Measurement of vaginal length: reliability of the vaginal sound—a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
A decrease in vaginal length associated with treatments for gynecological malignancies, particularly pelvic radiotherapy, negatively impacts sexuality. Research into this important problem has been hampered by a lack of instrumentation to measure vaginal length. The Gynecologic Oncology Group recent...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of gynecological cancer 2006-09, Vol.16 (5), p.1749-1755 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1755 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1749 |
container_title | International journal of gynecological cancer |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Bruner, D. W. Nolte, S. A. Shahin, M. S. Huang, H. Q. Sobel, E. Gallup, D. Cella, D. |
description | A decrease in vaginal length associated with treatments for gynecological malignancies, particularly pelvic radiotherapy, negatively impacts sexuality. Research into this important problem has been hampered by a lack of instrumentation to measure vaginal length. The Gynecologic Oncology Group recently evaluated the reliability of an instrument, the “vaginal sound,” designed to measure vaginal length. Eighty-eight physicians and nurses attended a training session in the use of the vaginal sound that included a clinical practicum with live models. Reliability was assessed at the time of the practicum. The instrument performed well, with vaginal lengths in models without cancer in the upper range of normal as documented by Masters and Johnson. The vaginal sound also appeared to be sensitive to hypothesized changes in vaginal length. Interrater reliability was high with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.88 among instructors and 0.76 among trainees. In conclusion, the vaginal sound is a simple, yet reproducible measure and adds methodologic rigor to studies of vaginal length. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200609000-00004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68908471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2552822930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2304-4a79b269b5d0c7fe19deade15f6bbc1f878564aa67223c740205c6c758160313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwCigSgl3AdvyLxKKq6IBU1AVdsLMc52YmgxMPdkyVHQ_RJ-RJcGaGIiGxwBsfX3_n-ucUxUuMXmNc8zf9dm0rlIdiQlQEIY5UXu1L9EFxihlhFaa1fJg1orKSCn85KZ7EuF1MBKnHxQkWWSrOT4v2E5iYAgwwTqXvyu9m3Y_GlQ7G9bR5WwZwvWl610_zsj1t4B6JPo3tzx93plzNI1jv_Lq35fW4V3O5Cj7tys9TauenxaPOuAjPjvNZcXP5_ubiQ3V1vfp4cX5VNaRGtKJGqIZw1bAWWdEBVi2YFjDreNNY3EkhGafGcEFIbQVFBDHLrWASc1Tj-qx4dWi7C_5bgjjpoY8WnDMj-BQ1lwpJKhbwxV_g1qeQ3xQ1YYxIQlSNMvXuQNngYwzQ6V3oBxNmjZFestBLFvp3Fvo-i32JZv_z4ympGaD94z5-fgboAbj1boIQv7p0C0FvwLhpo_-VcbbJg60Ztv95pV8Mx6bC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2552822930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measurement of vaginal length: reliability of the vaginal sound—a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Bruner, D. W. ; Nolte, S. A. ; Shahin, M. S. ; Huang, H. Q. ; Sobel, E. ; Gallup, D. ; Cella, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bruner, D. W. ; Nolte, S. A. ; Shahin, M. S. ; Huang, H. Q. ; Sobel, E. ; Gallup, D. ; Cella, D. ; Gynecologic Oncology Group</creatorcontrib><description>A decrease in vaginal length associated with treatments for gynecological malignancies, particularly pelvic radiotherapy, negatively impacts sexuality. Research into this important problem has been hampered by a lack of instrumentation to measure vaginal length. The Gynecologic Oncology Group recently evaluated the reliability of an instrument, the “vaginal sound,” designed to measure vaginal length. Eighty-eight physicians and nurses attended a training session in the use of the vaginal sound that included a clinical practicum with live models. Reliability was assessed at the time of the practicum. The instrument performed well, with vaginal lengths in models without cancer in the upper range of normal as documented by Masters and Johnson. The vaginal sound also appeared to be sensitive to hypothesized changes in vaginal length. Interrater reliability was high with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.88 among instructors and 0.76 among trainees. In conclusion, the vaginal sound is a simple, yet reproducible measure and adds methodologic rigor to studies of vaginal length.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1048-891X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200609000-00004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17009966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cervical cancer ; Diagnostic Equipment - standards ; Endometrial cancer ; Female ; Gynecology - instrumentation ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Reproducibility of Results ; Vagina ; Vagina - anatomy & histology</subject><ispartof>International journal of gynecological cancer, 2006-09, Vol.16 (5), p.1749-1755</ispartof><rights>2006, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>2006 2006, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2304-4a79b269b5d0c7fe19deade15f6bbc1f878564aa67223c740205c6c758160313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17009966$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bruner, D. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nolte, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahin, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, H. Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobel, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallup, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cella, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gynecologic Oncology Group</creatorcontrib><title>Measurement of vaginal length: reliability of the vaginal sound—a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study</title><title>International journal of gynecological cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Gynecol Cancer</addtitle><description>A decrease in vaginal length associated with treatments for gynecological malignancies, particularly pelvic radiotherapy, negatively impacts sexuality. Research into this important problem has been hampered by a lack of instrumentation to measure vaginal length. The Gynecologic Oncology Group recently evaluated the reliability of an instrument, the “vaginal sound,” designed to measure vaginal length. Eighty-eight physicians and nurses attended a training session in the use of the vaginal sound that included a clinical practicum with live models. Reliability was assessed at the time of the practicum. The instrument performed well, with vaginal lengths in models without cancer in the upper range of normal as documented by Masters and Johnson. The vaginal sound also appeared to be sensitive to hypothesized changes in vaginal length. Interrater reliability was high with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.88 among instructors and 0.76 among trainees. In conclusion, the vaginal sound is a simple, yet reproducible measure and adds methodologic rigor to studies of vaginal length.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Diagnostic Equipment - standards</subject><subject>Endometrial cancer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Vagina - anatomy & histology</subject><issn>1048-891X</issn><issn>1525-1438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwCigSgl3AdvyLxKKq6IBU1AVdsLMc52YmgxMPdkyVHQ_RJ-RJcGaGIiGxwBsfX3_n-ucUxUuMXmNc8zf9dm0rlIdiQlQEIY5UXu1L9EFxihlhFaa1fJg1orKSCn85KZ7EuF1MBKnHxQkWWSrOT4v2E5iYAgwwTqXvyu9m3Y_GlQ7G9bR5WwZwvWl610_zsj1t4B6JPo3tzx93plzNI1jv_Lq35fW4V3O5Cj7tys9TauenxaPOuAjPjvNZcXP5_ubiQ3V1vfp4cX5VNaRGtKJGqIZw1bAWWdEBVi2YFjDreNNY3EkhGafGcEFIbQVFBDHLrWASc1Tj-qx4dWi7C_5bgjjpoY8WnDMj-BQ1lwpJKhbwxV_g1qeQ3xQ1YYxIQlSNMvXuQNngYwzQ6V3oBxNmjZFestBLFvp3Fvo-i32JZv_z4ympGaD94z5-fgboAbj1boIQv7p0C0FvwLhpo_-VcbbJg60Ztv95pV8Mx6bC</recordid><startdate>200609</startdate><enddate>200609</enddate><creator>Bruner, D. W.</creator><creator>Nolte, S. A.</creator><creator>Shahin, M. S.</creator><creator>Huang, H. Q.</creator><creator>Sobel, E.</creator><creator>Gallup, D.</creator><creator>Cella, D.</creator><general>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200609</creationdate><title>Measurement of vaginal length: reliability of the vaginal sound—a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study</title><author>Bruner, D. W. ; Nolte, S. A. ; Shahin, M. S. ; Huang, H. Q. ; Sobel, E. ; Gallup, D. ; Cella, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2304-4a79b269b5d0c7fe19deade15f6bbc1f878564aa67223c740205c6c758160313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Diagnostic Equipment - standards</topic><topic>Endometrial cancer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Vagina - anatomy & histology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bruner, D. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nolte, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahin, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, H. Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobel, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallup, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cella, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gynecologic Oncology Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of gynecological cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bruner, D. W.</au><au>Nolte, S. A.</au><au>Shahin, M. S.</au><au>Huang, H. Q.</au><au>Sobel, E.</au><au>Gallup, D.</au><au>Cella, D.</au><aucorp>Gynecologic Oncology Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measurement of vaginal length: reliability of the vaginal sound—a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of gynecological cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Gynecol Cancer</addtitle><date>2006-09</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1749</spage><epage>1755</epage><pages>1749-1755</pages><issn>1048-891X</issn><eissn>1525-1438</eissn><abstract>A decrease in vaginal length associated with treatments for gynecological malignancies, particularly pelvic radiotherapy, negatively impacts sexuality. Research into this important problem has been hampered by a lack of instrumentation to measure vaginal length. The Gynecologic Oncology Group recently evaluated the reliability of an instrument, the “vaginal sound,” designed to measure vaginal length. Eighty-eight physicians and nurses attended a training session in the use of the vaginal sound that included a clinical practicum with live models. Reliability was assessed at the time of the practicum. The instrument performed well, with vaginal lengths in models without cancer in the upper range of normal as documented by Masters and Johnson. The vaginal sound also appeared to be sensitive to hypothesized changes in vaginal length. Interrater reliability was high with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.88 among instructors and 0.76 among trainees. In conclusion, the vaginal sound is a simple, yet reproducible measure and adds methodologic rigor to studies of vaginal length.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>17009966</pmid><doi>10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200609000-00004</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1048-891X |
ispartof | International journal of gynecological cancer, 2006-09, Vol.16 (5), p.1749-1755 |
issn | 1048-891X 1525-1438 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68908471 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Cervical cancer Diagnostic Equipment - standards Endometrial cancer Female Gynecology - instrumentation Humans Middle Aged Reproducibility of Results Vagina Vagina - anatomy & histology |
title | Measurement of vaginal length: reliability of the vaginal sound—a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T23%3A12%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measurement%20of%20vaginal%20length:%20reliability%20of%20the%20vaginal%20sound%E2%80%94a%20Gynecologic%20Oncology%20Group%20Study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20gynecological%20cancer&rft.au=Bruner,%20D.%20W.&rft.aucorp=Gynecologic%20Oncology%20Group&rft.date=2006-09&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1749&rft.epage=1755&rft.pages=1749-1755&rft.issn=1048-891X&rft.eissn=1525-1438&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200609000-00004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2552822930%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2552822930&rft_id=info:pmid/17009966&rfr_iscdi=true |