Influence of host cultivars and Rhizobium species on the growth and symbiotic performance of Phaseolus vulgaris under salt stress

In order to study the effect of salt stress on the Rhizobium–common bean symbiosis, we investigated the response of both partners, separately and in symbiosis. The comparison of the behaviour of five cultivars of Phaseolus vulgaris differing in seed colour, growing on nitrates and different concentr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of plant physiology 2005-10, Vol.162 (10), p.1103-1113
Hauptverfasser: Bouhmouch, Ilham, Souad-Mouhsine, Bouchra, Brhada, Fatiha, Aurag, Jamal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1113
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1103
container_title Journal of plant physiology
container_volume 162
creator Bouhmouch, Ilham
Souad-Mouhsine, Bouchra
Brhada, Fatiha
Aurag, Jamal
description In order to study the effect of salt stress on the Rhizobium–common bean symbiosis, we investigated the response of both partners, separately and in symbiosis. The comparison of the behaviour of five cultivars of Phaseolus vulgaris differing in seed colour, growing on nitrates and different concentrations of NaCl, showed genotypic variation with respect to salt tolerance. Coco Blanc was the most sensitive cultivar, whereas SMV 29-21 was the most tolerant one. At the Rhizobium level, two strains previously selected for their salt tolerance were used: Rhizobium tropici strain RP163 and Rhizobium giardinii strain RP161. Their relative growth was moderately decreased at 250 mM NaCl, but they were able to grow at a low rate in the presence of 342 mM NaCl. Their viability at the minimal inhibitory concentration was slightly affected. The effect of salinity on Rhizobium–plant association was studied by using the tolerant variety SMV 29-21 and the sensitive one Coco Blanc inoculated separately with both strains. In the absence of salinity, the strains induced a significantly higher number of nodules on the roots of the cultivar SMV 29-21 compared to those of Coco Blanc. Concerning effectiveness, both strains were similarly effective with SMV 29-21, but not with Coco Blanc. In the presence of salinity, Coco Blanc was more severely affected when associated with RP163 than with RP161. Salinity affected the nodulation development more than it affected the infection steps. Neither of the two strains was able to nodulate SMV 29-21 under saline conditions, in spite of the fact that this was considered the most salt-tolerant variety. The unsuccessful nodulation of SMV 29-21 could be related to the inhibition by salt of one or more steps of the early events of the infection process. In conclusion, N-fixing plants were found to be more sensitive to salt stress than those depending on mineral nitrogen. Evidence presented here suggests that a best symbiotic N 2 fixation under salinity conditions could be achieved if both symbiotic partners, as well as the different steps of their interaction (early events, nodule formation, activity, etc.), are all tolerant to this stress.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jplph.2004.12.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68748164</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0176161705000611</els_id><sourcerecordid>19930213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-62d7480268cb9dbb602fd07004339ca52eaaae7c16cdc35fdfe2ca8e929ebf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2L1TAUhosoznX0FwiSje5a89Gm7cKFDH4MDCgy-5Amp9Nc0qbmpFfGnf_c3LkXZqerkPCcl5z3KYrXjFaMMvl-X-1Xv04Vp7SuGK8oFU-KHZOsK5ng3dNiR1kry_zQXhQvEPc035tOPC8umORNw2S3K_5cL6PfYDFAwkimgImYzSd30BGJXiz5MbnfYXDbTHAF4wBJWEiagNzF8CtNDwzez4MLyRmyQhxDnPU57_ukEYLfkBw2f6ejQ7ItFiJB7RPBFAHxZfFs1B7h1fm8LG4_f7q9-lrefPtyffXxpjQ161IpuW3rjnLZmaG3wyApHy1t8-5C9EY3HLTW0BomjTWiGe0I3OgOet7DMApxWbw7xa4x_NwAk5odGvBeLxA2VLLL8UzW_wVZ3wvK2TFRnEATA2KEUa3RzTreK0bV0ZDaqwdD6mhIMa6yoTz15hy_DTPYx5mzkgy8PQMajfZjzGU6fORa1oq64Zn7cOIgl3ZwEBVmPbl46yKYpGxw__zIXzW9s18</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19930213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of host cultivars and Rhizobium species on the growth and symbiotic performance of Phaseolus vulgaris under salt stress</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Bouhmouch, Ilham ; Souad-Mouhsine, Bouchra ; Brhada, Fatiha ; Aurag, Jamal</creator><creatorcontrib>Bouhmouch, Ilham ; Souad-Mouhsine, Bouchra ; Brhada, Fatiha ; Aurag, Jamal</creatorcontrib><description>In order to study the effect of salt stress on the Rhizobium–common bean symbiosis, we investigated the response of both partners, separately and in symbiosis. The comparison of the behaviour of five cultivars of Phaseolus vulgaris differing in seed colour, growing on nitrates and different concentrations of NaCl, showed genotypic variation with respect to salt tolerance. Coco Blanc was the most sensitive cultivar, whereas SMV 29-21 was the most tolerant one. At the Rhizobium level, two strains previously selected for their salt tolerance were used: Rhizobium tropici strain RP163 and Rhizobium giardinii strain RP161. Their relative growth was moderately decreased at 250 mM NaCl, but they were able to grow at a low rate in the presence of 342 mM NaCl. Their viability at the minimal inhibitory concentration was slightly affected. The effect of salinity on Rhizobium–plant association was studied by using the tolerant variety SMV 29-21 and the sensitive one Coco Blanc inoculated separately with both strains. In the absence of salinity, the strains induced a significantly higher number of nodules on the roots of the cultivar SMV 29-21 compared to those of Coco Blanc. Concerning effectiveness, both strains were similarly effective with SMV 29-21, but not with Coco Blanc. In the presence of salinity, Coco Blanc was more severely affected when associated with RP163 than with RP161. Salinity affected the nodulation development more than it affected the infection steps. Neither of the two strains was able to nodulate SMV 29-21 under saline conditions, in spite of the fact that this was considered the most salt-tolerant variety. The unsuccessful nodulation of SMV 29-21 could be related to the inhibition by salt of one or more steps of the early events of the infection process. In conclusion, N-fixing plants were found to be more sensitive to salt stress than those depending on mineral nitrogen. Evidence presented here suggests that a best symbiotic N 2 fixation under salinity conditions could be achieved if both symbiotic partners, as well as the different steps of their interaction (early events, nodule formation, activity, etc.), are all tolerant to this stress.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0176-1617</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-1328</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2004.12.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16255168</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPPHEY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Jena: Elsevier GmbH</publisher><subject>Adaptation to environment and cultivation conditions ; Adaptation, Physiological ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Common bean ; Cultivar ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetics and breeding of economic plants ; Nitrogen Fixation ; Nodulation ; Phaseolus - growth &amp; development ; Phaseolus - microbiology ; Phaseolus - physiology ; Phaseolus vulgaris ; Rhizobium ; Rhizobium - classification ; Rhizobium - physiology ; Rhizobium tropici ; Salt tolerance ; Sodium Chloride ; Species Specificity ; Symbiosis ; Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims ; Viability</subject><ispartof>Journal of plant physiology, 2005-10, Vol.162 (10), p.1103-1113</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier GmbH</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-62d7480268cb9dbb602fd07004339ca52eaaae7c16cdc35fdfe2ca8e929ebf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-62d7480268cb9dbb602fd07004339ca52eaaae7c16cdc35fdfe2ca8e929ebf33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.12.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17173452$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16255168$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bouhmouch, Ilham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souad-Mouhsine, Bouchra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brhada, Fatiha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aurag, Jamal</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of host cultivars and Rhizobium species on the growth and symbiotic performance of Phaseolus vulgaris under salt stress</title><title>Journal of plant physiology</title><addtitle>J Plant Physiol</addtitle><description>In order to study the effect of salt stress on the Rhizobium–common bean symbiosis, we investigated the response of both partners, separately and in symbiosis. The comparison of the behaviour of five cultivars of Phaseolus vulgaris differing in seed colour, growing on nitrates and different concentrations of NaCl, showed genotypic variation with respect to salt tolerance. Coco Blanc was the most sensitive cultivar, whereas SMV 29-21 was the most tolerant one. At the Rhizobium level, two strains previously selected for their salt tolerance were used: Rhizobium tropici strain RP163 and Rhizobium giardinii strain RP161. Their relative growth was moderately decreased at 250 mM NaCl, but they were able to grow at a low rate in the presence of 342 mM NaCl. Their viability at the minimal inhibitory concentration was slightly affected. The effect of salinity on Rhizobium–plant association was studied by using the tolerant variety SMV 29-21 and the sensitive one Coco Blanc inoculated separately with both strains. In the absence of salinity, the strains induced a significantly higher number of nodules on the roots of the cultivar SMV 29-21 compared to those of Coco Blanc. Concerning effectiveness, both strains were similarly effective with SMV 29-21, but not with Coco Blanc. In the presence of salinity, Coco Blanc was more severely affected when associated with RP163 than with RP161. Salinity affected the nodulation development more than it affected the infection steps. Neither of the two strains was able to nodulate SMV 29-21 under saline conditions, in spite of the fact that this was considered the most salt-tolerant variety. The unsuccessful nodulation of SMV 29-21 could be related to the inhibition by salt of one or more steps of the early events of the infection process. In conclusion, N-fixing plants were found to be more sensitive to salt stress than those depending on mineral nitrogen. Evidence presented here suggests that a best symbiotic N 2 fixation under salinity conditions could be achieved if both symbiotic partners, as well as the different steps of their interaction (early events, nodule formation, activity, etc.), are all tolerant to this stress.</description><subject>Adaptation to environment and cultivation conditions</subject><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Common bean</subject><subject>Cultivar</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</subject><subject>Nitrogen Fixation</subject><subject>Nodulation</subject><subject>Phaseolus - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Phaseolus - microbiology</subject><subject>Phaseolus - physiology</subject><subject>Phaseolus vulgaris</subject><subject>Rhizobium</subject><subject>Rhizobium - classification</subject><subject>Rhizobium - physiology</subject><subject>Rhizobium tropici</subject><subject>Salt tolerance</subject><subject>Sodium Chloride</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims</subject><subject>Viability</subject><issn>0176-1617</issn><issn>1618-1328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2L1TAUhosoznX0FwiSje5a89Gm7cKFDH4MDCgy-5Amp9Nc0qbmpFfGnf_c3LkXZqerkPCcl5z3KYrXjFaMMvl-X-1Xv04Vp7SuGK8oFU-KHZOsK5ng3dNiR1kry_zQXhQvEPc035tOPC8umORNw2S3K_5cL6PfYDFAwkimgImYzSd30BGJXiz5MbnfYXDbTHAF4wBJWEiagNzF8CtNDwzez4MLyRmyQhxDnPU57_ukEYLfkBw2f6ejQ7ItFiJB7RPBFAHxZfFs1B7h1fm8LG4_f7q9-lrefPtyffXxpjQ161IpuW3rjnLZmaG3wyApHy1t8-5C9EY3HLTW0BomjTWiGe0I3OgOet7DMApxWbw7xa4x_NwAk5odGvBeLxA2VLLL8UzW_wVZ3wvK2TFRnEATA2KEUa3RzTreK0bV0ZDaqwdD6mhIMa6yoTz15hy_DTPYx5mzkgy8PQMajfZjzGU6fORa1oq64Zn7cOIgl3ZwEBVmPbl46yKYpGxw__zIXzW9s18</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Bouhmouch, Ilham</creator><creator>Souad-Mouhsine, Bouchra</creator><creator>Brhada, Fatiha</creator><creator>Aurag, Jamal</creator><general>Elsevier GmbH</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Influence of host cultivars and Rhizobium species on the growth and symbiotic performance of Phaseolus vulgaris under salt stress</title><author>Bouhmouch, Ilham ; Souad-Mouhsine, Bouchra ; Brhada, Fatiha ; Aurag, Jamal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-62d7480268cb9dbb602fd07004339ca52eaaae7c16cdc35fdfe2ca8e929ebf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adaptation to environment and cultivation conditions</topic><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Common bean</topic><topic>Cultivar</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</topic><topic>Nitrogen Fixation</topic><topic>Nodulation</topic><topic>Phaseolus - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Phaseolus - microbiology</topic><topic>Phaseolus - physiology</topic><topic>Phaseolus vulgaris</topic><topic>Rhizobium</topic><topic>Rhizobium - classification</topic><topic>Rhizobium - physiology</topic><topic>Rhizobium tropici</topic><topic>Salt tolerance</topic><topic>Sodium Chloride</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims</topic><topic>Viability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bouhmouch, Ilham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souad-Mouhsine, Bouchra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brhada, Fatiha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aurag, Jamal</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of plant physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bouhmouch, Ilham</au><au>Souad-Mouhsine, Bouchra</au><au>Brhada, Fatiha</au><au>Aurag, Jamal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of host cultivars and Rhizobium species on the growth and symbiotic performance of Phaseolus vulgaris under salt stress</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plant physiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Plant Physiol</addtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>162</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1103</spage><epage>1113</epage><pages>1103-1113</pages><issn>0176-1617</issn><eissn>1618-1328</eissn><coden>JPPHEY</coden><abstract>In order to study the effect of salt stress on the Rhizobium–common bean symbiosis, we investigated the response of both partners, separately and in symbiosis. The comparison of the behaviour of five cultivars of Phaseolus vulgaris differing in seed colour, growing on nitrates and different concentrations of NaCl, showed genotypic variation with respect to salt tolerance. Coco Blanc was the most sensitive cultivar, whereas SMV 29-21 was the most tolerant one. At the Rhizobium level, two strains previously selected for their salt tolerance were used: Rhizobium tropici strain RP163 and Rhizobium giardinii strain RP161. Their relative growth was moderately decreased at 250 mM NaCl, but they were able to grow at a low rate in the presence of 342 mM NaCl. Their viability at the minimal inhibitory concentration was slightly affected. The effect of salinity on Rhizobium–plant association was studied by using the tolerant variety SMV 29-21 and the sensitive one Coco Blanc inoculated separately with both strains. In the absence of salinity, the strains induced a significantly higher number of nodules on the roots of the cultivar SMV 29-21 compared to those of Coco Blanc. Concerning effectiveness, both strains were similarly effective with SMV 29-21, but not with Coco Blanc. In the presence of salinity, Coco Blanc was more severely affected when associated with RP163 than with RP161. Salinity affected the nodulation development more than it affected the infection steps. Neither of the two strains was able to nodulate SMV 29-21 under saline conditions, in spite of the fact that this was considered the most salt-tolerant variety. The unsuccessful nodulation of SMV 29-21 could be related to the inhibition by salt of one or more steps of the early events of the infection process. In conclusion, N-fixing plants were found to be more sensitive to salt stress than those depending on mineral nitrogen. Evidence presented here suggests that a best symbiotic N 2 fixation under salinity conditions could be achieved if both symbiotic partners, as well as the different steps of their interaction (early events, nodule formation, activity, etc.), are all tolerant to this stress.</abstract><cop>Jena</cop><pub>Elsevier GmbH</pub><pmid>16255168</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jplph.2004.12.003</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0176-1617
ispartof Journal of plant physiology, 2005-10, Vol.162 (10), p.1103-1113
issn 0176-1617
1618-1328
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68748164
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adaptation to environment and cultivation conditions
Adaptation, Physiological
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
Common bean
Cultivar
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genetics and breeding of economic plants
Nitrogen Fixation
Nodulation
Phaseolus - growth & development
Phaseolus - microbiology
Phaseolus - physiology
Phaseolus vulgaris
Rhizobium
Rhizobium - classification
Rhizobium - physiology
Rhizobium tropici
Salt tolerance
Sodium Chloride
Species Specificity
Symbiosis
Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims
Viability
title Influence of host cultivars and Rhizobium species on the growth and symbiotic performance of Phaseolus vulgaris under salt stress
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A04%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20host%20cultivars%20and%20Rhizobium%20species%20on%20the%20growth%20and%20symbiotic%20performance%20of%20Phaseolus%20vulgaris%20under%20salt%20stress&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plant%20physiology&rft.au=Bouhmouch,%20Ilham&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=162&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1103&rft.epage=1113&rft.pages=1103-1113&rft.issn=0176-1617&rft.eissn=1618-1328&rft.coden=JPPHEY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.12.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19930213%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19930213&rft_id=info:pmid/16255168&rft_els_id=S0176161705000611&rfr_iscdi=true