Focused assessment of surgical performance: Difficulty with faculty compliance
This study evaluated faculty compliance in the use of the global surgical rating scale of the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills to rate resident surgical performance after every endoscopic procedure. For this prospective cohort study, 4 faculty members in the Minimally Invasive Gyn...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2005-11, Vol.193 (5), p.1811-1816 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1816 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1811 |
| container_title | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
| container_volume | 193 |
| creator | Gosman, Gabriella G. Simhan, Hyagriv N. Guido, Richard S. Lee, Ted T.M. Mansuria, Suketu M. Sanfilippo, Joseph S. |
| description | This study evaluated faculty compliance in the use of the global surgical rating scale of the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills to rate resident surgical performance after every endoscopic procedure.
For this prospective cohort study, 4 faculty members in the Minimally Invasive Gynecology Surgery Program were asked to rate resident surgical performance using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills instrument after every case. Faculty compliance was analyzed with respect to the influence of the resident or surgical case characteristics. Faculty and residents completed surveys about the value of the case-by-case ratings.
Faculty members used the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills instrument 36% of the time (range, 26%-60%). Faculty member compliance did not vary according to resident or surgical case characteristics. Faculty members did not think the forms had much impact on whether they gave feedback. Residents thought the opportunity to read their ratings was helpful.
Faculty member compliance with case-by-case surgical performance evaluation of the residents was low. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.081 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68743960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937805011695</els_id><sourcerecordid>68743960</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-90ade9fe7ab319adb2e67ce1dfe1d7c4e92d5a6206308ba6b20d3d0f40edafdd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi0EokvhBTigXOCWMLZTO0ZcUKGAVMEFzpZjj4tXyXrxJKC-PY52pd44jEYjff9o5mPsJYeOA1dv953b57tOAFx1oDsY-CO242B0qwY1PGY7ABCtkXq4YM-I9tsojHjKLrgSCkQPO_btJvuVMDSOCIlmPCxNjg2t5S55NzVHLDGX2R08vms-phiTX6flvvmbll9NdKfB5_k4pY15zp5ENxG-OPdL9vPm04_rL-3t989frz_ctl4O_dIacAFNRO1GyY0Lo0ClPfIQa2nfoxHhyikBSsIwOjUKCDJA7AGDiyHIS_bmtPdY8u8VabFzIo_T5A6YV7Jq0L00CiooTqAvmahgtMeSZlfuLQe7WbR7u1m0m0UL2laLNfTqvH0dZwwPkbO2Crw-A46qpVjq74keOC25kmao3PsTh9XFn4TFkk9YPYVU0C825PS_O_4Bf96SdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68743960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Focused assessment of surgical performance: Difficulty with faculty compliance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gosman, Gabriella G. ; Simhan, Hyagriv N. ; Guido, Richard S. ; Lee, Ted T.M. ; Mansuria, Suketu M. ; Sanfilippo, Joseph S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gosman, Gabriella G. ; Simhan, Hyagriv N. ; Guido, Richard S. ; Lee, Ted T.M. ; Mansuria, Suketu M. ; Sanfilippo, Joseph S.</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated faculty compliance in the use of the global surgical rating scale of the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills to rate resident surgical performance after every endoscopic procedure.
For this prospective cohort study, 4 faculty members in the Minimally Invasive Gynecology Surgery Program were asked to rate resident surgical performance using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills instrument after every case. Faculty compliance was analyzed with respect to the influence of the resident or surgical case characteristics. Faculty and residents completed surveys about the value of the case-by-case ratings.
Faculty members used the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills instrument 36% of the time (range, 26%-60%). Faculty member compliance did not vary according to resident or surgical case characteristics. Faculty members did not think the forms had much impact on whether they gave feedback. Residents thought the opportunity to read their ratings was helpful.
Faculty member compliance with case-by-case surgical performance evaluation of the residents was low.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.081</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16260240</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Competence ; Cohort Studies ; Education ; Faculty ; Guideline Adherence ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Medical sciences ; Prospective Studies ; Residency ; Surgical Procedures, Operative - standards ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Training program</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2005-11, Vol.193 (5), p.1811-1816</ispartof><rights>2005 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-90ade9fe7ab319adb2e67ce1dfe1d7c4e92d5a6206308ba6b20d3d0f40edafdd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-90ade9fe7ab319adb2e67ce1dfe1d7c4e92d5a6206308ba6b20d3d0f40edafdd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.081$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,778,782,787,788,3539,23913,23914,25123,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17316398$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16260240$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gosman, Gabriella G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simhan, Hyagriv N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guido, Richard S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ted T.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansuria, Suketu M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanfilippo, Joseph S.</creatorcontrib><title>Focused assessment of surgical performance: Difficulty with faculty compliance</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>This study evaluated faculty compliance in the use of the global surgical rating scale of the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills to rate resident surgical performance after every endoscopic procedure.
For this prospective cohort study, 4 faculty members in the Minimally Invasive Gynecology Surgery Program were asked to rate resident surgical performance using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills instrument after every case. Faculty compliance was analyzed with respect to the influence of the resident or surgical case characteristics. Faculty and residents completed surveys about the value of the case-by-case ratings.
Faculty members used the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills instrument 36% of the time (range, 26%-60%). Faculty member compliance did not vary according to resident or surgical case characteristics. Faculty members did not think the forms had much impact on whether they gave feedback. Residents thought the opportunity to read their ratings was helpful.
Faculty member compliance with case-by-case surgical performance evaluation of the residents was low.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Faculty</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Residency</subject><subject>Surgical Procedures, Operative - standards</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Training program</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi0EokvhBTigXOCWMLZTO0ZcUKGAVMEFzpZjj4tXyXrxJKC-PY52pd44jEYjff9o5mPsJYeOA1dv953b57tOAFx1oDsY-CO242B0qwY1PGY7ABCtkXq4YM-I9tsojHjKLrgSCkQPO_btJvuVMDSOCIlmPCxNjg2t5S55NzVHLDGX2R08vms-phiTX6flvvmbll9NdKfB5_k4pY15zp5ENxG-OPdL9vPm04_rL-3t989frz_ctl4O_dIacAFNRO1GyY0Lo0ClPfIQa2nfoxHhyikBSsIwOjUKCDJA7AGDiyHIS_bmtPdY8u8VabFzIo_T5A6YV7Jq0L00CiooTqAvmahgtMeSZlfuLQe7WbR7u1m0m0UL2laLNfTqvH0dZwwPkbO2Crw-A46qpVjq74keOC25kmao3PsTh9XFn4TFkk9YPYVU0C825PS_O_4Bf96SdA</recordid><startdate>20051101</startdate><enddate>20051101</enddate><creator>Gosman, Gabriella G.</creator><creator>Simhan, Hyagriv N.</creator><creator>Guido, Richard S.</creator><creator>Lee, Ted T.M.</creator><creator>Mansuria, Suketu M.</creator><creator>Sanfilippo, Joseph S.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051101</creationdate><title>Focused assessment of surgical performance: Difficulty with faculty compliance</title><author>Gosman, Gabriella G. ; Simhan, Hyagriv N. ; Guido, Richard S. ; Lee, Ted T.M. ; Mansuria, Suketu M. ; Sanfilippo, Joseph S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-90ade9fe7ab319adb2e67ce1dfe1d7c4e92d5a6206308ba6b20d3d0f40edafdd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Faculty</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Residency</topic><topic>Surgical Procedures, Operative - standards</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Training program</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gosman, Gabriella G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simhan, Hyagriv N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guido, Richard S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ted T.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansuria, Suketu M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanfilippo, Joseph S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gosman, Gabriella G.</au><au>Simhan, Hyagriv N.</au><au>Guido, Richard S.</au><au>Lee, Ted T.M.</au><au>Mansuria, Suketu M.</au><au>Sanfilippo, Joseph S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Focused assessment of surgical performance: Difficulty with faculty compliance</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2005-11-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>193</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1811</spage><epage>1816</epage><pages>1811-1816</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><coden>AJOGAH</coden><abstract>This study evaluated faculty compliance in the use of the global surgical rating scale of the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills to rate resident surgical performance after every endoscopic procedure.
For this prospective cohort study, 4 faculty members in the Minimally Invasive Gynecology Surgery Program were asked to rate resident surgical performance using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills instrument after every case. Faculty compliance was analyzed with respect to the influence of the resident or surgical case characteristics. Faculty and residents completed surveys about the value of the case-by-case ratings.
Faculty members used the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills instrument 36% of the time (range, 26%-60%). Faculty member compliance did not vary according to resident or surgical case characteristics. Faculty members did not think the forms had much impact on whether they gave feedback. Residents thought the opportunity to read their ratings was helpful.
Faculty member compliance with case-by-case surgical performance evaluation of the residents was low.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>16260240</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.081</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9378 |
| ispartof | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2005-11, Vol.193 (5), p.1811-1816 |
| issn | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68743960 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Clinical Competence Cohort Studies Education Faculty Guideline Adherence Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Medical sciences Prospective Studies Residency Surgical Procedures, Operative - standards Surveys and Questionnaires Training program |
| title | Focused assessment of surgical performance: Difficulty with faculty compliance |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T23%3A21%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Focused%20assessment%20of%20surgical%20performance:%20Difficulty%20with%20faculty%20compliance&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Gosman,%20Gabriella%20G.&rft.date=2005-11-01&rft.volume=193&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1811&rft.epage=1816&rft.pages=1811-1816&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft.coden=AJOGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.081&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68743960%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68743960&rft_id=info:pmid/16260240&rft_els_id=S0002937805011695&rfr_iscdi=true |