Rib resection for live-donor nephrectomy

Living-related kidney transplants yield more favorable results than cadaveric kidney transplant. Although multiple techniques have been described for living-related donor nephrectomy, operation is generally performed subcostally in lateral decubitis position or by an 11th or 12th rib resection. Rece...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International urology and nephrology 2005-12, Vol.37 (4), p.675-679
Hauptverfasser: Eroğlu, Muzaffer, Güvence, Necmettin, Kiper, Ahmet, Bakirtaş, Hasan, Ozok, Uğur, Imamoğlu, Abdurrahim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 679
container_issue 4
container_start_page 675
container_title International urology and nephrology
container_volume 37
creator Eroğlu, Muzaffer
Güvence, Necmettin
Kiper, Ahmet
Bakirtaş, Hasan
Ozok, Uğur
Imamoğlu, Abdurrahim
description Living-related kidney transplants yield more favorable results than cadaveric kidney transplant. Although multiple techniques have been described for living-related donor nephrectomy, operation is generally performed subcostally in lateral decubitis position or by an 11th or 12th rib resection. Recently laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is getting popular. The aim of this study is to determine the rib resection increase the morbidity or not. Between 1997 and 2004 in our center 118 living donor nephrectomies were performed. 15 of these patients did not come to follow-up controls. This study consists of 103 patients: 11th rib resection (30 patients) determined as group I, 12th rib resection (52 patients) determined as group II, subcostal incision (21 patients) determined as group III. All these three groups were compared with each other according to operation time, pleural or peritoneal defect, pneumothorax, blood transfusion, wound infection, length of hospital stay, postoperative analgesic requirement, return to threshold activities and incisional hernia. Patients whose 11th rib was removed had the shortest operation time. But pain due to surgery continued more than others in this group of patients. The risk of developing incisional hernia was seen most in patients who had subcostal incision. In this group of patients incidence of incisional hernia was 4 (19%). None of the patients had wound infection. We also did not experience any pneumothorax and blood transfusion requirement. Peritoneal or pleural opening occurred in 4 out of 103 patients accidentally and there was no difference between groups. There was also no difference between groups in terms of returning back to daily activation. Morbidity of nephrectomy done with removal of 12th rib was less compared with other groups. Resection of 11th should be reserved for patients with high residing kidneys and also for those with a polar artery of the upper pole.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11255-005-0250-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68903807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68903807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-fde8cb5c06760d766f92286596caeae88d9c174fda9ef089cfab4309a55793a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBcpHsRLdJJsvo5S_IKCIHoO2WyCW3Y3NekK_femtCB4GGZgnncYHoQuCdwRAHmfCaGcY4BSlAOGIzQlXDJMuaqO0RQYEEwEZRN0lvMKALQCOEUTIpigXMopun1v63ny2btNG4d5iGnetT8eN3Eo4-DXX6msYr89RyfBdtlfHPoMfT49fixe8PLt-XXxsMSOVmSDQ-OVq7kDIQU0UoigKVWCa-Gst16pRjsiq9BY7QMo7YKtKwbaci41s4zN0M3-7jrF79Hnjenb7HzX2cHHMRuhNDAFsoDX_8BVHNNQfjOUCKJopXWByB5yKeacfDDr1PY2bQ0Bs3No9g5NcWh2Dg2UzNXh8Fj3vvlLHKSxX3WjauA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216182499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rib resection for live-donor nephrectomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Eroğlu, Muzaffer ; Güvence, Necmettin ; Kiper, Ahmet ; Bakirtaş, Hasan ; Ozok, Uğur ; Imamoğlu, Abdurrahim</creator><creatorcontrib>Eroğlu, Muzaffer ; Güvence, Necmettin ; Kiper, Ahmet ; Bakirtaş, Hasan ; Ozok, Uğur ; Imamoğlu, Abdurrahim</creatorcontrib><description>Living-related kidney transplants yield more favorable results than cadaveric kidney transplant. Although multiple techniques have been described for living-related donor nephrectomy, operation is generally performed subcostally in lateral decubitis position or by an 11th or 12th rib resection. Recently laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is getting popular. The aim of this study is to determine the rib resection increase the morbidity or not. Between 1997 and 2004 in our center 118 living donor nephrectomies were performed. 15 of these patients did not come to follow-up controls. This study consists of 103 patients: 11th rib resection (30 patients) determined as group I, 12th rib resection (52 patients) determined as group II, subcostal incision (21 patients) determined as group III. All these three groups were compared with each other according to operation time, pleural or peritoneal defect, pneumothorax, blood transfusion, wound infection, length of hospital stay, postoperative analgesic requirement, return to threshold activities and incisional hernia. Patients whose 11th rib was removed had the shortest operation time. But pain due to surgery continued more than others in this group of patients. The risk of developing incisional hernia was seen most in patients who had subcostal incision. In this group of patients incidence of incisional hernia was 4 (19%). None of the patients had wound infection. We also did not experience any pneumothorax and blood transfusion requirement. Peritoneal or pleural opening occurred in 4 out of 103 patients accidentally and there was no difference between groups. There was also no difference between groups in terms of returning back to daily activation. Morbidity of nephrectomy done with removal of 12th rib was less compared with other groups. Resection of 11th should be reserved for patients with high residing kidneys and also for those with a polar artery of the upper pole.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-1623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11255-005-0250-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16362577</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IURNAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Hernia, Abdominal - epidemiology ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Living Donors ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nephrectomy - adverse effects ; Nephrectomy - methods ; Periosteum - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Ribs - surgery</subject><ispartof>International urology and nephrology, 2005-12, Vol.37 (4), p.675-679</ispartof><rights>Springer 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-fde8cb5c06760d766f92286596caeae88d9c174fda9ef089cfab4309a55793a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-fde8cb5c06760d766f92286596caeae88d9c174fda9ef089cfab4309a55793a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16362577$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eroğlu, Muzaffer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güvence, Necmettin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiper, Ahmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakirtaş, Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozok, Uğur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imamoğlu, Abdurrahim</creatorcontrib><title>Rib resection for live-donor nephrectomy</title><title>International urology and nephrology</title><addtitle>Int Urol Nephrol</addtitle><description>Living-related kidney transplants yield more favorable results than cadaveric kidney transplant. Although multiple techniques have been described for living-related donor nephrectomy, operation is generally performed subcostally in lateral decubitis position or by an 11th or 12th rib resection. Recently laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is getting popular. The aim of this study is to determine the rib resection increase the morbidity or not. Between 1997 and 2004 in our center 118 living donor nephrectomies were performed. 15 of these patients did not come to follow-up controls. This study consists of 103 patients: 11th rib resection (30 patients) determined as group I, 12th rib resection (52 patients) determined as group II, subcostal incision (21 patients) determined as group III. All these three groups were compared with each other according to operation time, pleural or peritoneal defect, pneumothorax, blood transfusion, wound infection, length of hospital stay, postoperative analgesic requirement, return to threshold activities and incisional hernia. Patients whose 11th rib was removed had the shortest operation time. But pain due to surgery continued more than others in this group of patients. The risk of developing incisional hernia was seen most in patients who had subcostal incision. In this group of patients incidence of incisional hernia was 4 (19%). None of the patients had wound infection. We also did not experience any pneumothorax and blood transfusion requirement. Peritoneal or pleural opening occurred in 4 out of 103 patients accidentally and there was no difference between groups. There was also no difference between groups in terms of returning back to daily activation. Morbidity of nephrectomy done with removal of 12th rib was less compared with other groups. Resection of 11th should be reserved for patients with high residing kidneys and also for those with a polar artery of the upper pole.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hernia, Abdominal - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Living Donors</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Nephrectomy - methods</subject><subject>Periosteum - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Ribs - surgery</subject><issn>0301-1623</issn><issn>1573-2584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBcpHsRLdJJsvo5S_IKCIHoO2WyCW3Y3NekK_femtCB4GGZgnncYHoQuCdwRAHmfCaGcY4BSlAOGIzQlXDJMuaqO0RQYEEwEZRN0lvMKALQCOEUTIpigXMopun1v63ny2btNG4d5iGnetT8eN3Eo4-DXX6msYr89RyfBdtlfHPoMfT49fixe8PLt-XXxsMSOVmSDQ-OVq7kDIQU0UoigKVWCa-Gst16pRjsiq9BY7QMo7YKtKwbaci41s4zN0M3-7jrF79Hnjenb7HzX2cHHMRuhNDAFsoDX_8BVHNNQfjOUCKJopXWByB5yKeacfDDr1PY2bQ0Bs3No9g5NcWh2Dg2UzNXh8Fj3vvlLHKSxX3WjauA</recordid><startdate>200512</startdate><enddate>200512</enddate><creator>Eroğlu, Muzaffer</creator><creator>Güvence, Necmettin</creator><creator>Kiper, Ahmet</creator><creator>Bakirtaş, Hasan</creator><creator>Ozok, Uğur</creator><creator>Imamoğlu, Abdurrahim</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200512</creationdate><title>Rib resection for live-donor nephrectomy</title><author>Eroğlu, Muzaffer ; Güvence, Necmettin ; Kiper, Ahmet ; Bakirtaş, Hasan ; Ozok, Uğur ; Imamoğlu, Abdurrahim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-fde8cb5c06760d766f92286596caeae88d9c174fda9ef089cfab4309a55793a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hernia, Abdominal - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Living Donors</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Nephrectomy - methods</topic><topic>Periosteum - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Ribs - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eroğlu, Muzaffer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güvence, Necmettin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiper, Ahmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakirtaş, Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozok, Uğur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imamoğlu, Abdurrahim</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International urology and nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eroğlu, Muzaffer</au><au>Güvence, Necmettin</au><au>Kiper, Ahmet</au><au>Bakirtaş, Hasan</au><au>Ozok, Uğur</au><au>Imamoğlu, Abdurrahim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rib resection for live-donor nephrectomy</atitle><jtitle>International urology and nephrology</jtitle><addtitle>Int Urol Nephrol</addtitle><date>2005-12</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>675</spage><epage>679</epage><pages>675-679</pages><issn>0301-1623</issn><eissn>1573-2584</eissn><coden>IURNAE</coden><abstract>Living-related kidney transplants yield more favorable results than cadaveric kidney transplant. Although multiple techniques have been described for living-related donor nephrectomy, operation is generally performed subcostally in lateral decubitis position or by an 11th or 12th rib resection. Recently laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is getting popular. The aim of this study is to determine the rib resection increase the morbidity or not. Between 1997 and 2004 in our center 118 living donor nephrectomies were performed. 15 of these patients did not come to follow-up controls. This study consists of 103 patients: 11th rib resection (30 patients) determined as group I, 12th rib resection (52 patients) determined as group II, subcostal incision (21 patients) determined as group III. All these three groups were compared with each other according to operation time, pleural or peritoneal defect, pneumothorax, blood transfusion, wound infection, length of hospital stay, postoperative analgesic requirement, return to threshold activities and incisional hernia. Patients whose 11th rib was removed had the shortest operation time. But pain due to surgery continued more than others in this group of patients. The risk of developing incisional hernia was seen most in patients who had subcostal incision. In this group of patients incidence of incisional hernia was 4 (19%). None of the patients had wound infection. We also did not experience any pneumothorax and blood transfusion requirement. Peritoneal or pleural opening occurred in 4 out of 103 patients accidentally and there was no difference between groups. There was also no difference between groups in terms of returning back to daily activation. Morbidity of nephrectomy done with removal of 12th rib was less compared with other groups. Resection of 11th should be reserved for patients with high residing kidneys and also for those with a polar artery of the upper pole.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>16362577</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11255-005-0250-0</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-1623
ispartof International urology and nephrology, 2005-12, Vol.37 (4), p.675-679
issn 0301-1623
1573-2584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68903807
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Aged
Female
Hernia, Abdominal - epidemiology
Humans
Length of Stay
Living Donors
Male
Middle Aged
Nephrectomy - adverse effects
Nephrectomy - methods
Periosteum - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Ribs - surgery
title Rib resection for live-donor nephrectomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T16%3A09%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rib%20resection%20for%20live-donor%20nephrectomy&rft.jtitle=International%20urology%20and%20nephrology&rft.au=Ero%C4%9Flu,%20Muzaffer&rft.date=2005-12&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=675&rft.epage=679&rft.pages=675-679&rft.issn=0301-1623&rft.eissn=1573-2584&rft.coden=IURNAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11255-005-0250-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68903807%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216182499&rft_id=info:pmid/16362577&rfr_iscdi=true