Local Resection of Ampullary Tumors

There is no consensus on the appropriateness of local resection for ampullary tumors, because malignant recurrence of what were thought to be benign tumors has been reported. This study examined the role of local resection in the management of ampullary tumors. Thirty patients (mean age 66 years) ha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2005-12, Vol.9 (9), p.1300-1306
Hauptverfasser: Meneghetti, Adam T., Safadi, Bassem, Stewart, Lygia, Way, Lawrence W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1306
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1300
container_title Journal of gastrointestinal surgery
container_volume 9
creator Meneghetti, Adam T.
Safadi, Bassem
Stewart, Lygia
Way, Lawrence W.
description There is no consensus on the appropriateness of local resection for ampullary tumors, because malignant recurrence of what were thought to be benign tumors has been reported. This study examined the role of local resection in the management of ampullary tumors. Thirty patients (mean age 66 years) had transduodenal local resections performed at UCSF-Moffitt Hospital or the San Francisco VA Medical Center (February, 1992 to March, 2004). Mean follow-up time was 5.8 years. Preoperative biopsies (obtained in all patients) showed 18 adenomas, four adenomas with dysplasia, five adenomas with atypia, one adenoma with dysplasia and focal adenocarcinoma, and two tumors seen on endoscopy, whose biopsies showed only duodenal mucosa. In comparison with the final pathology findings, the results of frozen section examinations for malignancy in 20 patients, during the operation, were false-negative in three cases. The final pathologic diagnosis was 23 villous adenomas, six adenocarcinomas, and one paraganglioma. On preoperative biopsies, all patients who had high-grade dysplasia and one of five patients with atypia turned out to have invasive adenocarcinoma when the entire specimen was examined postoperatively. Two (33%) adenocarcinomas recurred at a mean of 4 years; both had negative margins at the initial resection. Among the 23 adenomas, three (13%) recurred (all as adenomas) at a mean of 3.2 years; in only one of these cases was the margin positive at the time of resection. Tumor size did not influence recurrence rate. Ampullary tumors with high-grade dysplasia on preoperative biopsy should be treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy because they usually harbor malignancy. Recurrence is too common and unpredictable after local resection of malignant lesions for this to be considered an acceptable alternative to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ampullary adenomas can be resected locally with good results, but the recurrence rate was 13%, so endoscopic surveillance is indicated postoperatively. Frozen sections were obtained during the operation, but they were less reliable than expected. No adenomas recurred as carcinomas, suggesting that local resection is appropriate for these tumors in the absence of dysplasia or atypia on preoperative biopsies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68872084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1091255X05006657</els_id><sourcerecordid>2789659691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-32323e3649b05c72efc2d111928f63adee0e5b27505ea04f6837c9e52ae6c0ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtLwzAUgIMobk7_gUhh4FvrSdKk6YswhjcYCDLBt9Clp9LSNjNZhf17MzoQfJDzcM7Dd24fIdcUEgpU3jXJZ-H94BIGIBJQCXB6QqZUZTxOJZOnoYacxkyIjwm58L4BoBlQdU4mVHLOUiWnZL6ypmijN_RodrXtI1tFi247tG3h9tF66Kzzl-SsKlqPV8c8I--PD-vlc7x6fXpZLlax4UrtYs5CIJdpvgFhMoaVYSWlNGeqkrwoEQHFhmUCBBaQVlLxzOQoWIHSACKfkdtx7tbZrwH9Tne1NxhO6dEOXkulMgYqDeD8D9jYwfXhNh32McalpDxQ6UgZZ713WOmtq7vwlqagDwp1o0eF-qBQg9JBYWi7OQ4fNh2Wv01HZwG4HwEMLr5rdNqbGnuDZe2CRF3a-v8NP3HYgdc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1112236613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Local Resection of Ampullary Tumors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Meneghetti, Adam T. ; Safadi, Bassem ; Stewart, Lygia ; Way, Lawrence W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Meneghetti, Adam T. ; Safadi, Bassem ; Stewart, Lygia ; Way, Lawrence W.</creatorcontrib><description>There is no consensus on the appropriateness of local resection for ampullary tumors, because malignant recurrence of what were thought to be benign tumors has been reported. This study examined the role of local resection in the management of ampullary tumors. Thirty patients (mean age 66 years) had transduodenal local resections performed at UCSF-Moffitt Hospital or the San Francisco VA Medical Center (February, 1992 to March, 2004). Mean follow-up time was 5.8 years. Preoperative biopsies (obtained in all patients) showed 18 adenomas, four adenomas with dysplasia, five adenomas with atypia, one adenoma with dysplasia and focal adenocarcinoma, and two tumors seen on endoscopy, whose biopsies showed only duodenal mucosa. In comparison with the final pathology findings, the results of frozen section examinations for malignancy in 20 patients, during the operation, were false-negative in three cases. The final pathologic diagnosis was 23 villous adenomas, six adenocarcinomas, and one paraganglioma. On preoperative biopsies, all patients who had high-grade dysplasia and one of five patients with atypia turned out to have invasive adenocarcinoma when the entire specimen was examined postoperatively. Two (33%) adenocarcinomas recurred at a mean of 4 years; both had negative margins at the initial resection. Among the 23 adenomas, three (13%) recurred (all as adenomas) at a mean of 3.2 years; in only one of these cases was the margin positive at the time of resection. Tumor size did not influence recurrence rate. Ampullary tumors with high-grade dysplasia on preoperative biopsy should be treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy because they usually harbor malignancy. Recurrence is too common and unpredictable after local resection of malignant lesions for this to be considered an acceptable alternative to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ampullary adenomas can be resected locally with good results, but the recurrence rate was 13%, so endoscopic surveillance is indicated postoperatively. Frozen sections were obtained during the operation, but they were less reliable than expected. No adenomas recurred as carcinomas, suggesting that local resection is appropriate for these tumors in the absence of dysplasia or atypia on preoperative biopsies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-255X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16332486</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ampulla of Vater - surgery ; ampullary adenoma ; ampullary carcinoma ; Ampullary tumors ; Common Bile Duct Neoplasms - pathology ; Common Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery ; Disease-Free Survival ; duodenal adenoma ; Female ; Humans ; local resection ; Male ; Middle Aged ; periampullary adenoma ; transduodenal resection ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2005-12, Vol.9 (9), p.1300-1306</ispartof><rights>2005 The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract</rights><rights>The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2005.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-32323e3649b05c72efc2d111928f63adee0e5b27505ea04f6837c9e52ae6c0ee3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16332486$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meneghetti, Adam T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safadi, Bassem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Lygia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Way, Lawrence W.</creatorcontrib><title>Local Resection of Ampullary Tumors</title><title>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</title><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><description>There is no consensus on the appropriateness of local resection for ampullary tumors, because malignant recurrence of what were thought to be benign tumors has been reported. This study examined the role of local resection in the management of ampullary tumors. Thirty patients (mean age 66 years) had transduodenal local resections performed at UCSF-Moffitt Hospital or the San Francisco VA Medical Center (February, 1992 to March, 2004). Mean follow-up time was 5.8 years. Preoperative biopsies (obtained in all patients) showed 18 adenomas, four adenomas with dysplasia, five adenomas with atypia, one adenoma with dysplasia and focal adenocarcinoma, and two tumors seen on endoscopy, whose biopsies showed only duodenal mucosa. In comparison with the final pathology findings, the results of frozen section examinations for malignancy in 20 patients, during the operation, were false-negative in three cases. The final pathologic diagnosis was 23 villous adenomas, six adenocarcinomas, and one paraganglioma. On preoperative biopsies, all patients who had high-grade dysplasia and one of five patients with atypia turned out to have invasive adenocarcinoma when the entire specimen was examined postoperatively. Two (33%) adenocarcinomas recurred at a mean of 4 years; both had negative margins at the initial resection. Among the 23 adenomas, three (13%) recurred (all as adenomas) at a mean of 3.2 years; in only one of these cases was the margin positive at the time of resection. Tumor size did not influence recurrence rate. Ampullary tumors with high-grade dysplasia on preoperative biopsy should be treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy because they usually harbor malignancy. Recurrence is too common and unpredictable after local resection of malignant lesions for this to be considered an acceptable alternative to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ampullary adenomas can be resected locally with good results, but the recurrence rate was 13%, so endoscopic surveillance is indicated postoperatively. Frozen sections were obtained during the operation, but they were less reliable than expected. No adenomas recurred as carcinomas, suggesting that local resection is appropriate for these tumors in the absence of dysplasia or atypia on preoperative biopsies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Ampulla of Vater - surgery</subject><subject>ampullary adenoma</subject><subject>ampullary carcinoma</subject><subject>Ampullary tumors</subject><subject>Common Bile Duct Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Common Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>duodenal adenoma</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>local resection</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>periampullary adenoma</subject><subject>transduodenal resection</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1091-255X</issn><issn>1873-4626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFtLwzAUgIMobk7_gUhh4FvrSdKk6YswhjcYCDLBt9Clp9LSNjNZhf17MzoQfJDzcM7Dd24fIdcUEgpU3jXJZ-H94BIGIBJQCXB6QqZUZTxOJZOnoYacxkyIjwm58L4BoBlQdU4mVHLOUiWnZL6ypmijN_RodrXtI1tFi247tG3h9tF66Kzzl-SsKlqPV8c8I--PD-vlc7x6fXpZLlax4UrtYs5CIJdpvgFhMoaVYSWlNGeqkrwoEQHFhmUCBBaQVlLxzOQoWIHSACKfkdtx7tbZrwH9Tne1NxhO6dEOXkulMgYqDeD8D9jYwfXhNh32McalpDxQ6UgZZ713WOmtq7vwlqagDwp1o0eF-qBQg9JBYWi7OQ4fNh2Wv01HZwG4HwEMLr5rdNqbGnuDZe2CRF3a-v8NP3HYgdc</recordid><startdate>20051201</startdate><enddate>20051201</enddate><creator>Meneghetti, Adam T.</creator><creator>Safadi, Bassem</creator><creator>Stewart, Lygia</creator><creator>Way, Lawrence W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051201</creationdate><title>Local Resection of Ampullary Tumors</title><author>Meneghetti, Adam T. ; Safadi, Bassem ; Stewart, Lygia ; Way, Lawrence W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-32323e3649b05c72efc2d111928f63adee0e5b27505ea04f6837c9e52ae6c0ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Ampulla of Vater - surgery</topic><topic>ampullary adenoma</topic><topic>ampullary carcinoma</topic><topic>Ampullary tumors</topic><topic>Common Bile Duct Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Common Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>duodenal adenoma</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>local resection</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>periampullary adenoma</topic><topic>transduodenal resection</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meneghetti, Adam T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safadi, Bassem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Lygia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Way, Lawrence W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meneghetti, Adam T.</au><au>Safadi, Bassem</au><au>Stewart, Lygia</au><au>Way, Lawrence W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Local Resection of Ampullary Tumors</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><date>2005-12-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1300</spage><epage>1306</epage><pages>1300-1306</pages><issn>1091-255X</issn><eissn>1873-4626</eissn><abstract>There is no consensus on the appropriateness of local resection for ampullary tumors, because malignant recurrence of what were thought to be benign tumors has been reported. This study examined the role of local resection in the management of ampullary tumors. Thirty patients (mean age 66 years) had transduodenal local resections performed at UCSF-Moffitt Hospital or the San Francisco VA Medical Center (February, 1992 to March, 2004). Mean follow-up time was 5.8 years. Preoperative biopsies (obtained in all patients) showed 18 adenomas, four adenomas with dysplasia, five adenomas with atypia, one adenoma with dysplasia and focal adenocarcinoma, and two tumors seen on endoscopy, whose biopsies showed only duodenal mucosa. In comparison with the final pathology findings, the results of frozen section examinations for malignancy in 20 patients, during the operation, were false-negative in three cases. The final pathologic diagnosis was 23 villous adenomas, six adenocarcinomas, and one paraganglioma. On preoperative biopsies, all patients who had high-grade dysplasia and one of five patients with atypia turned out to have invasive adenocarcinoma when the entire specimen was examined postoperatively. Two (33%) adenocarcinomas recurred at a mean of 4 years; both had negative margins at the initial resection. Among the 23 adenomas, three (13%) recurred (all as adenomas) at a mean of 3.2 years; in only one of these cases was the margin positive at the time of resection. Tumor size did not influence recurrence rate. Ampullary tumors with high-grade dysplasia on preoperative biopsy should be treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy because they usually harbor malignancy. Recurrence is too common and unpredictable after local resection of malignant lesions for this to be considered an acceptable alternative to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ampullary adenomas can be resected locally with good results, but the recurrence rate was 13%, so endoscopic surveillance is indicated postoperatively. Frozen sections were obtained during the operation, but they were less reliable than expected. No adenomas recurred as carcinomas, suggesting that local resection is appropriate for these tumors in the absence of dysplasia or atypia on preoperative biopsies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16332486</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.031</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1091-255X
ispartof Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2005-12, Vol.9 (9), p.1300-1306
issn 1091-255X
1873-4626
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68872084
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ampulla of Vater - surgery
ampullary adenoma
ampullary carcinoma
Ampullary tumors
Common Bile Duct Neoplasms - pathology
Common Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery
Disease-Free Survival
duodenal adenoma
Female
Humans
local resection
Male
Middle Aged
periampullary adenoma
transduodenal resection
Tumors
title Local Resection of Ampullary Tumors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T14%3A35%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Local%20Resection%20of%20Ampullary%20Tumors&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20surgery&rft.au=Meneghetti,%20Adam%20T.&rft.date=2005-12-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1300&rft.epage=1306&rft.pages=1300-1306&rft.issn=1091-255X&rft.eissn=1873-4626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2789659691%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1112236613&rft_id=info:pmid/16332486&rft_els_id=S1091255X05006657&rfr_iscdi=true