The LAM-SAFE Study: Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine or valproic acid in newly diagnosed focal and generalised epilepsies in adolescents and adults

To investigate efficacy and safety of lamotrigine (LTG) versus carbamazepine (CBZ) or valproic acid (VPA) in newly diagnosed focal (FE) and idiopathic generalised (GE) epilepsies in adolescents and adults. Open-label randomised comparative multicentre 24-week monotherapy trial in newly diagnosed epi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Seizure (London, England) England), 2005-12, Vol.14 (8), p.597-605
Hauptverfasser: Steinhoff, Bernhard J., Ueberall, Michael A., Siemes, Hartmut, Kurlemann, Gerd, Schmitz, Bettina, Bergmann, Lars
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 605
container_issue 8
container_start_page 597
container_title Seizure (London, England)
container_volume 14
creator Steinhoff, Bernhard J.
Ueberall, Michael A.
Siemes, Hartmut
Kurlemann, Gerd
Schmitz, Bettina
Bergmann, Lars
description To investigate efficacy and safety of lamotrigine (LTG) versus carbamazepine (CBZ) or valproic acid (VPA) in newly diagnosed focal (FE) and idiopathic generalised (GE) epilepsies in adolescents and adults. Open-label randomised comparative multicentre 24-week monotherapy trial in newly diagnosed epilepsy patients of ≥12 years of age. Patients with FE were treated with LTG or CBZ, those with GE received LTG or VPA. The primary efficacy variable was the number of seizure-free patients during study weeks 17 and 24. Two hundred and thirty-nine patients were included. One hundred and seventy-six patients suffered from FE and 63 from GE. In the FE group, 88 patients each were treated with CBZ or LTG. Ninety-four percent of the CBZ patients and 89% of the LTG patients became seizure-free according to an intent-to-treat analysis (not statistically different). The rate of patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse events or a lack of efficacy was 19% with CBZ compared to 9% with LTG (not statistically different). In the GE group, 30 patients received VPA and 33 LTG. During study weeks 17 and 24, 61% of the LTG patients and 84% of the VPA patients had become seizure-free (not statistically significant). The drop-out rate due to lack of efficacy or adverse events was 12% with LTG and 3% with VPA (not statistically different). This study indicates that the effectiveness of LTG in focal and generalised epilepsy syndromes as initial monotherapy in patients ≥12 years is in the range of standard first-line antiepileptic drugs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.seizure.2005.09.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68831331</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1059131105001664</els_id><sourcerecordid>68831331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-bc16a0c22f09ae9116cd24b2f8cc65a91812e6f6408ef8b8ab28d7b7acc42f503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU2P0zAQtRCIXQo_AeQTtwSP81GHC6pWu4BUxGGXszWxJ8WVkxQ76ar7N_jDOLQSR6SRZjR6b97MPMbegshBQP1hn0dyT3OgXApR5aLJBcAzdg1VITNZK_U81aJqMigArtirGPdCiKaE4iW7glqulVDqmv1--El8u_mW3W_ubvn9NNvTR77FfpyC27mB-JFCnCM3GFrs8YkOS3MM_Ij-EEZnOBpnuRv4QI_-xK3D3TBGsrwbDXqOg-U7Giigd0s38T0doqO4cNCOnqKhYYp_kWhnP8XX7EWHPtKbS16xH3e3Dzdfsu33z19vNtvMlCCmrDVQozBSdqJBagBqY2XZyk4ZU1fYgAJJdVeXQlGnWoWtVHbdrtGYUnaVKFbs_XluOuTXTHHSvUvLeI8DjXPU6YkFFClWrDoDTRhjDNTpQ3A9hpMGoRc39F5f3NCLG1o0OrmReO8uAnPbk_3Hurw_AT6dAZTOPDoKOhpHgyHrAplJ29H9R-IPPtShNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68831331</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The LAM-SAFE Study: Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine or valproic acid in newly diagnosed focal and generalised epilepsies in adolescents and adults</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Steinhoff, Bernhard J. ; Ueberall, Michael A. ; Siemes, Hartmut ; Kurlemann, Gerd ; Schmitz, Bettina ; Bergmann, Lars</creator><creatorcontrib>Steinhoff, Bernhard J. ; Ueberall, Michael A. ; Siemes, Hartmut ; Kurlemann, Gerd ; Schmitz, Bettina ; Bergmann, Lars ; The LAM-SAFE Study Group ; LAM-SAFE Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate efficacy and safety of lamotrigine (LTG) versus carbamazepine (CBZ) or valproic acid (VPA) in newly diagnosed focal (FE) and idiopathic generalised (GE) epilepsies in adolescents and adults. Open-label randomised comparative multicentre 24-week monotherapy trial in newly diagnosed epilepsy patients of ≥12 years of age. Patients with FE were treated with LTG or CBZ, those with GE received LTG or VPA. The primary efficacy variable was the number of seizure-free patients during study weeks 17 and 24. Two hundred and thirty-nine patients were included. One hundred and seventy-six patients suffered from FE and 63 from GE. In the FE group, 88 patients each were treated with CBZ or LTG. Ninety-four percent of the CBZ patients and 89% of the LTG patients became seizure-free according to an intent-to-treat analysis (not statistically different). The rate of patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse events or a lack of efficacy was 19% with CBZ compared to 9% with LTG (not statistically different). In the GE group, 30 patients received VPA and 33 LTG. During study weeks 17 and 24, 61% of the LTG patients and 84% of the VPA patients had become seizure-free (not statistically significant). The drop-out rate due to lack of efficacy or adverse events was 12% with LTG and 3% with VPA (not statistically different). This study indicates that the effectiveness of LTG in focal and generalised epilepsy syndromes as initial monotherapy in patients ≥12 years is in the range of standard first-line antiepileptic drugs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-1311</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2688</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2005.09.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16278088</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use ; Carbamazepine ; Carbamazepine - therapeutic use ; Comparative trial ; Demography ; Epilepsies, Partial - drug therapy ; Epilepsy, Generalized - drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Lamotrigine ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Monotherapy ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Triazines - therapeutic use ; Valproic acid ; Valproic Acid - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Seizure (London, England), 2005-12, Vol.14 (8), p.597-605</ispartof><rights>2005 BEA Trading Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-bc16a0c22f09ae9116cd24b2f8cc65a91812e6f6408ef8b8ab28d7b7acc42f503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-bc16a0c22f09ae9116cd24b2f8cc65a91812e6f6408ef8b8ab28d7b7acc42f503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2005.09.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16278088$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steinhoff, Bernhard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueberall, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siemes, Hartmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurlemann, Gerd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitz, Bettina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergmann, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The LAM-SAFE Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAM-SAFE Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>The LAM-SAFE Study: Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine or valproic acid in newly diagnosed focal and generalised epilepsies in adolescents and adults</title><title>Seizure (London, England)</title><addtitle>Seizure</addtitle><description>To investigate efficacy and safety of lamotrigine (LTG) versus carbamazepine (CBZ) or valproic acid (VPA) in newly diagnosed focal (FE) and idiopathic generalised (GE) epilepsies in adolescents and adults. Open-label randomised comparative multicentre 24-week monotherapy trial in newly diagnosed epilepsy patients of ≥12 years of age. Patients with FE were treated with LTG or CBZ, those with GE received LTG or VPA. The primary efficacy variable was the number of seizure-free patients during study weeks 17 and 24. Two hundred and thirty-nine patients were included. One hundred and seventy-six patients suffered from FE and 63 from GE. In the FE group, 88 patients each were treated with CBZ or LTG. Ninety-four percent of the CBZ patients and 89% of the LTG patients became seizure-free according to an intent-to-treat analysis (not statistically different). The rate of patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse events or a lack of efficacy was 19% with CBZ compared to 9% with LTG (not statistically different). In the GE group, 30 patients received VPA and 33 LTG. During study weeks 17 and 24, 61% of the LTG patients and 84% of the VPA patients had become seizure-free (not statistically significant). The drop-out rate due to lack of efficacy or adverse events was 12% with LTG and 3% with VPA (not statistically different). This study indicates that the effectiveness of LTG in focal and generalised epilepsy syndromes as initial monotherapy in patients ≥12 years is in the range of standard first-line antiepileptic drugs.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Carbamazepine</subject><subject>Carbamazepine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Comparative trial</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Epilepsies, Partial - drug therapy</subject><subject>Epilepsy, Generalized - drug therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lamotrigine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monotherapy</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Triazines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Valproic acid</subject><subject>Valproic Acid - therapeutic use</subject><issn>1059-1311</issn><issn>1532-2688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU2P0zAQtRCIXQo_AeQTtwSP81GHC6pWu4BUxGGXszWxJ8WVkxQ76ar7N_jDOLQSR6SRZjR6b97MPMbegshBQP1hn0dyT3OgXApR5aLJBcAzdg1VITNZK_U81aJqMigArtirGPdCiKaE4iW7glqulVDqmv1--El8u_mW3W_ubvn9NNvTR77FfpyC27mB-JFCnCM3GFrs8YkOS3MM_Ij-EEZnOBpnuRv4QI_-xK3D3TBGsrwbDXqOg-U7Giigd0s38T0doqO4cNCOnqKhYYp_kWhnP8XX7EWHPtKbS16xH3e3Dzdfsu33z19vNtvMlCCmrDVQozBSdqJBagBqY2XZyk4ZU1fYgAJJdVeXQlGnWoWtVHbdrtGYUnaVKFbs_XluOuTXTHHSvUvLeI8DjXPU6YkFFClWrDoDTRhjDNTpQ3A9hpMGoRc39F5f3NCLG1o0OrmReO8uAnPbk_3Hurw_AT6dAZTOPDoKOhpHgyHrAplJ29H9R-IPPtShNg</recordid><startdate>20051201</startdate><enddate>20051201</enddate><creator>Steinhoff, Bernhard J.</creator><creator>Ueberall, Michael A.</creator><creator>Siemes, Hartmut</creator><creator>Kurlemann, Gerd</creator><creator>Schmitz, Bettina</creator><creator>Bergmann, Lars</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051201</creationdate><title>The LAM-SAFE Study: Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine or valproic acid in newly diagnosed focal and generalised epilepsies in adolescents and adults</title><author>Steinhoff, Bernhard J. ; Ueberall, Michael A. ; Siemes, Hartmut ; Kurlemann, Gerd ; Schmitz, Bettina ; Bergmann, Lars</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-bc16a0c22f09ae9116cd24b2f8cc65a91812e6f6408ef8b8ab28d7b7acc42f503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Carbamazepine</topic><topic>Carbamazepine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Comparative trial</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Epilepsies, Partial - drug therapy</topic><topic>Epilepsy, Generalized - drug therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lamotrigine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monotherapy</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Triazines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Valproic acid</topic><topic>Valproic Acid - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steinhoff, Bernhard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueberall, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siemes, Hartmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurlemann, Gerd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitz, Bettina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergmann, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The LAM-SAFE Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAM-SAFE Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Seizure (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steinhoff, Bernhard J.</au><au>Ueberall, Michael A.</au><au>Siemes, Hartmut</au><au>Kurlemann, Gerd</au><au>Schmitz, Bettina</au><au>Bergmann, Lars</au><aucorp>The LAM-SAFE Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>LAM-SAFE Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The LAM-SAFE Study: Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine or valproic acid in newly diagnosed focal and generalised epilepsies in adolescents and adults</atitle><jtitle>Seizure (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Seizure</addtitle><date>2005-12-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>597</spage><epage>605</epage><pages>597-605</pages><issn>1059-1311</issn><eissn>1532-2688</eissn><abstract>To investigate efficacy and safety of lamotrigine (LTG) versus carbamazepine (CBZ) or valproic acid (VPA) in newly diagnosed focal (FE) and idiopathic generalised (GE) epilepsies in adolescents and adults. Open-label randomised comparative multicentre 24-week monotherapy trial in newly diagnosed epilepsy patients of ≥12 years of age. Patients with FE were treated with LTG or CBZ, those with GE received LTG or VPA. The primary efficacy variable was the number of seizure-free patients during study weeks 17 and 24. Two hundred and thirty-nine patients were included. One hundred and seventy-six patients suffered from FE and 63 from GE. In the FE group, 88 patients each were treated with CBZ or LTG. Ninety-four percent of the CBZ patients and 89% of the LTG patients became seizure-free according to an intent-to-treat analysis (not statistically different). The rate of patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse events or a lack of efficacy was 19% with CBZ compared to 9% with LTG (not statistically different). In the GE group, 30 patients received VPA and 33 LTG. During study weeks 17 and 24, 61% of the LTG patients and 84% of the VPA patients had become seizure-free (not statistically significant). The drop-out rate due to lack of efficacy or adverse events was 12% with LTG and 3% with VPA (not statistically different). This study indicates that the effectiveness of LTG in focal and generalised epilepsy syndromes as initial monotherapy in patients ≥12 years is in the range of standard first-line antiepileptic drugs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16278088</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.seizure.2005.09.011</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-1311
ispartof Seizure (London, England), 2005-12, Vol.14 (8), p.597-605
issn 1059-1311
1532-2688
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68831331
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use
Carbamazepine
Carbamazepine - therapeutic use
Comparative trial
Demography
Epilepsies, Partial - drug therapy
Epilepsy, Generalized - drug therapy
Female
Humans
Lamotrigine
Male
Middle Aged
Monotherapy
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Triazines - therapeutic use
Valproic acid
Valproic Acid - therapeutic use
title The LAM-SAFE Study: Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine or valproic acid in newly diagnosed focal and generalised epilepsies in adolescents and adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T04%3A01%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20LAM-SAFE%20Study:%20Lamotrigine%20versus%20carbamazepine%20or%20valproic%20acid%20in%20newly%20diagnosed%20focal%20and%20generalised%20epilepsies%20in%20adolescents%20and%20adults&rft.jtitle=Seizure%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Steinhoff,%20Bernhard%20J.&rft.aucorp=The%20LAM-SAFE%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2005-12-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=597&rft.epage=605&rft.pages=597-605&rft.issn=1059-1311&rft.eissn=1532-2688&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.seizure.2005.09.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68831331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68831331&rft_id=info:pmid/16278088&rft_els_id=S1059131105001664&rfr_iscdi=true