Reducing stem bending increases the height growth of tall pines

The hypothesis was tested that upper limits to height growth in trees are the result of the increasing bending moment of trees as they grow in height. The increasing bending moment of tall trees demands increased radial growth at the expense of height growth to maintain mechanical stability. In this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental botany 2006, Vol.57 (12), p.3175-3182
Hauptverfasser: Meng, Shawn X, Lieffers, Victor J, Reid, Douglas E.B, Rudnicki, Mark, Silins, Uldis, Jin, Ming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3182
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3175
container_title Journal of experimental botany
container_volume 57
creator Meng, Shawn X
Lieffers, Victor J
Reid, Douglas E.B
Rudnicki, Mark
Silins, Uldis
Jin, Ming
description The hypothesis was tested that upper limits to height growth in trees are the result of the increasing bending moment of trees as they grow in height. The increasing bending moment of tall trees demands increased radial growth at the expense of height growth to maintain mechanical stability. In this study, the bending moment of large lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. Ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) was reduced by tethering trees at 10 m height to counter the wind load. Average bending moment of tethered trees was reduced to 38% of control trees. Six years of tethering resulted in a 40% increase in height growth relative to the period before tethering. By contrast, control trees showed decreased height growth in the period after tethering treatment. Average radial growth along the bole, relative to height growth, was reduced in tethered trees. This strongly suggests that mechanical constraints play a crucial role in limiting the height growth of tall trees. Analysis of bending moment and basal area increment at both 10 m and 1.3 m showed that the amount of wood added to the stem was closely related to the bending moment produced at these heights, in both control and tethered trees. The tethering treatment also resulted in an increase in the proportion of latewood at the tethering height, relative to 1.3 m height. For untethered control trees, the ratio of bending stresses at 10 m versus 1.3 m height was close to 1 in both 1998 and 2003, suggesting a uniform stress distribution along the outer surface of the bole.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jxb/erl079
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68856204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24036531</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24036531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-cd5718414b0ada3a90a80f1298c4c8aa5137f737cc1218cc6b4cac73b01351fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0V1rFDEUBuAgFrtWb7xXh4K9EMaek6_JXEkpapWCnxXpTTiTyezOdnZmTWaw_nuzzNKCVyG8DyfJG8aeIbxBKMXp-rY69aGDonzAFig15FwKfMgWAJznUKrikD2OcQ0ACpR6xA5Rl2AUyAV7-83Xk2v7ZRZHv8kq39e7Tdu74Cn6mI0rn618u1yN2TIMf8ZVNjTZSF2XbdvexyfsoKEu-qf79YhdvX_34_wiv_z84eP52WXupOZj7mpVoJEoK6CaBJVABhrkpXHSGSKFomgKUTiHHI1zupKOXCEqQKGw8eKIncxzt2H4Pfk42k0bne866v0wRauNUZqDTPD4P7geptCnu1kuFCBqvkOvZ-TCEGPwjd2GdkPhr0Wwu05t6tTOnSb8Yj9xqja-vqf7EhN4tQcUHXVNoN618d4Z1FIJk9zz2a3jOIS7nEsQWglMeT7nbfqL27ucwo3VqRtlL35d2y8Ffip_fkV7nfzL2Tc0WFqGdObVd54aS68ELIwQ_wBBGKAp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235011624</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reducing stem bending increases the height growth of tall pines</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Meng, Shawn X ; Lieffers, Victor J ; Reid, Douglas E.B ; Rudnicki, Mark ; Silins, Uldis ; Jin, Ming</creator><creatorcontrib>Meng, Shawn X ; Lieffers, Victor J ; Reid, Douglas E.B ; Rudnicki, Mark ; Silins, Uldis ; Jin, Ming</creatorcontrib><description>The hypothesis was tested that upper limits to height growth in trees are the result of the increasing bending moment of trees as they grow in height. The increasing bending moment of tall trees demands increased radial growth at the expense of height growth to maintain mechanical stability. In this study, the bending moment of large lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. Ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) was reduced by tethering trees at 10 m height to counter the wind load. Average bending moment of tethered trees was reduced to 38% of control trees. Six years of tethering resulted in a 40% increase in height growth relative to the period before tethering. By contrast, control trees showed decreased height growth in the period after tethering treatment. Average radial growth along the bole, relative to height growth, was reduced in tethered trees. This strongly suggests that mechanical constraints play a crucial role in limiting the height growth of tall trees. Analysis of bending moment and basal area increment at both 10 m and 1.3 m showed that the amount of wood added to the stem was closely related to the bending moment produced at these heights, in both control and tethered trees. The tethering treatment also resulted in an increase in the proportion of latewood at the tethering height, relative to 1.3 m height. For untethered control trees, the ratio of bending stresses at 10 m versus 1.3 m height was close to 1 in both 1998 and 2003, suggesting a uniform stress distribution along the outer surface of the bole.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0957</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2431</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erl079</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16908504</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEBOA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; basal area ; Bending ; Bending moment ; Bending moments ; bending strength ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; diameter ; Economic plant physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Growth and development ; height ; Latewood ; mechanical constraints ; mechanical properties ; mechanical stress ; Morphogenesis, differentiation, rhizogenesis, tuberization. Senescence ; Pine trees ; Pinus - anatomy &amp; histology ; Pinus - growth &amp; development ; Pinus contorta ; Plant growth ; Plant Stems - anatomy &amp; histology ; Plant Stems - growth &amp; development ; plant stress ; proportion of latewood ; Ratios ; Research Papers ; stems ; Street trees ; Stress, Mechanical ; tethering ; Tree growth ; tree trunk ; Tree trunks ; Trees ; uniform stress ; wind load</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental botany, 2006, Vol.57 (12), p.3175-3182</ispartof><rights>Society for Experimental Biology 2006</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Sep 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-cd5718414b0ada3a90a80f1298c4c8aa5137f737cc1218cc6b4cac73b01351fe3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24036531$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24036531$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4024,27923,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18164538$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16908504$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meng, Shawn X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lieffers, Victor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Douglas E.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudnicki, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silins, Uldis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Ming</creatorcontrib><title>Reducing stem bending increases the height growth of tall pines</title><title>Journal of experimental botany</title><addtitle>J Exp Bot</addtitle><description>The hypothesis was tested that upper limits to height growth in trees are the result of the increasing bending moment of trees as they grow in height. The increasing bending moment of tall trees demands increased radial growth at the expense of height growth to maintain mechanical stability. In this study, the bending moment of large lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. Ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) was reduced by tethering trees at 10 m height to counter the wind load. Average bending moment of tethered trees was reduced to 38% of control trees. Six years of tethering resulted in a 40% increase in height growth relative to the period before tethering. By contrast, control trees showed decreased height growth in the period after tethering treatment. Average radial growth along the bole, relative to height growth, was reduced in tethered trees. This strongly suggests that mechanical constraints play a crucial role in limiting the height growth of tall trees. Analysis of bending moment and basal area increment at both 10 m and 1.3 m showed that the amount of wood added to the stem was closely related to the bending moment produced at these heights, in both control and tethered trees. The tethering treatment also resulted in an increase in the proportion of latewood at the tethering height, relative to 1.3 m height. For untethered control trees, the ratio of bending stresses at 10 m versus 1.3 m height was close to 1 in both 1998 and 2003, suggesting a uniform stress distribution along the outer surface of the bole.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>basal area</subject><subject>Bending</subject><subject>Bending moment</subject><subject>Bending moments</subject><subject>bending strength</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>diameter</subject><subject>Economic plant physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Growth and development</subject><subject>height</subject><subject>Latewood</subject><subject>mechanical constraints</subject><subject>mechanical properties</subject><subject>mechanical stress</subject><subject>Morphogenesis, differentiation, rhizogenesis, tuberization. Senescence</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Pinus - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Pinus - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Pinus contorta</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant Stems - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Plant Stems - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>plant stress</subject><subject>proportion of latewood</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Research Papers</subject><subject>stems</subject><subject>Street trees</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>tethering</subject><subject>Tree growth</subject><subject>tree trunk</subject><subject>Tree trunks</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>uniform stress</subject><subject>wind load</subject><issn>0022-0957</issn><issn>1460-2431</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0V1rFDEUBuAgFrtWb7xXh4K9EMaek6_JXEkpapWCnxXpTTiTyezOdnZmTWaw_nuzzNKCVyG8DyfJG8aeIbxBKMXp-rY69aGDonzAFig15FwKfMgWAJznUKrikD2OcQ0ACpR6xA5Rl2AUyAV7-83Xk2v7ZRZHv8kq39e7Tdu74Cn6mI0rn618u1yN2TIMf8ZVNjTZSF2XbdvexyfsoKEu-qf79YhdvX_34_wiv_z84eP52WXupOZj7mpVoJEoK6CaBJVABhrkpXHSGSKFomgKUTiHHI1zupKOXCEqQKGw8eKIncxzt2H4Pfk42k0bne866v0wRauNUZqDTPD4P7geptCnu1kuFCBqvkOvZ-TCEGPwjd2GdkPhr0Wwu05t6tTOnSb8Yj9xqja-vqf7EhN4tQcUHXVNoN618d4Z1FIJk9zz2a3jOIS7nEsQWglMeT7nbfqL27ucwo3VqRtlL35d2y8Ffip_fkV7nfzL2Tc0WFqGdObVd54aS68ELIwQ_wBBGKAp</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Meng, Shawn X</creator><creator>Lieffers, Victor J</creator><creator>Reid, Douglas E.B</creator><creator>Rudnicki, Mark</creator><creator>Silins, Uldis</creator><creator>Jin, Ming</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Reducing stem bending increases the height growth of tall pines</title><author>Meng, Shawn X ; Lieffers, Victor J ; Reid, Douglas E.B ; Rudnicki, Mark ; Silins, Uldis ; Jin, Ming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-cd5718414b0ada3a90a80f1298c4c8aa5137f737cc1218cc6b4cac73b01351fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>basal area</topic><topic>Bending</topic><topic>Bending moment</topic><topic>Bending moments</topic><topic>bending strength</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>diameter</topic><topic>Economic plant physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Growth and development</topic><topic>height</topic><topic>Latewood</topic><topic>mechanical constraints</topic><topic>mechanical properties</topic><topic>mechanical stress</topic><topic>Morphogenesis, differentiation, rhizogenesis, tuberization. Senescence</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Pinus - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Pinus - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Pinus contorta</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant Stems - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Plant Stems - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>plant stress</topic><topic>proportion of latewood</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Research Papers</topic><topic>stems</topic><topic>Street trees</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>tethering</topic><topic>Tree growth</topic><topic>tree trunk</topic><topic>Tree trunks</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>uniform stress</topic><topic>wind load</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meng, Shawn X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lieffers, Victor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Douglas E.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudnicki, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silins, Uldis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Ming</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meng, Shawn X</au><au>Lieffers, Victor J</au><au>Reid, Douglas E.B</au><au>Rudnicki, Mark</au><au>Silins, Uldis</au><au>Jin, Ming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reducing stem bending increases the height growth of tall pines</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental botany</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Bot</addtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3175</spage><epage>3182</epage><pages>3175-3182</pages><issn>0022-0957</issn><eissn>1460-2431</eissn><coden>JEBOA6</coden><abstract>The hypothesis was tested that upper limits to height growth in trees are the result of the increasing bending moment of trees as they grow in height. The increasing bending moment of tall trees demands increased radial growth at the expense of height growth to maintain mechanical stability. In this study, the bending moment of large lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. Ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) was reduced by tethering trees at 10 m height to counter the wind load. Average bending moment of tethered trees was reduced to 38% of control trees. Six years of tethering resulted in a 40% increase in height growth relative to the period before tethering. By contrast, control trees showed decreased height growth in the period after tethering treatment. Average radial growth along the bole, relative to height growth, was reduced in tethered trees. This strongly suggests that mechanical constraints play a crucial role in limiting the height growth of tall trees. Analysis of bending moment and basal area increment at both 10 m and 1.3 m showed that the amount of wood added to the stem was closely related to the bending moment produced at these heights, in both control and tethered trees. The tethering treatment also resulted in an increase in the proportion of latewood at the tethering height, relative to 1.3 m height. For untethered control trees, the ratio of bending stresses at 10 m versus 1.3 m height was close to 1 in both 1998 and 2003, suggesting a uniform stress distribution along the outer surface of the bole.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>16908504</pmid><doi>10.1093/jxb/erl079</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0957
ispartof Journal of experimental botany, 2006, Vol.57 (12), p.3175-3182
issn 0022-0957
1460-2431
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68856204
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
basal area
Bending
Bending moment
Bending moments
bending strength
Biological and medical sciences
Biomass
diameter
Economic plant physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Growth and development
height
Latewood
mechanical constraints
mechanical properties
mechanical stress
Morphogenesis, differentiation, rhizogenesis, tuberization. Senescence
Pine trees
Pinus - anatomy & histology
Pinus - growth & development
Pinus contorta
Plant growth
Plant Stems - anatomy & histology
Plant Stems - growth & development
plant stress
proportion of latewood
Ratios
Research Papers
stems
Street trees
Stress, Mechanical
tethering
Tree growth
tree trunk
Tree trunks
Trees
uniform stress
wind load
title Reducing stem bending increases the height growth of tall pines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A49%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reducing%20stem%20bending%20increases%20the%20height%20growth%20of%20tall%20pines&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20botany&rft.au=Meng,%20Shawn%20X&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3175&rft.epage=3182&rft.pages=3175-3182&rft.issn=0022-0957&rft.eissn=1460-2431&rft.coden=JEBOA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jxb/erl079&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24036531%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235011624&rft_id=info:pmid/16908504&rft_jstor_id=24036531&rfr_iscdi=true