The Relationship Between the Hindfoot Angle and the Medial Longitudinal Arch of the Foot

Introduction: The relationship of hindfoot valgus and the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) is a well-known parameter for the evaluation of the foot deformities. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between the hindfoot angle and the MLA and the effect of these parameters on the development and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foot & ankle international 2006-08, Vol.27 (8), p.623-627
Hauptverfasser: Kanatli, Ulunay, Gözil, Rabet, Besli, Köksal, Yetkin, Haluk, Bölükbasi, Selcuk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 627
container_issue 8
container_start_page 623
container_title Foot & ankle international
container_volume 27
creator Kanatli, Ulunay
Gözil, Rabet
Besli, Köksal
Yetkin, Haluk
Bölükbasi, Selcuk
description Introduction: The relationship of hindfoot valgus and the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) is a well-known parameter for the evaluation of the foot deformities. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between the hindfoot angle and the MLA and the effect of these parameters on the development and general joint laxity of the subjects. Methods: Two-hundred-sixty-one volunteers who had no foot pain or major foot deformity were examined. The age range of the volunteers was 4 to 20 years. For each subject, the right foot was evaluated for the clinical hindfoot angle and footprint analysis. General ligamentous laxity also was recorded. Arch index and valgus index were used for the evaluation of the footprint analysis, and the valgus angle was measured clinically. Results: The average heel valgus angle for all subjects was 5.2 (SD 3.3) degrees. The means of valgus index and arch index were 3.34 (SD, 5.6) and 0.7 (SD, 0.2), respectively. Although there was a positive correlation between the valgus angle and valgus index (p = 0.027), the arch index was not found to be correlated with these values. Positive correlation between joint laxity and arch height also was demonstrated (p < 0.05). Conclusions: We concluded that the hindfoot angle and MLA height must be considered separately in clinical practice, particularly in the management of childhood pes planus.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/107110070602700810
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68768655</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_107110070602700810</sage_id><sourcerecordid>68768655</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-78c61ec5fb2747842f17cf5e4c97aa68b485334dda7a22554f6afb009061c3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gBfSK-_qzmnTpL2cwzlhIsguvCtpmmwZXTKbFvHfm32AF4JX-TjP-3J4CLlFeEDkfIzAEQE4MEg4QI5wRoZYUBrznLPzcA9AvCcG5Mr7DQDyFItLMkBWYJEgG5KP5VpF76oRnXHWr80uelTdl1I26sJgbmytneuiiV01KhK2Pny_qtqIJlo4uzJdXxsbHpNWriOnD_NZiFyTCy0ar25O54gsZ0_L6TxevD2_TCeLWFLgXdhUMlQy01XCKc9popFLnSkqCy4EyyuaZ2lK61pwkSRZRjUTugIogKFMdToi98faXes-e-W7cmu8VE0jrHK9L1kwkbMsC2ByBGXrvG-VLnet2Yr2u0Qo9zrLvzpD6O7U3ldbVf9GTv4CMD4CXqxUuXF9G1z4_yp_AB4ie-0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68768655</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Relationship Between the Hindfoot Angle and the Medial Longitudinal Arch of the Foot</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Kanatli, Ulunay ; Gözil, Rabet ; Besli, Köksal ; Yetkin, Haluk ; Bölükbasi, Selcuk</creator><creatorcontrib>Kanatli, Ulunay ; Gözil, Rabet ; Besli, Köksal ; Yetkin, Haluk ; Bölükbasi, Selcuk</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: The relationship of hindfoot valgus and the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) is a well-known parameter for the evaluation of the foot deformities. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between the hindfoot angle and the MLA and the effect of these parameters on the development and general joint laxity of the subjects. Methods: Two-hundred-sixty-one volunteers who had no foot pain or major foot deformity were examined. The age range of the volunteers was 4 to 20 years. For each subject, the right foot was evaluated for the clinical hindfoot angle and footprint analysis. General ligamentous laxity also was recorded. Arch index and valgus index were used for the evaluation of the footprint analysis, and the valgus angle was measured clinically. Results: The average heel valgus angle for all subjects was 5.2 (SD 3.3) degrees. The means of valgus index and arch index were 3.34 (SD, 5.6) and 0.7 (SD, 0.2), respectively. Although there was a positive correlation between the valgus angle and valgus index (p = 0.027), the arch index was not found to be correlated with these values. Positive correlation between joint laxity and arch height also was demonstrated (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: We concluded that the hindfoot angle and MLA height must be considered separately in clinical practice, particularly in the management of childhood pes planus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-1007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7876</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/107110070602700810</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16919216</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Anthropometry ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Dermatoglyphics ; Female ; Flatfoot - diagnosis ; Foot - anatomy &amp; histology ; Humans ; Joint Instability - diagnosis ; Male</subject><ispartof>Foot &amp; ankle international, 2006-08, Vol.27 (8), p.623-627</ispartof><rights>2006 American Orthopaedic Foot &amp; Ankle Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-78c61ec5fb2747842f17cf5e4c97aa68b485334dda7a22554f6afb009061c3f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-78c61ec5fb2747842f17cf5e4c97aa68b485334dda7a22554f6afb009061c3f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/107110070602700810$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/107110070602700810$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21800,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16919216$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kanatli, Ulunay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gözil, Rabet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besli, Köksal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yetkin, Haluk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bölükbasi, Selcuk</creatorcontrib><title>The Relationship Between the Hindfoot Angle and the Medial Longitudinal Arch of the Foot</title><title>Foot &amp; ankle international</title><addtitle>Foot Ankle Int</addtitle><description>Introduction: The relationship of hindfoot valgus and the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) is a well-known parameter for the evaluation of the foot deformities. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between the hindfoot angle and the MLA and the effect of these parameters on the development and general joint laxity of the subjects. Methods: Two-hundred-sixty-one volunteers who had no foot pain or major foot deformity were examined. The age range of the volunteers was 4 to 20 years. For each subject, the right foot was evaluated for the clinical hindfoot angle and footprint analysis. General ligamentous laxity also was recorded. Arch index and valgus index were used for the evaluation of the footprint analysis, and the valgus angle was measured clinically. Results: The average heel valgus angle for all subjects was 5.2 (SD 3.3) degrees. The means of valgus index and arch index were 3.34 (SD, 5.6) and 0.7 (SD, 0.2), respectively. Although there was a positive correlation between the valgus angle and valgus index (p = 0.027), the arch index was not found to be correlated with these values. Positive correlation between joint laxity and arch height also was demonstrated (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: We concluded that the hindfoot angle and MLA height must be considered separately in clinical practice, particularly in the management of childhood pes planus.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Dermatoglyphics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flatfoot - diagnosis</subject><subject>Foot - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Instability - diagnosis</subject><subject>Male</subject><issn>1071-1007</issn><issn>1944-7876</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gBfSK-_qzmnTpL2cwzlhIsguvCtpmmwZXTKbFvHfm32AF4JX-TjP-3J4CLlFeEDkfIzAEQE4MEg4QI5wRoZYUBrznLPzcA9AvCcG5Mr7DQDyFItLMkBWYJEgG5KP5VpF76oRnXHWr80uelTdl1I26sJgbmytneuiiV01KhK2Pny_qtqIJlo4uzJdXxsbHpNWriOnD_NZiFyTCy0ar25O54gsZ0_L6TxevD2_TCeLWFLgXdhUMlQy01XCKc9popFLnSkqCy4EyyuaZ2lK61pwkSRZRjUTugIogKFMdToi98faXes-e-W7cmu8VE0jrHK9L1kwkbMsC2ByBGXrvG-VLnet2Yr2u0Qo9zrLvzpD6O7U3ldbVf9GTv4CMD4CXqxUuXF9G1z4_yp_AB4ie-0</recordid><startdate>20060801</startdate><enddate>20060801</enddate><creator>Kanatli, Ulunay</creator><creator>Gözil, Rabet</creator><creator>Besli, Köksal</creator><creator>Yetkin, Haluk</creator><creator>Bölükbasi, Selcuk</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060801</creationdate><title>The Relationship Between the Hindfoot Angle and the Medial Longitudinal Arch of the Foot</title><author>Kanatli, Ulunay ; Gözil, Rabet ; Besli, Köksal ; Yetkin, Haluk ; Bölükbasi, Selcuk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-78c61ec5fb2747842f17cf5e4c97aa68b485334dda7a22554f6afb009061c3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Dermatoglyphics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flatfoot - diagnosis</topic><topic>Foot - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Instability - diagnosis</topic><topic>Male</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kanatli, Ulunay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gözil, Rabet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besli, Köksal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yetkin, Haluk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bölükbasi, Selcuk</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Foot &amp; ankle international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kanatli, Ulunay</au><au>Gözil, Rabet</au><au>Besli, Köksal</au><au>Yetkin, Haluk</au><au>Bölükbasi, Selcuk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Relationship Between the Hindfoot Angle and the Medial Longitudinal Arch of the Foot</atitle><jtitle>Foot &amp; ankle international</jtitle><addtitle>Foot Ankle Int</addtitle><date>2006-08-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>623</spage><epage>627</epage><pages>623-627</pages><issn>1071-1007</issn><eissn>1944-7876</eissn><abstract>Introduction: The relationship of hindfoot valgus and the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) is a well-known parameter for the evaluation of the foot deformities. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between the hindfoot angle and the MLA and the effect of these parameters on the development and general joint laxity of the subjects. Methods: Two-hundred-sixty-one volunteers who had no foot pain or major foot deformity were examined. The age range of the volunteers was 4 to 20 years. For each subject, the right foot was evaluated for the clinical hindfoot angle and footprint analysis. General ligamentous laxity also was recorded. Arch index and valgus index were used for the evaluation of the footprint analysis, and the valgus angle was measured clinically. Results: The average heel valgus angle for all subjects was 5.2 (SD 3.3) degrees. The means of valgus index and arch index were 3.34 (SD, 5.6) and 0.7 (SD, 0.2), respectively. Although there was a positive correlation between the valgus angle and valgus index (p = 0.027), the arch index was not found to be correlated with these values. Positive correlation between joint laxity and arch height also was demonstrated (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: We concluded that the hindfoot angle and MLA height must be considered separately in clinical practice, particularly in the management of childhood pes planus.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>16919216</pmid><doi>10.1177/107110070602700810</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1071-1007
ispartof Foot & ankle international, 2006-08, Vol.27 (8), p.623-627
issn 1071-1007
1944-7876
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68768655
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Anthropometry
Child
Child, Preschool
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Dermatoglyphics
Female
Flatfoot - diagnosis
Foot - anatomy & histology
Humans
Joint Instability - diagnosis
Male
title The Relationship Between the Hindfoot Angle and the Medial Longitudinal Arch of the Foot
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T03%3A02%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Relationship%20Between%20the%20Hindfoot%20Angle%20and%20the%20Medial%20Longitudinal%20Arch%20of%20the%20Foot&rft.jtitle=Foot%20&%20ankle%20international&rft.au=Kanatli,%20Ulunay&rft.date=2006-08-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=623&rft.epage=627&rft.pages=623-627&rft.issn=1071-1007&rft.eissn=1944-7876&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/107110070602700810&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68768655%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68768655&rft_id=info:pmid/16919216&rft_sage_id=10.1177_107110070602700810&rfr_iscdi=true