Public perceptions and experiences of myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest and CPR in London
The lay public have limited knowledge of the symptoms of myocardial infarction (“heart attack”), and inaccurate perceptions of cardiac arrest survival rates. Levels of CPR training and willingness to intervene in cardiac emergencies are also low. To explore public perceptions of myocardial infarctio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Resuscitation 2006-10, Vol.71 (1), p.70-79 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 79 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 70 |
container_title | Resuscitation |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Donohoe, Rachael T. Haefeli, Karen Moore, Fionna |
description | The lay public have limited knowledge of the symptoms of myocardial infarction (“heart attack”), and inaccurate perceptions of cardiac arrest survival rates. Levels of CPR training and willingness to intervene in cardiac emergencies are also low.
To explore public perceptions of myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest; investigate perceptions of cardiac arrest survival rates; assess levels of training and attitudes towards CPR, and explore the types of interventions considered useful for increasing rates of bystander CPR among Greater London residents.
A quantitative interview survey was conducted with 1011 Greater London residents. Eight focus groups were also conducted to explore a range of issues in greater depth and validate trends that emerged in the initial survey.
Chest pain was the most commonly recognised symptom of “heart attack”. Around half of the respondents were aware that a myocardial infarction differs from a cardiac arrest, although their ability to explain this difference was limited. The majority overestimated that at least a quarter of cardiac arrest patients in London survive to hospital discharge. Few participants had received CPR training, and most were hesitant about performing the procedure on a stranger.
Awareness and knowledge of CPR, and reactions to cardiac emergencies, reflect relatively low levels of CPR training in London. Publicising cardiac arrest survival figures may be instrumental in prompting members of the public to train in CPR and motivating those who have been trained to intervene in a cardiac emergency. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.03.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68855964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0300957206001237</els_id><sourcerecordid>68855964</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-82f5dfdf43d16ed70393c6d249b7825bd57cd89d56589ec99c61a870561829f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtqHDEQRYVJsCdOfsEITLxKd0qt1guvzOA8YCAmJMsgNHqAhp7WWOoO9t9HnRkw2WVVUJxbdTkIXRNoCRD-cddmX-Zi42SmmMa2A-At0BaAnqEVkYI2hAl4hVZAARrFRHeB3pSyg0owJc7RBeGqZz0XK_TrYd4O0eKDz9YflnsFm9Fh_1Q30Y_WF5wC3j8na7KLZsBxDCbbhfyAjzuLTa6Vpr_B9cP3iuBNGl0a36LXwQzFvzvNS_Tz0_2P9Zdm8-3z1_XdprE9IVMju8BccKGnjnDvBFBFLXddr7ZCdmzrmLBOKsc4k8pbpSwnRgpgnMhOBU4v0c3x7iGnx7lW0ftYrB8GM_o0F82lZEzxvoK3R9DmVEr2QR9y3Jv8rAnoxa7e6X_s6sWuBqqru5q-Or2Zt3vvXrInnRV4fwJMsWYI2Yw2lhdOkl6AYJW7P3K-Svkdfdb14SLbxeztpF2K_1XoD9AkoOA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68855964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public perceptions and experiences of myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest and CPR in London</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Donohoe, Rachael T. ; Haefeli, Karen ; Moore, Fionna</creator><creatorcontrib>Donohoe, Rachael T. ; Haefeli, Karen ; Moore, Fionna</creatorcontrib><description>The lay public have limited knowledge of the symptoms of myocardial infarction (“heart attack”), and inaccurate perceptions of cardiac arrest survival rates. Levels of CPR training and willingness to intervene in cardiac emergencies are also low.
To explore public perceptions of myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest; investigate perceptions of cardiac arrest survival rates; assess levels of training and attitudes towards CPR, and explore the types of interventions considered useful for increasing rates of bystander CPR among Greater London residents.
A quantitative interview survey was conducted with 1011 Greater London residents. Eight focus groups were also conducted to explore a range of issues in greater depth and validate trends that emerged in the initial survey.
Chest pain was the most commonly recognised symptom of “heart attack”. Around half of the respondents were aware that a myocardial infarction differs from a cardiac arrest, although their ability to explain this difference was limited. The majority overestimated that at least a quarter of cardiac arrest patients in London survive to hospital discharge. Few participants had received CPR training, and most were hesitant about performing the procedure on a stranger.
Awareness and knowledge of CPR, and reactions to cardiac emergencies, reflect relatively low levels of CPR training in London. Publicising cardiac arrest survival figures may be instrumental in prompting members of the public to train in CPR and motivating those who have been trained to intervene in a cardiac emergency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-9572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1570</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.03.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16945467</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RSUSBS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Attitude ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bystander CPR ; Cardiac arrest ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) ; Coronary heart disease ; Data Collection ; Education ; Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care ; Female ; Focus Groups ; Heart ; Heart Arrest ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; London ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial infarction ; Myocardial Infarction - mortality ; Public Opinion ; Survival Rate ; Utstein template</subject><ispartof>Resuscitation, 2006-10, Vol.71 (1), p.70-79</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-82f5dfdf43d16ed70393c6d249b7825bd57cd89d56589ec99c61a870561829f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-82f5dfdf43d16ed70393c6d249b7825bd57cd89d56589ec99c61a870561829f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.03.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18147075$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16945467$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Donohoe, Rachael T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haefeli, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Fionna</creatorcontrib><title>Public perceptions and experiences of myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest and CPR in London</title><title>Resuscitation</title><addtitle>Resuscitation</addtitle><description>The lay public have limited knowledge of the symptoms of myocardial infarction (“heart attack”), and inaccurate perceptions of cardiac arrest survival rates. Levels of CPR training and willingness to intervene in cardiac emergencies are also low.
To explore public perceptions of myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest; investigate perceptions of cardiac arrest survival rates; assess levels of training and attitudes towards CPR, and explore the types of interventions considered useful for increasing rates of bystander CPR among Greater London residents.
A quantitative interview survey was conducted with 1011 Greater London residents. Eight focus groups were also conducted to explore a range of issues in greater depth and validate trends that emerged in the initial survey.
Chest pain was the most commonly recognised symptom of “heart attack”. Around half of the respondents were aware that a myocardial infarction differs from a cardiac arrest, although their ability to explain this difference was limited. The majority overestimated that at least a quarter of cardiac arrest patients in London survive to hospital discharge. Few participants had received CPR training, and most were hesitant about performing the procedure on a stranger.
Awareness and knowledge of CPR, and reactions to cardiac emergencies, reflect relatively low levels of CPR training in London. Publicising cardiac arrest survival figures may be instrumental in prompting members of the public to train in CPR and motivating those who have been trained to intervene in a cardiac emergency.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bystander CPR</subject><subject>Cardiac arrest</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)</subject><subject>Coronary heart disease</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart Arrest</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>London</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocardial infarction</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - mortality</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Utstein template</subject><issn>0300-9572</issn><issn>1873-1570</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtqHDEQRYVJsCdOfsEITLxKd0qt1guvzOA8YCAmJMsgNHqAhp7WWOoO9t9HnRkw2WVVUJxbdTkIXRNoCRD-cddmX-Zi42SmmMa2A-At0BaAnqEVkYI2hAl4hVZAARrFRHeB3pSyg0owJc7RBeGqZz0XK_TrYd4O0eKDz9YflnsFm9Fh_1Q30Y_WF5wC3j8na7KLZsBxDCbbhfyAjzuLTa6Vpr_B9cP3iuBNGl0a36LXwQzFvzvNS_Tz0_2P9Zdm8-3z1_XdprE9IVMju8BccKGnjnDvBFBFLXddr7ZCdmzrmLBOKsc4k8pbpSwnRgpgnMhOBU4v0c3x7iGnx7lW0ftYrB8GM_o0F82lZEzxvoK3R9DmVEr2QR9y3Jv8rAnoxa7e6X_s6sWuBqqru5q-Or2Zt3vvXrInnRV4fwJMsWYI2Yw2lhdOkl6AYJW7P3K-Svkdfdb14SLbxeztpF2K_1XoD9AkoOA</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Donohoe, Rachael T.</creator><creator>Haefeli, Karen</creator><creator>Moore, Fionna</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>Public perceptions and experiences of myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest and CPR in London</title><author>Donohoe, Rachael T. ; Haefeli, Karen ; Moore, Fionna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-82f5dfdf43d16ed70393c6d249b7825bd57cd89d56589ec99c61a870561829f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bystander CPR</topic><topic>Cardiac arrest</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)</topic><topic>Coronary heart disease</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart Arrest</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>London</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocardial infarction</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - mortality</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Utstein template</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Donohoe, Rachael T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haefeli, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Fionna</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Resuscitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Donohoe, Rachael T.</au><au>Haefeli, Karen</au><au>Moore, Fionna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public perceptions and experiences of myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest and CPR in London</atitle><jtitle>Resuscitation</jtitle><addtitle>Resuscitation</addtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>79</epage><pages>70-79</pages><issn>0300-9572</issn><eissn>1873-1570</eissn><coden>RSUSBS</coden><abstract>The lay public have limited knowledge of the symptoms of myocardial infarction (“heart attack”), and inaccurate perceptions of cardiac arrest survival rates. Levels of CPR training and willingness to intervene in cardiac emergencies are also low.
To explore public perceptions of myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest; investigate perceptions of cardiac arrest survival rates; assess levels of training and attitudes towards CPR, and explore the types of interventions considered useful for increasing rates of bystander CPR among Greater London residents.
A quantitative interview survey was conducted with 1011 Greater London residents. Eight focus groups were also conducted to explore a range of issues in greater depth and validate trends that emerged in the initial survey.
Chest pain was the most commonly recognised symptom of “heart attack”. Around half of the respondents were aware that a myocardial infarction differs from a cardiac arrest, although their ability to explain this difference was limited. The majority overestimated that at least a quarter of cardiac arrest patients in London survive to hospital discharge. Few participants had received CPR training, and most were hesitant about performing the procedure on a stranger.
Awareness and knowledge of CPR, and reactions to cardiac emergencies, reflect relatively low levels of CPR training in London. Publicising cardiac arrest survival figures may be instrumental in prompting members of the public to train in CPR and motivating those who have been trained to intervene in a cardiac emergency.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>16945467</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.03.003</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-9572 |
ispartof | Resuscitation, 2006-10, Vol.71 (1), p.70-79 |
issn | 0300-9572 1873-1570 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68855964 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Attitude Biological and medical sciences Bystander CPR Cardiac arrest Cardiology. Vascular system Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) Coronary heart disease Data Collection Education Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care Female Focus Groups Heart Heart Arrest Humans Intensive care medicine London Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Myocardial infarction Myocardial Infarction - mortality Public Opinion Survival Rate Utstein template |
title | Public perceptions and experiences of myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest and CPR in London |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A48%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20perceptions%20and%20experiences%20of%20myocardial%20infarction,%20cardiac%20arrest%20and%20CPR%20in%20London&rft.jtitle=Resuscitation&rft.au=Donohoe,%20Rachael%20T.&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=79&rft.pages=70-79&rft.issn=0300-9572&rft.eissn=1873-1570&rft.coden=RSUSBS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.03.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68855964%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68855964&rft_id=info:pmid/16945467&rft_els_id=S0300957206001237&rfr_iscdi=true |