Review article: similarities and differences among delayed‐release proton‐pump inhibitor formulations

Summary Proton‐pump inhibitors are acid‐labile, and require an enteric coating to protect them from degradation in the stomach when given orally. However, this leads to delayed absorption and onset of action of the proton‐pump inhibitor. This article aims to review the similarities and differences b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2005-12, Vol.22 (s3), p.20-24
Hauptverfasser: HORN, J. R., HOWDEN, C. W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 24
container_issue s3
container_start_page 20
container_title Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics
container_volume 22
creator HORN, J. R.
HOWDEN, C. W.
description Summary Proton‐pump inhibitors are acid‐labile, and require an enteric coating to protect them from degradation in the stomach when given orally. However, this leads to delayed absorption and onset of action of the proton‐pump inhibitor. This article aims to review the similarities and differences between the various formulations of delayed release proton‐pump inhibitors. Delayed‐release omeprazole and delayed‐release lansoprazole have been suspended in sodium bicarbonate for tube administration; however, for omeprazole, absorption is further impaired and antisecretory effects are disappointing. Although such formulations may be more convenient for clinical use in certain patient groups, absorption of the proton‐pump inhibitor is still influenced by residual enteric coating. There are few differences among the currently available delayed‐release proton‐pump inhibitors with respect to their pharmacodynamic effects during chronic administration. There are minor formulation‐based pharmacokinetic differences among these agents, primarily reflected in their bioavailability following the first few doses. Differences in bioavailability may explain slight differences in the rate of onset of maximal antisecretory effect. However, minor pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences are not associated with meaningful differences in clinical outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02714.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68823957</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68823957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2824-638ddf07d292535d8d3ef6ce6671d61689260bf73946ecbd0bf0550dc8b8f9d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMlOwzAQhi0EgrK8AvKJW4KXxnGQOCDEJiGBEJwtJx6DKycpdkLpjUfgGXkSElrBlZnDzNj_LPoQwpSkdLDjWUq5yBJGuEgZIVlKWE6n6fsGmvx-bKIJYaJImKR8B-3GOCOEiJywbbRDBSeD8wlyD_DmYIF16Fzl4QRHVzuvg-scRKwbg42zFgI01VjXbfOMDXi9BPP18RnAg46A56Ht2mZ4mPf1HLvmxZWuawO2bah7rzvXNnEfbVntIxys4x56urx4PL9Obu-ubs7PbpOKSTZNBJfGWJIbVrCMZ0YaDlZUIEROjaBCFkyQ0ua8mAqoSjPkJMuIqWQpbWEo30NHq7nDUa89xE7VLlbgvW6g7aMSUjJeZPkglCthFdoYA1g1D67WYakoUSNmNVMjTTXSVCNm9YNZvQ-th-sdfVmD-Wtccx0EpyvBwnlY_nuwOrt_HDP-DVV0j6s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68823957</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review article: similarities and differences among delayed‐release proton‐pump inhibitor formulations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><creator>HORN, J. R. ; HOWDEN, C. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>HORN, J. R. ; HOWDEN, C. W.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Proton‐pump inhibitors are acid‐labile, and require an enteric coating to protect them from degradation in the stomach when given orally. However, this leads to delayed absorption and onset of action of the proton‐pump inhibitor. This article aims to review the similarities and differences between the various formulations of delayed release proton‐pump inhibitors. Delayed‐release omeprazole and delayed‐release lansoprazole have been suspended in sodium bicarbonate for tube administration; however, for omeprazole, absorption is further impaired and antisecretory effects are disappointing. Although such formulations may be more convenient for clinical use in certain patient groups, absorption of the proton‐pump inhibitor is still influenced by residual enteric coating. There are few differences among the currently available delayed‐release proton‐pump inhibitors with respect to their pharmacodynamic effects during chronic administration. There are minor formulation‐based pharmacokinetic differences among these agents, primarily reflected in their bioavailability following the first few doses. Differences in bioavailability may explain slight differences in the rate of onset of maximal antisecretory effect. However, minor pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences are not associated with meaningful differences in clinical outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-2813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02714.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16303033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles ; Delayed-Action Preparations - administration &amp; dosage ; Delayed-Action Preparations - pharmacokinetics ; Delayed-Action Preparations - pharmacology ; Enzyme Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage ; Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacokinetics ; Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacology ; Gastrointestinal Diseases - drug therapy ; Gastrostomy - methods ; Humans ; Lansoprazole ; Omeprazole - administration &amp; dosage ; Omeprazole - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Omeprazole - pharmacokinetics ; Omeprazole - pharmacology ; Proton Pump Inhibitors</subject><ispartof>Alimentary pharmacology &amp; therapeutics, 2005-12, Vol.22 (s3), p.20-24</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2824-638ddf07d292535d8d3ef6ce6671d61689260bf73946ecbd0bf0550dc8b8f9d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2824-638ddf07d292535d8d3ef6ce6671d61689260bf73946ecbd0bf0550dc8b8f9d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2036.2005.02714.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2036.2005.02714.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46388,46812</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16303033$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HORN, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOWDEN, C. W.</creatorcontrib><title>Review article: similarities and differences among delayed‐release proton‐pump inhibitor formulations</title><title>Alimentary pharmacology &amp; therapeutics</title><addtitle>Aliment Pharmacol Ther</addtitle><description>Summary Proton‐pump inhibitors are acid‐labile, and require an enteric coating to protect them from degradation in the stomach when given orally. However, this leads to delayed absorption and onset of action of the proton‐pump inhibitor. This article aims to review the similarities and differences between the various formulations of delayed release proton‐pump inhibitors. Delayed‐release omeprazole and delayed‐release lansoprazole have been suspended in sodium bicarbonate for tube administration; however, for omeprazole, absorption is further impaired and antisecretory effects are disappointing. Although such formulations may be more convenient for clinical use in certain patient groups, absorption of the proton‐pump inhibitor is still influenced by residual enteric coating. There are few differences among the currently available delayed‐release proton‐pump inhibitors with respect to their pharmacodynamic effects during chronic administration. There are minor formulation‐based pharmacokinetic differences among these agents, primarily reflected in their bioavailability following the first few doses. Differences in bioavailability may explain slight differences in the rate of onset of maximal antisecretory effect. However, minor pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences are not associated with meaningful differences in clinical outcomes.</description><subject>2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles</subject><subject>Delayed-Action Preparations - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Delayed-Action Preparations - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Delayed-Action Preparations - pharmacology</subject><subject>Enzyme Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Diseases - drug therapy</subject><subject>Gastrostomy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lansoprazole</subject><subject>Omeprazole - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Omeprazole - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Omeprazole - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Omeprazole - pharmacology</subject><subject>Proton Pump Inhibitors</subject><issn>0269-2813</issn><issn>1365-2036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMlOwzAQhi0EgrK8AvKJW4KXxnGQOCDEJiGBEJwtJx6DKycpdkLpjUfgGXkSElrBlZnDzNj_LPoQwpSkdLDjWUq5yBJGuEgZIVlKWE6n6fsGmvx-bKIJYaJImKR8B-3GOCOEiJywbbRDBSeD8wlyD_DmYIF16Fzl4QRHVzuvg-scRKwbg42zFgI01VjXbfOMDXi9BPP18RnAg46A56Ht2mZ4mPf1HLvmxZWuawO2bah7rzvXNnEfbVntIxys4x56urx4PL9Obu-ubs7PbpOKSTZNBJfGWJIbVrCMZ0YaDlZUIEROjaBCFkyQ0ua8mAqoSjPkJMuIqWQpbWEo30NHq7nDUa89xE7VLlbgvW6g7aMSUjJeZPkglCthFdoYA1g1D67WYakoUSNmNVMjTTXSVCNm9YNZvQ-th-sdfVmD-Wtccx0EpyvBwnlY_nuwOrt_HDP-DVV0j6s</recordid><startdate>200512</startdate><enddate>200512</enddate><creator>HORN, J. R.</creator><creator>HOWDEN, C. W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200512</creationdate><title>Review article: similarities and differences among delayed‐release proton‐pump inhibitor formulations</title><author>HORN, J. R. ; HOWDEN, C. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2824-638ddf07d292535d8d3ef6ce6671d61689260bf73946ecbd0bf0550dc8b8f9d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles</topic><topic>Delayed-Action Preparations - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Delayed-Action Preparations - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Delayed-Action Preparations - pharmacology</topic><topic>Enzyme Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Diseases - drug therapy</topic><topic>Gastrostomy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lansoprazole</topic><topic>Omeprazole - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Omeprazole - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Omeprazole - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Omeprazole - pharmacology</topic><topic>Proton Pump Inhibitors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HORN, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOWDEN, C. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Alimentary pharmacology &amp; therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HORN, J. R.</au><au>HOWDEN, C. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review article: similarities and differences among delayed‐release proton‐pump inhibitor formulations</atitle><jtitle>Alimentary pharmacology &amp; therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Aliment Pharmacol Ther</addtitle><date>2005-12</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>s3</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>20-24</pages><issn>0269-2813</issn><eissn>1365-2036</eissn><abstract>Summary Proton‐pump inhibitors are acid‐labile, and require an enteric coating to protect them from degradation in the stomach when given orally. However, this leads to delayed absorption and onset of action of the proton‐pump inhibitor. This article aims to review the similarities and differences between the various formulations of delayed release proton‐pump inhibitors. Delayed‐release omeprazole and delayed‐release lansoprazole have been suspended in sodium bicarbonate for tube administration; however, for omeprazole, absorption is further impaired and antisecretory effects are disappointing. Although such formulations may be more convenient for clinical use in certain patient groups, absorption of the proton‐pump inhibitor is still influenced by residual enteric coating. There are few differences among the currently available delayed‐release proton‐pump inhibitors with respect to their pharmacodynamic effects during chronic administration. There are minor formulation‐based pharmacokinetic differences among these agents, primarily reflected in their bioavailability following the first few doses. Differences in bioavailability may explain slight differences in the rate of onset of maximal antisecretory effect. However, minor pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences are not associated with meaningful differences in clinical outcomes.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16303033</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02714.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-2813
ispartof Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2005-12, Vol.22 (s3), p.20-24
issn 0269-2813
1365-2036
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68823957
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals
subjects 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles
Delayed-Action Preparations - administration & dosage
Delayed-Action Preparations - pharmacokinetics
Delayed-Action Preparations - pharmacology
Enzyme Inhibitors - administration & dosage
Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacokinetics
Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacology
Gastrointestinal Diseases - drug therapy
Gastrostomy - methods
Humans
Lansoprazole
Omeprazole - administration & dosage
Omeprazole - analogs & derivatives
Omeprazole - pharmacokinetics
Omeprazole - pharmacology
Proton Pump Inhibitors
title Review article: similarities and differences among delayed‐release proton‐pump inhibitor formulations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T02%3A34%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20article:%20similarities%20and%20differences%20among%20delayed%E2%80%90release%20proton%E2%80%90pump%20inhibitor%20formulations&rft.jtitle=Alimentary%20pharmacology%20&%20therapeutics&rft.au=HORN,%20J.%20R.&rft.date=2005-12&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=s3&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=20-24&rft.issn=0269-2813&rft.eissn=1365-2036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02714.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68823957%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68823957&rft_id=info:pmid/16303033&rfr_iscdi=true