Comparison of HPLC method and commercial ELISA assay for asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) determination in human serum

The performance of a new ELISA assay kit (DLD Diagnostika GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) for the determination of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) was evaluated against a reversed phase HPLC method. ADMA concentrations of 55 serum samples were measured with both methods. The intra-assay CV for ADMA-ELISA...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2005-12, Vol.828 (1), p.97-102
Hauptverfasser: Valtonen, Pirjo, Karppi, Jouni, Nyyssönen, Kristiina, Valkonen, Veli-Pekka, Halonen, Toivo, Punnonen, Kari
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102
container_issue 1
container_start_page 97
container_title Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences
container_volume 828
creator Valtonen, Pirjo
Karppi, Jouni
Nyyssönen, Kristiina
Valkonen, Veli-Pekka
Halonen, Toivo
Punnonen, Kari
description The performance of a new ELISA assay kit (DLD Diagnostika GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) for the determination of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) was evaluated against a reversed phase HPLC method. ADMA concentrations of 55 serum samples were measured with both methods. The intra-assay CV for ADMA-ELISA was 19% ( n = 10). Inter-assay CVs for ADMA-ELISA were 9% for kit control 1 (0.410 ± 0.037 μM) and 14% for kit control 2 (1.174 ± 0.165 μM). The intra- and inter-assay CVs for HPLC assay for ADMA were 2.5% (0.586 ± 0.015 μM) and 4.2% (0.664 ± 0.028 μM), respectively. There was no correlation between these two methods ( R 2 = 0.0972). The effect of storage conditions of the samples on ADMA concentrations was investigated by HPLC. ADMA concentration was stable after four freezing and thawing cycles. Overall, the HPLC method offered better sensitivity, selectivity and, very importantly, simultaneous determination of ADMA, SDMA, l-homoarginine and l-arginine.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.09.023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68860301</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1570023205006641</els_id><sourcerecordid>68860301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-50ea999f42ec777a2ac4bcd1c0356072c09abaa5ae64349d4966551445357dc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2P0zAQhiMEYj_gJ4B8AcEhwY7jODmhqizsSkUgARI3a2pPqKvY7toJov9-XTXSHjl5ZD_vjOcpileMVoyy9sO-2utdDG5b1ZSKivYVrfmT4pJ1kpdctr-f5lpIWubr-qK4SmlPKZNU8ufFBWtr1jS1vCz-rYM7QLQpeBIGcvt9syYOp10wBLwhOjiHUVsYyc3m7seKQEpwJEOIuTrmtylaTYw9RY4jxD_WW4_k3erT19V7YnDC6KyHyeb21pPd7MCThHF2L4pnA4wJXy7ndfHr883P9W25-fblbr3alLrpuqkUFKHv-6GpUUspoQbdbLVhmnLRUllr2sMWQAC2DW960_RtK0ReTnAhjRb8unh77nuI4X7GNClnk8ZxBI9hTqrtupZyyjIozqCOIaWIgzpE6yAeFaPqpFzt1aJcnZQr2qvsNudeLwPmrUPzmFocZ-DNAkDSMA4RvLbpkZM871HTzH08c5h1_LUYVdIWvUZjI-pJmWD_85UHULWiDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68860301</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of HPLC method and commercial ELISA assay for asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) determination in human serum</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Valtonen, Pirjo ; Karppi, Jouni ; Nyyssönen, Kristiina ; Valkonen, Veli-Pekka ; Halonen, Toivo ; Punnonen, Kari</creator><creatorcontrib>Valtonen, Pirjo ; Karppi, Jouni ; Nyyssönen, Kristiina ; Valkonen, Veli-Pekka ; Halonen, Toivo ; Punnonen, Kari</creatorcontrib><description>The performance of a new ELISA assay kit (DLD Diagnostika GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) for the determination of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) was evaluated against a reversed phase HPLC method. ADMA concentrations of 55 serum samples were measured with both methods. The intra-assay CV for ADMA-ELISA was 19% ( n = 10). Inter-assay CVs for ADMA-ELISA were 9% for kit control 1 (0.410 ± 0.037 μM) and 14% for kit control 2 (1.174 ± 0.165 μM). The intra- and inter-assay CVs for HPLC assay for ADMA were 2.5% (0.586 ± 0.015 μM) and 4.2% (0.664 ± 0.028 μM), respectively. There was no correlation between these two methods ( R 2 = 0.0972). The effect of storage conditions of the samples on ADMA concentrations was investigated by HPLC. ADMA concentration was stable after four freezing and thawing cycles. Overall, the HPLC method offered better sensitivity, selectivity and, very importantly, simultaneous determination of ADMA, SDMA, l-homoarginine and l-arginine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-0232</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-376X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.09.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16214427</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>ADMA ; Analysis ; Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry ; Arginine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Arginine - blood ; Arginine - chemistry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods ; Drug Stability ; ELISA ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General pharmacology ; HPLC ; Humans ; l-Arginine ; l-Homoarginine ; Medical sciences ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Quality Control ; Reproducibility of Results ; SDMA</subject><ispartof>Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2005-12, Vol.828 (1), p.97-102</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-50ea999f42ec777a2ac4bcd1c0356072c09abaa5ae64349d4966551445357dc53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570023205006641$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17307220$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16214427$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Valtonen, Pirjo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karppi, Jouni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyyssönen, Kristiina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valkonen, Veli-Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halonen, Toivo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punnonen, Kari</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of HPLC method and commercial ELISA assay for asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) determination in human serum</title><title>Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences</title><addtitle>J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci</addtitle><description>The performance of a new ELISA assay kit (DLD Diagnostika GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) for the determination of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) was evaluated against a reversed phase HPLC method. ADMA concentrations of 55 serum samples were measured with both methods. The intra-assay CV for ADMA-ELISA was 19% ( n = 10). Inter-assay CVs for ADMA-ELISA were 9% for kit control 1 (0.410 ± 0.037 μM) and 14% for kit control 2 (1.174 ± 0.165 μM). The intra- and inter-assay CVs for HPLC assay for ADMA were 2.5% (0.586 ± 0.015 μM) and 4.2% (0.664 ± 0.028 μM), respectively. There was no correlation between these two methods ( R 2 = 0.0972). The effect of storage conditions of the samples on ADMA concentrations was investigated by HPLC. ADMA concentration was stable after four freezing and thawing cycles. Overall, the HPLC method offered better sensitivity, selectivity and, very importantly, simultaneous determination of ADMA, SDMA, l-homoarginine and l-arginine.</description><subject>ADMA</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry</subject><subject>Arginine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Arginine - blood</subject><subject>Arginine - chemistry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</subject><subject>Drug Stability</subject><subject>ELISA</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General pharmacology</subject><subject>HPLC</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>l-Arginine</subject><subject>l-Homoarginine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>SDMA</subject><issn>1570-0232</issn><issn>1873-376X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE2P0zAQhiMEYj_gJ4B8AcEhwY7jODmhqizsSkUgARI3a2pPqKvY7toJov9-XTXSHjl5ZD_vjOcpileMVoyy9sO-2utdDG5b1ZSKivYVrfmT4pJ1kpdctr-f5lpIWubr-qK4SmlPKZNU8ufFBWtr1jS1vCz-rYM7QLQpeBIGcvt9syYOp10wBLwhOjiHUVsYyc3m7seKQEpwJEOIuTrmtylaTYw9RY4jxD_WW4_k3erT19V7YnDC6KyHyeb21pPd7MCThHF2L4pnA4wJXy7ndfHr883P9W25-fblbr3alLrpuqkUFKHv-6GpUUspoQbdbLVhmnLRUllr2sMWQAC2DW960_RtK0ReTnAhjRb8unh77nuI4X7GNClnk8ZxBI9hTqrtupZyyjIozqCOIaWIgzpE6yAeFaPqpFzt1aJcnZQr2qvsNudeLwPmrUPzmFocZ-DNAkDSMA4RvLbpkZM871HTzH08c5h1_LUYVdIWvUZjI-pJmWD_85UHULWiDQ</recordid><startdate>20051215</startdate><enddate>20051215</enddate><creator>Valtonen, Pirjo</creator><creator>Karppi, Jouni</creator><creator>Nyyssönen, Kristiina</creator><creator>Valkonen, Veli-Pekka</creator><creator>Halonen, Toivo</creator><creator>Punnonen, Kari</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051215</creationdate><title>Comparison of HPLC method and commercial ELISA assay for asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) determination in human serum</title><author>Valtonen, Pirjo ; Karppi, Jouni ; Nyyssönen, Kristiina ; Valkonen, Veli-Pekka ; Halonen, Toivo ; Punnonen, Kari</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-50ea999f42ec777a2ac4bcd1c0356072c09abaa5ae64349d4966551445357dc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>ADMA</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry</topic><topic>Arginine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Arginine - blood</topic><topic>Arginine - chemistry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</topic><topic>Drug Stability</topic><topic>ELISA</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General pharmacology</topic><topic>HPLC</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>l-Arginine</topic><topic>l-Homoarginine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>SDMA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Valtonen, Pirjo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karppi, Jouni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyyssönen, Kristiina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valkonen, Veli-Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halonen, Toivo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punnonen, Kari</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Valtonen, Pirjo</au><au>Karppi, Jouni</au><au>Nyyssönen, Kristiina</au><au>Valkonen, Veli-Pekka</au><au>Halonen, Toivo</au><au>Punnonen, Kari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of HPLC method and commercial ELISA assay for asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) determination in human serum</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci</addtitle><date>2005-12-15</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>828</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>97-102</pages><issn>1570-0232</issn><eissn>1873-376X</eissn><abstract>The performance of a new ELISA assay kit (DLD Diagnostika GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) for the determination of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) was evaluated against a reversed phase HPLC method. ADMA concentrations of 55 serum samples were measured with both methods. The intra-assay CV for ADMA-ELISA was 19% ( n = 10). Inter-assay CVs for ADMA-ELISA were 9% for kit control 1 (0.410 ± 0.037 μM) and 14% for kit control 2 (1.174 ± 0.165 μM). The intra- and inter-assay CVs for HPLC assay for ADMA were 2.5% (0.586 ± 0.015 μM) and 4.2% (0.664 ± 0.028 μM), respectively. There was no correlation between these two methods ( R 2 = 0.0972). The effect of storage conditions of the samples on ADMA concentrations was investigated by HPLC. ADMA concentration was stable after four freezing and thawing cycles. Overall, the HPLC method offered better sensitivity, selectivity and, very importantly, simultaneous determination of ADMA, SDMA, l-homoarginine and l-arginine.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>16214427</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.09.023</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1570-0232
ispartof Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2005-12, Vol.828 (1), p.97-102
issn 1570-0232
1873-376X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68860301
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects ADMA
Analysis
Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry
Arginine - analogs & derivatives
Arginine - blood
Arginine - chemistry
Biological and medical sciences
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods
Drug Stability
ELISA
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General pharmacology
HPLC
Humans
l-Arginine
l-Homoarginine
Medical sciences
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Quality Control
Reproducibility of Results
SDMA
title Comparison of HPLC method and commercial ELISA assay for asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) determination in human serum
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T17%3A50%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20HPLC%20method%20and%20commercial%20ELISA%20assay%20for%20asymmetric%20dimethylarginine%20(ADMA)%20determination%20in%20human%20serum&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chromatography.%20B,%20Analytical%20technologies%20in%20the%20biomedical%20and%20life%20sciences&rft.au=Valtonen,%20Pirjo&rft.date=2005-12-15&rft.volume=828&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=97-102&rft.issn=1570-0232&rft.eissn=1873-376X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.09.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68860301%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68860301&rft_id=info:pmid/16214427&rft_els_id=S1570023205006641&rfr_iscdi=true