Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting is Superior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Prevention of Perioperative Myocardial Infarctions During Subsequent Vascular Surgery

Among patients in need of coronary revascularization before an elective vascular operation, the value of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in preventing perioperative myocardial infarctions is uncertain. We hypothesized that more complete revascul...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of thoracic surgery 2006-09, Vol.82 (3), p.795-801
Hauptverfasser: Ward, Herbert B., Kelly, Rosemary F., Thottapurathu, Lizy, Moritz, Thomas E., Larsen, Greg C., Pierpont, Gordon, Santilli, Steve, Goldman, Steven, Krupski, William C., Littooy, Fred, Reda, Domenic J., McFalls, Edward O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 801
container_issue 3
container_start_page 795
container_title The Annals of thoracic surgery
container_volume 82
creator Ward, Herbert B.
Kelly, Rosemary F.
Thottapurathu, Lizy
Moritz, Thomas E.
Larsen, Greg C.
Pierpont, Gordon
Santilli, Steve
Goldman, Steven
Krupski, William C.
Littooy, Fred
Reda, Domenic J.
McFalls, Edward O.
description Among patients in need of coronary revascularization before an elective vascular operation, the value of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in preventing perioperative myocardial infarctions is uncertain. We hypothesized that more complete revascularization would improve outcomes after vascular surgery. In this Veterans Affairs Cooperative trial involving 18 medical centers, 222 patients underwent elective vascular surgery after coronary revascularization. The mode of coronary revascularization was selected at each site by the local investigators (CABG in 91 patients and PCI in 131 patients). The vascular surgical indications were similar in both groups. There were 2 deaths in the CABG group (2.2%) and 5 deaths in the PCI group (3.8%; p = 0.497) after the vascular procedure. There were fewer perioperative myocardial infarctions after the vascular operation in CABG patients (6.6%) than in PCI patients (16.8%; p = 0.024), despite more diseased vessels in the CABG group (3.0 ± 1.3 versus 2.2 ± 1.4, respectively; p < 0.001). The completeness of revascularization (defined as the number of coronary artery vessels revascularized relative to the total number of vessels with a stenosis ≥70%) in patients in the CABG and PCI groups was 117% ± 63% and 81% ± 57%, respectively ( p < 0.001). Hospital length of stay in CABG versus PCI patients was 6 (4, 8) and 7 (4, 10) days, respectively ( p = 0.078). Among patients receiving multivessel coronary artery revascularization as prophylaxis for elective vascular surgery, patients having a CABG had fewer myocardial infarctions and tended to spend less time in the hospital after the vascular operation than patients having a PCI. More complete revascularization accounted for the intergroup differences.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.074
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68780605</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003497506006217</els_id><sourcerecordid>68780605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-956134dcfda577664b283d36505f15492bd0a841b67ea0408134947eb97650223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokvLX0A-cUtwEn8kx3aBUqlVK5VytRxnUrzKxsvYXmn_Er8SR7vQI6fReJ53PvwSQitWVqySnzaliT89GhsSljVjsmRNyRR_RVaVEHUha9G9JivGWFPwTokz8i6ETU7rXH5LzirZ1S1vxYr8Xnv0s8EDvcQIOVwddiYEeo1mjG5-pi7Qx7QDdB5p9PQB0KZoZvAp0H_amzlr9zBH52fqZvqA8Dfz46JxPrcw0e2B3h28NTg4M2XZaNAuWKCfEy7jHlMf4FfKYvrDBJsmg_kNn_NqF-TNaKYA70_xnDx9_fJ9_a24vb--WV_eFpYzFYtOyKrhgx0HI5SSkvd12wyNFEyMleBd3Q_MtLzqpQLDOGsz3XEFfacyU9fNOfl47LtDnzcJUW9dsDBNx6u1bFXLJBMZbI-gRR8Cwqh36Lb5P3TF9OKT3ugXn_Tik2aNzj5l6YfTjNRvYXgRnozJwNURgHzp3gHqYB3MFgaHYKMevPv_lD_DL628</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68780605</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting is Superior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Prevention of Perioperative Myocardial Infarctions During Subsequent Vascular Surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ward, Herbert B. ; Kelly, Rosemary F. ; Thottapurathu, Lizy ; Moritz, Thomas E. ; Larsen, Greg C. ; Pierpont, Gordon ; Santilli, Steve ; Goldman, Steven ; Krupski, William C. ; Littooy, Fred ; Reda, Domenic J. ; McFalls, Edward O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ward, Herbert B. ; Kelly, Rosemary F. ; Thottapurathu, Lizy ; Moritz, Thomas E. ; Larsen, Greg C. ; Pierpont, Gordon ; Santilli, Steve ; Goldman, Steven ; Krupski, William C. ; Littooy, Fred ; Reda, Domenic J. ; McFalls, Edward O.</creatorcontrib><description>Among patients in need of coronary revascularization before an elective vascular operation, the value of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in preventing perioperative myocardial infarctions is uncertain. We hypothesized that more complete revascularization would improve outcomes after vascular surgery. In this Veterans Affairs Cooperative trial involving 18 medical centers, 222 patients underwent elective vascular surgery after coronary revascularization. The mode of coronary revascularization was selected at each site by the local investigators (CABG in 91 patients and PCI in 131 patients). The vascular surgical indications were similar in both groups. There were 2 deaths in the CABG group (2.2%) and 5 deaths in the PCI group (3.8%; p = 0.497) after the vascular procedure. There were fewer perioperative myocardial infarctions after the vascular operation in CABG patients (6.6%) than in PCI patients (16.8%; p = 0.024), despite more diseased vessels in the CABG group (3.0 ± 1.3 versus 2.2 ± 1.4, respectively; p &lt; 0.001). The completeness of revascularization (defined as the number of coronary artery vessels revascularized relative to the total number of vessels with a stenosis ≥70%) in patients in the CABG and PCI groups was 117% ± 63% and 81% ± 57%, respectively ( p &lt; 0.001). Hospital length of stay in CABG versus PCI patients was 6 (4, 8) and 7 (4, 10) days, respectively ( p = 0.078). Among patients receiving multivessel coronary artery revascularization as prophylaxis for elective vascular surgery, patients having a CABG had fewer myocardial infarctions and tended to spend less time in the hospital after the vascular operation than patients having a PCI. More complete revascularization accounted for the intergroup differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4975</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.074</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16928485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery ; Arterial Occlusive Diseases - surgery ; Coronary Artery Bypass - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Elective Surgical Procedures ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Intraoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control ; Leg - blood supply ; Leg - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction - epidemiology ; Myocardial Infarction - prevention &amp; control ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2006-09, Vol.82 (3), p.795-801</ispartof><rights>2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-956134dcfda577664b283d36505f15492bd0a841b67ea0408134947eb97650223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-956134dcfda577664b283d36505f15492bd0a841b67ea0408134947eb97650223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16928485$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ward, Herbert B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Rosemary F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thottapurathu, Lizy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moritz, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Greg C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierpont, Gordon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santilli, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krupski, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Littooy, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reda, Domenic J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFalls, Edward O.</creatorcontrib><title>Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting is Superior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Prevention of Perioperative Myocardial Infarctions During Subsequent Vascular Surgery</title><title>The Annals of thoracic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg</addtitle><description>Among patients in need of coronary revascularization before an elective vascular operation, the value of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in preventing perioperative myocardial infarctions is uncertain. We hypothesized that more complete revascularization would improve outcomes after vascular surgery. In this Veterans Affairs Cooperative trial involving 18 medical centers, 222 patients underwent elective vascular surgery after coronary revascularization. The mode of coronary revascularization was selected at each site by the local investigators (CABG in 91 patients and PCI in 131 patients). The vascular surgical indications were similar in both groups. There were 2 deaths in the CABG group (2.2%) and 5 deaths in the PCI group (3.8%; p = 0.497) after the vascular procedure. There were fewer perioperative myocardial infarctions after the vascular operation in CABG patients (6.6%) than in PCI patients (16.8%; p = 0.024), despite more diseased vessels in the CABG group (3.0 ± 1.3 versus 2.2 ± 1.4, respectively; p &lt; 0.001). The completeness of revascularization (defined as the number of coronary artery vessels revascularized relative to the total number of vessels with a stenosis ≥70%) in patients in the CABG and PCI groups was 117% ± 63% and 81% ± 57%, respectively ( p &lt; 0.001). Hospital length of stay in CABG versus PCI patients was 6 (4, 8) and 7 (4, 10) days, respectively ( p = 0.078). Among patients receiving multivessel coronary artery revascularization as prophylaxis for elective vascular surgery, patients having a CABG had fewer myocardial infarctions and tended to spend less time in the hospital after the vascular operation than patients having a PCI. More complete revascularization accounted for the intergroup differences.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</subject><subject>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Leg - blood supply</subject><subject>Leg - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - epidemiology</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0003-4975</issn><issn>1552-6259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokvLX0A-cUtwEn8kx3aBUqlVK5VytRxnUrzKxsvYXmn_Er8SR7vQI6fReJ53PvwSQitWVqySnzaliT89GhsSljVjsmRNyRR_RVaVEHUha9G9JivGWFPwTokz8i6ETU7rXH5LzirZ1S1vxYr8Xnv0s8EDvcQIOVwddiYEeo1mjG5-pi7Qx7QDdB5p9PQB0KZoZvAp0H_amzlr9zBH52fqZvqA8Dfz46JxPrcw0e2B3h28NTg4M2XZaNAuWKCfEy7jHlMf4FfKYvrDBJsmg_kNn_NqF-TNaKYA70_xnDx9_fJ9_a24vb--WV_eFpYzFYtOyKrhgx0HI5SSkvd12wyNFEyMleBd3Q_MtLzqpQLDOGsz3XEFfacyU9fNOfl47LtDnzcJUW9dsDBNx6u1bFXLJBMZbI-gRR8Cwqh36Lb5P3TF9OKT3ugXn_Tik2aNzj5l6YfTjNRvYXgRnozJwNURgHzp3gHqYB3MFgaHYKMevPv_lD_DL628</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>Ward, Herbert B.</creator><creator>Kelly, Rosemary F.</creator><creator>Thottapurathu, Lizy</creator><creator>Moritz, Thomas E.</creator><creator>Larsen, Greg C.</creator><creator>Pierpont, Gordon</creator><creator>Santilli, Steve</creator><creator>Goldman, Steven</creator><creator>Krupski, William C.</creator><creator>Littooy, Fred</creator><creator>Reda, Domenic J.</creator><creator>McFalls, Edward O.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting is Superior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Prevention of Perioperative Myocardial Infarctions During Subsequent Vascular Surgery</title><author>Ward, Herbert B. ; Kelly, Rosemary F. ; Thottapurathu, Lizy ; Moritz, Thomas E. ; Larsen, Greg C. ; Pierpont, Gordon ; Santilli, Steve ; Goldman, Steven ; Krupski, William C. ; Littooy, Fred ; Reda, Domenic J. ; McFalls, Edward O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-956134dcfda577664b283d36505f15492bd0a841b67ea0408134947eb97650223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</topic><topic>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Leg - blood supply</topic><topic>Leg - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - epidemiology</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ward, Herbert B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Rosemary F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thottapurathu, Lizy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moritz, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Greg C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierpont, Gordon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santilli, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krupski, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Littooy, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reda, Domenic J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFalls, Edward O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Annals of thoracic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ward, Herbert B.</au><au>Kelly, Rosemary F.</au><au>Thottapurathu, Lizy</au><au>Moritz, Thomas E.</au><au>Larsen, Greg C.</au><au>Pierpont, Gordon</au><au>Santilli, Steve</au><au>Goldman, Steven</au><au>Krupski, William C.</au><au>Littooy, Fred</au><au>Reda, Domenic J.</au><au>McFalls, Edward O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting is Superior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Prevention of Perioperative Myocardial Infarctions During Subsequent Vascular Surgery</atitle><jtitle>The Annals of thoracic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg</addtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>795</spage><epage>801</epage><pages>795-801</pages><issn>0003-4975</issn><eissn>1552-6259</eissn><abstract>Among patients in need of coronary revascularization before an elective vascular operation, the value of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in preventing perioperative myocardial infarctions is uncertain. We hypothesized that more complete revascularization would improve outcomes after vascular surgery. In this Veterans Affairs Cooperative trial involving 18 medical centers, 222 patients underwent elective vascular surgery after coronary revascularization. The mode of coronary revascularization was selected at each site by the local investigators (CABG in 91 patients and PCI in 131 patients). The vascular surgical indications were similar in both groups. There were 2 deaths in the CABG group (2.2%) and 5 deaths in the PCI group (3.8%; p = 0.497) after the vascular procedure. There were fewer perioperative myocardial infarctions after the vascular operation in CABG patients (6.6%) than in PCI patients (16.8%; p = 0.024), despite more diseased vessels in the CABG group (3.0 ± 1.3 versus 2.2 ± 1.4, respectively; p &lt; 0.001). The completeness of revascularization (defined as the number of coronary artery vessels revascularized relative to the total number of vessels with a stenosis ≥70%) in patients in the CABG and PCI groups was 117% ± 63% and 81% ± 57%, respectively ( p &lt; 0.001). Hospital length of stay in CABG versus PCI patients was 6 (4, 8) and 7 (4, 10) days, respectively ( p = 0.078). Among patients receiving multivessel coronary artery revascularization as prophylaxis for elective vascular surgery, patients having a CABG had fewer myocardial infarctions and tended to spend less time in the hospital after the vascular operation than patients having a PCI. More complete revascularization accounted for the intergroup differences.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16928485</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.074</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4975
ispartof The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2006-09, Vol.82 (3), p.795-801
issn 0003-4975
1552-6259
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68780605
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - statistics & numerical data
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery
Arterial Occlusive Diseases - surgery
Coronary Artery Bypass - statistics & numerical data
Elective Surgical Procedures
Female
Humans
Incidence
Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology
Intraoperative Complications - prevention & control
Leg - blood supply
Leg - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction - epidemiology
Myocardial Infarction - prevention & control
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
Time Factors
title Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting is Superior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Prevention of Perioperative Myocardial Infarctions During Subsequent Vascular Surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T12%3A47%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coronary%20Artery%20Bypass%20Grafting%20is%20Superior%20to%20Percutaneous%20Coronary%20Intervention%20in%20Prevention%20of%20Perioperative%20Myocardial%20Infarctions%20During%20Subsequent%20Vascular%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=The%20Annals%20of%20thoracic%20surgery&rft.au=Ward,%20Herbert%20B.&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=795&rft.epage=801&rft.pages=795-801&rft.issn=0003-4975&rft.eissn=1552-6259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68780605%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68780605&rft_id=info:pmid/16928485&rft_els_id=S0003497506006217&rfr_iscdi=true