Cytomegalovirus Immune Reconstitution Occurs in Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplants Irrespective of Detectable Cytomegalovirus Infection

The question of when immune reconstitution of cytomegalovirus (CMV)–specific CD8 T cells occurs after hematopoietic cell transplantation and, more specifically, to which CMV targets this immunity is likely to be directed remains poorly understood. The dependence of immune reconstitution on CMV react...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biology of blood and marrow transplantation 2005-11, Vol.11 (11), p.890-902
Hauptverfasser: Gallez-Hawkins, Ghislaine, Thao, Lia, Lacey, Simon F., Martinez, Joybelle, Li, Xiuli, Franck, Anne E., Lomeli, Norma A., Longmate, Jeff, Diamond, Don J., Spielberger, Ricardo, Forman, Stephen J., Zaia, John A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 902
container_issue 11
container_start_page 890
container_title Biology of blood and marrow transplantation
container_volume 11
creator Gallez-Hawkins, Ghislaine
Thao, Lia
Lacey, Simon F.
Martinez, Joybelle
Li, Xiuli
Franck, Anne E.
Lomeli, Norma A.
Longmate, Jeff
Diamond, Don J.
Spielberger, Ricardo
Forman, Stephen J.
Zaia, John A.
description The question of when immune reconstitution of cytomegalovirus (CMV)–specific CD8 T cells occurs after hematopoietic cell transplantation and, more specifically, to which CMV targets this immunity is likely to be directed remains poorly understood. The dependence of immune reconstitution on CMV reactivation is even less clear. To better understand these events, 44 CMV-seropositive HLA-A*0201 subjects were followed up at approximately days 40, 90, 120, 150, 180, and 360 after hematopoietic cell transplantation for CMV immunity as measured by 2 types of assays: (1) an HLA-A*0201 tetramer-binding assay for both CMV pp65 (pp65) and immediate-early 1 (IE-1) or (2) intracellular cytokine interferon γ responses induced by pp65 or IE-1–derived peptides. To verify the reliability of IE-1–specific assays relative to the pp65-based assays, a pilot study first compared the development of IE-1–specific immunity in a subgroup by using multiple HLA-A*0201–restricted peptides, and then these recipients were followed up for 1 year for immunologic function and for CMV infection. The IE-1–specific response occurred to each of the 3 HLA-A*0201–restricted peptides studied (IE-1-256, -297, and -316), and there was no predominant IE peptide response. However, the immunodominant HLA-A*0201–restricted pp65 peptide was recognized significantly more frequently than these IE-1 peptides. When this was compared with the occurrence of CMV infection, the overall immune reactivity, as measured by the mean or median number of CD8 + T cells reactive to either pp65 or IE-1 peptides by intracellular cytokine or tetramer binding assay, was not significantly different in those with and without CMV infection. For patients who demonstrated reconstituted immunity to CMV at 1 year, all were reconstituted by 6 months, and the timing of the first observed immune reactivity to either of the pp65 or the IE peptides was not different in those with and without detectable CMV infection.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.07.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68777363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1083879105004635</els_id><sourcerecordid>68777363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-a90ebd805e35e6aff4822fb8bf532e91c3d64d6ca203e1e66d468e66a3efe8373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9q3DAQxk1padK0L9BD0ak3u_pjSzL0ErZJsxAIhOQsZHkUtNiSK8kLeZc-bGV2oYdCT6NBv-9jZr6q-kxwQzDh3w7NMMy5oRh3DRYNxvJNdUk6ymreMf62vLFktRQ9uag-pHTAGItW9u-rC8Kp6LqeXla_d685zPCip3B0cU1oP8-rB_QIJviUXV6zCx49GLPGhJzfPtziwOeEgkXX0xRewIMz6A5mncMSHOTS7WCa0FPUPi2T3uB9jJAWMNkdYVP-gFwaPUyA_hnB240L_mP1zuopwadzvaqeb2-ednf1_cPP_e76vjZtz3KtewzDKHEHrAOurW0lpXaQg-0YhZ4YNvJ25EZTzIAA52PLZSmagQXJBLuqvp58lxh-rZCyml0yZQPtIaxJcSmEYJwVkJ5AE0NKEaxaopt1fFUEqy0TdVBbJmrLRGGhSiZF9OXsvg4zjH8l5xAK8P0EQNnx6CCqZMqFDYwulkOoMbj_-f8B5-Ki_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68777363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cytomegalovirus Immune Reconstitution Occurs in Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplants Irrespective of Detectable Cytomegalovirus Infection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gallez-Hawkins, Ghislaine ; Thao, Lia ; Lacey, Simon F. ; Martinez, Joybelle ; Li, Xiuli ; Franck, Anne E. ; Lomeli, Norma A. ; Longmate, Jeff ; Diamond, Don J. ; Spielberger, Ricardo ; Forman, Stephen J. ; Zaia, John A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gallez-Hawkins, Ghislaine ; Thao, Lia ; Lacey, Simon F. ; Martinez, Joybelle ; Li, Xiuli ; Franck, Anne E. ; Lomeli, Norma A. ; Longmate, Jeff ; Diamond, Don J. ; Spielberger, Ricardo ; Forman, Stephen J. ; Zaia, John A.</creatorcontrib><description>The question of when immune reconstitution of cytomegalovirus (CMV)–specific CD8 T cells occurs after hematopoietic cell transplantation and, more specifically, to which CMV targets this immunity is likely to be directed remains poorly understood. The dependence of immune reconstitution on CMV reactivation is even less clear. To better understand these events, 44 CMV-seropositive HLA-A*0201 subjects were followed up at approximately days 40, 90, 120, 150, 180, and 360 after hematopoietic cell transplantation for CMV immunity as measured by 2 types of assays: (1) an HLA-A*0201 tetramer-binding assay for both CMV pp65 (pp65) and immediate-early 1 (IE-1) or (2) intracellular cytokine interferon γ responses induced by pp65 or IE-1–derived peptides. To verify the reliability of IE-1–specific assays relative to the pp65-based assays, a pilot study first compared the development of IE-1–specific immunity in a subgroup by using multiple HLA-A*0201–restricted peptides, and then these recipients were followed up for 1 year for immunologic function and for CMV infection. The IE-1–specific response occurred to each of the 3 HLA-A*0201–restricted peptides studied (IE-1-256, -297, and -316), and there was no predominant IE peptide response. However, the immunodominant HLA-A*0201–restricted pp65 peptide was recognized significantly more frequently than these IE-1 peptides. When this was compared with the occurrence of CMV infection, the overall immune reactivity, as measured by the mean or median number of CD8 + T cells reactive to either pp65 or IE-1 peptides by intracellular cytokine or tetramer binding assay, was not significantly different in those with and without CMV infection. For patients who demonstrated reconstituted immunity to CMV at 1 year, all were reconstituted by 6 months, and the timing of the first observed immune reactivity to either of the pp65 or the IE peptides was not different in those with and without detectable CMV infection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1083-8791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-6536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.07.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16275592</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology ; Cytomegalovirus ; Cytomegalovirus - immunology ; Cytomegalovirus Infections ; Hematopoietic cell transplantation ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; HLA-A Antigens - immunology ; HLA-A2 Antigen ; Humans ; Immediate-Early Proteins - immunology ; Immune reconstitution ; Immunity - physiology ; Intracellular cytokine responses ; Phosphoproteins - immunology ; Regeneration ; Tetramer ; Transplantation, Homologous ; Viral Matrix Proteins - immunology ; Viral Proteins - immunology ; Virus Activation</subject><ispartof>Biology of blood and marrow transplantation, 2005-11, Vol.11 (11), p.890-902</ispartof><rights>2005 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-a90ebd805e35e6aff4822fb8bf532e91c3d64d6ca203e1e66d468e66a3efe8373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-a90ebd805e35e6aff4822fb8bf532e91c3d64d6ca203e1e66d468e66a3efe8373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.07.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16275592$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gallez-Hawkins, Ghislaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thao, Lia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacey, Simon F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Joybelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiuli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franck, Anne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomeli, Norma A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longmate, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diamond, Don J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spielberger, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forman, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaia, John A.</creatorcontrib><title>Cytomegalovirus Immune Reconstitution Occurs in Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplants Irrespective of Detectable Cytomegalovirus Infection</title><title>Biology of blood and marrow transplantation</title><addtitle>Biol Blood Marrow Transplant</addtitle><description>The question of when immune reconstitution of cytomegalovirus (CMV)–specific CD8 T cells occurs after hematopoietic cell transplantation and, more specifically, to which CMV targets this immunity is likely to be directed remains poorly understood. The dependence of immune reconstitution on CMV reactivation is even less clear. To better understand these events, 44 CMV-seropositive HLA-A*0201 subjects were followed up at approximately days 40, 90, 120, 150, 180, and 360 after hematopoietic cell transplantation for CMV immunity as measured by 2 types of assays: (1) an HLA-A*0201 tetramer-binding assay for both CMV pp65 (pp65) and immediate-early 1 (IE-1) or (2) intracellular cytokine interferon γ responses induced by pp65 or IE-1–derived peptides. To verify the reliability of IE-1–specific assays relative to the pp65-based assays, a pilot study first compared the development of IE-1–specific immunity in a subgroup by using multiple HLA-A*0201–restricted peptides, and then these recipients were followed up for 1 year for immunologic function and for CMV infection. The IE-1–specific response occurred to each of the 3 HLA-A*0201–restricted peptides studied (IE-1-256, -297, and -316), and there was no predominant IE peptide response. However, the immunodominant HLA-A*0201–restricted pp65 peptide was recognized significantly more frequently than these IE-1 peptides. When this was compared with the occurrence of CMV infection, the overall immune reactivity, as measured by the mean or median number of CD8 + T cells reactive to either pp65 or IE-1 peptides by intracellular cytokine or tetramer binding assay, was not significantly different in those with and without CMV infection. For patients who demonstrated reconstituted immunity to CMV at 1 year, all were reconstituted by 6 months, and the timing of the first observed immune reactivity to either of the pp65 or the IE peptides was not different in those with and without detectable CMV infection.</description><subject>CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus - immunology</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus Infections</subject><subject>Hematopoietic cell transplantation</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation</subject><subject>HLA-A Antigens - immunology</subject><subject>HLA-A2 Antigen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immediate-Early Proteins - immunology</subject><subject>Immune reconstitution</subject><subject>Immunity - physiology</subject><subject>Intracellular cytokine responses</subject><subject>Phosphoproteins - immunology</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Tetramer</subject><subject>Transplantation, Homologous</subject><subject>Viral Matrix Proteins - immunology</subject><subject>Viral Proteins - immunology</subject><subject>Virus Activation</subject><issn>1083-8791</issn><issn>1523-6536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9q3DAQxk1padK0L9BD0ak3u_pjSzL0ErZJsxAIhOQsZHkUtNiSK8kLeZc-bGV2oYdCT6NBv-9jZr6q-kxwQzDh3w7NMMy5oRh3DRYNxvJNdUk6ymreMf62vLFktRQ9uag-pHTAGItW9u-rC8Kp6LqeXla_d685zPCip3B0cU1oP8-rB_QIJviUXV6zCx49GLPGhJzfPtziwOeEgkXX0xRewIMz6A5mncMSHOTS7WCa0FPUPi2T3uB9jJAWMNkdYVP-gFwaPUyA_hnB240L_mP1zuopwadzvaqeb2-ednf1_cPP_e76vjZtz3KtewzDKHEHrAOurW0lpXaQg-0YhZ4YNvJ25EZTzIAA52PLZSmagQXJBLuqvp58lxh-rZCyml0yZQPtIaxJcSmEYJwVkJ5AE0NKEaxaopt1fFUEqy0TdVBbJmrLRGGhSiZF9OXsvg4zjH8l5xAK8P0EQNnx6CCqZMqFDYwulkOoMbj_-f8B5-Ki_w</recordid><startdate>20051101</startdate><enddate>20051101</enddate><creator>Gallez-Hawkins, Ghislaine</creator><creator>Thao, Lia</creator><creator>Lacey, Simon F.</creator><creator>Martinez, Joybelle</creator><creator>Li, Xiuli</creator><creator>Franck, Anne E.</creator><creator>Lomeli, Norma A.</creator><creator>Longmate, Jeff</creator><creator>Diamond, Don J.</creator><creator>Spielberger, Ricardo</creator><creator>Forman, Stephen J.</creator><creator>Zaia, John A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051101</creationdate><title>Cytomegalovirus Immune Reconstitution Occurs in Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplants Irrespective of Detectable Cytomegalovirus Infection</title><author>Gallez-Hawkins, Ghislaine ; Thao, Lia ; Lacey, Simon F. ; Martinez, Joybelle ; Li, Xiuli ; Franck, Anne E. ; Lomeli, Norma A. ; Longmate, Jeff ; Diamond, Don J. ; Spielberger, Ricardo ; Forman, Stephen J. ; Zaia, John A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-a90ebd805e35e6aff4822fb8bf532e91c3d64d6ca203e1e66d468e66a3efe8373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus - immunology</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus Infections</topic><topic>Hematopoietic cell transplantation</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation</topic><topic>HLA-A Antigens - immunology</topic><topic>HLA-A2 Antigen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immediate-Early Proteins - immunology</topic><topic>Immune reconstitution</topic><topic>Immunity - physiology</topic><topic>Intracellular cytokine responses</topic><topic>Phosphoproteins - immunology</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Tetramer</topic><topic>Transplantation, Homologous</topic><topic>Viral Matrix Proteins - immunology</topic><topic>Viral Proteins - immunology</topic><topic>Virus Activation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gallez-Hawkins, Ghislaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thao, Lia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacey, Simon F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Joybelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiuli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franck, Anne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomeli, Norma A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longmate, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diamond, Don J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spielberger, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forman, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaia, John A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biology of blood and marrow transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gallez-Hawkins, Ghislaine</au><au>Thao, Lia</au><au>Lacey, Simon F.</au><au>Martinez, Joybelle</au><au>Li, Xiuli</au><au>Franck, Anne E.</au><au>Lomeli, Norma A.</au><au>Longmate, Jeff</au><au>Diamond, Don J.</au><au>Spielberger, Ricardo</au><au>Forman, Stephen J.</au><au>Zaia, John A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cytomegalovirus Immune Reconstitution Occurs in Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplants Irrespective of Detectable Cytomegalovirus Infection</atitle><jtitle>Biology of blood and marrow transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Biol Blood Marrow Transplant</addtitle><date>2005-11-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>890</spage><epage>902</epage><pages>890-902</pages><issn>1083-8791</issn><eissn>1523-6536</eissn><abstract>The question of when immune reconstitution of cytomegalovirus (CMV)–specific CD8 T cells occurs after hematopoietic cell transplantation and, more specifically, to which CMV targets this immunity is likely to be directed remains poorly understood. The dependence of immune reconstitution on CMV reactivation is even less clear. To better understand these events, 44 CMV-seropositive HLA-A*0201 subjects were followed up at approximately days 40, 90, 120, 150, 180, and 360 after hematopoietic cell transplantation for CMV immunity as measured by 2 types of assays: (1) an HLA-A*0201 tetramer-binding assay for both CMV pp65 (pp65) and immediate-early 1 (IE-1) or (2) intracellular cytokine interferon γ responses induced by pp65 or IE-1–derived peptides. To verify the reliability of IE-1–specific assays relative to the pp65-based assays, a pilot study first compared the development of IE-1–specific immunity in a subgroup by using multiple HLA-A*0201–restricted peptides, and then these recipients were followed up for 1 year for immunologic function and for CMV infection. The IE-1–specific response occurred to each of the 3 HLA-A*0201–restricted peptides studied (IE-1-256, -297, and -316), and there was no predominant IE peptide response. However, the immunodominant HLA-A*0201–restricted pp65 peptide was recognized significantly more frequently than these IE-1 peptides. When this was compared with the occurrence of CMV infection, the overall immune reactivity, as measured by the mean or median number of CD8 + T cells reactive to either pp65 or IE-1 peptides by intracellular cytokine or tetramer binding assay, was not significantly different in those with and without CMV infection. For patients who demonstrated reconstituted immunity to CMV at 1 year, all were reconstituted by 6 months, and the timing of the first observed immune reactivity to either of the pp65 or the IE peptides was not different in those with and without detectable CMV infection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16275592</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.07.008</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1083-8791
ispartof Biology of blood and marrow transplantation, 2005-11, Vol.11 (11), p.890-902
issn 1083-8791
1523-6536
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68777363
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology
Cytomegalovirus
Cytomegalovirus - immunology
Cytomegalovirus Infections
Hematopoietic cell transplantation
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
HLA-A Antigens - immunology
HLA-A2 Antigen
Humans
Immediate-Early Proteins - immunology
Immune reconstitution
Immunity - physiology
Intracellular cytokine responses
Phosphoproteins - immunology
Regeneration
Tetramer
Transplantation, Homologous
Viral Matrix Proteins - immunology
Viral Proteins - immunology
Virus Activation
title Cytomegalovirus Immune Reconstitution Occurs in Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplants Irrespective of Detectable Cytomegalovirus Infection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T13%3A54%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cytomegalovirus%20Immune%20Reconstitution%20Occurs%20in%20Recipients%20of%20Allogeneic%20Hematopoietic%20Cell%20Transplants%20Irrespective%20of%20Detectable%20Cytomegalovirus%20Infection&rft.jtitle=Biology%20of%20blood%20and%20marrow%20transplantation&rft.au=Gallez-Hawkins,%20Ghislaine&rft.date=2005-11-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=890&rft.epage=902&rft.pages=890-902&rft.issn=1083-8791&rft.eissn=1523-6536&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.07.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68777363%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68777363&rft_id=info:pmid/16275592&rft_els_id=S1083879105004635&rfr_iscdi=true