Intramuscular tenderness variation within four muscles of the beef chuck

The i.m. tenderness variation was examined within four beef chuck muscles, the infraspinatus (IF), supraspinatus (SS), triceps brachii (TB), and serratus ventralis (SV). The IF, SS, TB, and SV muscles were cut into 2.5 cm thick steaks perpendicular to the long axis of the muscle. An identification t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2005-12, Vol.83 (12), p.2835-2842
Hauptverfasser: Searls, G. A, Maddock, R. J, Wulf, D. M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2842
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2835
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 83
creator Searls, G. A
Maddock, R. J
Wulf, D. M
description The i.m. tenderness variation was examined within four beef chuck muscles, the infraspinatus (IF), supraspinatus (SS), triceps brachii (TB), and serratus ventralis (SV). The IF, SS, TB, and SV muscles were cut into 2.5 cm thick steaks perpendicular to the long axis of the muscle. An identification tag was placed on each steak, consisting of a muscle identification number, steak number, and orientation of the steak. Steaks were vacuum-packaged and stored at -22°C until subsequent analysis. Steaks were thawed at 1°C and cooked on electric broilers to an internal temperature of 71°C. One core was removed from each 2.5-cm x 2.5-cm section parallel to the muscle fiber and sheared once to determine Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF). The SS had an overall WBSF mean of 5.43 kg (SD = 2.20 kg) with no tenderness difference (P = 0.43) among steak locations. The IF had an overall WBSF mean of 3.16 kg (SD = 1.01 kg) with no tenderness difference (P = 0.51) among steak locations. The SV had a mean WBSF value of 4.37 kg (SD = 1.27 kg) with tenderness variation (P < 0.05) among steak locations; however, tenderness variations were not dispersed in a discernible pattern. The TB had a mean WBSF value of 4.12 kg (SD = 1.26 kg) with lower (P < 0.05) shear force in the middle region of the TB, and the distal and proximal ends were tougher (P < 0.05). Results of this study provided a reasonably detailed mapping of the tenderness regions within the IF, SS, TB, and SV muscles, and this information could be used to add value to the beef chuck by cutting and marketing consistently tender regions.
doi_str_mv 10.2527/2005.83122835x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68797360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68797360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f295t-fafa208ae3598bb6d13f37466648839bd4850a34e13885ab650f9e81bfa9c2bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0E9PFTEUhvGGYOCKbllCN-pqsD1n2mmXhKiQkLhQ1s3p3JYpzB9oZ0S_vUPuNa7O5pcneQ9jp1JcgILmMwihLgxKAIPq9wHbSAWqQqnxkG2EAFkZI-GYvS3lQQgJyqojdiw1GNAAG3Z9M86ZhqW0S0-Zz2HchjyGUvgvyonmNI38Jc1dGnmclsxfZR8KnyKfu8B9CJG33dI-vmNvIvUlvN_fE3b39cvPq-vq9vu3m6vL2yqCVXMVKRIIQwGVNd7rrcSITa21ro1B67e1UYKwDhKNUeS1EtEGI30k24L3eMI-7rpPeXpeQpndkEob-p7GMC3FadPYBrVY4dkeLn4IW_eU00D5j_u3fQUf9oBKS33MNLap_HcNWK1UvbpPO9el--4l5eDKQH2_ZqV7oGLQSXCv71_l-U5Gmhzd57V29wOERCEF2sYg_gXSMn6j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68797360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intramuscular tenderness variation within four muscles of the beef chuck</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Searls, G. A ; Maddock, R. J ; Wulf, D. M</creator><creatorcontrib>Searls, G. A ; Maddock, R. J ; Wulf, D. M</creatorcontrib><description>The i.m. tenderness variation was examined within four beef chuck muscles, the infraspinatus (IF), supraspinatus (SS), triceps brachii (TB), and serratus ventralis (SV). The IF, SS, TB, and SV muscles were cut into 2.5 cm thick steaks perpendicular to the long axis of the muscle. An identification tag was placed on each steak, consisting of a muscle identification number, steak number, and orientation of the steak. Steaks were vacuum-packaged and stored at -22°C until subsequent analysis. Steaks were thawed at 1°C and cooked on electric broilers to an internal temperature of 71°C. One core was removed from each 2.5-cm x 2.5-cm section parallel to the muscle fiber and sheared once to determine Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF). The SS had an overall WBSF mean of 5.43 kg (SD = 2.20 kg) with no tenderness difference (P = 0.43) among steak locations. The IF had an overall WBSF mean of 3.16 kg (SD = 1.01 kg) with no tenderness difference (P = 0.51) among steak locations. The SV had a mean WBSF value of 4.37 kg (SD = 1.27 kg) with tenderness variation (P &lt; 0.05) among steak locations; however, tenderness variations were not dispersed in a discernible pattern. The TB had a mean WBSF value of 4.12 kg (SD = 1.26 kg) with lower (P &lt; 0.05) shear force in the middle region of the TB, and the distal and proximal ends were tougher (P &lt; 0.05). Results of this study provided a reasonably detailed mapping of the tenderness regions within the IF, SS, TB, and SV muscles, and this information could be used to add value to the beef chuck by cutting and marketing consistently tender regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/2005.83122835x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16282622</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Am Soc Animal Sci</publisher><subject>Animal productions ; Animals ; beef ; beef cattle ; beef chuck ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle ; cooked foods ; food analysis ; Food Handling - methods ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; infraspinatus muscle ; Meat - classification ; Meat - standards ; Meat and meat product industries ; meat cuts ; meat tenderness ; Muscle, Skeletal ; muscles ; serratus ventralis muscle ; steaks ; supraspinatus muscle ; Terrestrial animal productions ; tissue analysis ; triceps brachii muscle ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2005-12, Vol.83 (12), p.2835-2842</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17296554$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16282622$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Searls, G. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddock, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wulf, D. M</creatorcontrib><title>Intramuscular tenderness variation within four muscles of the beef chuck</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>The i.m. tenderness variation was examined within four beef chuck muscles, the infraspinatus (IF), supraspinatus (SS), triceps brachii (TB), and serratus ventralis (SV). The IF, SS, TB, and SV muscles were cut into 2.5 cm thick steaks perpendicular to the long axis of the muscle. An identification tag was placed on each steak, consisting of a muscle identification number, steak number, and orientation of the steak. Steaks were vacuum-packaged and stored at -22°C until subsequent analysis. Steaks were thawed at 1°C and cooked on electric broilers to an internal temperature of 71°C. One core was removed from each 2.5-cm x 2.5-cm section parallel to the muscle fiber and sheared once to determine Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF). The SS had an overall WBSF mean of 5.43 kg (SD = 2.20 kg) with no tenderness difference (P = 0.43) among steak locations. The IF had an overall WBSF mean of 3.16 kg (SD = 1.01 kg) with no tenderness difference (P = 0.51) among steak locations. The SV had a mean WBSF value of 4.37 kg (SD = 1.27 kg) with tenderness variation (P &lt; 0.05) among steak locations; however, tenderness variations were not dispersed in a discernible pattern. The TB had a mean WBSF value of 4.12 kg (SD = 1.26 kg) with lower (P &lt; 0.05) shear force in the middle region of the TB, and the distal and proximal ends were tougher (P &lt; 0.05). Results of this study provided a reasonably detailed mapping of the tenderness regions within the IF, SS, TB, and SV muscles, and this information could be used to add value to the beef chuck by cutting and marketing consistently tender regions.</description><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>beef</subject><subject>beef cattle</subject><subject>beef chuck</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>cooked foods</subject><subject>food analysis</subject><subject>Food Handling - methods</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>infraspinatus muscle</subject><subject>Meat - classification</subject><subject>Meat - standards</subject><subject>Meat and meat product industries</subject><subject>meat cuts</subject><subject>meat tenderness</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal</subject><subject>muscles</subject><subject>serratus ventralis muscle</subject><subject>steaks</subject><subject>supraspinatus muscle</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>tissue analysis</subject><subject>triceps brachii muscle</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0E9PFTEUhvGGYOCKbllCN-pqsD1n2mmXhKiQkLhQ1s3p3JYpzB9oZ0S_vUPuNa7O5pcneQ9jp1JcgILmMwihLgxKAIPq9wHbSAWqQqnxkG2EAFkZI-GYvS3lQQgJyqojdiw1GNAAG3Z9M86ZhqW0S0-Zz2HchjyGUvgvyonmNI38Jc1dGnmclsxfZR8KnyKfu8B9CJG33dI-vmNvIvUlvN_fE3b39cvPq-vq9vu3m6vL2yqCVXMVKRIIQwGVNd7rrcSITa21ro1B67e1UYKwDhKNUeS1EtEGI30k24L3eMI-7rpPeXpeQpndkEob-p7GMC3FadPYBrVY4dkeLn4IW_eU00D5j_u3fQUf9oBKS33MNLap_HcNWK1UvbpPO9el--4l5eDKQH2_ZqV7oGLQSXCv71_l-U5Gmhzd57V29wOERCEF2sYg_gXSMn6j</recordid><startdate>20051201</startdate><enddate>20051201</enddate><creator>Searls, G. A</creator><creator>Maddock, R. J</creator><creator>Wulf, D. M</creator><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><general>American Society of Animal Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051201</creationdate><title>Intramuscular tenderness variation within four muscles of the beef chuck</title><author>Searls, G. A ; Maddock, R. J ; Wulf, D. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f295t-fafa208ae3598bb6d13f37466648839bd4850a34e13885ab650f9e81bfa9c2bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>beef</topic><topic>beef cattle</topic><topic>beef chuck</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>cooked foods</topic><topic>food analysis</topic><topic>Food Handling - methods</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>infraspinatus muscle</topic><topic>Meat - classification</topic><topic>Meat - standards</topic><topic>Meat and meat product industries</topic><topic>meat cuts</topic><topic>meat tenderness</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal</topic><topic>muscles</topic><topic>serratus ventralis muscle</topic><topic>steaks</topic><topic>supraspinatus muscle</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>tissue analysis</topic><topic>triceps brachii muscle</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Searls, G. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddock, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wulf, D. M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Searls, G. A</au><au>Maddock, R. J</au><au>Wulf, D. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intramuscular tenderness variation within four muscles of the beef chuck</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2005-12-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2835</spage><epage>2842</epage><pages>2835-2842</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>The i.m. tenderness variation was examined within four beef chuck muscles, the infraspinatus (IF), supraspinatus (SS), triceps brachii (TB), and serratus ventralis (SV). The IF, SS, TB, and SV muscles were cut into 2.5 cm thick steaks perpendicular to the long axis of the muscle. An identification tag was placed on each steak, consisting of a muscle identification number, steak number, and orientation of the steak. Steaks were vacuum-packaged and stored at -22°C until subsequent analysis. Steaks were thawed at 1°C and cooked on electric broilers to an internal temperature of 71°C. One core was removed from each 2.5-cm x 2.5-cm section parallel to the muscle fiber and sheared once to determine Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF). The SS had an overall WBSF mean of 5.43 kg (SD = 2.20 kg) with no tenderness difference (P = 0.43) among steak locations. The IF had an overall WBSF mean of 3.16 kg (SD = 1.01 kg) with no tenderness difference (P = 0.51) among steak locations. The SV had a mean WBSF value of 4.37 kg (SD = 1.27 kg) with tenderness variation (P &lt; 0.05) among steak locations; however, tenderness variations were not dispersed in a discernible pattern. The TB had a mean WBSF value of 4.12 kg (SD = 1.26 kg) with lower (P &lt; 0.05) shear force in the middle region of the TB, and the distal and proximal ends were tougher (P &lt; 0.05). Results of this study provided a reasonably detailed mapping of the tenderness regions within the IF, SS, TB, and SV muscles, and this information could be used to add value to the beef chuck by cutting and marketing consistently tender regions.</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Am Soc Animal Sci</pub><pmid>16282622</pmid><doi>10.2527/2005.83122835x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2005-12, Vol.83 (12), p.2835-2842
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68797360
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Animal productions
Animals
beef
beef cattle
beef chuck
Biological and medical sciences
Cattle
cooked foods
food analysis
Food Handling - methods
Food industries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
infraspinatus muscle
Meat - classification
Meat - standards
Meat and meat product industries
meat cuts
meat tenderness
Muscle, Skeletal
muscles
serratus ventralis muscle
steaks
supraspinatus muscle
Terrestrial animal productions
tissue analysis
triceps brachii muscle
Vertebrates
title Intramuscular tenderness variation within four muscles of the beef chuck
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T09%3A25%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intramuscular%20tenderness%20variation%20within%20four%20muscles%20of%20the%20beef%20chuck&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Searls,%20G.%20A&rft.date=2005-12-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2835&rft.epage=2842&rft.pages=2835-2842&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/2005.83122835x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68797360%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68797360&rft_id=info:pmid/16282622&rfr_iscdi=true