Intramuscular tenderness variation within four muscles of the beef chuck
The i.m. tenderness variation was examined within four beef chuck muscles, the infraspinatus (IF), supraspinatus (SS), triceps brachii (TB), and serratus ventralis (SV). The IF, SS, TB, and SV muscles were cut into 2.5 cm thick steaks perpendicular to the long axis of the muscle. An identification t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2005-12, Vol.83 (12), p.2835-2842 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2842 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2835 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Searls, G. A Maddock, R. J Wulf, D. M |
description | The i.m. tenderness variation was examined within four beef chuck muscles, the infraspinatus (IF), supraspinatus (SS), triceps brachii (TB), and serratus ventralis (SV). The IF, SS, TB, and SV muscles were cut into 2.5 cm thick steaks perpendicular to the long axis of the muscle. An identification tag was placed on each steak, consisting of a muscle identification number, steak number, and orientation of the steak. Steaks were vacuum-packaged and stored at -22°C until subsequent analysis. Steaks were thawed at 1°C and cooked on electric broilers to an internal temperature of 71°C. One core was removed from each 2.5-cm x 2.5-cm section parallel to the muscle fiber and sheared once to determine Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF). The SS had an overall WBSF mean of 5.43 kg (SD = 2.20 kg) with no tenderness difference (P = 0.43) among steak locations. The IF had an overall WBSF mean of 3.16 kg (SD = 1.01 kg) with no tenderness difference (P = 0.51) among steak locations. The SV had a mean WBSF value of 4.37 kg (SD = 1.27 kg) with tenderness variation (P < 0.05) among steak locations; however, tenderness variations were not dispersed in a discernible pattern. The TB had a mean WBSF value of 4.12 kg (SD = 1.26 kg) with lower (P < 0.05) shear force in the middle region of the TB, and the distal and proximal ends were tougher (P < 0.05). Results of this study provided a reasonably detailed mapping of the tenderness regions within the IF, SS, TB, and SV muscles, and this information could be used to add value to the beef chuck by cutting and marketing consistently tender regions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/2005.83122835x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68797360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68797360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f295t-fafa208ae3598bb6d13f37466648839bd4850a34e13885ab650f9e81bfa9c2bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0E9PFTEUhvGGYOCKbllCN-pqsD1n2mmXhKiQkLhQ1s3p3JYpzB9oZ0S_vUPuNa7O5pcneQ9jp1JcgILmMwihLgxKAIPq9wHbSAWqQqnxkG2EAFkZI-GYvS3lQQgJyqojdiw1GNAAG3Z9M86ZhqW0S0-Zz2HchjyGUvgvyonmNI38Jc1dGnmclsxfZR8KnyKfu8B9CJG33dI-vmNvIvUlvN_fE3b39cvPq-vq9vu3m6vL2yqCVXMVKRIIQwGVNd7rrcSITa21ro1B67e1UYKwDhKNUeS1EtEGI30k24L3eMI-7rpPeXpeQpndkEob-p7GMC3FadPYBrVY4dkeLn4IW_eU00D5j_u3fQUf9oBKS33MNLap_HcNWK1UvbpPO9el--4l5eDKQH2_ZqV7oGLQSXCv71_l-U5Gmhzd57V29wOERCEF2sYg_gXSMn6j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68797360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intramuscular tenderness variation within four muscles of the beef chuck</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Searls, G. A ; Maddock, R. J ; Wulf, D. M</creator><creatorcontrib>Searls, G. A ; Maddock, R. J ; Wulf, D. M</creatorcontrib><description>The i.m. tenderness variation was examined within four beef chuck muscles, the infraspinatus (IF), supraspinatus (SS), triceps brachii (TB), and serratus ventralis (SV). The IF, SS, TB, and SV muscles were cut into 2.5 cm thick steaks perpendicular to the long axis of the muscle. An identification tag was placed on each steak, consisting of a muscle identification number, steak number, and orientation of the steak. Steaks were vacuum-packaged and stored at -22°C until subsequent analysis. Steaks were thawed at 1°C and cooked on electric broilers to an internal temperature of 71°C. One core was removed from each 2.5-cm x 2.5-cm section parallel to the muscle fiber and sheared once to determine Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF). The SS had an overall WBSF mean of 5.43 kg (SD = 2.20 kg) with no tenderness difference (P = 0.43) among steak locations. The IF had an overall WBSF mean of 3.16 kg (SD = 1.01 kg) with no tenderness difference (P = 0.51) among steak locations. The SV had a mean WBSF value of 4.37 kg (SD = 1.27 kg) with tenderness variation (P < 0.05) among steak locations; however, tenderness variations were not dispersed in a discernible pattern. The TB had a mean WBSF value of 4.12 kg (SD = 1.26 kg) with lower (P < 0.05) shear force in the middle region of the TB, and the distal and proximal ends were tougher (P < 0.05). Results of this study provided a reasonably detailed mapping of the tenderness regions within the IF, SS, TB, and SV muscles, and this information could be used to add value to the beef chuck by cutting and marketing consistently tender regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/2005.83122835x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16282622</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Am Soc Animal Sci</publisher><subject>Animal productions ; Animals ; beef ; beef cattle ; beef chuck ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle ; cooked foods ; food analysis ; Food Handling - methods ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; infraspinatus muscle ; Meat - classification ; Meat - standards ; Meat and meat product industries ; meat cuts ; meat tenderness ; Muscle, Skeletal ; muscles ; serratus ventralis muscle ; steaks ; supraspinatus muscle ; Terrestrial animal productions ; tissue analysis ; triceps brachii muscle ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2005-12, Vol.83 (12), p.2835-2842</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17296554$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16282622$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Searls, G. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddock, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wulf, D. M</creatorcontrib><title>Intramuscular tenderness variation within four muscles of the beef chuck</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>The i.m. tenderness variation was examined within four beef chuck muscles, the infraspinatus (IF), supraspinatus (SS), triceps brachii (TB), and serratus ventralis (SV). The IF, SS, TB, and SV muscles were cut into 2.5 cm thick steaks perpendicular to the long axis of the muscle. An identification tag was placed on each steak, consisting of a muscle identification number, steak number, and orientation of the steak. Steaks were vacuum-packaged and stored at -22°C until subsequent analysis. Steaks were thawed at 1°C and cooked on electric broilers to an internal temperature of 71°C. One core was removed from each 2.5-cm x 2.5-cm section parallel to the muscle fiber and sheared once to determine Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF). The SS had an overall WBSF mean of 5.43 kg (SD = 2.20 kg) with no tenderness difference (P = 0.43) among steak locations. The IF had an overall WBSF mean of 3.16 kg (SD = 1.01 kg) with no tenderness difference (P = 0.51) among steak locations. The SV had a mean WBSF value of 4.37 kg (SD = 1.27 kg) with tenderness variation (P < 0.05) among steak locations; however, tenderness variations were not dispersed in a discernible pattern. The TB had a mean WBSF value of 4.12 kg (SD = 1.26 kg) with lower (P < 0.05) shear force in the middle region of the TB, and the distal and proximal ends were tougher (P < 0.05). Results of this study provided a reasonably detailed mapping of the tenderness regions within the IF, SS, TB, and SV muscles, and this information could be used to add value to the beef chuck by cutting and marketing consistently tender regions.</description><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>beef</subject><subject>beef cattle</subject><subject>beef chuck</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>cooked foods</subject><subject>food analysis</subject><subject>Food Handling - methods</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>infraspinatus muscle</subject><subject>Meat - classification</subject><subject>Meat - standards</subject><subject>Meat and meat product industries</subject><subject>meat cuts</subject><subject>meat tenderness</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal</subject><subject>muscles</subject><subject>serratus ventralis muscle</subject><subject>steaks</subject><subject>supraspinatus muscle</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>tissue analysis</subject><subject>triceps brachii muscle</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0E9PFTEUhvGGYOCKbllCN-pqsD1n2mmXhKiQkLhQ1s3p3JYpzB9oZ0S_vUPuNa7O5pcneQ9jp1JcgILmMwihLgxKAIPq9wHbSAWqQqnxkG2EAFkZI-GYvS3lQQgJyqojdiw1GNAAG3Z9M86ZhqW0S0-Zz2HchjyGUvgvyonmNI38Jc1dGnmclsxfZR8KnyKfu8B9CJG33dI-vmNvIvUlvN_fE3b39cvPq-vq9vu3m6vL2yqCVXMVKRIIQwGVNd7rrcSITa21ro1B67e1UYKwDhKNUeS1EtEGI30k24L3eMI-7rpPeXpeQpndkEob-p7GMC3FadPYBrVY4dkeLn4IW_eU00D5j_u3fQUf9oBKS33MNLap_HcNWK1UvbpPO9el--4l5eDKQH2_ZqV7oGLQSXCv71_l-U5Gmhzd57V29wOERCEF2sYg_gXSMn6j</recordid><startdate>20051201</startdate><enddate>20051201</enddate><creator>Searls, G. A</creator><creator>Maddock, R. J</creator><creator>Wulf, D. M</creator><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><general>American Society of Animal Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051201</creationdate><title>Intramuscular tenderness variation within four muscles of the beef chuck</title><author>Searls, G. A ; Maddock, R. J ; Wulf, D. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f295t-fafa208ae3598bb6d13f37466648839bd4850a34e13885ab650f9e81bfa9c2bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>beef</topic><topic>beef cattle</topic><topic>beef chuck</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>cooked foods</topic><topic>food analysis</topic><topic>Food Handling - methods</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>infraspinatus muscle</topic><topic>Meat - classification</topic><topic>Meat - standards</topic><topic>Meat and meat product industries</topic><topic>meat cuts</topic><topic>meat tenderness</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal</topic><topic>muscles</topic><topic>serratus ventralis muscle</topic><topic>steaks</topic><topic>supraspinatus muscle</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>tissue analysis</topic><topic>triceps brachii muscle</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Searls, G. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddock, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wulf, D. M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Searls, G. A</au><au>Maddock, R. J</au><au>Wulf, D. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intramuscular tenderness variation within four muscles of the beef chuck</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2005-12-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2835</spage><epage>2842</epage><pages>2835-2842</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>The i.m. tenderness variation was examined within four beef chuck muscles, the infraspinatus (IF), supraspinatus (SS), triceps brachii (TB), and serratus ventralis (SV). The IF, SS, TB, and SV muscles were cut into 2.5 cm thick steaks perpendicular to the long axis of the muscle. An identification tag was placed on each steak, consisting of a muscle identification number, steak number, and orientation of the steak. Steaks were vacuum-packaged and stored at -22°C until subsequent analysis. Steaks were thawed at 1°C and cooked on electric broilers to an internal temperature of 71°C. One core was removed from each 2.5-cm x 2.5-cm section parallel to the muscle fiber and sheared once to determine Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF). The SS had an overall WBSF mean of 5.43 kg (SD = 2.20 kg) with no tenderness difference (P = 0.43) among steak locations. The IF had an overall WBSF mean of 3.16 kg (SD = 1.01 kg) with no tenderness difference (P = 0.51) among steak locations. The SV had a mean WBSF value of 4.37 kg (SD = 1.27 kg) with tenderness variation (P < 0.05) among steak locations; however, tenderness variations were not dispersed in a discernible pattern. The TB had a mean WBSF value of 4.12 kg (SD = 1.26 kg) with lower (P < 0.05) shear force in the middle region of the TB, and the distal and proximal ends were tougher (P < 0.05). Results of this study provided a reasonably detailed mapping of the tenderness regions within the IF, SS, TB, and SV muscles, and this information could be used to add value to the beef chuck by cutting and marketing consistently tender regions.</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Am Soc Animal Sci</pub><pmid>16282622</pmid><doi>10.2527/2005.83122835x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2005-12, Vol.83 (12), p.2835-2842 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68797360 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Animal productions Animals beef beef cattle beef chuck Biological and medical sciences Cattle cooked foods food analysis Food Handling - methods Food industries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology infraspinatus muscle Meat - classification Meat - standards Meat and meat product industries meat cuts meat tenderness Muscle, Skeletal muscles serratus ventralis muscle steaks supraspinatus muscle Terrestrial animal productions tissue analysis triceps brachii muscle Vertebrates |
title | Intramuscular tenderness variation within four muscles of the beef chuck |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T09%3A25%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intramuscular%20tenderness%20variation%20within%20four%20muscles%20of%20the%20beef%20chuck&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Searls,%20G.%20A&rft.date=2005-12-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2835&rft.epage=2842&rft.pages=2835-2842&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/2005.83122835x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68797360%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68797360&rft_id=info:pmid/16282622&rfr_iscdi=true |