Recruiting faculty with clinical responsibilities: factors that influence a decision to accept an academic position

Department of Clinical Sciences at Kansas State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, 111B Mosier Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA. ggrauer@vet.k-state.edu The current opportunities for veterinary clinical specialists in private practice and industry have made recruiting and retaining faculty a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of veterinary medical education 2005, Vol.32 (3), p.366-372
1. Verfasser: Grauer, GF
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 372
container_issue 3
container_start_page 366
container_title Journal of veterinary medical education
container_volume 32
creator Grauer, GF
description Department of Clinical Sciences at Kansas State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, 111B Mosier Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA. ggrauer@vet.k-state.edu The current opportunities for veterinary clinical specialists in private practice and industry have made recruiting and retaining faculty a major focus for most clinical academic departments. To gain a better understanding of the importance of the various factors considered in accepting an academic position, an electronic survey was distributed to newly hired veterinary faculty with clinical responsibilities. The results suggest that the perceived climate and collegiality within the prospective hiring department is the most important factor influencing the decision to accept an academic position. Salary is the second most important factor. Institutional support for the newly hired faculty member and the reputation and quality of the prospective institution rank as more important than the perceived quality of the local community and the geographic location of the institution. The search process and administrative support are the least important factors. There were no differences between the responses of faculty hired into tenure-track positions and those of faculty hired into clinical-track positions. Focusing on the advantages of a collegial environment, enhancing compensation packages, and using creative and flexible appointments may improve faculty recruitment and retention in clinical academic departments.
doi_str_mv 10.3138/jvme.32.3.366
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68747304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68747304</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6d4b4149b240ab31811b3da385e3a298506cc0be079ffaaa47676b04ee4adcfe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0MFrFDEUx_Egit1Wj14lJ0_O-jLJZma9SVErFARR8BbeZN50UzLJmGQs_e_Nuoue3jt8-B2-jL0SsJVC9u_uf8-0le1WbqXWT9hG7JVsulb0T9kGOtU3shU_L9hlzvcAIEHo5-xC6FaLHcCG5W9k0-qKC3d8Qrv68sgfXDlw611wFj1PlJcYshucr4zy-6MrMWVeDli4C5NfKVjiyEeyLrsYeIkcraWlcAz1w5FmZ_kSc12I4QV7NqHP9PJ8r9iPTx-_X980t18_f7n-cNtYBVAaPapBCbUfWgU4SNELMcgRZb8jie2-34G2FgaCbj9NiKg63ekBFJHC0U4kr9ib0-6S4q-VcjGzy5a8x0BxzUb3neokqAqbE7Qp5pxoMktyM6ZHI8AcK5tjZSNbI02tXP3r8_A6zDT-1-esFbw9gYO7Ozy4RCbP6H3l7d-pGGpd-rf3B11si5M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68747304</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recruiting faculty with clinical responsibilities: factors that influence a decision to accept an academic position</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Grauer, GF</creator><creatorcontrib>Grauer, GF</creatorcontrib><description>Department of Clinical Sciences at Kansas State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, 111B Mosier Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA. ggrauer@vet.k-state.edu The current opportunities for veterinary clinical specialists in private practice and industry have made recruiting and retaining faculty a major focus for most clinical academic departments. To gain a better understanding of the importance of the various factors considered in accepting an academic position, an electronic survey was distributed to newly hired veterinary faculty with clinical responsibilities. The results suggest that the perceived climate and collegiality within the prospective hiring department is the most important factor influencing the decision to accept an academic position. Salary is the second most important factor. Institutional support for the newly hired faculty member and the reputation and quality of the prospective institution rank as more important than the perceived quality of the local community and the geographic location of the institution. The search process and administrative support are the least important factors. There were no differences between the responses of faculty hired into tenure-track positions and those of faculty hired into clinical-track positions. Focusing on the advantages of a collegial environment, enhancing compensation packages, and using creative and flexible appointments may improve faculty recruitment and retention in clinical academic departments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-321X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3138/jvme.32.3.366</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16261500</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: AAVMC</publisher><subject>Animals ; Career Choice ; Decision Making ; Education, Veterinary ; Faculty ; Humans ; Personnel Selection ; Schools, Veterinary ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of veterinary medical education, 2005, Vol.32 (3), p.366-372</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6d4b4149b240ab31811b3da385e3a298506cc0be079ffaaa47676b04ee4adcfe3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16261500$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grauer, GF</creatorcontrib><title>Recruiting faculty with clinical responsibilities: factors that influence a decision to accept an academic position</title><title>Journal of veterinary medical education</title><addtitle>J Vet Med Educ</addtitle><description>Department of Clinical Sciences at Kansas State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, 111B Mosier Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA. ggrauer@vet.k-state.edu The current opportunities for veterinary clinical specialists in private practice and industry have made recruiting and retaining faculty a major focus for most clinical academic departments. To gain a better understanding of the importance of the various factors considered in accepting an academic position, an electronic survey was distributed to newly hired veterinary faculty with clinical responsibilities. The results suggest that the perceived climate and collegiality within the prospective hiring department is the most important factor influencing the decision to accept an academic position. Salary is the second most important factor. Institutional support for the newly hired faculty member and the reputation and quality of the prospective institution rank as more important than the perceived quality of the local community and the geographic location of the institution. The search process and administrative support are the least important factors. There were no differences between the responses of faculty hired into tenure-track positions and those of faculty hired into clinical-track positions. Focusing on the advantages of a collegial environment, enhancing compensation packages, and using creative and flexible appointments may improve faculty recruitment and retention in clinical academic departments.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Career Choice</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Education, Veterinary</subject><subject>Faculty</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Personnel Selection</subject><subject>Schools, Veterinary</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0748-321X</issn><issn>1943-7218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0MFrFDEUx_Egit1Wj14lJ0_O-jLJZma9SVErFARR8BbeZN50UzLJmGQs_e_Nuoue3jt8-B2-jL0SsJVC9u_uf8-0le1WbqXWT9hG7JVsulb0T9kGOtU3shU_L9hlzvcAIEHo5-xC6FaLHcCG5W9k0-qKC3d8Qrv68sgfXDlw611wFj1PlJcYshucr4zy-6MrMWVeDli4C5NfKVjiyEeyLrsYeIkcraWlcAz1w5FmZ_kSc12I4QV7NqHP9PJ8r9iPTx-_X980t18_f7n-cNtYBVAaPapBCbUfWgU4SNELMcgRZb8jie2-34G2FgaCbj9NiKg63ekBFJHC0U4kr9ib0-6S4q-VcjGzy5a8x0BxzUb3neokqAqbE7Qp5pxoMktyM6ZHI8AcK5tjZSNbI02tXP3r8_A6zDT-1-esFbw9gYO7Ozy4RCbP6H3l7d-pGGpd-rf3B11si5M</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Grauer, GF</creator><general>AAVMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Recruiting faculty with clinical responsibilities: factors that influence a decision to accept an academic position</title><author>Grauer, GF</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6d4b4149b240ab31811b3da385e3a298506cc0be079ffaaa47676b04ee4adcfe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Career Choice</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Education, Veterinary</topic><topic>Faculty</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Personnel Selection</topic><topic>Schools, Veterinary</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grauer, GF</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of veterinary medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grauer, GF</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recruiting faculty with clinical responsibilities: factors that influence a decision to accept an academic position</atitle><jtitle>Journal of veterinary medical education</jtitle><addtitle>J Vet Med Educ</addtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>366</spage><epage>372</epage><pages>366-372</pages><issn>0748-321X</issn><eissn>1943-7218</eissn><abstract>Department of Clinical Sciences at Kansas State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, 111B Mosier Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA. ggrauer@vet.k-state.edu The current opportunities for veterinary clinical specialists in private practice and industry have made recruiting and retaining faculty a major focus for most clinical academic departments. To gain a better understanding of the importance of the various factors considered in accepting an academic position, an electronic survey was distributed to newly hired veterinary faculty with clinical responsibilities. The results suggest that the perceived climate and collegiality within the prospective hiring department is the most important factor influencing the decision to accept an academic position. Salary is the second most important factor. Institutional support for the newly hired faculty member and the reputation and quality of the prospective institution rank as more important than the perceived quality of the local community and the geographic location of the institution. The search process and administrative support are the least important factors. There were no differences between the responses of faculty hired into tenure-track positions and those of faculty hired into clinical-track positions. Focusing on the advantages of a collegial environment, enhancing compensation packages, and using creative and flexible appointments may improve faculty recruitment and retention in clinical academic departments.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>AAVMC</pub><pmid>16261500</pmid><doi>10.3138/jvme.32.3.366</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-321X
ispartof Journal of veterinary medical education, 2005, Vol.32 (3), p.366-372
issn 0748-321X
1943-7218
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68747304
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Career Choice
Decision Making
Education, Veterinary
Faculty
Humans
Personnel Selection
Schools, Veterinary
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
title Recruiting faculty with clinical responsibilities: factors that influence a decision to accept an academic position
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A17%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recruiting%20faculty%20with%20clinical%20responsibilities:%20factors%20that%20influence%20a%20decision%20to%20accept%20an%20academic%20position&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20veterinary%20medical%20education&rft.au=Grauer,%20GF&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=366&rft.epage=372&rft.pages=366-372&rft.issn=0748-321X&rft.eissn=1943-7218&rft_id=info:doi/10.3138/jvme.32.3.366&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68747304%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68747304&rft_id=info:pmid/16261500&rfr_iscdi=true