Endoscopic necrosectomy as primary therapy in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis

Open pancreatic necrosectomy is the standard treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis but is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and prolonged hospital stay. Percutaneous or endoscopic necrosectomy are alternative techniques. We evaluated the use of endoscopic necrosectomy for treatm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Endoscopy 2006-09, Vol.38 (9), p.925-928
Hauptverfasser: Charnley, R. M., Lochan, R., Gray, H., O’Sullivan, C. B., Scott, J., Oppong, K. E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 928
container_issue 9
container_start_page 925
container_title Endoscopy
container_volume 38
creator Charnley, R. M.
Lochan, R.
Gray, H.
O’Sullivan, C. B.
Scott, J.
Oppong, K. E.
description Open pancreatic necrosectomy is the standard treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis but is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and prolonged hospital stay. Percutaneous or endoscopic necrosectomy are alternative techniques. We evaluated the use of endoscopic necrosectomy for treatment of patients with necrosis that could be accessed through the posterior wall of the stomach. We retrospectively analyzed the indication, patient status according to acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) 2 severity score, and success of endoscopic necrosectomy as primary treatment, in selected patients with localized infected pancreatic necrosis, who presented between May 2002 and October 2004. After the necrosis cavity had been accessed, with the assistance of endoscopic ultrasound, a large orifice was created and necrotic debris was removed using endoscopic accessories under radiological control. Follow-up was clinical and radiological. 13 patients (nine men, four women, mean age 53 years), 11 with positive bacteriology, underwent attempted endoscopic necrosectomy. Median APACHE 2 score on presentation was 8 (range 1-18). Four patients needed intensive therapy unit care and one other patient required (nonventilatory) high-dependency unit care only. Necrosis was successfully treated endoscopically in 12 patients, requiring a mean of 4 endoscopic interventions (range 1-10); one patient required open surgery; two underwent additional percutaneous necrosectomy and one required laparoscopic drainage. Two patients died of complications unrelated to the procedure. The 11 survivors have a median (range) follow-up of 16 (6-38) months. Endoscopic necrosectomy is a safe method for treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis. Multiple procedures are usually needed. It may be combined with other methods of surgical intervention. Larger prospective studies will more precisely define its role.
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-2006-944731
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68867496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68867496</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-6f36a541990fb5fbe6906c4caf1751e1f13d485411674ef7e9fb60d2130969cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtPwzAURi0EoqUwsqIsMGGwE8exR1SVh1SJBSQGJMtxrmmqvLCTof8eR4lgwosfOve7vgehS0ruKEnTe49jQjiWjGUJPUJLyhKBhaDxMVoSQhOcxfxjgc68349XQtJTtKBcChrWEn1umqL1pu1KEzVgXOvB9G19iLSPOlfW2h2ifgdOd4eobMZjVOtGf0ENTR-1NjzaUAFF1OnGOND9b1Dpz9GJ1ZWHi3lfoffHzdv6GW9fn17WD1tsWMx6zG3CdcqolMTmqc2BS8INM9rSLKVALU0KJgJAecbAZiBtzkkRh2kklyZPVuhmyu1c-z2A71VdegNVpRtoB6-4EKFS8gDiCRz_5x1YNc-oKFGjTuXVqFNNOgN_NQcPeQ3FHz37C8D1DGhvdGVdkFD6P05QwgWJA3c7cf2uDOrUvh1cE5T80_cHcCSLfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68867496</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endoscopic necrosectomy as primary therapy in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Charnley, R. M. ; Lochan, R. ; Gray, H. ; O’Sullivan, C. B. ; Scott, J. ; Oppong, K. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Charnley, R. M. ; Lochan, R. ; Gray, H. ; O’Sullivan, C. B. ; Scott, J. ; Oppong, K. E.</creatorcontrib><description>Open pancreatic necrosectomy is the standard treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis but is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and prolonged hospital stay. Percutaneous or endoscopic necrosectomy are alternative techniques. We evaluated the use of endoscopic necrosectomy for treatment of patients with necrosis that could be accessed through the posterior wall of the stomach. We retrospectively analyzed the indication, patient status according to acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) 2 severity score, and success of endoscopic necrosectomy as primary treatment, in selected patients with localized infected pancreatic necrosis, who presented between May 2002 and October 2004. After the necrosis cavity had been accessed, with the assistance of endoscopic ultrasound, a large orifice was created and necrotic debris was removed using endoscopic accessories under radiological control. Follow-up was clinical and radiological. 13 patients (nine men, four women, mean age 53 years), 11 with positive bacteriology, underwent attempted endoscopic necrosectomy. Median APACHE 2 score on presentation was 8 (range 1-18). Four patients needed intensive therapy unit care and one other patient required (nonventilatory) high-dependency unit care only. Necrosis was successfully treated endoscopically in 12 patients, requiring a mean of 4 endoscopic interventions (range 1-10); one patient required open surgery; two underwent additional percutaneous necrosectomy and one required laparoscopic drainage. Two patients died of complications unrelated to the procedure. The 11 survivors have a median (range) follow-up of 16 (6-38) months. Endoscopic necrosectomy is a safe method for treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis. Multiple procedures are usually needed. It may be combined with other methods of surgical intervention. Larger prospective studies will more precisely define its role.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-726X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-8812</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-944731</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16981111</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENDCAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Stuttgart: Thieme</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Necrosis - surgery ; Original article ; Pancreas - diagnostic imaging ; Pancreas - pathology ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Endoscopy, 2006-09, Vol.38 (9), p.925-928</ispartof><rights>Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-6f36a541990fb5fbe6906c4caf1751e1f13d485411674ef7e9fb60d2130969cb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-2006-944731.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-2006-944731$$EHTML$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3015,3016,27922,27923,54557,54558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18106802$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16981111$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Charnley, R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lochan, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, C. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppong, K. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Endoscopic necrosectomy as primary therapy in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis</title><title>Endoscopy</title><addtitle>Endoscopy</addtitle><description>Open pancreatic necrosectomy is the standard treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis but is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and prolonged hospital stay. Percutaneous or endoscopic necrosectomy are alternative techniques. We evaluated the use of endoscopic necrosectomy for treatment of patients with necrosis that could be accessed through the posterior wall of the stomach. We retrospectively analyzed the indication, patient status according to acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) 2 severity score, and success of endoscopic necrosectomy as primary treatment, in selected patients with localized infected pancreatic necrosis, who presented between May 2002 and October 2004. After the necrosis cavity had been accessed, with the assistance of endoscopic ultrasound, a large orifice was created and necrotic debris was removed using endoscopic accessories under radiological control. Follow-up was clinical and radiological. 13 patients (nine men, four women, mean age 53 years), 11 with positive bacteriology, underwent attempted endoscopic necrosectomy. Median APACHE 2 score on presentation was 8 (range 1-18). Four patients needed intensive therapy unit care and one other patient required (nonventilatory) high-dependency unit care only. Necrosis was successfully treated endoscopically in 12 patients, requiring a mean of 4 endoscopic interventions (range 1-10); one patient required open surgery; two underwent additional percutaneous necrosectomy and one required laparoscopic drainage. Two patients died of complications unrelated to the procedure. The 11 survivors have a median (range) follow-up of 16 (6-38) months. Endoscopic necrosectomy is a safe method for treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis. Multiple procedures are usually needed. It may be combined with other methods of surgical intervention. Larger prospective studies will more precisely define its role.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Necrosis - surgery</subject><subject>Original article</subject><subject>Pancreas - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pancreas - pathology</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0013-726X</issn><issn>1438-8812</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDtPwzAURi0EoqUwsqIsMGGwE8exR1SVh1SJBSQGJMtxrmmqvLCTof8eR4lgwosfOve7vgehS0ruKEnTe49jQjiWjGUJPUJLyhKBhaDxMVoSQhOcxfxjgc68349XQtJTtKBcChrWEn1umqL1pu1KEzVgXOvB9G19iLSPOlfW2h2ifgdOd4eobMZjVOtGf0ENTR-1NjzaUAFF1OnGOND9b1Dpz9GJ1ZWHi3lfoffHzdv6GW9fn17WD1tsWMx6zG3CdcqolMTmqc2BS8INM9rSLKVALU0KJgJAecbAZiBtzkkRh2kklyZPVuhmyu1c-z2A71VdegNVpRtoB6-4EKFS8gDiCRz_5x1YNc-oKFGjTuXVqFNNOgN_NQcPeQ3FHz37C8D1DGhvdGVdkFD6P05QwgWJA3c7cf2uDOrUvh1cE5T80_cHcCSLfg</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>Charnley, R. M.</creator><creator>Lochan, R.</creator><creator>Gray, H.</creator><creator>O’Sullivan, C. B.</creator><creator>Scott, J.</creator><creator>Oppong, K. E.</creator><general>Thieme</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>Endoscopic necrosectomy as primary therapy in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis</title><author>Charnley, R. M. ; Lochan, R. ; Gray, H. ; O’Sullivan, C. B. ; Scott, J. ; Oppong, K. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-6f36a541990fb5fbe6906c4caf1751e1f13d485411674ef7e9fb60d2130969cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Necrosis - surgery</topic><topic>Original article</topic><topic>Pancreas - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pancreas - pathology</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Charnley, R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lochan, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, C. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppong, K. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Charnley, R. M.</au><au>Lochan, R.</au><au>Gray, H.</au><au>O’Sullivan, C. B.</au><au>Scott, J.</au><au>Oppong, K. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endoscopic necrosectomy as primary therapy in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis</atitle><jtitle>Endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Endoscopy</addtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>925</spage><epage>928</epage><pages>925-928</pages><issn>0013-726X</issn><eissn>1438-8812</eissn><coden>ENDCAM</coden><abstract>Open pancreatic necrosectomy is the standard treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis but is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and prolonged hospital stay. Percutaneous or endoscopic necrosectomy are alternative techniques. We evaluated the use of endoscopic necrosectomy for treatment of patients with necrosis that could be accessed through the posterior wall of the stomach. We retrospectively analyzed the indication, patient status according to acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) 2 severity score, and success of endoscopic necrosectomy as primary treatment, in selected patients with localized infected pancreatic necrosis, who presented between May 2002 and October 2004. After the necrosis cavity had been accessed, with the assistance of endoscopic ultrasound, a large orifice was created and necrotic debris was removed using endoscopic accessories under radiological control. Follow-up was clinical and radiological. 13 patients (nine men, four women, mean age 53 years), 11 with positive bacteriology, underwent attempted endoscopic necrosectomy. Median APACHE 2 score on presentation was 8 (range 1-18). Four patients needed intensive therapy unit care and one other patient required (nonventilatory) high-dependency unit care only. Necrosis was successfully treated endoscopically in 12 patients, requiring a mean of 4 endoscopic interventions (range 1-10); one patient required open surgery; two underwent additional percutaneous necrosectomy and one required laparoscopic drainage. Two patients died of complications unrelated to the procedure. The 11 survivors have a median (range) follow-up of 16 (6-38) months. Endoscopic necrosectomy is a safe method for treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis. Multiple procedures are usually needed. It may be combined with other methods of surgical intervention. Larger prospective studies will more precisely define its role.</abstract><cop>Stuttgart</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Thieme</pub><pmid>16981111</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-2006-944731</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-726X
ispartof Endoscopy, 2006-09, Vol.38 (9), p.925-928
issn 0013-726X
1438-8812
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68867496
source MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Necrosis - surgery
Original article
Pancreas - diagnostic imaging
Pancreas - pathology
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
title Endoscopic necrosectomy as primary therapy in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T15%3A29%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endoscopic%20necrosectomy%20as%20primary%20therapy%20in%20the%20management%20of%20infected%20pancreatic%20necrosis&rft.jtitle=Endoscopy&rft.au=Charnley,%20R.%20M.&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=925&rft.epage=928&rft.pages=925-928&rft.issn=0013-726X&rft.eissn=1438-8812&rft.coden=ENDCAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-2006-944731&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68867496%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68867496&rft_id=info:pmid/16981111&rfr_iscdi=true