Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon
Bone healing is a complex and multifactorial process. As such, there are numerous steps in the process to which intervention can be directed. This has given rise to many bone graft technologies that have been used to regenerate bone, creating, perhaps, a bewildering array of options. The options tha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of craniofacial surgery 2005-11, Vol.16 (6), p.981-989 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 989 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 981 |
container_title | The Journal of craniofacial surgery |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Eppley, Barry L Pietrzak, William S Blanton, Matthew W |
description | Bone healing is a complex and multifactorial process. As such, there are numerous steps in the process to which intervention can be directed. This has given rise to many bone graft technologies that have been used to regenerate bone, creating, perhaps, a bewildering array of options. The options that surgeons have the most familiarity with are the ones that have been available the longest (i.e., autograft and allograft). Although useful for the widest spectrum of clinical applications, limitations of these grafts has prompted the development of new materials. Demineralized bone matrix formulations and synthetic ceramic materials are now being used with greater frequency. These biomaterials have demonstrated their usefulness in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery with their ability to augment and replace portions of the craniofacial skeleton. The purpose of this article is to describe and discuss the allograft and alloplastic bone grafting technologies so that the reader can consider each in the context of the others and gain a better appreciation for how each fits into the universe of existing and emerging treatments for bone regeneration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/01.scs.0000179662.38172.dd |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68861021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68861021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-fb7035c72297d8be29c22e6cb114daff046011f851dada8f18d5bf9ec951b3003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1OwzAQhH0A0VJ4BWRx4JbgdRIn6a2q-JMqcYGz5djrNiiNi50AfXtMW4m9rGY1Myt9hNwCS4HV5T2DNOiQsjhQ1kLwNKug5KkxZ2QKLK8TzstiQi5D-GCMA3BxQSYgsnjN8ynxi65za6_sQFVvqIpq16kwtJo2rkcaxiaKYRwwzKmiHr9a_KbO0qBb7DUeUgPqTe9iz55a5-mwQaq96lu3VT9tbLRKt6qLXX6Nrr8i51Z1Aa9Pe0beHx_els_J6vXpZblYJTqrsiGxTcmyQpec16WpGuS15hyFbgByo6xluWAAtirAKKMqC5UpGlujrgtoMsayGbk79u68-xwxDHLbBo1dp3p0Y5CiqgREJNE4Pxq1dyF4tHLn263yewlM_lGWDGSkLP8pywNlaUwM35y-jM0WzX_0hDj7BQ4dfyM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68861021</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Eppley, Barry L ; Pietrzak, William S ; Blanton, Matthew W</creator><creatorcontrib>Eppley, Barry L ; Pietrzak, William S ; Blanton, Matthew W</creatorcontrib><description>Bone healing is a complex and multifactorial process. As such, there are numerous steps in the process to which intervention can be directed. This has given rise to many bone graft technologies that have been used to regenerate bone, creating, perhaps, a bewildering array of options. The options that surgeons have the most familiarity with are the ones that have been available the longest (i.e., autograft and allograft). Although useful for the widest spectrum of clinical applications, limitations of these grafts has prompted the development of new materials. Demineralized bone matrix formulations and synthetic ceramic materials are now being used with greater frequency. These biomaterials have demonstrated their usefulness in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery with their ability to augment and replace portions of the craniofacial skeleton. The purpose of this article is to describe and discuss the allograft and alloplastic bone grafting technologies so that the reader can consider each in the context of the others and gain a better appreciation for how each fits into the universe of existing and emerging treatments for bone regeneration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-2275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000179662.38172.dd</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16327544</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use ; Bone Regeneration - physiology ; Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use ; Bone Transplantation - methods ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Oral Surgical Procedures - methods ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Technology, Dental ; Transplantation, Homologous</subject><ispartof>The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2005-11, Vol.16 (6), p.981-989</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-fb7035c72297d8be29c22e6cb114daff046011f851dada8f18d5bf9ec951b3003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-fb7035c72297d8be29c22e6cb114daff046011f851dada8f18d5bf9ec951b3003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16327544$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eppley, Barry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietrzak, William S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanton, Matthew W</creatorcontrib><title>Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon</title><title>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniofac Surg</addtitle><description>Bone healing is a complex and multifactorial process. As such, there are numerous steps in the process to which intervention can be directed. This has given rise to many bone graft technologies that have been used to regenerate bone, creating, perhaps, a bewildering array of options. The options that surgeons have the most familiarity with are the ones that have been available the longest (i.e., autograft and allograft). Although useful for the widest spectrum of clinical applications, limitations of these grafts has prompted the development of new materials. Demineralized bone matrix formulations and synthetic ceramic materials are now being used with greater frequency. These biomaterials have demonstrated their usefulness in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery with their ability to augment and replace portions of the craniofacial skeleton. The purpose of this article is to describe and discuss the allograft and alloplastic bone grafting technologies so that the reader can consider each in the context of the others and gain a better appreciation for how each fits into the universe of existing and emerging treatments for bone regeneration.</description><subject>Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Oral Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Technology, Dental</subject><subject>Transplantation, Homologous</subject><issn>1049-2275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1OwzAQhH0A0VJ4BWRx4JbgdRIn6a2q-JMqcYGz5djrNiiNi50AfXtMW4m9rGY1Myt9hNwCS4HV5T2DNOiQsjhQ1kLwNKug5KkxZ2QKLK8TzstiQi5D-GCMA3BxQSYgsnjN8ynxi65za6_sQFVvqIpq16kwtJo2rkcaxiaKYRwwzKmiHr9a_KbO0qBb7DUeUgPqTe9iz55a5-mwQaq96lu3VT9tbLRKt6qLXX6Nrr8i51Z1Aa9Pe0beHx_els_J6vXpZblYJTqrsiGxTcmyQpec16WpGuS15hyFbgByo6xluWAAtirAKKMqC5UpGlujrgtoMsayGbk79u68-xwxDHLbBo1dp3p0Y5CiqgREJNE4Pxq1dyF4tHLn263yewlM_lGWDGSkLP8pywNlaUwM35y-jM0WzX_0hDj7BQ4dfyM</recordid><startdate>200511</startdate><enddate>200511</enddate><creator>Eppley, Barry L</creator><creator>Pietrzak, William S</creator><creator>Blanton, Matthew W</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200511</creationdate><title>Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon</title><author>Eppley, Barry L ; Pietrzak, William S ; Blanton, Matthew W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-fb7035c72297d8be29c22e6cb114daff046011f851dada8f18d5bf9ec951b3003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Oral Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Technology, Dental</topic><topic>Transplantation, Homologous</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eppley, Barry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietrzak, William S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanton, Matthew W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eppley, Barry L</au><au>Pietrzak, William S</au><au>Blanton, Matthew W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniofac Surg</addtitle><date>2005-11</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>981</spage><epage>989</epage><pages>981-989</pages><issn>1049-2275</issn><abstract>Bone healing is a complex and multifactorial process. As such, there are numerous steps in the process to which intervention can be directed. This has given rise to many bone graft technologies that have been used to regenerate bone, creating, perhaps, a bewildering array of options. The options that surgeons have the most familiarity with are the ones that have been available the longest (i.e., autograft and allograft). Although useful for the widest spectrum of clinical applications, limitations of these grafts has prompted the development of new materials. Demineralized bone matrix formulations and synthetic ceramic materials are now being used with greater frequency. These biomaterials have demonstrated their usefulness in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery with their ability to augment and replace portions of the craniofacial skeleton. The purpose of this article is to describe and discuss the allograft and alloplastic bone grafting technologies so that the reader can consider each in the context of the others and gain a better appreciation for how each fits into the universe of existing and emerging treatments for bone regeneration.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>16327544</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.scs.0000179662.38172.dd</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1049-2275 |
ispartof | The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2005-11, Vol.16 (6), p.981-989 |
issn | 1049-2275 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68861021 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use Bone Regeneration - physiology Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use Bone Transplantation - methods Dentistry Humans Oral Surgical Procedures - methods Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods Technology, Dental Transplantation, Homologous |
title | Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T11%3A35%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Allograft%20and%20alloplastic%20bone%20substitutes:%20a%20review%20of%20science%20and%20technology%20for%20the%20craniomaxillofacial%20surgeon&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20craniofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Eppley,%20Barry%20L&rft.date=2005-11&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=981&rft.epage=989&rft.pages=981-989&rft.issn=1049-2275&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.scs.0000179662.38172.dd&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68861021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68861021&rft_id=info:pmid/16327544&rfr_iscdi=true |