Fracture Reduction Affects Medicare Economics (FRAME) : Impact of increased osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment
Osteoporosis is a common, debilitating disease affecting US Medicare beneficiaries, yet diagnosis and treatment lag behind medical advances. We estimated the cost of fractures to the Medicare program and the impact of increasing osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment. A Markov model was used to predic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Osteoporosis international 2005-12, Vol.16 (12), p.1545-1557 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1557 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1545 |
container_title | Osteoporosis international |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | KING, Alison B SAAG, K. G BURGE, R. T PISU, M GOEL, N |
description | Osteoporosis is a common, debilitating disease affecting US Medicare beneficiaries, yet diagnosis and treatment lag behind medical advances. We estimated the cost of fractures to the Medicare program and the impact of increasing osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment. A Markov model was used to predict fracture incidence and costs in postmenopausal women aged 65 years and older, over 3 years (2001-2003). Only 1.80 million women were estimated to receive a Medicare-reimbursed bone mineral density (BMD) test in 2001. We evaluated the budget impact of testing an additional 1 million women from Medicare and patient perspectives. These women were stratified into high-risk (osteoporotic with prevalent vertebral fracture) and moderate-risk (without prevalent vertebral fracture) groups. During 2001-2003, an estimated 2.39 million fractures occurred among the 5.11 million women aged 65+ with osteoporosis, at a cost to Medicare of 12.96 billion dollars. We projected that BMD testing of an additional 1 million women in 2001 would result in treatment of 440,000 new patients with a bone-specific medication, preventing over 35,000 fractures over the 3 years. The decrease in fractures would produce a net discounted savings to the Medicare budget of 77.86 million dollars. Medicare's hospital inpatient cost would decrease by 115.41 million dollars and long-term care cost by 43.51 million dollars, more than offsetting incremental outpatient cost of 81.07 million dollars. Patients would benefit from fracture avoidance, but their out-of-pocket medical costs would increase by 63.49 million dollars during 2001-2003, or 1,771 dollars per fracture avoided. Sensitivity analyses showed that savings to the Medicare program varied in proportion to the unit cost of fractures, fracture risk of the populations tested, treatment rate, and adherence to therapy. Increased osteoporosis diagnosis may produce savings for the Medicare program if interventions are targeted to women at elevated risk for fracture and may be budget neutral if all older women are screened. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00198-005-1869-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68905007</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>943513921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9da40ffcf98cc42283d7623b6da5deb18c6ef549b2fa10a3d4dd358cfc2d95c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd9rFDEQx4Mo9qz-Ab5IEJT6sJofm92kb0e500JLoVjoW8hNEkm5TdYk-9D_3rR3UPBlZmA-32Fmvgh9pOQ7JWT8UQihSnaEiI7KQXXiFVrRnvOOqUG8Riui-Nipnt6foHelPJCmUWp8i06oUD0bCVuheZsN1CU7fOvsAjWkiNfeO6gFXzsbwLTWBlJMU4CCz7a36-vNN3yOL6e5CXHyOETIzhRncSrVpTnlVELBNpg_8bky0eLakDq5WN-jN97si_twzKfobrv5ffGru7r5eXmxvuqAi6F2ypqeeA9eSYCeMcntODC-G6wR1u2ohMF50asd84YSw21vLRcSPDCrBIz8FH09zJ1z-ru4UvUUCrj93kSXlqIHqYhoD2ng5__Ah7Tk2HbTjErJWxgaRA8QtONKdl7POUwmP2pK9JMX-uCFbl7oJy-0aJpPx8HLbnL2RXF8fgO-HAFTwOx9NhFCeeFGLgRhlP8D2RCSWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218832186</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fracture Reduction Affects Medicare Economics (FRAME) : Impact of increased osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>KING, Alison B ; SAAG, K. G ; BURGE, R. T ; PISU, M ; GOEL, N</creator><creatorcontrib>KING, Alison B ; SAAG, K. G ; BURGE, R. T ; PISU, M ; GOEL, N</creatorcontrib><description>Osteoporosis is a common, debilitating disease affecting US Medicare beneficiaries, yet diagnosis and treatment lag behind medical advances. We estimated the cost of fractures to the Medicare program and the impact of increasing osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment. A Markov model was used to predict fracture incidence and costs in postmenopausal women aged 65 years and older, over 3 years (2001-2003). Only 1.80 million women were estimated to receive a Medicare-reimbursed bone mineral density (BMD) test in 2001. We evaluated the budget impact of testing an additional 1 million women from Medicare and patient perspectives. These women were stratified into high-risk (osteoporotic with prevalent vertebral fracture) and moderate-risk (without prevalent vertebral fracture) groups. During 2001-2003, an estimated 2.39 million fractures occurred among the 5.11 million women aged 65+ with osteoporosis, at a cost to Medicare of 12.96 billion dollars. We projected that BMD testing of an additional 1 million women in 2001 would result in treatment of 440,000 new patients with a bone-specific medication, preventing over 35,000 fractures over the 3 years. The decrease in fractures would produce a net discounted savings to the Medicare budget of 77.86 million dollars. Medicare's hospital inpatient cost would decrease by 115.41 million dollars and long-term care cost by 43.51 million dollars, more than offsetting incremental outpatient cost of 81.07 million dollars. Patients would benefit from fracture avoidance, but their out-of-pocket medical costs would increase by 63.49 million dollars during 2001-2003, or 1,771 dollars per fracture avoided. Sensitivity analyses showed that savings to the Medicare program varied in proportion to the unit cost of fractures, fracture risk of the populations tested, treatment rate, and adherence to therapy. Increased osteoporosis diagnosis may produce savings for the Medicare program if interventions are targeted to women at elevated risk for fracture and may be budget neutral if all older women are screened.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-1869-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15942702</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ambulatory Care - economics ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone density ; Bone Density - physiology ; Computer Simulation ; Cost control ; Cost of Illness ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Economics ; Female ; Fractures ; Fractures, Bone - economics ; Fractures, Bone - epidemiology ; Fractures, Bone - prevention & control ; Health Care Costs ; Hospitalization - economics ; Humans ; Incidence ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Long-Term Care - economics ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Medicare ; Medicare - economics ; Models, Statistical ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - diagnosis ; Osteoporosis - economics ; Osteoporosis - therapy ; Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease ; Patients ; Risk Factors ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents ; United States - epidemiology ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Osteoporosis international, 2005-12, Vol.16 (12), p.1545-1557</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9da40ffcf98cc42283d7623b6da5deb18c6ef549b2fa10a3d4dd358cfc2d95c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9da40ffcf98cc42283d7623b6da5deb18c6ef549b2fa10a3d4dd358cfc2d95c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17355021$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15942702$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KING, Alison B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAAG, K. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURGE, R. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PISU, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOEL, N</creatorcontrib><title>Fracture Reduction Affects Medicare Economics (FRAME) : Impact of increased osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment</title><title>Osteoporosis international</title><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><description>Osteoporosis is a common, debilitating disease affecting US Medicare beneficiaries, yet diagnosis and treatment lag behind medical advances. We estimated the cost of fractures to the Medicare program and the impact of increasing osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment. A Markov model was used to predict fracture incidence and costs in postmenopausal women aged 65 years and older, over 3 years (2001-2003). Only 1.80 million women were estimated to receive a Medicare-reimbursed bone mineral density (BMD) test in 2001. We evaluated the budget impact of testing an additional 1 million women from Medicare and patient perspectives. These women were stratified into high-risk (osteoporotic with prevalent vertebral fracture) and moderate-risk (without prevalent vertebral fracture) groups. During 2001-2003, an estimated 2.39 million fractures occurred among the 5.11 million women aged 65+ with osteoporosis, at a cost to Medicare of 12.96 billion dollars. We projected that BMD testing of an additional 1 million women in 2001 would result in treatment of 440,000 new patients with a bone-specific medication, preventing over 35,000 fractures over the 3 years. The decrease in fractures would produce a net discounted savings to the Medicare budget of 77.86 million dollars. Medicare's hospital inpatient cost would decrease by 115.41 million dollars and long-term care cost by 43.51 million dollars, more than offsetting incremental outpatient cost of 81.07 million dollars. Patients would benefit from fracture avoidance, but their out-of-pocket medical costs would increase by 63.49 million dollars during 2001-2003, or 1,771 dollars per fracture avoided. Sensitivity analyses showed that savings to the Medicare program varied in proportion to the unit cost of fractures, fracture risk of the populations tested, treatment rate, and adherence to therapy. Increased osteoporosis diagnosis may produce savings for the Medicare program if interventions are targeted to women at elevated risk for fracture and may be budget neutral if all older women are screened.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care - economics</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone density</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost of Illness</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - economics</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - epidemiology</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - prevention & control</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Hospitalization - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Long-Term Care - economics</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Medicare - economics</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - economics</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - therapy</subject><subject>Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0937-941X</issn><issn>1433-2965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd9rFDEQx4Mo9qz-Ab5IEJT6sJofm92kb0e500JLoVjoW8hNEkm5TdYk-9D_3rR3UPBlZmA-32Fmvgh9pOQ7JWT8UQihSnaEiI7KQXXiFVrRnvOOqUG8Riui-Nipnt6foHelPJCmUWp8i06oUD0bCVuheZsN1CU7fOvsAjWkiNfeO6gFXzsbwLTWBlJMU4CCz7a36-vNN3yOL6e5CXHyOETIzhRncSrVpTnlVELBNpg_8bky0eLakDq5WN-jN97si_twzKfobrv5ffGru7r5eXmxvuqAi6F2ypqeeA9eSYCeMcntODC-G6wR1u2ohMF50asd84YSw21vLRcSPDCrBIz8FH09zJ1z-ru4UvUUCrj93kSXlqIHqYhoD2ng5__Ah7Tk2HbTjErJWxgaRA8QtONKdl7POUwmP2pK9JMX-uCFbl7oJy-0aJpPx8HLbnL2RXF8fgO-HAFTwOx9NhFCeeFGLgRhlP8D2RCSWw</recordid><startdate>20051201</startdate><enddate>20051201</enddate><creator>KING, Alison B</creator><creator>SAAG, K. G</creator><creator>BURGE, R. T</creator><creator>PISU, M</creator><creator>GOEL, N</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051201</creationdate><title>Fracture Reduction Affects Medicare Economics (FRAME) : Impact of increased osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment</title><author>KING, Alison B ; SAAG, K. G ; BURGE, R. T ; PISU, M ; GOEL, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9da40ffcf98cc42283d7623b6da5deb18c6ef549b2fa10a3d4dd358cfc2d95c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care - economics</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone density</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost of Illness</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - economics</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - epidemiology</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - prevention & control</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Hospitalization - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Long-Term Care - economics</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Medicare - economics</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - economics</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - therapy</topic><topic>Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KING, Alison B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAAG, K. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURGE, R. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PISU, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOEL, N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KING, Alison B</au><au>SAAG, K. G</au><au>BURGE, R. T</au><au>PISU, M</au><au>GOEL, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fracture Reduction Affects Medicare Economics (FRAME) : Impact of increased osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment</atitle><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><date>2005-12-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1545</spage><epage>1557</epage><pages>1545-1557</pages><issn>0937-941X</issn><eissn>1433-2965</eissn><abstract>Osteoporosis is a common, debilitating disease affecting US Medicare beneficiaries, yet diagnosis and treatment lag behind medical advances. We estimated the cost of fractures to the Medicare program and the impact of increasing osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment. A Markov model was used to predict fracture incidence and costs in postmenopausal women aged 65 years and older, over 3 years (2001-2003). Only 1.80 million women were estimated to receive a Medicare-reimbursed bone mineral density (BMD) test in 2001. We evaluated the budget impact of testing an additional 1 million women from Medicare and patient perspectives. These women were stratified into high-risk (osteoporotic with prevalent vertebral fracture) and moderate-risk (without prevalent vertebral fracture) groups. During 2001-2003, an estimated 2.39 million fractures occurred among the 5.11 million women aged 65+ with osteoporosis, at a cost to Medicare of 12.96 billion dollars. We projected that BMD testing of an additional 1 million women in 2001 would result in treatment of 440,000 new patients with a bone-specific medication, preventing over 35,000 fractures over the 3 years. The decrease in fractures would produce a net discounted savings to the Medicare budget of 77.86 million dollars. Medicare's hospital inpatient cost would decrease by 115.41 million dollars and long-term care cost by 43.51 million dollars, more than offsetting incremental outpatient cost of 81.07 million dollars. Patients would benefit from fracture avoidance, but their out-of-pocket medical costs would increase by 63.49 million dollars during 2001-2003, or 1,771 dollars per fracture avoided. Sensitivity analyses showed that savings to the Medicare program varied in proportion to the unit cost of fractures, fracture risk of the populations tested, treatment rate, and adherence to therapy. Increased osteoporosis diagnosis may produce savings for the Medicare program if interventions are targeted to women at elevated risk for fracture and may be budget neutral if all older women are screened.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>15942702</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00198-005-1869-5</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0937-941X |
ispartof | Osteoporosis international, 2005-12, Vol.16 (12), p.1545-1557 |
issn | 0937-941X 1433-2965 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68905007 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Ambulatory Care - economics Biological and medical sciences Bone density Bone Density - physiology Computer Simulation Cost control Cost of Illness Diseases of the osteoarticular system Economics Female Fractures Fractures, Bone - economics Fractures, Bone - epidemiology Fractures, Bone - prevention & control Health Care Costs Hospitalization - economics Humans Incidence Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine Long-Term Care - economics Medical diagnosis Medical sciences Medicare Medicare - economics Models, Statistical Osteoporosis Osteoporosis - diagnosis Osteoporosis - economics Osteoporosis - therapy Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease Patients Risk Factors Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents United States - epidemiology Womens health |
title | Fracture Reduction Affects Medicare Economics (FRAME) : Impact of increased osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T08%3A34%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fracture%20Reduction%20Affects%20Medicare%20Economics%20(FRAME)%20:%20Impact%20of%20increased%20osteoporosis%20diagnosis%20and%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Osteoporosis%20international&rft.au=KING,%20Alison%20B&rft.date=2005-12-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1545&rft.epage=1557&rft.pages=1545-1557&rft.issn=0937-941X&rft.eissn=1433-2965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00198-005-1869-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E943513921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218832186&rft_id=info:pmid/15942702&rfr_iscdi=true |