Upper extremity fractures in the elderly: consequences on utilization of rehabilitation care
While hip fractures represent the most dramatic consequence of osteoporosis, fractures of the humerus, forearm and wrist account for one-third of the total incidence of fractures due to osteoporosis in the older population. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate rehabilitation ca...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aging clinical and experimental research 2005-08, Vol.17 (4), p.276-280 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 280 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 276 |
container_title | Aging clinical and experimental research |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Lübbeke, Anne Stern, Richard Grab, Bernard Herrmann, François Michel, Jean-Pierre Hoffmeyer, Pierre |
description | While hip fractures represent the most dramatic consequence of osteoporosis, fractures of the humerus, forearm and wrist account for one-third of the total incidence of fractures due to osteoporosis in the older population. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate rehabilitation care utilization and associated factors in elderly individuals with upper limb fracture.
Over two years, 667 patients 65 years of age or older were studied, who presented to the emergency department either from their private homes or nursing homes with an upper extremity fracture. The following outcome variables were collected: gender; age; residence; location of fracture; treatment; discharge destination; length of hospitalization; length of stay in a rehabilitation facility; and ultimate place of habitation after the event.
The most frequent sites of fracture were distal radius (37.2%) and proximal humerus (29.1%). Two-thirds of the patients were treated non-operatively. Inpatient rehabilitation care was necessary for 248 patients (37.2%; length of stay, 46 days). Factors associated with increased care included older age (> or = 80 years), coming from private home, sustaining two fractures, fractures of the humerus, and operative treatment. Six percent of the patients required permanent nursing home care.
Upper extremity fractures in older people often require prolonged hospitalization and therefore account for considerable health care costs. Reasons are more related to advanced age and living conditions than to particular injury or treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF03324610 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68797188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68797188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-41fbeda86bd1e4cd5b29d5a7b32157d586d183e64de33b5dd6768c9106e78c0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9LAzEUxIMotlYvfgAJCB6E1WSTTbLetFgVCl7sTViyyVu6Zf-ZZMH66Y20UPD0hjc_hmEQuqTkjhIi758WhLGUC0qO0JTKlCSK0fw46iznCRFCTtCZ9xtCOI3GKZpQkaqM5ukUfa6GARyG7-CgrcMWV06bMDrwuO5wWAOGxoJrtg_Y9J2HrxE6E82-w2Oom_pHhzrqvsIO1rqMn7D7GO3gHJ1UuvFwsb8ztFo8f8xfk-X7y9v8cZkYxvOQcFqVYLUSpaXAjc3KNLeZliVLaSZtpoSlioHgFhgrM2uFFMrklAiQyhBgM3Szyx1cHwv6ULS1N9A0uoN-9IVQMpdUqQhe_wM3_ei62K1IGVc5k0LKSN3uKON67x1UxeDqVrttQUnxt3hxWDzCV_vIsWzBHtD9xOwXNZh71Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2348937677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Upper extremity fractures in the elderly: consequences on utilization of rehabilitation care</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Lübbeke, Anne ; Stern, Richard ; Grab, Bernard ; Herrmann, François ; Michel, Jean-Pierre ; Hoffmeyer, Pierre</creator><creatorcontrib>Lübbeke, Anne ; Stern, Richard ; Grab, Bernard ; Herrmann, François ; Michel, Jean-Pierre ; Hoffmeyer, Pierre</creatorcontrib><description>While hip fractures represent the most dramatic consequence of osteoporosis, fractures of the humerus, forearm and wrist account for one-third of the total incidence of fractures due to osteoporosis in the older population. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate rehabilitation care utilization and associated factors in elderly individuals with upper limb fracture.
Over two years, 667 patients 65 years of age or older were studied, who presented to the emergency department either from their private homes or nursing homes with an upper extremity fracture. The following outcome variables were collected: gender; age; residence; location of fracture; treatment; discharge destination; length of hospitalization; length of stay in a rehabilitation facility; and ultimate place of habitation after the event.
The most frequent sites of fracture were distal radius (37.2%) and proximal humerus (29.1%). Two-thirds of the patients were treated non-operatively. Inpatient rehabilitation care was necessary for 248 patients (37.2%; length of stay, 46 days). Factors associated with increased care included older age (> or = 80 years), coming from private home, sustaining two fractures, fractures of the humerus, and operative treatment. Six percent of the patients required permanent nursing home care.
Upper extremity fractures in older people often require prolonged hospitalization and therefore account for considerable health care costs. Reasons are more related to advanced age and living conditions than to particular injury or treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1594-0667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1720-8319</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03324610</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16285192</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Accidental Falls ; Age ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cohort Studies ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Female ; Fractures ; Health Care Costs ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Humeral Fractures - rehabilitation ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Nursing Homes ; Older people ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - complications ; Osteoporosis - pathology ; Radius Fractures - rehabilitation ; Rehabilitation ; Retrospective Studies ; Upper Extremity - pathology</subject><ispartof>Aging clinical and experimental research, 2005-08, Vol.17 (4), p.276-280</ispartof><rights>Aging Clinical and Experimental Research is a copyright of Springer, (2005). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-41fbeda86bd1e4cd5b29d5a7b32157d586d183e64de33b5dd6768c9106e78c0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-41fbeda86bd1e4cd5b29d5a7b32157d586d183e64de33b5dd6768c9106e78c0e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16285192$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lübbeke, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grab, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michel, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmeyer, Pierre</creatorcontrib><title>Upper extremity fractures in the elderly: consequences on utilization of rehabilitation care</title><title>Aging clinical and experimental research</title><addtitle>Aging Clin Exp Res</addtitle><description>While hip fractures represent the most dramatic consequence of osteoporosis, fractures of the humerus, forearm and wrist account for one-third of the total incidence of fractures due to osteoporosis in the older population. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate rehabilitation care utilization and associated factors in elderly individuals with upper limb fracture.
Over two years, 667 patients 65 years of age or older were studied, who presented to the emergency department either from their private homes or nursing homes with an upper extremity fracture. The following outcome variables were collected: gender; age; residence; location of fracture; treatment; discharge destination; length of hospitalization; length of stay in a rehabilitation facility; and ultimate place of habitation after the event.
The most frequent sites of fracture were distal radius (37.2%) and proximal humerus (29.1%). Two-thirds of the patients were treated non-operatively. Inpatient rehabilitation care was necessary for 248 patients (37.2%; length of stay, 46 days). Factors associated with increased care included older age (> or = 80 years), coming from private home, sustaining two fractures, fractures of the humerus, and operative treatment. Six percent of the patients required permanent nursing home care.
Upper extremity fractures in older people often require prolonged hospitalization and therefore account for considerable health care costs. Reasons are more related to advanced age and living conditions than to particular injury or treatment.</description><subject>Accidental Falls</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humeral Fractures - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nursing Homes</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - complications</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - pathology</subject><subject>Radius Fractures - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - pathology</subject><issn>1594-0667</issn><issn>1720-8319</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE9LAzEUxIMotlYvfgAJCB6E1WSTTbLetFgVCl7sTViyyVu6Zf-ZZMH66Y20UPD0hjc_hmEQuqTkjhIi758WhLGUC0qO0JTKlCSK0fw46iznCRFCTtCZ9xtCOI3GKZpQkaqM5ukUfa6GARyG7-CgrcMWV06bMDrwuO5wWAOGxoJrtg_Y9J2HrxE6E82-w2Oom_pHhzrqvsIO1rqMn7D7GO3gHJ1UuvFwsb8ztFo8f8xfk-X7y9v8cZkYxvOQcFqVYLUSpaXAjc3KNLeZliVLaSZtpoSlioHgFhgrM2uFFMrklAiQyhBgM3Szyx1cHwv6ULS1N9A0uoN-9IVQMpdUqQhe_wM3_ei62K1IGVc5k0LKSN3uKON67x1UxeDqVrttQUnxt3hxWDzCV_vIsWzBHtD9xOwXNZh71Q</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>Lübbeke, Anne</creator><creator>Stern, Richard</creator><creator>Grab, Bernard</creator><creator>Herrmann, François</creator><creator>Michel, Jean-Pierre</creator><creator>Hoffmeyer, Pierre</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>Upper extremity fractures in the elderly: consequences on utilization of rehabilitation care</title><author>Lübbeke, Anne ; Stern, Richard ; Grab, Bernard ; Herrmann, François ; Michel, Jean-Pierre ; Hoffmeyer, Pierre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-41fbeda86bd1e4cd5b29d5a7b32157d586d183e64de33b5dd6768c9106e78c0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Accidental Falls</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humeral Fractures - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nursing Homes</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - complications</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - pathology</topic><topic>Radius Fractures - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lübbeke, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grab, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michel, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmeyer, Pierre</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aging clinical and experimental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lübbeke, Anne</au><au>Stern, Richard</au><au>Grab, Bernard</au><au>Herrmann, François</au><au>Michel, Jean-Pierre</au><au>Hoffmeyer, Pierre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Upper extremity fractures in the elderly: consequences on utilization of rehabilitation care</atitle><jtitle>Aging clinical and experimental research</jtitle><addtitle>Aging Clin Exp Res</addtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>276</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>276-280</pages><issn>1594-0667</issn><eissn>1720-8319</eissn><abstract>While hip fractures represent the most dramatic consequence of osteoporosis, fractures of the humerus, forearm and wrist account for one-third of the total incidence of fractures due to osteoporosis in the older population. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate rehabilitation care utilization and associated factors in elderly individuals with upper limb fracture.
Over two years, 667 patients 65 years of age or older were studied, who presented to the emergency department either from their private homes or nursing homes with an upper extremity fracture. The following outcome variables were collected: gender; age; residence; location of fracture; treatment; discharge destination; length of hospitalization; length of stay in a rehabilitation facility; and ultimate place of habitation after the event.
The most frequent sites of fracture were distal radius (37.2%) and proximal humerus (29.1%). Two-thirds of the patients were treated non-operatively. Inpatient rehabilitation care was necessary for 248 patients (37.2%; length of stay, 46 days). Factors associated with increased care included older age (> or = 80 years), coming from private home, sustaining two fractures, fractures of the humerus, and operative treatment. Six percent of the patients required permanent nursing home care.
Upper extremity fractures in older people often require prolonged hospitalization and therefore account for considerable health care costs. Reasons are more related to advanced age and living conditions than to particular injury or treatment.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>16285192</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF03324610</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1594-0667 |
ispartof | Aging clinical and experimental research, 2005-08, Vol.17 (4), p.276-280 |
issn | 1594-0667 1720-8319 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68797188 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Accidental Falls Age Aged Aged, 80 and over Cohort Studies Emergency Service, Hospital Female Fractures Health Care Costs Hospitalization Humans Humeral Fractures - rehabilitation Length of Stay Male Nursing Homes Older people Osteoporosis Osteoporosis - complications Osteoporosis - pathology Radius Fractures - rehabilitation Rehabilitation Retrospective Studies Upper Extremity - pathology |
title | Upper extremity fractures in the elderly: consequences on utilization of rehabilitation care |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T09%3A14%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Upper%20extremity%20fractures%20in%20the%20elderly:%20consequences%20on%20utilization%20of%20rehabilitation%20care&rft.jtitle=Aging%20clinical%20and%20experimental%20research&rft.au=L%C3%BCbbeke,%20Anne&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=276&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=276-280&rft.issn=1594-0667&rft.eissn=1720-8319&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03324610&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68797188%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2348937677&rft_id=info:pmid/16285192&rfr_iscdi=true |