausal osteoporosis preferred once-monthly ibandronate therapy to once-weekly alendronate therapy, and found the once-monthly regimen to be more convenient. Ease of following a treatment regimen for a long time was the most common reason given for the patients’ preferences.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Alendronate</subject><subject>Alendronate - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Convenience</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Diphosphonates - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ibandronate</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - drug therapy</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Preference</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>0300-7995</issn><issn>1473-4877</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURi0EokNhzQ5ZLBBIDbXjOLG7m1b8SSMNi1mwixznRuPi2IPttBoeiyfEYUYUKnVlS9-5R1f3Q-glJe8pFfycMEIaKQn_1lSiLh-hBa0aVlSiaR6jxZwWOeYn6FmM14TQUkj5FJ3QmtWCMLFAv76qZMAlvAswQACnAQ8-YJ8_xehd2to9Np1yffBOJcA3EOIUD_ktwPccKwt_Y-OwwiHjfjQ_oT_DfgeusKoDe4Z18DEWPitwCkbZC5y2gC-9MzcKL_-xbOZ0dq1jAr_zec5E_PZyudqs3z1HTwZlI7w4vqdo8_HD5upzsVp_-nK1XBWa0yoVrG5op5uaVV1FhKRdNVCtiey0aHjdceAlUNBU11JI0guhWTVAKbQqOZGKnaI3B-0u-B8TxNSOJmqwVjnwU2zr7ORVwzP4-h547afg8mptOZfDJJcZOj9Af26Qb93ughlV2LeUtHOV7b0q88Sro3bqRujv-GN3Gbg4AMblxkZ164Pt26T21ochV6BNbNnDdvnf8BaUTVutAtxt_9Dsb9JXwIc</recordid><startdate>20051201</startdate><enddate>20051201</enddate><creator>Emkey, Ronald</creator><creator>Koltun, William</creator><creator>Beusterien, Kathleen</creator><creator>Seidman, Larry</creator><creator>Kivitz, Alan</creator><creator>Devas, Vipul</creator><creator>Masanauskaite, Daiva</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Informa Healthcare</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051201</creationdate><title>Patient preference for once-monthly ibandronate versus once-weekly alendronate in a randomized, open-label, cross-over trial: the Boniva Alendronate Trial in Osteoporosis (BALTO)</title><author>Emkey, Ronald ; Koltun, William ; Beusterien, Kathleen ; Seidman, Larry ; Kivitz, Alan ; Devas, Vipul ; Masanauskaite, Daiva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-3671bc7634b40891b4f1cc09bc8756b5e52e1ec1c69890d88c34fe28ca2509a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Alendronate</topic><topic>Alendronate - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Convenience</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Diphosphonates - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ibandronate</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - drug therapy</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Preference</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Emkey, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koltun, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beusterien, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidman, Larry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivitz, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devas, Vipul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masanauskaite, Daiva</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current medical research and opinion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Emkey, Ronald</au><au>Koltun, William</au><au>Beusterien, Kathleen</au><au>Seidman, Larry</au><au>Kivitz, Alan</au><au>Devas, Vipul</au><au>Masanauskaite, Daiva</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient preference for once-monthly ibandronate versus once-weekly alendronate in a randomized, open-label, cross-over trial: the Boniva Alendronate Trial in Osteoporosis (BALTO)</atitle><jtitle>Current medical research and opinion</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Med Res Opin</addtitle><date>2005-12-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1895</spage><epage>1903</epage><pages>1895-1903</pages><issn>0300-7995</issn><eissn>1473-4877</eissn><coden>CMROCX</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT Objective: Ibandronate, a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, can be administered with extended interval dosing. Patient preferences were assessed for once-monthly versus once-weekly bisphosphonate treatment using a previously developed, open-label, cross-over trial design. Research design and methods: This was a 6‐month, prospective, randomized, open-label, multi-center study with a two-period and two-sequence cross-over treatment design. After screening, eligible patients (postmenopausal women with osteoporosis) were randomized to once-monthly ibandronate 150 mg followed by once-weekly alendronate 70 mg for a total of 6 months (Sequence A) or once-weekly alendronate followed by once-monthly ibandronate for a total of 6 months (Sequence B). The primary objective was to evaluate patient-reported preference for either the once-monthly ibandronate regimen or the once-weekly alendronate regimen based on responses to a preference questionnaire. Results: A total of 342 patients were enrolled into this study (Sequence A, 170; Sequence B, 172). In the primary analysis of patient preference, 71.4% of women selected once-monthly ibandronate and 28.6% of women selected once-weekly alendronate. Overall, 66.1% preferred the once-monthly ibandronate regimen to the once-weekly alendronate regimen (26.5%) and 7.4% of participants stated no preference for either regimen. The preference rate for once-monthly ibandronate was statistically significant ( p &lt; 0.0001). ‘Ease of following a treatment regimen for a long time’ was the most common reason given for patient preference for both the once-monthly ibandronate (61%, 169/276) and once-weekly alendronate (25%, 70/276) regimens. Additionally, 17% (47/276) of patients who preferred once-monthly ibandronate chose ‘it is easier to tolerate side effects’ as did 4.3% (12/276) of patients who preferred alendronate. Significantly more women found once-monthly ibandronate to be more convenient ( p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions: Significantly more women with postmenopausal osteoporosis preferred once-monthly ibandronate therapy to once-weekly alendronate therapy, and found the once-monthly regimen to be more convenient. Ease of following a treatment regimen for a long time was the most common reason given for the patients’ preferences.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>16368038</pmid><doi>10.1185/030079905X74862</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-7995
ispartof Current medical research and opinion, 2005-12, Vol.21 (12), p.1895-1903
issn 0300-7995
1473-4877
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68915475
source Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles); MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alendronate
Alendronate - administration & dosage
Convenience
Cross-Over Studies
Diphosphonates - administration & dosage
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Humans
Ibandronate
Middle Aged
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - drug therapy
Patient Satisfaction
Preference
Prospective Studies
title Patient preference for once-monthly ibandronate versus once-weekly alendronate in a randomized, open-label, cross-over trial: the Boniva Alendronate Trial in Osteoporosis (BALTO)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T17%3A46%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20preference%20for%20once-monthly%20ibandronate%20versus%20once-weekly%20alendronate%20in%20a%20randomized,%20open-label,%20cross-over%20trial:%20the%20Boniva%20Alendronate%20Trial%20in%20Osteoporosis%20(BALTO)&rft.jtitle=Current%20medical%20research%20and%20opinion&rft.au=Emkey,%20Ronald&rft.date=2005-12-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1895&rft.epage=1903&rft.pages=1895-1903&rft.issn=0300-7995&rft.eissn=1473-4877&rft.coden=CMROCX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1185/030079905X74862&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E68915475%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=207993959&rft_id=info:pmid/16368038&rfr_iscdi=true