Comparison of radiographic landmarks and the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction in the positioning of long-term central venous catheters

Background:  When implanting a permanent central venous catheter, the usual aim is to place the tip at the superior vena cava/right atrial (SVC/RA) junction. However, data validating radiographic landmarks of the SVC/RA junction are limited. This investigation was undertaken to compare the radiograp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2006-07, Vol.50 (6), p.731-735
Hauptverfasser: Hsu, J.-H., Wang, C.-K., Chu, K.-S., Cheng, K.-I., Chuang, H.-Y., Jaw, T.-S., Wu, J.-R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 735
container_issue 6
container_start_page 731
container_title Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
container_volume 50
creator Hsu, J.-H.
Wang, C.-K.
Chu, K.-S.
Cheng, K.-I.
Chuang, H.-Y.
Jaw, T.-S.
Wu, J.-R.
description Background:  When implanting a permanent central venous catheter, the usual aim is to place the tip at the superior vena cava/right atrial (SVC/RA) junction. However, data validating radiographic landmarks of the SVC/RA junction are limited. This investigation was undertaken to compare the radiographic landmarks with the SVC/RA junction as determined by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Methods:  In 20 adult oncologic patients undergoing implantation of a permanent subcutaneous central venous catheter, the catheter tip was placed in the SVC/RA junction under TEE guidance. The position of the catheter tip on chest X‐ray, which represented the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction, was then compared with a standard radiographic landmark of the SVC/RA junction and with thoracic vertebral levels. Results:  In all but two patients radiographic SVC/RA junctions were identified. The echocardiographic SVC/RA junction ranged from 0.6 cm above to 2.8 cm below the radiographic SVC/RA junction. There was a significant difference between the distance from the carina to the radiographic SVC/RA junction and the distance from the carina to the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction. The thoracic vertebral body correlating with the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction ranged from the sixth to the ninth level. Conclusion:  Both the radiographic SVC/RA junction and the thoracic vertebral bodies are not reliable landmarks for the SVC/RA junction defined by TEE. Physicians should be aware that using the radiographic SVC/RA junction to confirm proper positioning of permanent central venous catheters risks placing the catheter tip in the upper SVC, with subsequent potential long‐term complications. More reliable radiographic landmarks for the SVC/RA junction should be investigated.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01025.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68874933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68874933</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4355-ee8419a19cfd50b1ba56c9a6bcea0b6d3afbf33aa81b35059a1f736248dfe8183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhFZAvcEtqx7ETHzisVlBQqyK1ULhZE8fZ9ZLYwc7C9gl4bZzuquWIL_Zovn88Mz9CmJKcpnO2zSmTMhO8EnlBiMgJJQXP90_Q4iHxFC0IITTjtCpO0IsYtylkpZTP0QkVsq6YkAv0Z-WHEYKN3mHf4QCt9esA48Zq3INrBwg_Ik4PPG0MNnrjNYR_mJvb1dn1Em93Tk821bDuHhx9tHNs3Xou23u3ziYTBqyNmwL0-JdxfhexhkSnRHyJnnXQR_PqeJ-irx_ef1l9zC4_n39aLS8zXTLOM2PqkkqgUnctJw1tgAstQTTaAGlEy6BrOsYAatowTnhCuzRoUdZtZ2pas1P09lB3DP7nzsRJDTZq06dZTWpIibquSslYAusDqIOPMZhOjcGmbdwpStRsgtqqeddq3rWaTVD3Jqh9kr4-_rFrBtM-Co9bT8CbIwBRQ98FcNrGR66StCwqkrh3B-637c3dfzeglsub-ZX02UFv42T2D_pkqRIVq7j6dnWurpm8-s4vbtUF-wvnQLT6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68874933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of radiographic landmarks and the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction in the positioning of long-term central venous catheters</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hsu, J.-H. ; Wang, C.-K. ; Chu, K.-S. ; Cheng, K.-I. ; Chuang, H.-Y. ; Jaw, T.-S. ; Wu, J.-R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hsu, J.-H. ; Wang, C.-K. ; Chu, K.-S. ; Cheng, K.-I. ; Chuang, H.-Y. ; Jaw, T.-S. ; Wu, J.-R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background:  When implanting a permanent central venous catheter, the usual aim is to place the tip at the superior vena cava/right atrial (SVC/RA) junction. However, data validating radiographic landmarks of the SVC/RA junction are limited. This investigation was undertaken to compare the radiographic landmarks with the SVC/RA junction as determined by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Methods:  In 20 adult oncologic patients undergoing implantation of a permanent subcutaneous central venous catheter, the catheter tip was placed in the SVC/RA junction under TEE guidance. The position of the catheter tip on chest X‐ray, which represented the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction, was then compared with a standard radiographic landmark of the SVC/RA junction and with thoracic vertebral levels. Results:  In all but two patients radiographic SVC/RA junctions were identified. The echocardiographic SVC/RA junction ranged from 0.6 cm above to 2.8 cm below the radiographic SVC/RA junction. There was a significant difference between the distance from the carina to the radiographic SVC/RA junction and the distance from the carina to the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction. The thoracic vertebral body correlating with the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction ranged from the sixth to the ninth level. Conclusion:  Both the radiographic SVC/RA junction and the thoracic vertebral bodies are not reliable landmarks for the SVC/RA junction defined by TEE. Physicians should be aware that using the radiographic SVC/RA junction to confirm proper positioning of permanent central venous catheters risks placing the catheter tip in the upper SVC, with subsequent potential long‐term complications. More reliable radiographic landmarks for the SVC/RA junction should be investigated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-5172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-6576</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01025.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16987369</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AANEAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Catheterization, Central Venous ; central venous catheters ; Echocardiography, Transesophageal ; Female ; Heart - anatomy &amp; histology ; Heart Atria - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; landmark ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Preoperative Care ; SVC/RA junction ; transesophageal echocardiography ; Vena Cava, Superior - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2006-07, Vol.50 (6), p.731-735</ispartof><rights>2006 Acta Anaesthesiol Scand</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4355-ee8419a19cfd50b1ba56c9a6bcea0b6d3afbf33aa81b35059a1f736248dfe8183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4355-ee8419a19cfd50b1ba56c9a6bcea0b6d3afbf33aa81b35059a1f736248dfe8183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1399-6576.2006.01025.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1399-6576.2006.01025.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17914270$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16987369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hsu, J.-H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, C.-K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, K.-S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, K.-I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuang, H.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaw, T.-S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, J.-R.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of radiographic landmarks and the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction in the positioning of long-term central venous catheters</title><title>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>Acta Anaesthesiol Scand</addtitle><description>Background:  When implanting a permanent central venous catheter, the usual aim is to place the tip at the superior vena cava/right atrial (SVC/RA) junction. However, data validating radiographic landmarks of the SVC/RA junction are limited. This investigation was undertaken to compare the radiographic landmarks with the SVC/RA junction as determined by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Methods:  In 20 adult oncologic patients undergoing implantation of a permanent subcutaneous central venous catheter, the catheter tip was placed in the SVC/RA junction under TEE guidance. The position of the catheter tip on chest X‐ray, which represented the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction, was then compared with a standard radiographic landmark of the SVC/RA junction and with thoracic vertebral levels. Results:  In all but two patients radiographic SVC/RA junctions were identified. The echocardiographic SVC/RA junction ranged from 0.6 cm above to 2.8 cm below the radiographic SVC/RA junction. There was a significant difference between the distance from the carina to the radiographic SVC/RA junction and the distance from the carina to the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction. The thoracic vertebral body correlating with the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction ranged from the sixth to the ninth level. Conclusion:  Both the radiographic SVC/RA junction and the thoracic vertebral bodies are not reliable landmarks for the SVC/RA junction defined by TEE. Physicians should be aware that using the radiographic SVC/RA junction to confirm proper positioning of permanent central venous catheters risks placing the catheter tip in the upper SVC, with subsequent potential long‐term complications. More reliable radiographic landmarks for the SVC/RA junction should be investigated.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous</subject><subject>central venous catheters</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Transesophageal</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Heart Atria - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>landmark</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Preoperative Care</subject><subject>SVC/RA junction</subject><subject>transesophageal echocardiography</subject><subject>Vena Cava, Superior - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>0001-5172</issn><issn>1399-6576</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhFZAvcEtqx7ETHzisVlBQqyK1ULhZE8fZ9ZLYwc7C9gl4bZzuquWIL_Zovn88Mz9CmJKcpnO2zSmTMhO8EnlBiMgJJQXP90_Q4iHxFC0IITTjtCpO0IsYtylkpZTP0QkVsq6YkAv0Z-WHEYKN3mHf4QCt9esA48Zq3INrBwg_Ik4PPG0MNnrjNYR_mJvb1dn1Em93Tk821bDuHhx9tHNs3Xou23u3ziYTBqyNmwL0-JdxfhexhkSnRHyJnnXQR_PqeJ-irx_ef1l9zC4_n39aLS8zXTLOM2PqkkqgUnctJw1tgAstQTTaAGlEy6BrOsYAatowTnhCuzRoUdZtZ2pas1P09lB3DP7nzsRJDTZq06dZTWpIibquSslYAusDqIOPMZhOjcGmbdwpStRsgtqqeddq3rWaTVD3Jqh9kr4-_rFrBtM-Co9bT8CbIwBRQ98FcNrGR66StCwqkrh3B-637c3dfzeglsub-ZX02UFv42T2D_pkqRIVq7j6dnWurpm8-s4vbtUF-wvnQLT6</recordid><startdate>200607</startdate><enddate>200607</enddate><creator>Hsu, J.-H.</creator><creator>Wang, C.-K.</creator><creator>Chu, K.-S.</creator><creator>Cheng, K.-I.</creator><creator>Chuang, H.-Y.</creator><creator>Jaw, T.-S.</creator><creator>Wu, J.-R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200607</creationdate><title>Comparison of radiographic landmarks and the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction in the positioning of long-term central venous catheters</title><author>Hsu, J.-H. ; Wang, C.-K. ; Chu, K.-S. ; Cheng, K.-I. ; Chuang, H.-Y. ; Jaw, T.-S. ; Wu, J.-R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4355-ee8419a19cfd50b1ba56c9a6bcea0b6d3afbf33aa81b35059a1f736248dfe8183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous</topic><topic>central venous catheters</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Transesophageal</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Heart Atria - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>landmark</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Preoperative Care</topic><topic>SVC/RA junction</topic><topic>transesophageal echocardiography</topic><topic>Vena Cava, Superior - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hsu, J.-H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, C.-K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, K.-S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, K.-I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuang, H.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaw, T.-S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, J.-R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hsu, J.-H.</au><au>Wang, C.-K.</au><au>Chu, K.-S.</au><au>Cheng, K.-I.</au><au>Chuang, H.-Y.</au><au>Jaw, T.-S.</au><au>Wu, J.-R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of radiographic landmarks and the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction in the positioning of long-term central venous catheters</atitle><jtitle>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Anaesthesiol Scand</addtitle><date>2006-07</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>731</spage><epage>735</epage><pages>731-735</pages><issn>0001-5172</issn><eissn>1399-6576</eissn><coden>AANEAB</coden><abstract>Background:  When implanting a permanent central venous catheter, the usual aim is to place the tip at the superior vena cava/right atrial (SVC/RA) junction. However, data validating radiographic landmarks of the SVC/RA junction are limited. This investigation was undertaken to compare the radiographic landmarks with the SVC/RA junction as determined by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Methods:  In 20 adult oncologic patients undergoing implantation of a permanent subcutaneous central venous catheter, the catheter tip was placed in the SVC/RA junction under TEE guidance. The position of the catheter tip on chest X‐ray, which represented the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction, was then compared with a standard radiographic landmark of the SVC/RA junction and with thoracic vertebral levels. Results:  In all but two patients radiographic SVC/RA junctions were identified. The echocardiographic SVC/RA junction ranged from 0.6 cm above to 2.8 cm below the radiographic SVC/RA junction. There was a significant difference between the distance from the carina to the radiographic SVC/RA junction and the distance from the carina to the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction. The thoracic vertebral body correlating with the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction ranged from the sixth to the ninth level. Conclusion:  Both the radiographic SVC/RA junction and the thoracic vertebral bodies are not reliable landmarks for the SVC/RA junction defined by TEE. Physicians should be aware that using the radiographic SVC/RA junction to confirm proper positioning of permanent central venous catheters risks placing the catheter tip in the upper SVC, with subsequent potential long‐term complications. More reliable radiographic landmarks for the SVC/RA junction should be investigated.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16987369</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01025.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-5172
ispartof Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2006-07, Vol.50 (6), p.731-735
issn 0001-5172
1399-6576
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68874933
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Catheterization, Central Venous
central venous catheters
Echocardiography, Transesophageal
Female
Heart - anatomy & histology
Heart Atria - diagnostic imaging
Humans
landmark
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Preoperative Care
SVC/RA junction
transesophageal echocardiography
Vena Cava, Superior - diagnostic imaging
title Comparison of radiographic landmarks and the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction in the positioning of long-term central venous catheters
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T12%3A27%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20radiographic%20landmarks%20and%20the%20echocardiographic%20SVC/RA%20junction%20in%20the%20positioning%20of%20long-term%20central%20venous%20catheters&rft.jtitle=Acta%20anaesthesiologica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=Hsu,%20J.-H.&rft.date=2006-07&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=731&rft.epage=735&rft.pages=731-735&rft.issn=0001-5172&rft.eissn=1399-6576&rft.coden=AANEAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01025.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68874933%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68874933&rft_id=info:pmid/16987369&rfr_iscdi=true