French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts

Objectives To construct new reference charts and equations for fetal biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL), using a large sample of fetuses examined at 15–40 weeks in France, and to compare them with previous references. Methods The st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2006-08, Vol.28 (2), p.193-198
Hauptverfasser: Salomon, L. J., Duyme, M., Crequat, J., Brodaty, G., Talmant, C., Fries, N., Althuser, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To construct new reference charts and equations for fetal biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL), using a large sample of fetuses examined at 15–40 weeks in France, and to compare them with previous references. Methods The study data were obtained over a continuous 1‐year period from a population of pregnant women undergoing ultrasound examination. Excluded were those with a known abnormal karyotype or congenital malformation, multiple pregnancies, and those with no first‐trimester dating based on crown–rump length. No fetuses were excluded on the basis of abnormal biometry or birth weight. For each measurement, separate regression models were fitted to estimate both the mean and the SD at each gestational age. Results Full biometric measurements were obtained for 19 647 fetuses. New charts and reference equations are reported for BPD, HC, AC and FL. Prediction intervals for the new reference charts were similar to those of previous ones, whereas there were some differences in predicted centiles. Conclusion We present new French reference charts and equations for fetal biometry. They can be used easily to compute centiles and Z‐scores to control the quality of biometric assessments and to evaluate their performance relative to other references. Copyright © 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN:0960-7692
1469-0705
DOI:10.1002/uog.2733