Evaluation of five dental silanes on bonding a luting cement onto silica-coated titanium
Five commercial dental silanes were evaluated in vitro as adhesion promoters bonding a luting cement to silica-coated titanium surfaces . Titanium slides ( n = 20) were cleaned with alumina sand and then silica-coated with a special sand consisting of alumina particles coated with silica. The bondin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dentistry 2006-10, Vol.34 (9), p.721-726 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Five commercial dental silanes were evaluated in vitro as adhesion promoters bonding a luting cement to silica-coated titanium surfaces
.
Titanium slides (
n
=
20) were cleaned with alumina sand and then silica-coated with a special sand consisting of alumina particles coated with silica. The bonding of a resin composite cement (3
M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) to silica-coated and silanized titanium was evaluated by using the dental silane (RelyX™ Ceramic Primer) that belongs to the RelyX™ ARC cementing kit, and comparing it to four other dental silanes (Bisco Porcelain Primer™, Cimara™, ESPE Sil™, and Pulpdent™ Silane Bond Enhancer). The resin composite cement stubs (
n
=
8) were light-polymerized onto a silanized silica-coated titanium surface. The shear bond strength of the cement stubs was measured after dry storage and thermo-cycling 6000 times between 5 and 55
°C. The silanes and their reactions were chemically monitored by using Fourier transform infrared analysis.
Statistical analysis using ANOVA revealed that the brand of silanes and the types of storage condition differ significantly (
p
<
0.005). The highest shear bond strength was obtained with RelyX™ ceramic silane in dry conditions (19.5
±
4.3
MPa), and after thermo-cycling (16.6
±
3.5
MPa). The lowest results were obtained using Pulpdent™ Silane Bond Enhancer, in dry conditions (7.8
±
2.2
MPa), and after thermocycling (5.3
±
2.4
MPa). The analysis showed that silanes had different pH values. Some differences were detected between the silanes and their reactions.
Dental silanes provide different bonding strengths and have differences in their pH, solvent system and silane concentration. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0300-5712 1879-176X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.01.005 |