Fracture Reduction Affects Medicare Economics (FRAME) : Impact of increased osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment

Osteoporosis is a common, debilitating disease affecting US Medicare beneficiaries, yet diagnosis and treatment lag behind medical advances. We estimated the cost of fractures to the Medicare program and the impact of increasing osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment. A Markov model was used to predic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Osteoporosis international 2005-12, Vol.16 (12), p.1545-1557
Hauptverfasser: KING, Alison B, SAAG, K. G, BURGE, R. T, PISU, M, GOEL, N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1557
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1545
container_title Osteoporosis international
container_volume 16
creator KING, Alison B
SAAG, K. G
BURGE, R. T
PISU, M
GOEL, N
description Osteoporosis is a common, debilitating disease affecting US Medicare beneficiaries, yet diagnosis and treatment lag behind medical advances. We estimated the cost of fractures to the Medicare program and the impact of increasing osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment. A Markov model was used to predict fracture incidence and costs in postmenopausal women aged 65 years and older, over 3 years (2001-2003). Only 1.80 million women were estimated to receive a Medicare-reimbursed bone mineral density (BMD) test in 2001. We evaluated the budget impact of testing an additional 1 million women from Medicare and patient perspectives. These women were stratified into high-risk (osteoporotic with prevalent vertebral fracture) and moderate-risk (without prevalent vertebral fracture) groups. During 2001-2003, an estimated 2.39 million fractures occurred among the 5.11 million women aged 65+ with osteoporosis, at a cost to Medicare of 12.96 billion dollars. We projected that BMD testing of an additional 1 million women in 2001 would result in treatment of 440,000 new patients with a bone-specific medication, preventing over 35,000 fractures over the 3 years. The decrease in fractures would produce a net discounted savings to the Medicare budget of 77.86 million dollars. Medicare's hospital inpatient cost would decrease by 115.41 million dollars and long-term care cost by 43.51 million dollars, more than offsetting incremental outpatient cost of 81.07 million dollars. Patients would benefit from fracture avoidance, but their out-of-pocket medical costs would increase by 63.49 million dollars during 2001-2003, or 1,771 dollars per fracture avoided. Sensitivity analyses showed that savings to the Medicare program varied in proportion to the unit cost of fractures, fracture risk of the populations tested, treatment rate, and adherence to therapy. Increased osteoporosis diagnosis may produce savings for the Medicare program if interventions are targeted to women at elevated risk for fracture and may be budget neutral if all older women are screened.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00198-005-1869-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68905007</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>943513921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9da40ffcf98cc42283d7623b6da5deb18c6ef549b2fa10a3d4dd358cfc2d95c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd9rFDEQx4Mo9qz-Ab5IEJT6sJofm92kb0e500JLoVjoW8hNEkm5TdYk-9D_3rR3UPBlZmA-32Fmvgh9pOQ7JWT8UQihSnaEiI7KQXXiFVrRnvOOqUG8Riui-Nipnt6foHelPJCmUWp8i06oUD0bCVuheZsN1CU7fOvsAjWkiNfeO6gFXzsbwLTWBlJMU4CCz7a36-vNN3yOL6e5CXHyOETIzhRncSrVpTnlVELBNpg_8bky0eLakDq5WN-jN97si_twzKfobrv5ffGru7r5eXmxvuqAi6F2ypqeeA9eSYCeMcntODC-G6wR1u2ohMF50asd84YSw21vLRcSPDCrBIz8FH09zJ1z-ru4UvUUCrj93kSXlqIHqYhoD2ng5__Ah7Tk2HbTjErJWxgaRA8QtONKdl7POUwmP2pK9JMX-uCFbl7oJy-0aJpPx8HLbnL2RXF8fgO-HAFTwOx9NhFCeeFGLgRhlP8D2RCSWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218832186</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fracture Reduction Affects Medicare Economics (FRAME) : Impact of increased osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>KING, Alison B ; SAAG, K. G ; BURGE, R. T ; PISU, M ; GOEL, N</creator><creatorcontrib>KING, Alison B ; SAAG, K. G ; BURGE, R. T ; PISU, M ; GOEL, N</creatorcontrib><description>Osteoporosis is a common, debilitating disease affecting US Medicare beneficiaries, yet diagnosis and treatment lag behind medical advances. We estimated the cost of fractures to the Medicare program and the impact of increasing osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment. A Markov model was used to predict fracture incidence and costs in postmenopausal women aged 65 years and older, over 3 years (2001-2003). Only 1.80 million women were estimated to receive a Medicare-reimbursed bone mineral density (BMD) test in 2001. We evaluated the budget impact of testing an additional 1 million women from Medicare and patient perspectives. These women were stratified into high-risk (osteoporotic with prevalent vertebral fracture) and moderate-risk (without prevalent vertebral fracture) groups. During 2001-2003, an estimated 2.39 million fractures occurred among the 5.11 million women aged 65+ with osteoporosis, at a cost to Medicare of 12.96 billion dollars. We projected that BMD testing of an additional 1 million women in 2001 would result in treatment of 440,000 new patients with a bone-specific medication, preventing over 35,000 fractures over the 3 years. The decrease in fractures would produce a net discounted savings to the Medicare budget of 77.86 million dollars. Medicare's hospital inpatient cost would decrease by 115.41 million dollars and long-term care cost by 43.51 million dollars, more than offsetting incremental outpatient cost of 81.07 million dollars. Patients would benefit from fracture avoidance, but their out-of-pocket medical costs would increase by 63.49 million dollars during 2001-2003, or 1,771 dollars per fracture avoided. Sensitivity analyses showed that savings to the Medicare program varied in proportion to the unit cost of fractures, fracture risk of the populations tested, treatment rate, and adherence to therapy. Increased osteoporosis diagnosis may produce savings for the Medicare program if interventions are targeted to women at elevated risk for fracture and may be budget neutral if all older women are screened.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-1869-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15942702</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ambulatory Care - economics ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone density ; Bone Density - physiology ; Computer Simulation ; Cost control ; Cost of Illness ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Economics ; Female ; Fractures ; Fractures, Bone - economics ; Fractures, Bone - epidemiology ; Fractures, Bone - prevention &amp; control ; Health Care Costs ; Hospitalization - economics ; Humans ; Incidence ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Long-Term Care - economics ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Medicare ; Medicare - economics ; Models, Statistical ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - diagnosis ; Osteoporosis - economics ; Osteoporosis - therapy ; Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease ; Patients ; Risk Factors ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents ; United States - epidemiology ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Osteoporosis international, 2005-12, Vol.16 (12), p.1545-1557</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9da40ffcf98cc42283d7623b6da5deb18c6ef549b2fa10a3d4dd358cfc2d95c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9da40ffcf98cc42283d7623b6da5deb18c6ef549b2fa10a3d4dd358cfc2d95c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17355021$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15942702$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KING, Alison B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAAG, K. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURGE, R. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PISU, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOEL, N</creatorcontrib><title>Fracture Reduction Affects Medicare Economics (FRAME) : Impact of increased osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment</title><title>Osteoporosis international</title><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><description>Osteoporosis is a common, debilitating disease affecting US Medicare beneficiaries, yet diagnosis and treatment lag behind medical advances. We estimated the cost of fractures to the Medicare program and the impact of increasing osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment. A Markov model was used to predict fracture incidence and costs in postmenopausal women aged 65 years and older, over 3 years (2001-2003). Only 1.80 million women were estimated to receive a Medicare-reimbursed bone mineral density (BMD) test in 2001. We evaluated the budget impact of testing an additional 1 million women from Medicare and patient perspectives. These women were stratified into high-risk (osteoporotic with prevalent vertebral fracture) and moderate-risk (without prevalent vertebral fracture) groups. During 2001-2003, an estimated 2.39 million fractures occurred among the 5.11 million women aged 65+ with osteoporosis, at a cost to Medicare of 12.96 billion dollars. We projected that BMD testing of an additional 1 million women in 2001 would result in treatment of 440,000 new patients with a bone-specific medication, preventing over 35,000 fractures over the 3 years. The decrease in fractures would produce a net discounted savings to the Medicare budget of 77.86 million dollars. Medicare's hospital inpatient cost would decrease by 115.41 million dollars and long-term care cost by 43.51 million dollars, more than offsetting incremental outpatient cost of 81.07 million dollars. Patients would benefit from fracture avoidance, but their out-of-pocket medical costs would increase by 63.49 million dollars during 2001-2003, or 1,771 dollars per fracture avoided. Sensitivity analyses showed that savings to the Medicare program varied in proportion to the unit cost of fractures, fracture risk of the populations tested, treatment rate, and adherence to therapy. Increased osteoporosis diagnosis may produce savings for the Medicare program if interventions are targeted to women at elevated risk for fracture and may be budget neutral if all older women are screened.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care - economics</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone density</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost of Illness</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - economics</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - epidemiology</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Hospitalization - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Long-Term Care - economics</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Medicare - economics</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - economics</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - therapy</subject><subject>Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0937-941X</issn><issn>1433-2965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd9rFDEQx4Mo9qz-Ab5IEJT6sJofm92kb0e500JLoVjoW8hNEkm5TdYk-9D_3rR3UPBlZmA-32Fmvgh9pOQ7JWT8UQihSnaEiI7KQXXiFVrRnvOOqUG8Riui-Nipnt6foHelPJCmUWp8i06oUD0bCVuheZsN1CU7fOvsAjWkiNfeO6gFXzsbwLTWBlJMU4CCz7a36-vNN3yOL6e5CXHyOETIzhRncSrVpTnlVELBNpg_8bky0eLakDq5WN-jN97si_twzKfobrv5ffGru7r5eXmxvuqAi6F2ypqeeA9eSYCeMcntODC-G6wR1u2ohMF50asd84YSw21vLRcSPDCrBIz8FH09zJ1z-ru4UvUUCrj93kSXlqIHqYhoD2ng5__Ah7Tk2HbTjErJWxgaRA8QtONKdl7POUwmP2pK9JMX-uCFbl7oJy-0aJpPx8HLbnL2RXF8fgO-HAFTwOx9NhFCeeFGLgRhlP8D2RCSWw</recordid><startdate>20051201</startdate><enddate>20051201</enddate><creator>KING, Alison B</creator><creator>SAAG, K. G</creator><creator>BURGE, R. T</creator><creator>PISU, M</creator><creator>GOEL, N</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051201</creationdate><title>Fracture Reduction Affects Medicare Economics (FRAME) : Impact of increased osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment</title><author>KING, Alison B ; SAAG, K. G ; BURGE, R. T ; PISU, M ; GOEL, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9da40ffcf98cc42283d7623b6da5deb18c6ef549b2fa10a3d4dd358cfc2d95c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care - economics</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone density</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost of Illness</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - economics</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - epidemiology</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Hospitalization - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Long-Term Care - economics</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Medicare - economics</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - economics</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - therapy</topic><topic>Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KING, Alison B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAAG, K. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURGE, R. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PISU, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOEL, N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KING, Alison B</au><au>SAAG, K. G</au><au>BURGE, R. T</au><au>PISU, M</au><au>GOEL, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fracture Reduction Affects Medicare Economics (FRAME) : Impact of increased osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment</atitle><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><date>2005-12-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1545</spage><epage>1557</epage><pages>1545-1557</pages><issn>0937-941X</issn><eissn>1433-2965</eissn><abstract>Osteoporosis is a common, debilitating disease affecting US Medicare beneficiaries, yet diagnosis and treatment lag behind medical advances. We estimated the cost of fractures to the Medicare program and the impact of increasing osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment. A Markov model was used to predict fracture incidence and costs in postmenopausal women aged 65 years and older, over 3 years (2001-2003). Only 1.80 million women were estimated to receive a Medicare-reimbursed bone mineral density (BMD) test in 2001. We evaluated the budget impact of testing an additional 1 million women from Medicare and patient perspectives. These women were stratified into high-risk (osteoporotic with prevalent vertebral fracture) and moderate-risk (without prevalent vertebral fracture) groups. During 2001-2003, an estimated 2.39 million fractures occurred among the 5.11 million women aged 65+ with osteoporosis, at a cost to Medicare of 12.96 billion dollars. We projected that BMD testing of an additional 1 million women in 2001 would result in treatment of 440,000 new patients with a bone-specific medication, preventing over 35,000 fractures over the 3 years. The decrease in fractures would produce a net discounted savings to the Medicare budget of 77.86 million dollars. Medicare's hospital inpatient cost would decrease by 115.41 million dollars and long-term care cost by 43.51 million dollars, more than offsetting incremental outpatient cost of 81.07 million dollars. Patients would benefit from fracture avoidance, but their out-of-pocket medical costs would increase by 63.49 million dollars during 2001-2003, or 1,771 dollars per fracture avoided. Sensitivity analyses showed that savings to the Medicare program varied in proportion to the unit cost of fractures, fracture risk of the populations tested, treatment rate, and adherence to therapy. Increased osteoporosis diagnosis may produce savings for the Medicare program if interventions are targeted to women at elevated risk for fracture and may be budget neutral if all older women are screened.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>15942702</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00198-005-1869-5</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0937-941X
ispartof Osteoporosis international, 2005-12, Vol.16 (12), p.1545-1557
issn 0937-941X
1433-2965
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68905007
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ambulatory Care - economics
Biological and medical sciences
Bone density
Bone Density - physiology
Computer Simulation
Cost control
Cost of Illness
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Economics
Female
Fractures
Fractures, Bone - economics
Fractures, Bone - epidemiology
Fractures, Bone - prevention & control
Health Care Costs
Hospitalization - economics
Humans
Incidence
Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine
Long-Term Care - economics
Medical diagnosis
Medical sciences
Medicare
Medicare - economics
Models, Statistical
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis - diagnosis
Osteoporosis - economics
Osteoporosis - therapy
Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease
Patients
Risk Factors
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
United States - epidemiology
Womens health
title Fracture Reduction Affects Medicare Economics (FRAME) : Impact of increased osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T08%3A34%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fracture%20Reduction%20Affects%20Medicare%20Economics%20(FRAME)%20:%20Impact%20of%20increased%20osteoporosis%20diagnosis%20and%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Osteoporosis%20international&rft.au=KING,%20Alison%20B&rft.date=2005-12-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1545&rft.epage=1557&rft.pages=1545-1557&rft.issn=0937-941X&rft.eissn=1433-2965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00198-005-1869-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E943513921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218832186&rft_id=info:pmid/15942702&rfr_iscdi=true