Uptake of varicella vaccine—a cross sectional survey of parental attitudes to nationally recommended but unfunded varicella immunisation
The aim of this study was to assess the uptake of varicella vaccine in South Australian children under circumstances where varicella immunisation is recommended, but is not funded by Government. The study examined the main reasons that determined a parent's decision whether or not to have their...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2005-11, Vol.23 (46), p.5389-5397 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5397 |
---|---|
container_issue | 46 |
container_start_page | 5389 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Marshall, Helen Ryan, Philip Roberton, Don |
description | The aim of this study was to assess the uptake of varicella vaccine in South Australian children under circumstances where varicella immunisation is recommended, but is not funded by Government. The study examined the main reasons that determined a parent's decision whether or not to have their child immunised with varicella vaccine. A cross-sectional survey was conducted by Computer Aided Telephone Interviews (CATI) in June 2004. Data were obtained from 613 households containing 1148 children aged from birth to 17 years of age. Statistical analyses were performed using data weighted to the South Australian population. Six hundred and eighty children (55.7%) had a history of varicella infection and 446 children (42.0%) had received varicella vaccine (weighted data). The most common reasons cited for not having children immunised included lack of knowledge about the vaccine and cost. One year after inclusion of varicella vaccine in the Australian Standard Vaccination Schedule there is evidence of incomplete coverage in children in South Australia due to absence of government funding for vaccine provision. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.05.033 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68801013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X05005657</els_id><sourcerecordid>17239862</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-f2772afb73ebadf3b0c8eb136832c107e575d9fe1f5b8530491de46f9468cf863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuKFDEUhoMoTjv6CEpAFDfd5lKpSq0GGcYLDLhxwF1IpU4gbVWqzaWhd65dzxP6JKa6CxpcOBAICd_5c3I-hF5SsqGE1u-3m702xnnYMELEZl6cP0IrKhu-ZoLKx2hFWF2tK0q-X6BnMW5JATltn6ILWhPeEkZW6PfdLukfgCeL9zo4A8Og8ZL859e9xiZMMeIIJrnJ6wHHHPZwmPmdDuBTudIpuZR7iDhN2OsTOBxwADONI_geetzlhLO3-Xg4v-TGMXsXjzXP0ROrhwgvlv0S3X28-Xb9eX379dOX6w-3a1NJkdaWNQ3Ttms4dLq3vCNGQkd5LTkzlDQgGtG3FqgVnRScVC3toaptW9XSWFnzS_T2lLsL088MManRxWM7HqYcVS0lKSPmD4K0YbyVNSvgu_-DgpCmKSJEQV__g26nHMq8ZkrIEkdoWyhxoo7TD2DVLrhRh4OiRM361VYtktSsX82Lzx2_WtJzN0J_rlp8F-DNAuho9GCD9sbFM9cwSSo6_-jqxEERsXcQVDQOvIHeFatJ9ZN7oJW_KNPTnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1558986019</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uptake of varicella vaccine—a cross sectional survey of parental attitudes to nationally recommended but unfunded varicella immunisation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Marshall, Helen ; Ryan, Philip ; Roberton, Don</creator><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Helen ; Ryan, Philip ; Roberton, Don</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to assess the uptake of varicella vaccine in South Australian children under circumstances where varicella immunisation is recommended, but is not funded by Government. The study examined the main reasons that determined a parent's decision whether or not to have their child immunised with varicella vaccine. A cross-sectional survey was conducted by Computer Aided Telephone Interviews (CATI) in June 2004. Data were obtained from 613 households containing 1148 children aged from birth to 17 years of age. Statistical analyses were performed using data weighted to the South Australian population. Six hundred and eighty children (55.7%) had a history of varicella infection and 446 children (42.0%) had received varicella vaccine (weighted data). The most common reasons cited for not having children immunised included lack of knowledge about the vaccine and cost. One year after inclusion of varicella vaccine in the Australian Standard Vaccination Schedule there is evidence of incomplete coverage in children in South Australia due to absence of government funding for vaccine provision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.05.033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16039020</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VACCDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Applied microbiology ; Attitude ; Biological and medical sciences ; Caregivers - psychology ; Chicken pox ; Chickenpox - epidemiology ; Chickenpox - prevention & control ; Chickenpox Vaccine - economics ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children & youth ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Health Care Surveys ; Households ; Human viral diseases ; Humans ; Immunization ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Infectious diseases ; Male ; Mass Vaccination ; Medical sciences ; Microbiology ; Middle Aged ; Parental attitudes ; Parents - psychology ; Sex Factors ; Socioeconomic Factors ; South Australia - epidemiology ; Statistical analysis ; Vaccine uptake ; Vaccines ; Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects) ; Varicella ; Viral diseases ; Viral diseases with cutaneous or mucosal lesions and viral diseases of the eye</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2005-11, Vol.23 (46), p.5389-5397</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 16, 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-f2772afb73ebadf3b0c8eb136832c107e575d9fe1f5b8530491de46f9468cf863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-f2772afb73ebadf3b0c8eb136832c107e575d9fe1f5b8530491de46f9468cf863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1558986019?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17280412$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16039020$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberton, Don</creatorcontrib><title>Uptake of varicella vaccine—a cross sectional survey of parental attitudes to nationally recommended but unfunded varicella immunisation</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to assess the uptake of varicella vaccine in South Australian children under circumstances where varicella immunisation is recommended, but is not funded by Government. The study examined the main reasons that determined a parent's decision whether or not to have their child immunised with varicella vaccine. A cross-sectional survey was conducted by Computer Aided Telephone Interviews (CATI) in June 2004. Data were obtained from 613 households containing 1148 children aged from birth to 17 years of age. Statistical analyses were performed using data weighted to the South Australian population. Six hundred and eighty children (55.7%) had a history of varicella infection and 446 children (42.0%) had received varicella vaccine (weighted data). The most common reasons cited for not having children immunised included lack of knowledge about the vaccine and cost. One year after inclusion of varicella vaccine in the Australian Standard Vaccination Schedule there is evidence of incomplete coverage in children in South Australia due to absence of government funding for vaccine provision.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Applied microbiology</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Caregivers - psychology</subject><subject>Chicken pox</subject><subject>Chickenpox - epidemiology</subject><subject>Chickenpox - prevention & control</subject><subject>Chickenpox Vaccine - economics</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Human viral diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Vaccination</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Parental attitudes</subject><subject>Parents - psychology</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>South Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Vaccine uptake</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects)</subject><subject>Varicella</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viral diseases with cutaneous or mucosal lesions and viral diseases of the eye</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcuKFDEUhoMoTjv6CEpAFDfd5lKpSq0GGcYLDLhxwF1IpU4gbVWqzaWhd65dzxP6JKa6CxpcOBAICd_5c3I-hF5SsqGE1u-3m702xnnYMELEZl6cP0IrKhu-ZoLKx2hFWF2tK0q-X6BnMW5JATltn6ILWhPeEkZW6PfdLukfgCeL9zo4A8Og8ZL859e9xiZMMeIIJrnJ6wHHHPZwmPmdDuBTudIpuZR7iDhN2OsTOBxwADONI_geetzlhLO3-Xg4v-TGMXsXjzXP0ROrhwgvlv0S3X28-Xb9eX379dOX6w-3a1NJkdaWNQ3Ttms4dLq3vCNGQkd5LTkzlDQgGtG3FqgVnRScVC3toaptW9XSWFnzS_T2lLsL088MManRxWM7HqYcVS0lKSPmD4K0YbyVNSvgu_-DgpCmKSJEQV__g26nHMq8ZkrIEkdoWyhxoo7TD2DVLrhRh4OiRM361VYtktSsX82Lzx2_WtJzN0J_rlp8F-DNAuho9GCD9sbFM9cwSSo6_-jqxEERsXcQVDQOvIHeFatJ9ZN7oJW_KNPTnw</recordid><startdate>20051116</startdate><enddate>20051116</enddate><creator>Marshall, Helen</creator><creator>Ryan, Philip</creator><creator>Roberton, Don</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051116</creationdate><title>Uptake of varicella vaccine—a cross sectional survey of parental attitudes to nationally recommended but unfunded varicella immunisation</title><author>Marshall, Helen ; Ryan, Philip ; Roberton, Don</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-f2772afb73ebadf3b0c8eb136832c107e575d9fe1f5b8530491de46f9468cf863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Applied microbiology</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Caregivers - psychology</topic><topic>Chicken pox</topic><topic>Chickenpox - epidemiology</topic><topic>Chickenpox - prevention & control</topic><topic>Chickenpox Vaccine - economics</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Human viral diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Vaccination</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Parental attitudes</topic><topic>Parents - psychology</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>South Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Vaccine uptake</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects)</topic><topic>Varicella</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viral diseases with cutaneous or mucosal lesions and viral diseases of the eye</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberton, Don</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marshall, Helen</au><au>Ryan, Philip</au><au>Roberton, Don</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uptake of varicella vaccine—a cross sectional survey of parental attitudes to nationally recommended but unfunded varicella immunisation</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2005-11-16</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>46</issue><spage>5389</spage><epage>5397</epage><pages>5389-5397</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><coden>VACCDE</coden><abstract>The aim of this study was to assess the uptake of varicella vaccine in South Australian children under circumstances where varicella immunisation is recommended, but is not funded by Government. The study examined the main reasons that determined a parent's decision whether or not to have their child immunised with varicella vaccine. A cross-sectional survey was conducted by Computer Aided Telephone Interviews (CATI) in June 2004. Data were obtained from 613 households containing 1148 children aged from birth to 17 years of age. Statistical analyses were performed using data weighted to the South Australian population. Six hundred and eighty children (55.7%) had a history of varicella infection and 446 children (42.0%) had received varicella vaccine (weighted data). The most common reasons cited for not having children immunised included lack of knowledge about the vaccine and cost. One year after inclusion of varicella vaccine in the Australian Standard Vaccination Schedule there is evidence of incomplete coverage in children in South Australia due to absence of government funding for vaccine provision.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16039020</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.05.033</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2005-11, Vol.23 (46), p.5389-5397 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68801013 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Age Factors Aged Applied microbiology Attitude Biological and medical sciences Caregivers - psychology Chicken pox Chickenpox - epidemiology Chickenpox - prevention & control Chickenpox Vaccine - economics Child Child, Preschool Children & youth Cross-Sectional Studies Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Health Care Surveys Households Human viral diseases Humans Immunization Infant Infant, Newborn Infectious diseases Male Mass Vaccination Medical sciences Microbiology Middle Aged Parental attitudes Parents - psychology Sex Factors Socioeconomic Factors South Australia - epidemiology Statistical analysis Vaccine uptake Vaccines Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects) Varicella Viral diseases Viral diseases with cutaneous or mucosal lesions and viral diseases of the eye |
title | Uptake of varicella vaccine—a cross sectional survey of parental attitudes to nationally recommended but unfunded varicella immunisation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T16%3A47%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uptake%20of%20varicella%20vaccine%E2%80%94a%20cross%20sectional%20survey%20of%20parental%20attitudes%20to%20nationally%20recommended%20but%20unfunded%20varicella%20immunisation&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Marshall,%20Helen&rft.date=2005-11-16&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=46&rft.spage=5389&rft.epage=5397&rft.pages=5389-5397&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft.coden=VACCDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.05.033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17239862%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1558986019&rft_id=info:pmid/16039020&rft_els_id=S0264410X05005657&rfr_iscdi=true |