When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?
Four experiments examined judgements of the duration of auditory and visual stimuli. Two used a bisection method, and two used verbal estimation. Auditory/visual differences were found when durations of auditory and visual stimuli were explicitly compared and when durations from both modalities were...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2006-10, Vol.59 (10), p.1709-1724 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1724 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 1709 |
| container_title | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) |
| container_volume | 59 |
| creator | Wearden, J. H. Todd, N. P. M. Jones, L. A. |
| description | Four experiments examined judgements of the duration of auditory and visual stimuli. Two used a bisection method, and two used verbal estimation. Auditory/visual differences were found when durations of auditory and visual stimuli were explicitly compared and when durations from both modalities were mixed in partition bisection. Differences in verbal estimation were also found both when people received a single modality and when they received both. In all cases, the auditory stimuli appeared longer than the visual stimuli, and the effect was greater at longer stimulus durations, consistent with a "pacemaker speed" interpretation of the effect. Results suggested that Penney, Gibbon, and Meck's (2000) "memory mixing" account of auditory/visual differences in duration judgements, while correct in some circumstances, was incomplete, and that in some cases people were basing their judgements on some preexisting temporal standard. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/17470210500314729 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68811026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_17470210500314729</sage_id><sourcerecordid>68811026</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-b356f603110ac58a4e54ce96d7f5edd8531088710d15136f37dcd93aea45d3473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LXDEUhoNUdGr7A9yUu6m70eTmc0AQEdsKghvFZcgkJ2OGe2-myU3r_HujM60LsV0lhOd5z8mL0CHBxwQrfEIkk7glmGNMCZPtbAdNnt-muG3Fh793ovbRx5yXGDMqhdxD-0TMGFdcTND5_QMMjYuNKS6MMa1PfoVcTNe44D0kGCzkJlSiJDOGODTL4hbQwzDmJlpb0tkntOtNl-Hz9jxAd98uby9-TK9vvl9dnF9PLad8nM4pF17UPQk2livDgDMLM-Gk5-Cc4rR-SUmCHeGECk-ls25GDRjGHWWSHqCjTe4qxZ8F8qj7kC10nRkglqyFUjW7FRUkG9CmmHMCr1cp9CatNcH6uTf9prfqfNmGl3kP7tXYFlWBr1vAZGs6n8xgQ37lVIsZeeGON1w2C9DLWNJQS_nnZLkRwuBj6s3vmDqnR7PuYvoz5Y2lx8exmqf_Nen7g58AvW-meQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68811026</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Wearden, J. H. ; Todd, N. P. M. ; Jones, L. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wearden, J. H. ; Todd, N. P. M. ; Jones, L. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Four experiments examined judgements of the duration of auditory and visual stimuli. Two used a bisection method, and two used verbal estimation. Auditory/visual differences were found when durations of auditory and visual stimuli were explicitly compared and when durations from both modalities were mixed in partition bisection. Differences in verbal estimation were also found both when people received a single modality and when they received both. In all cases, the auditory stimuli appeared longer than the visual stimuli, and the effect was greater at longer stimulus durations, consistent with a "pacemaker speed" interpretation of the effect. Results suggested that Penney, Gibbon, and Meck's (2000) "memory mixing" account of auditory/visual differences in duration judgements, while correct in some circumstances, was incomplete, and that in some cases people were basing their judgements on some preexisting temporal standard.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17470210500314729</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16945856</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Psychology Press</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods ; Analysis of Variance ; Audition ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition. Intelligence ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Judgment - physiology ; Memory - physiology ; Perception ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Spatial perception. Time perception ; Students - psychology ; Time Factors ; Vision ; Visual Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2006-10, Vol.59 (10), p.1709-1724</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Experimental Psychology Society 2006</rights><rights>2006 Experimental Pscyhology Society</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-b356f603110ac58a4e54ce96d7f5edd8531088710d15136f37dcd93aea45d3473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-b356f603110ac58a4e54ce96d7f5edd8531088710d15136f37dcd93aea45d3473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17470210500314729$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470210500314729$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18204156$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16945856$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wearden, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd, N. P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, L. A.</creatorcontrib><title>When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>Four experiments examined judgements of the duration of auditory and visual stimuli. Two used a bisection method, and two used verbal estimation. Auditory/visual differences were found when durations of auditory and visual stimuli were explicitly compared and when durations from both modalities were mixed in partition bisection. Differences in verbal estimation were also found both when people received a single modality and when they received both. In all cases, the auditory stimuli appeared longer than the visual stimuli, and the effect was greater at longer stimulus durations, consistent with a "pacemaker speed" interpretation of the effect. Results suggested that Penney, Gibbon, and Meck's (2000) "memory mixing" account of auditory/visual differences in duration judgements, while correct in some circumstances, was incomplete, and that in some cases people were basing their judgements on some preexisting temporal standard.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Audition</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition. Intelligence</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment - physiology</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Spatial perception. Time perception</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LXDEUhoNUdGr7A9yUu6m70eTmc0AQEdsKghvFZcgkJ2OGe2-myU3r_HujM60LsV0lhOd5z8mL0CHBxwQrfEIkk7glmGNMCZPtbAdNnt-muG3Fh793ovbRx5yXGDMqhdxD-0TMGFdcTND5_QMMjYuNKS6MMa1PfoVcTNe44D0kGCzkJlSiJDOGODTL4hbQwzDmJlpb0tkntOtNl-Hz9jxAd98uby9-TK9vvl9dnF9PLad8nM4pF17UPQk2livDgDMLM-Gk5-Cc4rR-SUmCHeGECk-ls25GDRjGHWWSHqCjTe4qxZ8F8qj7kC10nRkglqyFUjW7FRUkG9CmmHMCr1cp9CatNcH6uTf9prfqfNmGl3kP7tXYFlWBr1vAZGs6n8xgQ37lVIsZeeGON1w2C9DLWNJQS_nnZLkRwuBj6s3vmDqnR7PuYvoz5Y2lx8exmqf_Nen7g58AvW-meQ</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Wearden, J. H.</creator><creator>Todd, N. P. M.</creator><creator>Jones, L. A.</creator><general>Psychology Press</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Psychology press</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?</title><author>Wearden, J. H. ; Todd, N. P. M. ; Jones, L. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-b356f603110ac58a4e54ce96d7f5edd8531088710d15136f37dcd93aea45d3473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Audition</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition. Intelligence</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment - physiology</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Spatial perception. Time perception</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wearden, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd, N. P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, L. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wearden, J. H.</au><au>Todd, N. P. M.</au><au>Jones, L. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1709</spage><epage>1724</epage><pages>1709-1724</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>Four experiments examined judgements of the duration of auditory and visual stimuli. Two used a bisection method, and two used verbal estimation. Auditory/visual differences were found when durations of auditory and visual stimuli were explicitly compared and when durations from both modalities were mixed in partition bisection. Differences in verbal estimation were also found both when people received a single modality and when they received both. In all cases, the auditory stimuli appeared longer than the visual stimuli, and the effect was greater at longer stimulus durations, consistent with a "pacemaker speed" interpretation of the effect. Results suggested that Penney, Gibbon, and Meck's (2000) "memory mixing" account of auditory/visual differences in duration judgements, while correct in some circumstances, was incomplete, and that in some cases people were basing their judgements on some preexisting temporal standard.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Psychology Press</pub><pmid>16945856</pmid><doi>10.1080/17470210500314729</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1747-0218 |
| ispartof | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2006-10, Vol.59 (10), p.1709-1724 |
| issn | 1747-0218 1747-0226 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68811026 |
| source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE |
| subjects | Acoustic Stimulation - methods Analysis of Variance Audition Auditory Perception - physiology Biological and medical sciences Cognition. Intelligence Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Judgment - physiology Memory - physiology Perception Photic Stimulation - methods Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Spatial perception. Time perception Students - psychology Time Factors Vision Visual Perception - physiology |
| title | When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T00%3A13%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20do%20auditory/visual%20differences%20in%20duration%20judgements%20occur?&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Wearden,%20J.%20H.&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1709&rft.epage=1724&rft.pages=1709-1724&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17470210500314729&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68811026%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68811026&rft_id=info:pmid/16945856&rft_sage_id=10.1080_17470210500314729&rfr_iscdi=true |