PHYSICAL AND PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCES AMONG FORWARDS,DEFENSEMEN, AND GOALIES IN ELITE WOMENʼS ICE HOCKEY

Positional differences have been examined in womenʼs basketball, field hockey, netball, and volleyball, but not in elite womenʼs ice hockey. Our purpose was to describe and compare physical, fitness, and skating performance characteristics of forwards (F), defensemen (D), and goalies (G). Subjects w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2006-08, Vol.20 (3), p.500-505
Hauptverfasser: GEITHNER, CHRISTINA A, LEE, AMANDA M, BRACKO, MICHAEL R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 505
container_issue 3
container_start_page 500
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 20
creator GEITHNER, CHRISTINA A
LEE, AMANDA M
BRACKO, MICHAEL R
description Positional differences have been examined in womenʼs basketball, field hockey, netball, and volleyball, but not in elite womenʼs ice hockey. Our purpose was to describe and compare physical, fitness, and skating performance characteristics of forwards (F), defensemen (D), and goalies (G). Subjects were 112 University of Alberta women players (21.4 ± 2.9 years of age). A full anthropometric battery was conducted on each player. Heath-Carter anthropometric somatotypes were calculated. Percent body fat (%fat) was estimated from both general and population-specific equations. Subjects performed off-ice fitness tests (vertical jump, 40-yd dash, Leger test for predicting O2max) and on-ice fitness (Modified 3-Repeat Sprint Skate Test—MRSS, blood lactate after sprint test) and skating performance tests (6.10-m acceleration test, Cornering S-Turn Agility Test). Descriptive statistics and multivariate analyses of variance were run using SPSS (Version 10.0) for the MacIntosh, with a significance level set a priori at p> 0.05. Significant positional differences were found for bicristal breadths (D > G, F > G); relaxed arm circumference (D > F, G > F); supraspinale and biceps skinfolds (G > D, G > F); and endomorphy (G > F). Significant differences among positions were also found for the MRSS (G > D > F) and agility tests (G > D, G > F). D tended to have the most robust build overall. F were leaner than D and G, and their smaller relaxed arm circumference measurements most likely reflect less subcutaneous fat on the upper arm. F had greater anaerobic power than D, followed by G, and they tended to have greater aerobic capacity. F and D were more agile than G. Performance demands appear to be position specific. F need to be the most versatile and fit because of a greater amount and variety of work performed both during practices and games; their required degrees of versatility and fitness are followed by those required of D and G.
doi_str_mv 10.1519/00124278-200608000-00007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68856444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68856444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3657-ef9445ecd679ed4a29f9b0dcae058773ea057b7a30e702f583329f0116295b5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9O2zAUxi0EGn-2V0ARF1wRdvzfuYxap43WJqhlQlxZbuqoQEogboR4tz3BngpDyyZN2oXlI5_f9x3bH0IRhkvMcfIdABNGpIoJgAAFAHFYIPfQEeaUxowouR9qECxWgPEhOvb-HoBwzukXdIhFIqUEdoRWV-PbeT5IJ1FaDKMrPcvK2TQtBjoa5lmmZzqU8yidlsUoCq2bdDacXwx1pou5nuri4kM2KtNJHrC8iPQkv9bRTRl6v3-Fk2A0Lgc_9O1XdFDbxrtvu_0E_cz09WAcT8rR-_y4ooLL2NUJY9xVSyETt2SWJHWygGVlHXAlJXUWuFxIS8FJIDVXlAYkPFGQhC-4pSfofOv71LXPvfMbs77zlWsa--ja3huhFBeMsQCe_QPet333GO5mCKYgKAUVILWFqq71vnO1eeru1rZ7NRjMexTmMwrzJwrzEUWQnu78-8XaLf8Kd38fALYFXtpm4zr_0PQvrjMrZ5vNyvwvYvoGqm-JiA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213063308</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PHYSICAL AND PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCES AMONG FORWARDS,DEFENSEMEN, AND GOALIES IN ELITE WOMENʼS ICE HOCKEY</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>GEITHNER, CHRISTINA A ; LEE, AMANDA M ; BRACKO, MICHAEL R</creator><creatorcontrib>GEITHNER, CHRISTINA A ; LEE, AMANDA M ; BRACKO, MICHAEL R</creatorcontrib><description>Positional differences have been examined in womenʼs basketball, field hockey, netball, and volleyball, but not in elite womenʼs ice hockey. Our purpose was to describe and compare physical, fitness, and skating performance characteristics of forwards (F), defensemen (D), and goalies (G). Subjects were 112 University of Alberta women players (21.4 ± 2.9 years of age). A full anthropometric battery was conducted on each player. Heath-Carter anthropometric somatotypes were calculated. Percent body fat (%fat) was estimated from both general and population-specific equations. Subjects performed off-ice fitness tests (vertical jump, 40-yd dash, Leger test for predicting O2max) and on-ice fitness (Modified 3-Repeat Sprint Skate Test—MRSS, blood lactate after sprint test) and skating performance tests (6.10-m acceleration test, Cornering S-Turn Agility Test). Descriptive statistics and multivariate analyses of variance were run using SPSS (Version 10.0) for the MacIntosh, with a significance level set a priori at p&gt; 0.05. Significant positional differences were found for bicristal breadths (D &gt; G, F &gt; G); relaxed arm circumference (D &gt; F, G &gt; F); supraspinale and biceps skinfolds (G &gt; D, G &gt; F); and endomorphy (G &gt; F). Significant differences among positions were also found for the MRSS (G &gt; D &gt; F) and agility tests (G &gt; D, G &gt; F). D tended to have the most robust build overall. F were leaner than D and G, and their smaller relaxed arm circumference measurements most likely reflect less subcutaneous fat on the upper arm. F had greater anaerobic power than D, followed by G, and they tended to have greater aerobic capacity. F and D were more agile than G. Performance demands appear to be position specific. F need to be the most versatile and fit because of a greater amount and variety of work performed both during practices and games; their required degrees of versatility and fitness are followed by those required of D and G.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/00124278-200608000-00007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16977704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Strength and Conditioning Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Body Composition - physiology ; Canada ; Female ; Hockey - physiology ; Humans ; Lactic Acid - blood ; Multivariate Analysis ; Physical Fitness - physiology ; Skinfold Thickness ; Space life sciences</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2006-08, Vol.20 (3), p.500-505</ispartof><rights>2006 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><rights>Copyright Alliance Communications Group, A Division of Allen Press, Inc. Aug 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3657-ef9445ecd679ed4a29f9b0dcae058773ea057b7a30e702f583329f0116295b5a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16977704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GEITHNER, CHRISTINA A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEE, AMANDA M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRACKO, MICHAEL R</creatorcontrib><title>PHYSICAL AND PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCES AMONG FORWARDS,DEFENSEMEN, AND GOALIES IN ELITE WOMENʼS ICE HOCKEY</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>Positional differences have been examined in womenʼs basketball, field hockey, netball, and volleyball, but not in elite womenʼs ice hockey. Our purpose was to describe and compare physical, fitness, and skating performance characteristics of forwards (F), defensemen (D), and goalies (G). Subjects were 112 University of Alberta women players (21.4 ± 2.9 years of age). A full anthropometric battery was conducted on each player. Heath-Carter anthropometric somatotypes were calculated. Percent body fat (%fat) was estimated from both general and population-specific equations. Subjects performed off-ice fitness tests (vertical jump, 40-yd dash, Leger test for predicting O2max) and on-ice fitness (Modified 3-Repeat Sprint Skate Test—MRSS, blood lactate after sprint test) and skating performance tests (6.10-m acceleration test, Cornering S-Turn Agility Test). Descriptive statistics and multivariate analyses of variance were run using SPSS (Version 10.0) for the MacIntosh, with a significance level set a priori at p&gt; 0.05. Significant positional differences were found for bicristal breadths (D &gt; G, F &gt; G); relaxed arm circumference (D &gt; F, G &gt; F); supraspinale and biceps skinfolds (G &gt; D, G &gt; F); and endomorphy (G &gt; F). Significant differences among positions were also found for the MRSS (G &gt; D &gt; F) and agility tests (G &gt; D, G &gt; F). D tended to have the most robust build overall. F were leaner than D and G, and their smaller relaxed arm circumference measurements most likely reflect less subcutaneous fat on the upper arm. F had greater anaerobic power than D, followed by G, and they tended to have greater aerobic capacity. F and D were more agile than G. Performance demands appear to be position specific. F need to be the most versatile and fit because of a greater amount and variety of work performed both during practices and games; their required degrees of versatility and fitness are followed by those required of D and G.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Body Composition - physiology</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hockey - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lactic Acid - blood</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Physical Fitness - physiology</subject><subject>Skinfold Thickness</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd9O2zAUxi0EGn-2V0ARF1wRdvzfuYxap43WJqhlQlxZbuqoQEogboR4tz3BngpDyyZN2oXlI5_f9x3bH0IRhkvMcfIdABNGpIoJgAAFAHFYIPfQEeaUxowouR9qECxWgPEhOvb-HoBwzukXdIhFIqUEdoRWV-PbeT5IJ1FaDKMrPcvK2TQtBjoa5lmmZzqU8yidlsUoCq2bdDacXwx1pou5nuri4kM2KtNJHrC8iPQkv9bRTRl6v3-Fk2A0Lgc_9O1XdFDbxrtvu_0E_cz09WAcT8rR-_y4ooLL2NUJY9xVSyETt2SWJHWygGVlHXAlJXUWuFxIS8FJIDVXlAYkPFGQhC-4pSfofOv71LXPvfMbs77zlWsa--ja3huhFBeMsQCe_QPet333GO5mCKYgKAUVILWFqq71vnO1eeru1rZ7NRjMexTmMwrzJwrzEUWQnu78-8XaLf8Kd38fALYFXtpm4zr_0PQvrjMrZ5vNyvwvYvoGqm-JiA</recordid><startdate>200608</startdate><enddate>200608</enddate><creator>GEITHNER, CHRISTINA A</creator><creator>LEE, AMANDA M</creator><creator>BRACKO, MICHAEL R</creator><general>National Strength and Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200608</creationdate><title>PHYSICAL AND PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCES AMONG FORWARDS,DEFENSEMEN, AND GOALIES IN ELITE WOMENʼS ICE HOCKEY</title><author>GEITHNER, CHRISTINA A ; LEE, AMANDA M ; BRACKO, MICHAEL R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3657-ef9445ecd679ed4a29f9b0dcae058773ea057b7a30e702f583329f0116295b5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Body Composition - physiology</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hockey - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lactic Acid - blood</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Physical Fitness - physiology</topic><topic>Skinfold Thickness</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GEITHNER, CHRISTINA A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEE, AMANDA M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRACKO, MICHAEL R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GEITHNER, CHRISTINA A</au><au>LEE, AMANDA M</au><au>BRACKO, MICHAEL R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PHYSICAL AND PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCES AMONG FORWARDS,DEFENSEMEN, AND GOALIES IN ELITE WOMENʼS ICE HOCKEY</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2006-08</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>500</spage><epage>505</epage><pages>500-505</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>Positional differences have been examined in womenʼs basketball, field hockey, netball, and volleyball, but not in elite womenʼs ice hockey. Our purpose was to describe and compare physical, fitness, and skating performance characteristics of forwards (F), defensemen (D), and goalies (G). Subjects were 112 University of Alberta women players (21.4 ± 2.9 years of age). A full anthropometric battery was conducted on each player. Heath-Carter anthropometric somatotypes were calculated. Percent body fat (%fat) was estimated from both general and population-specific equations. Subjects performed off-ice fitness tests (vertical jump, 40-yd dash, Leger test for predicting O2max) and on-ice fitness (Modified 3-Repeat Sprint Skate Test—MRSS, blood lactate after sprint test) and skating performance tests (6.10-m acceleration test, Cornering S-Turn Agility Test). Descriptive statistics and multivariate analyses of variance were run using SPSS (Version 10.0) for the MacIntosh, with a significance level set a priori at p&gt; 0.05. Significant positional differences were found for bicristal breadths (D &gt; G, F &gt; G); relaxed arm circumference (D &gt; F, G &gt; F); supraspinale and biceps skinfolds (G &gt; D, G &gt; F); and endomorphy (G &gt; F). Significant differences among positions were also found for the MRSS (G &gt; D &gt; F) and agility tests (G &gt; D, G &gt; F). D tended to have the most robust build overall. F were leaner than D and G, and their smaller relaxed arm circumference measurements most likely reflect less subcutaneous fat on the upper arm. F had greater anaerobic power than D, followed by G, and they tended to have greater aerobic capacity. F and D were more agile than G. Performance demands appear to be position specific. F need to be the most versatile and fit because of a greater amount and variety of work performed both during practices and games; their required degrees of versatility and fitness are followed by those required of D and G.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Strength and Conditioning Association</pub><pmid>16977704</pmid><doi>10.1519/00124278-200608000-00007</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2006-08, Vol.20 (3), p.500-505
issn 1064-8011
1533-4287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68856444
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Body Composition - physiology
Canada
Female
Hockey - physiology
Humans
Lactic Acid - blood
Multivariate Analysis
Physical Fitness - physiology
Skinfold Thickness
Space life sciences
title PHYSICAL AND PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCES AMONG FORWARDS,DEFENSEMEN, AND GOALIES IN ELITE WOMENʼS ICE HOCKEY
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A25%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PHYSICAL%20AND%20PERFORMANCE%20DIFFERENCES%20AMONG%20FORWARDS,DEFENSEMEN,%20AND%20GOALIES%20IN%20ELITE%20WOMEN%CA%BCS%20ICE%20HOCKEY&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=GEITHNER,%20CHRISTINA%20A&rft.date=2006-08&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=500&rft.epage=505&rft.pages=500-505&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/00124278-200608000-00007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68856444%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213063308&rft_id=info:pmid/16977704&rfr_iscdi=true