Patch testing: pitfalls and performance
PURPOSE OF REVIEWContact dermatitis is a common disease process that includes allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. The gold standard for diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis, a type IV delayed hypersensitivity reaction, is patch testing. Patch testing is not a difficult procedure, however, th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology 2006-10, Vol.6 (5), p.340-344 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 344 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 340 |
container_title | Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Mowad, Christen M |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEWContact dermatitis is a common disease process that includes allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. The gold standard for diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis, a type IV delayed hypersensitivity reaction, is patch testing. Patch testing is not a difficult procedure, however, there are several critical components that determine the success of the testhaving an appropriate level of suspicion for the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis, an adequate threshold for patch testing, the necessary experience to properly interpret the results and to determine their relevance, and the ability to thoroughly educate the patient about the condition.
RECENT FINDINGSResearch shows that patch testing practices differ among individuals and specialties. The level of patch testing education, interest in, and experience with, the procedure can affect the results of the test. Some of these practice differences and how they affect the outcome of patch testing are highlighted.
SUMMARYPhysiciansʼ knowledge and experience with patch testing, their level of interest and access to allergens will determine the performance of this test, the reliability of the results and the benefits gained from this procedure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/01.all.0000244794.03239.8e |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68830125</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68830125</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3628-defa7525fa0a6d4964998118e1e248285d6c8825076f7e0e9fd8e2de9237a3763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUMlOw0AMHSEQLYVfQBEHOCV4lszSG6rYpEpwgPNoSBwayFJmElX8PVNaqT7YlvX8nv0IuaKQUTDqFmjmmiaDGEwIZUQGnHGTaTwiUyoUTyVn7Dj2OdOpgBwm5CyELwDKDLBTMqHS5EJpNSU3r24oVsmAYai7z3myrocqkofEdWWyRl_1vnVdgefkJM4DXuzrjLw_3L8tntLly-Pz4m6ZFlxGsRIrp3KWVw6cLIWRwhhNqUaKTGim81IWWrMclKwUApqq1MhKNIwrx5XkM3K94137_meMV9m2DgU2jeuwH4OVWvP4Rh6B8x2w8H0IHiu79nXr_K-lYLc2WaA2fmIPNtl_m6zGuHy5Vxk_WiwPq3tfIkDsAJu-GdCH72bcoLcrdM2wipSUg-YsZQCSbgXSbdL8DzT9cl8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68830125</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patch testing: pitfalls and performance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Mowad, Christen M</creator><creatorcontrib>Mowad, Christen M</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE OF REVIEWContact dermatitis is a common disease process that includes allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. The gold standard for diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis, a type IV delayed hypersensitivity reaction, is patch testing. Patch testing is not a difficult procedure, however, there are several critical components that determine the success of the testhaving an appropriate level of suspicion for the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis, an adequate threshold for patch testing, the necessary experience to properly interpret the results and to determine their relevance, and the ability to thoroughly educate the patient about the condition.
RECENT FINDINGSResearch shows that patch testing practices differ among individuals and specialties. The level of patch testing education, interest in, and experience with, the procedure can affect the results of the test. Some of these practice differences and how they affect the outcome of patch testing are highlighted.
SUMMARYPhysiciansʼ knowledge and experience with patch testing, their level of interest and access to allergens will determine the performance of this test, the reliability of the results and the benefits gained from this procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1528-4050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-6322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.all.0000244794.03239.8e</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16954787</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Allergens ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity - immunology ; Patch Tests</subject><ispartof>Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology, 2006-10, Vol.6 (5), p.340-344</ispartof><rights>2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3628-defa7525fa0a6d4964998118e1e248285d6c8825076f7e0e9fd8e2de9237a3763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3628-defa7525fa0a6d4964998118e1e248285d6c8825076f7e0e9fd8e2de9237a3763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16954787$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mowad, Christen M</creatorcontrib><title>Patch testing: pitfalls and performance</title><title>Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology</title><addtitle>Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol</addtitle><description>PURPOSE OF REVIEWContact dermatitis is a common disease process that includes allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. The gold standard for diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis, a type IV delayed hypersensitivity reaction, is patch testing. Patch testing is not a difficult procedure, however, there are several critical components that determine the success of the testhaving an appropriate level of suspicion for the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis, an adequate threshold for patch testing, the necessary experience to properly interpret the results and to determine their relevance, and the ability to thoroughly educate the patient about the condition.
RECENT FINDINGSResearch shows that patch testing practices differ among individuals and specialties. The level of patch testing education, interest in, and experience with, the procedure can affect the results of the test. Some of these practice differences and how they affect the outcome of patch testing are highlighted.
SUMMARYPhysiciansʼ knowledge and experience with patch testing, their level of interest and access to allergens will determine the performance of this test, the reliability of the results and the benefits gained from this procedure.</description><subject>Allergens</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity - immunology</subject><subject>Patch Tests</subject><issn>1528-4050</issn><issn>1473-6322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUMlOw0AMHSEQLYVfQBEHOCV4lszSG6rYpEpwgPNoSBwayFJmElX8PVNaqT7YlvX8nv0IuaKQUTDqFmjmmiaDGEwIZUQGnHGTaTwiUyoUTyVn7Dj2OdOpgBwm5CyELwDKDLBTMqHS5EJpNSU3r24oVsmAYai7z3myrocqkofEdWWyRl_1vnVdgefkJM4DXuzrjLw_3L8tntLly-Pz4m6ZFlxGsRIrp3KWVw6cLIWRwhhNqUaKTGim81IWWrMclKwUApqq1MhKNIwrx5XkM3K94137_meMV9m2DgU2jeuwH4OVWvP4Rh6B8x2w8H0IHiu79nXr_K-lYLc2WaA2fmIPNtl_m6zGuHy5Vxk_WiwPq3tfIkDsAJu-GdCH72bcoLcrdM2wipSUg-YsZQCSbgXSbdL8DzT9cl8</recordid><startdate>200610</startdate><enddate>200610</enddate><creator>Mowad, Christen M</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200610</creationdate><title>Patch testing: pitfalls and performance</title><author>Mowad, Christen M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3628-defa7525fa0a6d4964998118e1e248285d6c8825076f7e0e9fd8e2de9237a3763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Allergens</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity - immunology</topic><topic>Patch Tests</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mowad, Christen M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mowad, Christen M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patch testing: pitfalls and performance</atitle><jtitle>Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol</addtitle><date>2006-10</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>340</spage><epage>344</epage><pages>340-344</pages><issn>1528-4050</issn><eissn>1473-6322</eissn><abstract>PURPOSE OF REVIEWContact dermatitis is a common disease process that includes allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. The gold standard for diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis, a type IV delayed hypersensitivity reaction, is patch testing. Patch testing is not a difficult procedure, however, there are several critical components that determine the success of the testhaving an appropriate level of suspicion for the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis, an adequate threshold for patch testing, the necessary experience to properly interpret the results and to determine their relevance, and the ability to thoroughly educate the patient about the condition.
RECENT FINDINGSResearch shows that patch testing practices differ among individuals and specialties. The level of patch testing education, interest in, and experience with, the procedure can affect the results of the test. Some of these practice differences and how they affect the outcome of patch testing are highlighted.
SUMMARYPhysiciansʼ knowledge and experience with patch testing, their level of interest and access to allergens will determine the performance of this test, the reliability of the results and the benefits gained from this procedure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>16954787</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.all.0000244794.03239.8e</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1528-4050 |
ispartof | Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology, 2006-10, Vol.6 (5), p.340-344 |
issn | 1528-4050 1473-6322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68830125 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Allergens Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis Humans Hypersensitivity - immunology Patch Tests |
title | Patch testing: pitfalls and performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T11%3A28%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patch%20testing:%20pitfalls%20and%20performance&rft.jtitle=Current%20opinion%20in%20allergy%20and%20clinical%20immunology&rft.au=Mowad,%20Christen%20M&rft.date=2006-10&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=340&rft.epage=344&rft.pages=340-344&rft.issn=1528-4050&rft.eissn=1473-6322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.all.0000244794.03239.8e&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68830125%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68830125&rft_id=info:pmid/16954787&rfr_iscdi=true |