Upper extremity fractures in the elderly: consequences on utilization of rehabilitation care

While hip fractures represent the most dramatic consequence of osteoporosis, fractures of the humerus, forearm and wrist account for one-third of the total incidence of fractures due to osteoporosis in the older population. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate rehabilitation ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aging clinical and experimental research 2005-08, Vol.17 (4), p.276-280
Hauptverfasser: Lübbeke, Anne, Stern, Richard, Grab, Bernard, Herrmann, François, Michel, Jean-Pierre, Hoffmeyer, Pierre
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 280
container_issue 4
container_start_page 276
container_title Aging clinical and experimental research
container_volume 17
creator Lübbeke, Anne
Stern, Richard
Grab, Bernard
Herrmann, François
Michel, Jean-Pierre
Hoffmeyer, Pierre
description While hip fractures represent the most dramatic consequence of osteoporosis, fractures of the humerus, forearm and wrist account for one-third of the total incidence of fractures due to osteoporosis in the older population. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate rehabilitation care utilization and associated factors in elderly individuals with upper limb fracture. Over two years, 667 patients 65 years of age or older were studied, who presented to the emergency department either from their private homes or nursing homes with an upper extremity fracture. The following outcome variables were collected: gender; age; residence; location of fracture; treatment; discharge destination; length of hospitalization; length of stay in a rehabilitation facility; and ultimate place of habitation after the event. The most frequent sites of fracture were distal radius (37.2%) and proximal humerus (29.1%). Two-thirds of the patients were treated non-operatively. Inpatient rehabilitation care was necessary for 248 patients (37.2%; length of stay, 46 days). Factors associated with increased care included older age (> or = 80 years), coming from private home, sustaining two fractures, fractures of the humerus, and operative treatment. Six percent of the patients required permanent nursing home care. Upper extremity fractures in older people often require prolonged hospitalization and therefore account for considerable health care costs. Reasons are more related to advanced age and living conditions than to particular injury or treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF03324610
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68797188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68797188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-41fbeda86bd1e4cd5b29d5a7b32157d586d183e64de33b5dd6768c9106e78c0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9LAzEUxIMotlYvfgAJCB6E1WSTTbLetFgVCl7sTViyyVu6Zf-ZZMH66Y20UPD0hjc_hmEQuqTkjhIi758WhLGUC0qO0JTKlCSK0fw46iznCRFCTtCZ9xtCOI3GKZpQkaqM5ukUfa6GARyG7-CgrcMWV06bMDrwuO5wWAOGxoJrtg_Y9J2HrxE6E82-w2Oom_pHhzrqvsIO1rqMn7D7GO3gHJ1UuvFwsb8ztFo8f8xfk-X7y9v8cZkYxvOQcFqVYLUSpaXAjc3KNLeZliVLaSZtpoSlioHgFhgrM2uFFMrklAiQyhBgM3Szyx1cHwv6ULS1N9A0uoN-9IVQMpdUqQhe_wM3_ei62K1IGVc5k0LKSN3uKON67x1UxeDqVrttQUnxt3hxWDzCV_vIsWzBHtD9xOwXNZh71Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2348937677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Upper extremity fractures in the elderly: consequences on utilization of rehabilitation care</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Lübbeke, Anne ; Stern, Richard ; Grab, Bernard ; Herrmann, François ; Michel, Jean-Pierre ; Hoffmeyer, Pierre</creator><creatorcontrib>Lübbeke, Anne ; Stern, Richard ; Grab, Bernard ; Herrmann, François ; Michel, Jean-Pierre ; Hoffmeyer, Pierre</creatorcontrib><description>While hip fractures represent the most dramatic consequence of osteoporosis, fractures of the humerus, forearm and wrist account for one-third of the total incidence of fractures due to osteoporosis in the older population. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate rehabilitation care utilization and associated factors in elderly individuals with upper limb fracture. Over two years, 667 patients 65 years of age or older were studied, who presented to the emergency department either from their private homes or nursing homes with an upper extremity fracture. The following outcome variables were collected: gender; age; residence; location of fracture; treatment; discharge destination; length of hospitalization; length of stay in a rehabilitation facility; and ultimate place of habitation after the event. The most frequent sites of fracture were distal radius (37.2%) and proximal humerus (29.1%). Two-thirds of the patients were treated non-operatively. Inpatient rehabilitation care was necessary for 248 patients (37.2%; length of stay, 46 days). Factors associated with increased care included older age (&gt; or = 80 years), coming from private home, sustaining two fractures, fractures of the humerus, and operative treatment. Six percent of the patients required permanent nursing home care. Upper extremity fractures in older people often require prolonged hospitalization and therefore account for considerable health care costs. Reasons are more related to advanced age and living conditions than to particular injury or treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1594-0667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1720-8319</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03324610</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16285192</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Accidental Falls ; Age ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cohort Studies ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Female ; Fractures ; Health Care Costs ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Humeral Fractures - rehabilitation ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Nursing Homes ; Older people ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - complications ; Osteoporosis - pathology ; Radius Fractures - rehabilitation ; Rehabilitation ; Retrospective Studies ; Upper Extremity - pathology</subject><ispartof>Aging clinical and experimental research, 2005-08, Vol.17 (4), p.276-280</ispartof><rights>Aging Clinical and Experimental Research is a copyright of Springer, (2005). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-41fbeda86bd1e4cd5b29d5a7b32157d586d183e64de33b5dd6768c9106e78c0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-41fbeda86bd1e4cd5b29d5a7b32157d586d183e64de33b5dd6768c9106e78c0e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16285192$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lübbeke, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grab, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michel, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmeyer, Pierre</creatorcontrib><title>Upper extremity fractures in the elderly: consequences on utilization of rehabilitation care</title><title>Aging clinical and experimental research</title><addtitle>Aging Clin Exp Res</addtitle><description>While hip fractures represent the most dramatic consequence of osteoporosis, fractures of the humerus, forearm and wrist account for one-third of the total incidence of fractures due to osteoporosis in the older population. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate rehabilitation care utilization and associated factors in elderly individuals with upper limb fracture. Over two years, 667 patients 65 years of age or older were studied, who presented to the emergency department either from their private homes or nursing homes with an upper extremity fracture. The following outcome variables were collected: gender; age; residence; location of fracture; treatment; discharge destination; length of hospitalization; length of stay in a rehabilitation facility; and ultimate place of habitation after the event. The most frequent sites of fracture were distal radius (37.2%) and proximal humerus (29.1%). Two-thirds of the patients were treated non-operatively. Inpatient rehabilitation care was necessary for 248 patients (37.2%; length of stay, 46 days). Factors associated with increased care included older age (&gt; or = 80 years), coming from private home, sustaining two fractures, fractures of the humerus, and operative treatment. Six percent of the patients required permanent nursing home care. Upper extremity fractures in older people often require prolonged hospitalization and therefore account for considerable health care costs. Reasons are more related to advanced age and living conditions than to particular injury or treatment.</description><subject>Accidental Falls</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humeral Fractures - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nursing Homes</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - complications</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - pathology</subject><subject>Radius Fractures - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - pathology</subject><issn>1594-0667</issn><issn>1720-8319</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE9LAzEUxIMotlYvfgAJCB6E1WSTTbLetFgVCl7sTViyyVu6Zf-ZZMH66Y20UPD0hjc_hmEQuqTkjhIi758WhLGUC0qO0JTKlCSK0fw46iznCRFCTtCZ9xtCOI3GKZpQkaqM5ukUfa6GARyG7-CgrcMWV06bMDrwuO5wWAOGxoJrtg_Y9J2HrxE6E82-w2Oom_pHhzrqvsIO1rqMn7D7GO3gHJ1UuvFwsb8ztFo8f8xfk-X7y9v8cZkYxvOQcFqVYLUSpaXAjc3KNLeZliVLaSZtpoSlioHgFhgrM2uFFMrklAiQyhBgM3Szyx1cHwv6ULS1N9A0uoN-9IVQMpdUqQhe_wM3_ei62K1IGVc5k0LKSN3uKON67x1UxeDqVrttQUnxt3hxWDzCV_vIsWzBHtD9xOwXNZh71Q</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>Lübbeke, Anne</creator><creator>Stern, Richard</creator><creator>Grab, Bernard</creator><creator>Herrmann, François</creator><creator>Michel, Jean-Pierre</creator><creator>Hoffmeyer, Pierre</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>Upper extremity fractures in the elderly: consequences on utilization of rehabilitation care</title><author>Lübbeke, Anne ; Stern, Richard ; Grab, Bernard ; Herrmann, François ; Michel, Jean-Pierre ; Hoffmeyer, Pierre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-41fbeda86bd1e4cd5b29d5a7b32157d586d183e64de33b5dd6768c9106e78c0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Accidental Falls</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humeral Fractures - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nursing Homes</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - complications</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - pathology</topic><topic>Radius Fractures - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lübbeke, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grab, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michel, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmeyer, Pierre</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aging clinical and experimental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lübbeke, Anne</au><au>Stern, Richard</au><au>Grab, Bernard</au><au>Herrmann, François</au><au>Michel, Jean-Pierre</au><au>Hoffmeyer, Pierre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Upper extremity fractures in the elderly: consequences on utilization of rehabilitation care</atitle><jtitle>Aging clinical and experimental research</jtitle><addtitle>Aging Clin Exp Res</addtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>276</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>276-280</pages><issn>1594-0667</issn><eissn>1720-8319</eissn><abstract>While hip fractures represent the most dramatic consequence of osteoporosis, fractures of the humerus, forearm and wrist account for one-third of the total incidence of fractures due to osteoporosis in the older population. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate rehabilitation care utilization and associated factors in elderly individuals with upper limb fracture. Over two years, 667 patients 65 years of age or older were studied, who presented to the emergency department either from their private homes or nursing homes with an upper extremity fracture. The following outcome variables were collected: gender; age; residence; location of fracture; treatment; discharge destination; length of hospitalization; length of stay in a rehabilitation facility; and ultimate place of habitation after the event. The most frequent sites of fracture were distal radius (37.2%) and proximal humerus (29.1%). Two-thirds of the patients were treated non-operatively. Inpatient rehabilitation care was necessary for 248 patients (37.2%; length of stay, 46 days). Factors associated with increased care included older age (&gt; or = 80 years), coming from private home, sustaining two fractures, fractures of the humerus, and operative treatment. Six percent of the patients required permanent nursing home care. Upper extremity fractures in older people often require prolonged hospitalization and therefore account for considerable health care costs. Reasons are more related to advanced age and living conditions than to particular injury or treatment.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>16285192</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF03324610</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1594-0667
ispartof Aging clinical and experimental research, 2005-08, Vol.17 (4), p.276-280
issn 1594-0667
1720-8319
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68797188
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Accidental Falls
Age
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cohort Studies
Emergency Service, Hospital
Female
Fractures
Health Care Costs
Hospitalization
Humans
Humeral Fractures - rehabilitation
Length of Stay
Male
Nursing Homes
Older people
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis - complications
Osteoporosis - pathology
Radius Fractures - rehabilitation
Rehabilitation
Retrospective Studies
Upper Extremity - pathology
title Upper extremity fractures in the elderly: consequences on utilization of rehabilitation care
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T09%3A14%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Upper%20extremity%20fractures%20in%20the%20elderly:%20consequences%20on%20utilization%20of%20rehabilitation%20care&rft.jtitle=Aging%20clinical%20and%20experimental%20research&rft.au=L%C3%BCbbeke,%20Anne&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=276&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=276-280&rft.issn=1594-0667&rft.eissn=1720-8319&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03324610&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68797188%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2348937677&rft_id=info:pmid/16285192&rfr_iscdi=true