T4 rectal cancer: analysis of patient outcome after surgical excision

Locally advanced rectal cancer dictates a major surgical undertaking, which includes en bloc resection of the rectum and all involved organs. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient outcome and compare multimodality treatment options after various surgical approaches from one institution for T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American surgeon 2005-11, Vol.71 (11), p.901-904
Hauptverfasser: Amshel, Craig, Avital, Shmuel, Miller, Allison, Sands, Laurence, Marchetti, Floriano, Hellinger, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 904
container_issue 11
container_start_page 901
container_title The American surgeon
container_volume 71
creator Amshel, Craig
Avital, Shmuel
Miller, Allison
Sands, Laurence
Marchetti, Floriano
Hellinger, Michael
description Locally advanced rectal cancer dictates a major surgical undertaking, which includes en bloc resection of the rectum and all involved organs. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient outcome and compare multimodality treatment options after various surgical approaches from one institution for T4 rectal cancer. A retrospective chart review identified 24 patients who were operated on for advanced primary rectal cancer invading adjacent structures (T4) over a 5(1/2)-year period. The types of treatment and outcome were analyzed. From these 24 patients, the most frequently involved organ was the bladder (33%). A total of 16 patients underwent chemoradiotherapy. There were 12 complications (50%), the most common being wound infection (33% of complications, 17% overall). Nine patients had nodal disease. Disease-free survival was 54 per cent, and overall survival was 75 per cent. However, disease-free survival in node-negative patients was 67 per cent versus 33 per cent in node-positive individuals. Out of the six patients who died in this review, five (83%) received chemoradiotherapy. Operations for advanced primary rectal cancer with involvement of adjacent organs are major procedures associated with high morbidity. Patients without nodal disease may have long-term survival despite the locally advanced tumor. Interestingly, neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant, or both, did not increase survival.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/000313480507101101
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68915309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68915309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-60674b6d44a3646d83f528831e249b124c880c8ed6d83276d031db26dcb1ad013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6BzxITt6qmXw19SayfsCCl_Vc0iSVSNusSQvuvzdlFzwIA8Mwz_sO8yJ0DeQOoCzvCSEMGFdEkBII5DpBSxBCFJWi7BQtZ6CYiQW6SOkrj1wKOEcLkKykksglWm85js6MusNGD8bFB6wH3e2TTzi0eKdH74YRh2k0oXdYt6OLOE3x05sscT_GJx-GS3TW6i65q2NfoY_n9fbptdi8v7w9PW4Kw7gYi3yx5I20nGsmubSKtYIqxcBRXjVAuVGKGOXsvKKltPk_21BpTQPaEmArdHvw3cXwPbk01r1PxnWdHlyYUi1VBYKRKoP0AJoYUoqurXfR9zruayD1HF79P7wsujm6T03v7J_kmBb7BT2kaAo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68915309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>T4 rectal cancer: analysis of patient outcome after surgical excision</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Amshel, Craig ; Avital, Shmuel ; Miller, Allison ; Sands, Laurence ; Marchetti, Floriano ; Hellinger, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Amshel, Craig ; Avital, Shmuel ; Miller, Allison ; Sands, Laurence ; Marchetti, Floriano ; Hellinger, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Locally advanced rectal cancer dictates a major surgical undertaking, which includes en bloc resection of the rectum and all involved organs. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient outcome and compare multimodality treatment options after various surgical approaches from one institution for T4 rectal cancer. A retrospective chart review identified 24 patients who were operated on for advanced primary rectal cancer invading adjacent structures (T4) over a 5(1/2)-year period. The types of treatment and outcome were analyzed. From these 24 patients, the most frequently involved organ was the bladder (33%). A total of 16 patients underwent chemoradiotherapy. There were 12 complications (50%), the most common being wound infection (33% of complications, 17% overall). Nine patients had nodal disease. Disease-free survival was 54 per cent, and overall survival was 75 per cent. However, disease-free survival in node-negative patients was 67 per cent versus 33 per cent in node-positive individuals. Out of the six patients who died in this review, five (83%) received chemoradiotherapy. Operations for advanced primary rectal cancer with involvement of adjacent organs are major procedures associated with high morbidity. Patients without nodal disease may have long-term survival despite the locally advanced tumor. Interestingly, neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant, or both, did not increase survival.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000313480507101101</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16372606</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Abdominal Neoplasms - pathology ; Abdominal Neoplasms - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neoplasm Staging ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2005-11, Vol.71 (11), p.901-904</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-60674b6d44a3646d83f528831e249b124c880c8ed6d83276d031db26dcb1ad013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-60674b6d44a3646d83f528831e249b124c880c8ed6d83276d031db26dcb1ad013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16372606$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amshel, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avital, Shmuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sands, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchetti, Floriano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hellinger, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>T4 rectal cancer: analysis of patient outcome after surgical excision</title><title>The American surgeon</title><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><description>Locally advanced rectal cancer dictates a major surgical undertaking, which includes en bloc resection of the rectum and all involved organs. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient outcome and compare multimodality treatment options after various surgical approaches from one institution for T4 rectal cancer. A retrospective chart review identified 24 patients who were operated on for advanced primary rectal cancer invading adjacent structures (T4) over a 5(1/2)-year period. The types of treatment and outcome were analyzed. From these 24 patients, the most frequently involved organ was the bladder (33%). A total of 16 patients underwent chemoradiotherapy. There were 12 complications (50%), the most common being wound infection (33% of complications, 17% overall). Nine patients had nodal disease. Disease-free survival was 54 per cent, and overall survival was 75 per cent. However, disease-free survival in node-negative patients was 67 per cent versus 33 per cent in node-positive individuals. Out of the six patients who died in this review, five (83%) received chemoradiotherapy. Operations for advanced primary rectal cancer with involvement of adjacent organs are major procedures associated with high morbidity. Patients without nodal disease may have long-term survival despite the locally advanced tumor. Interestingly, neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant, or both, did not increase survival.</description><subject>Abdominal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Abdominal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplkE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6BzxITt6qmXw19SayfsCCl_Vc0iSVSNusSQvuvzdlFzwIA8Mwz_sO8yJ0DeQOoCzvCSEMGFdEkBII5DpBSxBCFJWi7BQtZ6CYiQW6SOkrj1wKOEcLkKykksglWm85js6MusNGD8bFB6wH3e2TTzi0eKdH74YRh2k0oXdYt6OLOE3x05sscT_GJx-GS3TW6i65q2NfoY_n9fbptdi8v7w9PW4Kw7gYi3yx5I20nGsmubSKtYIqxcBRXjVAuVGKGOXsvKKltPk_21BpTQPaEmArdHvw3cXwPbk01r1PxnWdHlyYUi1VBYKRKoP0AJoYUoqurXfR9zruayD1HF79P7wsujm6T03v7J_kmBb7BT2kaAo</recordid><startdate>20051101</startdate><enddate>20051101</enddate><creator>Amshel, Craig</creator><creator>Avital, Shmuel</creator><creator>Miller, Allison</creator><creator>Sands, Laurence</creator><creator>Marchetti, Floriano</creator><creator>Hellinger, Michael</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051101</creationdate><title>T4 rectal cancer: analysis of patient outcome after surgical excision</title><author>Amshel, Craig ; Avital, Shmuel ; Miller, Allison ; Sands, Laurence ; Marchetti, Floriano ; Hellinger, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-60674b6d44a3646d83f528831e249b124c880c8ed6d83276d031db26dcb1ad013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Abdominal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amshel, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avital, Shmuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sands, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchetti, Floriano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hellinger, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amshel, Craig</au><au>Avital, Shmuel</au><au>Miller, Allison</au><au>Sands, Laurence</au><au>Marchetti, Floriano</au><au>Hellinger, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>T4 rectal cancer: analysis of patient outcome after surgical excision</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><date>2005-11-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>901</spage><epage>904</epage><pages>901-904</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><abstract>Locally advanced rectal cancer dictates a major surgical undertaking, which includes en bloc resection of the rectum and all involved organs. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient outcome and compare multimodality treatment options after various surgical approaches from one institution for T4 rectal cancer. A retrospective chart review identified 24 patients who were operated on for advanced primary rectal cancer invading adjacent structures (T4) over a 5(1/2)-year period. The types of treatment and outcome were analyzed. From these 24 patients, the most frequently involved organ was the bladder (33%). A total of 16 patients underwent chemoradiotherapy. There were 12 complications (50%), the most common being wound infection (33% of complications, 17% overall). Nine patients had nodal disease. Disease-free survival was 54 per cent, and overall survival was 75 per cent. However, disease-free survival in node-negative patients was 67 per cent versus 33 per cent in node-positive individuals. Out of the six patients who died in this review, five (83%) received chemoradiotherapy. Operations for advanced primary rectal cancer with involvement of adjacent organs are major procedures associated with high morbidity. Patients without nodal disease may have long-term survival despite the locally advanced tumor. Interestingly, neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant, or both, did not increase survival.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>16372606</pmid><doi>10.1177/000313480507101101</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-1348
ispartof The American surgeon, 2005-11, Vol.71 (11), p.901-904
issn 0003-1348
1555-9823
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68915309
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Abdominal Neoplasms - pathology
Abdominal Neoplasms - surgery
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplasm Staging
Rectal Neoplasms - pathology
Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
title T4 rectal cancer: analysis of patient outcome after surgical excision
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T02%3A31%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=T4%20rectal%20cancer:%20analysis%20of%20patient%20outcome%20after%20surgical%20excision&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=Amshel,%20Craig&rft.date=2005-11-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=901&rft.epage=904&rft.pages=901-904&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000313480507101101&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68915309%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68915309&rft_id=info:pmid/16372606&rfr_iscdi=true