Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon

Bone healing is a complex and multifactorial process. As such, there are numerous steps in the process to which intervention can be directed. This has given rise to many bone graft technologies that have been used to regenerate bone, creating, perhaps, a bewildering array of options. The options tha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of craniofacial surgery 2005-11, Vol.16 (6), p.981-989
Hauptverfasser: Eppley, Barry L, Pietrzak, William S, Blanton, Matthew W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 989
container_issue 6
container_start_page 981
container_title The Journal of craniofacial surgery
container_volume 16
creator Eppley, Barry L
Pietrzak, William S
Blanton, Matthew W
description Bone healing is a complex and multifactorial process. As such, there are numerous steps in the process to which intervention can be directed. This has given rise to many bone graft technologies that have been used to regenerate bone, creating, perhaps, a bewildering array of options. The options that surgeons have the most familiarity with are the ones that have been available the longest (i.e., autograft and allograft). Although useful for the widest spectrum of clinical applications, limitations of these grafts has prompted the development of new materials. Demineralized bone matrix formulations and synthetic ceramic materials are now being used with greater frequency. These biomaterials have demonstrated their usefulness in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery with their ability to augment and replace portions of the craniofacial skeleton. The purpose of this article is to describe and discuss the allograft and alloplastic bone grafting technologies so that the reader can consider each in the context of the others and gain a better appreciation for how each fits into the universe of existing and emerging treatments for bone regeneration.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.scs.0000179662.38172.dd
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68861021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68861021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-fb7035c72297d8be29c22e6cb114daff046011f851dada8f18d5bf9ec951b3003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1OwzAQhH0A0VJ4BWRx4JbgdRIn6a2q-JMqcYGz5djrNiiNi50AfXtMW4m9rGY1Myt9hNwCS4HV5T2DNOiQsjhQ1kLwNKug5KkxZ2QKLK8TzstiQi5D-GCMA3BxQSYgsnjN8ynxi65za6_sQFVvqIpq16kwtJo2rkcaxiaKYRwwzKmiHr9a_KbO0qBb7DUeUgPqTe9iz55a5-mwQaq96lu3VT9tbLRKt6qLXX6Nrr8i51Z1Aa9Pe0beHx_els_J6vXpZblYJTqrsiGxTcmyQpec16WpGuS15hyFbgByo6xluWAAtirAKKMqC5UpGlujrgtoMsayGbk79u68-xwxDHLbBo1dp3p0Y5CiqgREJNE4Pxq1dyF4tHLn263yewlM_lGWDGSkLP8pywNlaUwM35y-jM0WzX_0hDj7BQ4dfyM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68861021</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Eppley, Barry L ; Pietrzak, William S ; Blanton, Matthew W</creator><creatorcontrib>Eppley, Barry L ; Pietrzak, William S ; Blanton, Matthew W</creatorcontrib><description>Bone healing is a complex and multifactorial process. As such, there are numerous steps in the process to which intervention can be directed. This has given rise to many bone graft technologies that have been used to regenerate bone, creating, perhaps, a bewildering array of options. The options that surgeons have the most familiarity with are the ones that have been available the longest (i.e., autograft and allograft). Although useful for the widest spectrum of clinical applications, limitations of these grafts has prompted the development of new materials. Demineralized bone matrix formulations and synthetic ceramic materials are now being used with greater frequency. These biomaterials have demonstrated their usefulness in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery with their ability to augment and replace portions of the craniofacial skeleton. The purpose of this article is to describe and discuss the allograft and alloplastic bone grafting technologies so that the reader can consider each in the context of the others and gain a better appreciation for how each fits into the universe of existing and emerging treatments for bone regeneration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-2275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000179662.38172.dd</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16327544</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use ; Bone Regeneration - physiology ; Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use ; Bone Transplantation - methods ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Oral Surgical Procedures - methods ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Technology, Dental ; Transplantation, Homologous</subject><ispartof>The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2005-11, Vol.16 (6), p.981-989</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-fb7035c72297d8be29c22e6cb114daff046011f851dada8f18d5bf9ec951b3003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-fb7035c72297d8be29c22e6cb114daff046011f851dada8f18d5bf9ec951b3003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16327544$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eppley, Barry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietrzak, William S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanton, Matthew W</creatorcontrib><title>Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon</title><title>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniofac Surg</addtitle><description>Bone healing is a complex and multifactorial process. As such, there are numerous steps in the process to which intervention can be directed. This has given rise to many bone graft technologies that have been used to regenerate bone, creating, perhaps, a bewildering array of options. The options that surgeons have the most familiarity with are the ones that have been available the longest (i.e., autograft and allograft). Although useful for the widest spectrum of clinical applications, limitations of these grafts has prompted the development of new materials. Demineralized bone matrix formulations and synthetic ceramic materials are now being used with greater frequency. These biomaterials have demonstrated their usefulness in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery with their ability to augment and replace portions of the craniofacial skeleton. The purpose of this article is to describe and discuss the allograft and alloplastic bone grafting technologies so that the reader can consider each in the context of the others and gain a better appreciation for how each fits into the universe of existing and emerging treatments for bone regeneration.</description><subject>Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Oral Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Technology, Dental</subject><subject>Transplantation, Homologous</subject><issn>1049-2275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1OwzAQhH0A0VJ4BWRx4JbgdRIn6a2q-JMqcYGz5djrNiiNi50AfXtMW4m9rGY1Myt9hNwCS4HV5T2DNOiQsjhQ1kLwNKug5KkxZ2QKLK8TzstiQi5D-GCMA3BxQSYgsnjN8ynxi65za6_sQFVvqIpq16kwtJo2rkcaxiaKYRwwzKmiHr9a_KbO0qBb7DUeUgPqTe9iz55a5-mwQaq96lu3VT9tbLRKt6qLXX6Nrr8i51Z1Aa9Pe0beHx_els_J6vXpZblYJTqrsiGxTcmyQpec16WpGuS15hyFbgByo6xluWAAtirAKKMqC5UpGlujrgtoMsayGbk79u68-xwxDHLbBo1dp3p0Y5CiqgREJNE4Pxq1dyF4tHLn263yewlM_lGWDGSkLP8pywNlaUwM35y-jM0WzX_0hDj7BQ4dfyM</recordid><startdate>200511</startdate><enddate>200511</enddate><creator>Eppley, Barry L</creator><creator>Pietrzak, William S</creator><creator>Blanton, Matthew W</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200511</creationdate><title>Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon</title><author>Eppley, Barry L ; Pietrzak, William S ; Blanton, Matthew W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-fb7035c72297d8be29c22e6cb114daff046011f851dada8f18d5bf9ec951b3003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Oral Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Technology, Dental</topic><topic>Transplantation, Homologous</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eppley, Barry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietrzak, William S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanton, Matthew W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eppley, Barry L</au><au>Pietrzak, William S</au><au>Blanton, Matthew W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniofac Surg</addtitle><date>2005-11</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>981</spage><epage>989</epage><pages>981-989</pages><issn>1049-2275</issn><abstract>Bone healing is a complex and multifactorial process. As such, there are numerous steps in the process to which intervention can be directed. This has given rise to many bone graft technologies that have been used to regenerate bone, creating, perhaps, a bewildering array of options. The options that surgeons have the most familiarity with are the ones that have been available the longest (i.e., autograft and allograft). Although useful for the widest spectrum of clinical applications, limitations of these grafts has prompted the development of new materials. Demineralized bone matrix formulations and synthetic ceramic materials are now being used with greater frequency. These biomaterials have demonstrated their usefulness in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery with their ability to augment and replace portions of the craniofacial skeleton. The purpose of this article is to describe and discuss the allograft and alloplastic bone grafting technologies so that the reader can consider each in the context of the others and gain a better appreciation for how each fits into the universe of existing and emerging treatments for bone regeneration.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>16327544</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.scs.0000179662.38172.dd</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1049-2275
ispartof The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2005-11, Vol.16 (6), p.981-989
issn 1049-2275
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68861021
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use
Bone Regeneration - physiology
Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use
Bone Transplantation - methods
Dentistry
Humans
Oral Surgical Procedures - methods
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods
Technology, Dental
Transplantation, Homologous
title Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T11%3A35%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Allograft%20and%20alloplastic%20bone%20substitutes:%20a%20review%20of%20science%20and%20technology%20for%20the%20craniomaxillofacial%20surgeon&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20craniofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Eppley,%20Barry%20L&rft.date=2005-11&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=981&rft.epage=989&rft.pages=981-989&rft.issn=1049-2275&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.scs.0000179662.38172.dd&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68861021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68861021&rft_id=info:pmid/16327544&rfr_iscdi=true