Radiographic Evaluation of Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis: Analysis of 60 Cases
The aim of this study was to evaluate radiographically the effectiveness of alveolar distraction osteogenesis (ADO) technique for vertical reconstruction of atrophy alveolar ridges in partially edentulous patients. A total of 60 vertical distraction osteogenesis procedures were performed in 55 patie...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2005-12, Vol.63 (12), p.1708-1711 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1711 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 1708 |
| container_title | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery |
| container_volume | 63 |
| creator | Mazzonetto, Renato Allais de Maurette, Marvis |
| description | The aim of this study was to evaluate radiographically the effectiveness of alveolar distraction osteogenesis (ADO) technique for vertical reconstruction of atrophy alveolar ridges in partially edentulous patients.
A total of 60 vertical distraction osteogenesis procedures were performed in 55 patients. Two panoramic radiographies were performed in all patients, one the day before the beginning of distraction, and one after consolidation period, 12 weeks postoperatively. The radiographic analysis consisted of obtaining the amount of the vertical bone gain (VBG) in each radiography. For this, we obtained initially the magnification factor (MF) of each panoramic radiography by dividing the real size (RS) of the activation rod among the image size (IS) of the activation rod. After this, to obtain the VGB, we measured initially the length of the distracton preactivation (LD1), which consisted of the distance between the superior portion of the basal plate and the superior portion of the transport plate, multiplying by the MF. Then, we measured the length of the distraction postactivation (LD2), using the same method described before, in radiographies performed 12 weeks postoperatively. The VBG was obtained using the following formula: VBG = LD2 − LD1. The results were applied to descriptive statistical analysis. Complications were also investigated during all of the treatments.
The mean alveolar distraction achieved in 60 cases was 6.27 mm (range, 0 to 10.83 mm). According to the region treated, 51.6% were in the posterior mandible (mean VBG, 4.60 mm), 36.66% were in the anterior maxilla (mean VBG, 7.46 mm), 8.33% were in the anterior mandible (mean VBG, 6.73 mm), and 3.33% were in the posterior maxilla (mean VBG, 6.32 mm). The overall rate of complications that compromised the success of the technique was 8.44%. The increased radiopacity of the distracted region could be observed in the 12-week period after surgery.
The ADO technique was demonstrated to be an effective tool to treat vertical defects of the alveolar ridge with a success rate of 91.66%. Our radiographic analysis seems to be an important tool in verifying the technique as well as planning implant placement after ADO. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.joms.2005.08.016 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68818510</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278239105013741</els_id><sourcerecordid>68818510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-6a915054d3cdc735513b9933a46ebaf55f908be618fafb527ac02d320345620e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpaTZJ_0APxZf2ZndkWbJcelm26QcEAiE9i7E8TrV4ra3Gu5B_Xzu7kFtPM7w87zA8QryXUEiQ5vO22MYdFyWALsAWc_RKrKRWMteg1WuxgrK2eakaeSEumbcAUuravBUX0pRNbRpYift77EJ8TLj_E3x2c8ThgFOIYxb7bD0cKQ6Ysm-Bp4T-Ob_jieIjjcSBv2TrEYeneVtwA9kGmfhavOlxYHp3nlfi9_ebh83P_Pbux6_N-jb3ylZTbrCR859Vp3zna6W1VG3TKIWVoRZ7rfsGbEtG2h77Vpc1eig7VYKqtCmB1JX4dLq7T_HvgXhyu8CehgFHigd2xlpptYQZLE-gT5E5Ue_2KewwPTkJbjHptm4x6RaTDqybo7n04Xz90O6oe6mc1c3AxzOA7HHoE44-8AtXK1lVsHBfTxzNLo6BkmMfaPTUhUR-cl0M__vjH63QkPs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68818510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiographic Evaluation of Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis: Analysis of 60 Cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Mazzonetto, Renato ; Allais de Maurette, Marvis</creator><creatorcontrib>Mazzonetto, Renato ; Allais de Maurette, Marvis</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate radiographically the effectiveness of alveolar distraction osteogenesis (ADO) technique for vertical reconstruction of atrophy alveolar ridges in partially edentulous patients.
A total of 60 vertical distraction osteogenesis procedures were performed in 55 patients. Two panoramic radiographies were performed in all patients, one the day before the beginning of distraction, and one after consolidation period, 12 weeks postoperatively. The radiographic analysis consisted of obtaining the amount of the vertical bone gain (VBG) in each radiography. For this, we obtained initially the magnification factor (MF) of each panoramic radiography by dividing the real size (RS) of the activation rod among the image size (IS) of the activation rod. After this, to obtain the VGB, we measured initially the length of the distracton preactivation (LD1), which consisted of the distance between the superior portion of the basal plate and the superior portion of the transport plate, multiplying by the MF. Then, we measured the length of the distraction postactivation (LD2), using the same method described before, in radiographies performed 12 weeks postoperatively. The VBG was obtained using the following formula: VBG = LD2 − LD1. The results were applied to descriptive statistical analysis. Complications were also investigated during all of the treatments.
The mean alveolar distraction achieved in 60 cases was 6.27 mm (range, 0 to 10.83 mm). According to the region treated, 51.6% were in the posterior mandible (mean VBG, 4.60 mm), 36.66% were in the anterior maxilla (mean VBG, 7.46 mm), 8.33% were in the anterior mandible (mean VBG, 6.73 mm), and 3.33% were in the posterior maxilla (mean VBG, 6.32 mm). The overall rate of complications that compromised the success of the technique was 8.44%. The increased radiopacity of the distracted region could be observed in the 12-week period after surgery.
The ADO technique was demonstrated to be an effective tool to treat vertical defects of the alveolar ridge with a success rate of 91.66%. Our radiographic analysis seems to be an important tool in verifying the technique as well as planning implant placement after ADO.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.08.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16297690</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOMSDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging ; Alveolar Process - surgery ; Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Regeneration ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous ; Dentistry ; Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Non tumoral diseases ; Osteogenesis, Distraction ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Radiographic Magnification ; Radiography, Panoramic ; Vertical Dimension</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2005-12, Vol.63 (12), p.1708-1711</ispartof><rights>2005 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-6a915054d3cdc735513b9933a46ebaf55f908be618fafb527ac02d320345620e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-6a915054d3cdc735513b9933a46ebaf55f908be618fafb527ac02d320345620e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.08.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17314400$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16297690$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mazzonetto, Renato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allais de Maurette, Marvis</creatorcontrib><title>Radiographic Evaluation of Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis: Analysis of 60 Cases</title><title>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate radiographically the effectiveness of alveolar distraction osteogenesis (ADO) technique for vertical reconstruction of atrophy alveolar ridges in partially edentulous patients.
A total of 60 vertical distraction osteogenesis procedures were performed in 55 patients. Two panoramic radiographies were performed in all patients, one the day before the beginning of distraction, and one after consolidation period, 12 weeks postoperatively. The radiographic analysis consisted of obtaining the amount of the vertical bone gain (VBG) in each radiography. For this, we obtained initially the magnification factor (MF) of each panoramic radiography by dividing the real size (RS) of the activation rod among the image size (IS) of the activation rod. After this, to obtain the VGB, we measured initially the length of the distracton preactivation (LD1), which consisted of the distance between the superior portion of the basal plate and the superior portion of the transport plate, multiplying by the MF. Then, we measured the length of the distraction postactivation (LD2), using the same method described before, in radiographies performed 12 weeks postoperatively. The VBG was obtained using the following formula: VBG = LD2 − LD1. The results were applied to descriptive statistical analysis. Complications were also investigated during all of the treatments.
The mean alveolar distraction achieved in 60 cases was 6.27 mm (range, 0 to 10.83 mm). According to the region treated, 51.6% were in the posterior mandible (mean VBG, 4.60 mm), 36.66% were in the anterior maxilla (mean VBG, 7.46 mm), 8.33% were in the anterior mandible (mean VBG, 6.73 mm), and 3.33% were in the posterior maxilla (mean VBG, 6.32 mm). The overall rate of complications that compromised the success of the technique was 8.44%. The increased radiopacity of the distracted region could be observed in the 12-week period after surgery.
The ADO technique was demonstrated to be an effective tool to treat vertical defects of the alveolar ridge with a success rate of 91.66%. Our radiographic analysis seems to be an important tool in verifying the technique as well as planning implant placement after ADO.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - surgery</subject><subject>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>Osteogenesis, Distraction</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Radiographic Magnification</subject><subject>Radiography, Panoramic</subject><subject>Vertical Dimension</subject><issn>0278-2391</issn><issn>1531-5053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpaTZJ_0APxZf2ZndkWbJcelm26QcEAiE9i7E8TrV4ra3Gu5B_Xzu7kFtPM7w87zA8QryXUEiQ5vO22MYdFyWALsAWc_RKrKRWMteg1WuxgrK2eakaeSEumbcAUuravBUX0pRNbRpYift77EJ8TLj_E3x2c8ThgFOIYxb7bD0cKQ6Ysm-Bp4T-Ob_jieIjjcSBv2TrEYeneVtwA9kGmfhavOlxYHp3nlfi9_ebh83P_Pbux6_N-jb3ylZTbrCR859Vp3zna6W1VG3TKIWVoRZ7rfsGbEtG2h77Vpc1eig7VYKqtCmB1JX4dLq7T_HvgXhyu8CehgFHigd2xlpptYQZLE-gT5E5Ue_2KewwPTkJbjHptm4x6RaTDqybo7n04Xz90O6oe6mc1c3AxzOA7HHoE44-8AtXK1lVsHBfTxzNLo6BkmMfaPTUhUR-cl0M__vjH63QkPs</recordid><startdate>20051201</startdate><enddate>20051201</enddate><creator>Mazzonetto, Renato</creator><creator>Allais de Maurette, Marvis</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051201</creationdate><title>Radiographic Evaluation of Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis: Analysis of 60 Cases</title><author>Mazzonetto, Renato ; Allais de Maurette, Marvis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-6a915054d3cdc735513b9933a46ebaf55f908be618fafb527ac02d320345620e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - surgery</topic><topic>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>Osteogenesis, Distraction</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Radiographic Magnification</topic><topic>Radiography, Panoramic</topic><topic>Vertical Dimension</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mazzonetto, Renato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allais de Maurette, Marvis</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mazzonetto, Renato</au><au>Allais de Maurette, Marvis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiographic Evaluation of Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis: Analysis of 60 Cases</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2005-12-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1708</spage><epage>1711</epage><pages>1708-1711</pages><issn>0278-2391</issn><eissn>1531-5053</eissn><coden>JOMSDA</coden><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate radiographically the effectiveness of alveolar distraction osteogenesis (ADO) technique for vertical reconstruction of atrophy alveolar ridges in partially edentulous patients.
A total of 60 vertical distraction osteogenesis procedures were performed in 55 patients. Two panoramic radiographies were performed in all patients, one the day before the beginning of distraction, and one after consolidation period, 12 weeks postoperatively. The radiographic analysis consisted of obtaining the amount of the vertical bone gain (VBG) in each radiography. For this, we obtained initially the magnification factor (MF) of each panoramic radiography by dividing the real size (RS) of the activation rod among the image size (IS) of the activation rod. After this, to obtain the VGB, we measured initially the length of the distracton preactivation (LD1), which consisted of the distance between the superior portion of the basal plate and the superior portion of the transport plate, multiplying by the MF. Then, we measured the length of the distraction postactivation (LD2), using the same method described before, in radiographies performed 12 weeks postoperatively. The VBG was obtained using the following formula: VBG = LD2 − LD1. The results were applied to descriptive statistical analysis. Complications were also investigated during all of the treatments.
The mean alveolar distraction achieved in 60 cases was 6.27 mm (range, 0 to 10.83 mm). According to the region treated, 51.6% were in the posterior mandible (mean VBG, 4.60 mm), 36.66% were in the anterior maxilla (mean VBG, 7.46 mm), 8.33% were in the anterior mandible (mean VBG, 6.73 mm), and 3.33% were in the posterior maxilla (mean VBG, 6.32 mm). The overall rate of complications that compromised the success of the technique was 8.44%. The increased radiopacity of the distracted region could be observed in the 12-week period after surgery.
The ADO technique was demonstrated to be an effective tool to treat vertical defects of the alveolar ridge with a success rate of 91.66%. Our radiographic analysis seems to be an important tool in verifying the technique as well as planning implant placement after ADO.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16297690</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joms.2005.08.016</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0278-2391 |
| ispartof | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2005-12, Vol.63 (12), p.1708-1711 |
| issn | 0278-2391 1531-5053 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68818510 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Adult Aged Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging Alveolar Process - surgery Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods Biological and medical sciences Bone Regeneration Dental Implantation, Endosseous Dentistry Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology Female Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Non tumoral diseases Osteogenesis, Distraction Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology Radiographic Magnification Radiography, Panoramic Vertical Dimension |
| title | Radiographic Evaluation of Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis: Analysis of 60 Cases |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T21%3A46%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiographic%20Evaluation%20of%20Alveolar%20Distraction%20Osteogenesis:%20Analysis%20of%2060%20Cases&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Mazzonetto,%20Renato&rft.date=2005-12-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1708&rft.epage=1711&rft.pages=1708-1711&rft.issn=0278-2391&rft.eissn=1531-5053&rft.coden=JOMSDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joms.2005.08.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68818510%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68818510&rft_id=info:pmid/16297690&rft_els_id=S0278239105013741&rfr_iscdi=true |