Behavioral differences between Pogonomyrmex rugosus and dependent lineage (H1/H2) harvester ants
The discovery of genetic caste determination (GCD) in population of Pogonomyrmex harvester ants raises many questions about the evolution and persistence of such populations. The genetic caste determination arises from the existence of two distinct, but mutually dependent, genetic lineages within a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology (Durham) 2006-09, Vol.87 (9), p.2207-2214 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2214 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2207 |
container_title | Ecology (Durham) |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Julian, Glennis E. Cahan, Sara Helms |
description | The discovery of genetic caste determination (GCD) in population of Pogonomyrmex harvester ants raises many questions about the evolution and persistence of such populations. The genetic caste determination arises from the existence of two distinct, but mutually dependent, genetic lineages within a population. Workers always develop from a combination of the two lineages, but their sister queens develop from within-lineage matings. Maintaining genetic caste determination appears to be costly because many queen-destined eggs are wasted when a colony is not in the reproductive stage, yet these populations appear to be widespread. We investigated whether inter-lineage workers have novel traits that give GCD colonies a selective advantage in certain environments. In particular, we compared ecologically relevant behavioral characteristics of inter-lineage workers in H-lineage colonies with co-occurring normal colonies of P. rugosus. First, we measured colony defensive response toward a simulated vertebrate predator. Second, we set up direct competitive foraging and recruitment experiments between dependent lineage and P. rugosus colonies. Last, we measured individual aggressive response to foreign inter-lineage and P. rugosus workers. We found that H1/H2 inter-lineage workers explored objects on the nest more thoroughly and responded much more aggressively to simulated predator disturbance than the P. rugosus colonies. In individual encounters, H1/H2 inter-lineage and P. rugosus workers were equally aggressive toward foreign ants, but both worker types could discriminate P. rugosus from inter-lineage intruders and were more aggressive toward ants of the alternate type to themselves. When competing directly for resources, however, P. rugosus colonies consistently dominated seed piles. In summary, H1/H2 GCD colonies show distinct behavioral differences, but there is no clear ecological advantage from the traits we examined. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2207:BDBPRA]2.0.CO;2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68875935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20069221</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20069221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5207-67ec2a1701aac83f32df107dc45a7dec23ad38783e76e1d1f7c3839f777866b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkV9v0zAUxS0EYmXwEYCIB7Q9pPOfJbbhaQ0bRZrUabAHhNDFjW-6VElc7Gaj3x5HqYbECxJ-8cP5-Zx7fQiZMjplStMTShlPdZ6pI05pfqzkN86pfDf7MLu6PvvOp3RaLN7zR2TCtNCpZpI-JpOHRwfkWQhrGg87VU_JAcu1znJOJ-THDG_NXe28aRJbVxV67EoMyRK394hdcuVWrnPtzrf4K_H9yoU-JKazicUNdha7bdLUHZoVJkdzdjLnx8mt8XcYtugjtw3PyZPKNAFf7O9DcnNx_qWYp5eLj5-Ks8u0zOIiaS6x5CaOzYwplagEtxWj0panmZE2asJYoaQSKHNkllWyFEroSkqp8nzJxSF5O_puvPvZx3xo61Bi05gOXR8gV0pmWmT_BOMHCp4pGsE3f4Fr1_suLgGcacoyKUSELkao9C4EjxVsfN0avwNGYWgOhhJgKAGG5kBJGJqDsTngQKFYwDD_q31av2zR_rHZVxWB6xG4rxvc_WcMnBdfB11JPcjR9OVoug5b5x9MByQCLOqvR70yDszK1wFuPnPKBGWMC86F-A03jcCO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219015733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behavioral differences between Pogonomyrmex rugosus and dependent lineage (H1/H2) harvester ants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Julian, Glennis E. ; Cahan, Sara Helms</creator><creatorcontrib>Julian, Glennis E. ; Cahan, Sara Helms</creatorcontrib><description>The discovery of genetic caste determination (GCD) in population of Pogonomyrmex harvester ants raises many questions about the evolution and persistence of such populations. The genetic caste determination arises from the existence of two distinct, but mutually dependent, genetic lineages within a population. Workers always develop from a combination of the two lineages, but their sister queens develop from within-lineage matings. Maintaining genetic caste determination appears to be costly because many queen-destined eggs are wasted when a colony is not in the reproductive stage, yet these populations appear to be widespread. We investigated whether inter-lineage workers have novel traits that give GCD colonies a selective advantage in certain environments. In particular, we compared ecologically relevant behavioral characteristics of inter-lineage workers in H-lineage colonies with co-occurring normal colonies of P. rugosus. First, we measured colony defensive response toward a simulated vertebrate predator. Second, we set up direct competitive foraging and recruitment experiments between dependent lineage and P. rugosus colonies. Last, we measured individual aggressive response to foreign inter-lineage and P. rugosus workers. We found that H1/H2 inter-lineage workers explored objects on the nest more thoroughly and responded much more aggressively to simulated predator disturbance than the P. rugosus colonies. In individual encounters, H1/H2 inter-lineage and P. rugosus workers were equally aggressive toward foreign ants, but both worker types could discriminate P. rugosus from inter-lineage intruders and were more aggressive toward ants of the alternate type to themselves. When competing directly for resources, however, P. rugosus colonies consistently dominated seed piles. In summary, H1/H2 GCD colonies show distinct behavioral differences, but there is no clear ecological advantage from the traits we examined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2207:BDBPRA]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16995620</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>aggression ; Aggression - physiology ; Animal behavior ; Animals ; Ants ; Ants - genetics ; Ants - physiology ; Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Comparative studies ; Competitive Behavior - physiology ; Ecological genetics ; Ecosystem ; Entomology ; Evolutionary genetics ; Foraging ; Formicidae ; genetic caste determination ; harvester ants ; Honey bee colonies ; hybridization ; Insect behavior ; insect castes ; Insect colonies ; Insect ecology ; Insect genetics ; Insects ; intraspecific competition ; Pogonomyrmex ; Pogonomyrmex rugosus ; predation ; Rugosus ; social hybridogenesis ; Special Feature: Evolutionary Ecology of Hybrid Ants ; Worker insects</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2006-09, Vol.87 (9), p.2207-2214</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2006 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Sep 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5207-67ec2a1701aac83f32df107dc45a7dec23ad38783e76e1d1f7c3839f777866b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5207-67ec2a1701aac83f32df107dc45a7dec23ad38783e76e1d1f7c3839f777866b23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20069221$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20069221$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16995620$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Julian, Glennis E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cahan, Sara Helms</creatorcontrib><title>Behavioral differences between Pogonomyrmex rugosus and dependent lineage (H1/H2) harvester ants</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><description>The discovery of genetic caste determination (GCD) in population of Pogonomyrmex harvester ants raises many questions about the evolution and persistence of such populations. The genetic caste determination arises from the existence of two distinct, but mutually dependent, genetic lineages within a population. Workers always develop from a combination of the two lineages, but their sister queens develop from within-lineage matings. Maintaining genetic caste determination appears to be costly because many queen-destined eggs are wasted when a colony is not in the reproductive stage, yet these populations appear to be widespread. We investigated whether inter-lineage workers have novel traits that give GCD colonies a selective advantage in certain environments. In particular, we compared ecologically relevant behavioral characteristics of inter-lineage workers in H-lineage colonies with co-occurring normal colonies of P. rugosus. First, we measured colony defensive response toward a simulated vertebrate predator. Second, we set up direct competitive foraging and recruitment experiments between dependent lineage and P. rugosus colonies. Last, we measured individual aggressive response to foreign inter-lineage and P. rugosus workers. We found that H1/H2 inter-lineage workers explored objects on the nest more thoroughly and responded much more aggressively to simulated predator disturbance than the P. rugosus colonies. In individual encounters, H1/H2 inter-lineage and P. rugosus workers were equally aggressive toward foreign ants, but both worker types could discriminate P. rugosus from inter-lineage intruders and were more aggressive toward ants of the alternate type to themselves. When competing directly for resources, however, P. rugosus colonies consistently dominated seed piles. In summary, H1/H2 GCD colonies show distinct behavioral differences, but there is no clear ecological advantage from the traits we examined.</description><subject>aggression</subject><subject>Aggression - physiology</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ants</subject><subject>Ants - genetics</subject><subject>Ants - physiology</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Competitive Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Formicidae</subject><subject>genetic caste determination</subject><subject>harvester ants</subject><subject>Honey bee colonies</subject><subject>hybridization</subject><subject>Insect behavior</subject><subject>insect castes</subject><subject>Insect colonies</subject><subject>Insect ecology</subject><subject>Insect genetics</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>intraspecific competition</subject><subject>Pogonomyrmex</subject><subject>Pogonomyrmex rugosus</subject><subject>predation</subject><subject>Rugosus</subject><subject>social hybridogenesis</subject><subject>Special Feature: Evolutionary Ecology of Hybrid Ants</subject><subject>Worker insects</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkV9v0zAUxS0EYmXwEYCIB7Q9pPOfJbbhaQ0bRZrUabAHhNDFjW-6VElc7Gaj3x5HqYbECxJ-8cP5-Zx7fQiZMjplStMTShlPdZ6pI05pfqzkN86pfDf7MLu6PvvOp3RaLN7zR2TCtNCpZpI-JpOHRwfkWQhrGg87VU_JAcu1znJOJ-THDG_NXe28aRJbVxV67EoMyRK394hdcuVWrnPtzrf4K_H9yoU-JKazicUNdha7bdLUHZoVJkdzdjLnx8mt8XcYtugjtw3PyZPKNAFf7O9DcnNx_qWYp5eLj5-Ks8u0zOIiaS6x5CaOzYwplagEtxWj0panmZE2asJYoaQSKHNkllWyFEroSkqp8nzJxSF5O_puvPvZx3xo61Bi05gOXR8gV0pmWmT_BOMHCp4pGsE3f4Fr1_suLgGcacoyKUSELkao9C4EjxVsfN0avwNGYWgOhhJgKAGG5kBJGJqDsTngQKFYwDD_q31av2zR_rHZVxWB6xG4rxvc_WcMnBdfB11JPcjR9OVoug5b5x9MByQCLOqvR70yDszK1wFuPnPKBGWMC86F-A03jcCO</recordid><startdate>200609</startdate><enddate>200609</enddate><creator>Julian, Glennis E.</creator><creator>Cahan, Sara Helms</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200609</creationdate><title>Behavioral differences between Pogonomyrmex rugosus and dependent lineage (H1/H2) harvester ants</title><author>Julian, Glennis E. ; Cahan, Sara Helms</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5207-67ec2a1701aac83f32df107dc45a7dec23ad38783e76e1d1f7c3839f777866b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>aggression</topic><topic>Aggression - physiology</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ants</topic><topic>Ants - genetics</topic><topic>Ants - physiology</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Competitive Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Formicidae</topic><topic>genetic caste determination</topic><topic>harvester ants</topic><topic>Honey bee colonies</topic><topic>hybridization</topic><topic>Insect behavior</topic><topic>insect castes</topic><topic>Insect colonies</topic><topic>Insect ecology</topic><topic>Insect genetics</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>intraspecific competition</topic><topic>Pogonomyrmex</topic><topic>Pogonomyrmex rugosus</topic><topic>predation</topic><topic>Rugosus</topic><topic>social hybridogenesis</topic><topic>Special Feature: Evolutionary Ecology of Hybrid Ants</topic><topic>Worker insects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Julian, Glennis E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cahan, Sara Helms</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Julian, Glennis E.</au><au>Cahan, Sara Helms</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behavioral differences between Pogonomyrmex rugosus and dependent lineage (H1/H2) harvester ants</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><date>2006-09</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2207</spage><epage>2214</epage><pages>2207-2214</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>The discovery of genetic caste determination (GCD) in population of Pogonomyrmex harvester ants raises many questions about the evolution and persistence of such populations. The genetic caste determination arises from the existence of two distinct, but mutually dependent, genetic lineages within a population. Workers always develop from a combination of the two lineages, but their sister queens develop from within-lineage matings. Maintaining genetic caste determination appears to be costly because many queen-destined eggs are wasted when a colony is not in the reproductive stage, yet these populations appear to be widespread. We investigated whether inter-lineage workers have novel traits that give GCD colonies a selective advantage in certain environments. In particular, we compared ecologically relevant behavioral characteristics of inter-lineage workers in H-lineage colonies with co-occurring normal colonies of P. rugosus. First, we measured colony defensive response toward a simulated vertebrate predator. Second, we set up direct competitive foraging and recruitment experiments between dependent lineage and P. rugosus colonies. Last, we measured individual aggressive response to foreign inter-lineage and P. rugosus workers. We found that H1/H2 inter-lineage workers explored objects on the nest more thoroughly and responded much more aggressively to simulated predator disturbance than the P. rugosus colonies. In individual encounters, H1/H2 inter-lineage and P. rugosus workers were equally aggressive toward foreign ants, but both worker types could discriminate P. rugosus from inter-lineage intruders and were more aggressive toward ants of the alternate type to themselves. When competing directly for resources, however, P. rugosus colonies consistently dominated seed piles. In summary, H1/H2 GCD colonies show distinct behavioral differences, but there is no clear ecological advantage from the traits we examined.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><pmid>16995620</pmid><doi>10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2207:BDBPRA]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9658 |
ispartof | Ecology (Durham), 2006-09, Vol.87 (9), p.2207-2214 |
issn | 0012-9658 1939-9170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68875935 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library; JSTOR |
subjects | aggression Aggression - physiology Animal behavior Animals Ants Ants - genetics Ants - physiology Behavior, Animal - physiology Comparative studies Competitive Behavior - physiology Ecological genetics Ecosystem Entomology Evolutionary genetics Foraging Formicidae genetic caste determination harvester ants Honey bee colonies hybridization Insect behavior insect castes Insect colonies Insect ecology Insect genetics Insects intraspecific competition Pogonomyrmex Pogonomyrmex rugosus predation Rugosus social hybridogenesis Special Feature: Evolutionary Ecology of Hybrid Ants Worker insects |
title | Behavioral differences between Pogonomyrmex rugosus and dependent lineage (H1/H2) harvester ants |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T18%3A45%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behavioral%20differences%20between%20Pogonomyrmex%20rugosus%20and%20dependent%20lineage%20(H1/H2)%20harvester%20ants&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Julian,%20Glennis%20E.&rft.date=2006-09&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2207&rft.epage=2214&rft.pages=2207-2214&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87%5B2207:BDBPRA%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20069221%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219015733&rft_id=info:pmid/16995620&rft_jstor_id=20069221&rfr_iscdi=true |