Prospective Study Using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm to Screen for Ovarian Cancer

To evaluate prevalence screening in the first prospective trial of a new ovarian cancer screening (OCS) strategy (risk of ovarian cancer or ROC algorithm) on the basis of age and CA125 profile. Postmenopausal women, > or = 50 years were randomly assigned to a control group or screen group. Screen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 2005-11, Vol.23 (31), p.7919-7926
Hauptverfasser: MENON, Usha, SKATES, Steven J, ORAM, David, JACOBS, Ian J, LEWIS, Sara, ROSENTHAL, Adam N, RUFFORD, Barnaby, SIBLEY, Karen, MACDONALD, Nicola, DAWNAY, Anne, JEYARAJAH, Arjun, BAST, Robert C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7926
container_issue 31
container_start_page 7919
container_title Journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 23
creator MENON, Usha
SKATES, Steven J
ORAM, David
JACOBS, Ian J
LEWIS, Sara
ROSENTHAL, Adam N
RUFFORD, Barnaby
SIBLEY, Karen
MACDONALD, Nicola
DAWNAY, Anne
JEYARAJAH, Arjun
BAST, Robert C
description To evaluate prevalence screening in the first prospective trial of a new ovarian cancer screening (OCS) strategy (risk of ovarian cancer or ROC algorithm) on the basis of age and CA125 profile. Postmenopausal women, > or = 50 years were randomly assigned to a control group or screen group. Screening involved serum CA125, interpreted using the ROC algorithm. Participants with normal results returned to annual screening; those with intermediate results had repeat CA125 testing; and those with elevated values underwent transvaginal ultrasound (TVS). Women with abnormal or persistently equivocal TVS were referred for a gynecologic opinion. Thirteen thousand five hundred eighty-two women were recruited. Of 6,682 women randomly assigned to screening, 6,532 women underwent the first screen. After the initial CA125, 5,213 women were classified as normal risk, 91 women elevated, and 1,228 women intermediate. On repeat CA125 testing of the latter, a further 53 women were classified as elevated risk. All 144 women with elevated risk had TVS. Sixteen women underwent surgery. Eleven women had benign pathology; one woman had ovarian recurrence of breast cancer; one woman had borderline; and three women had primary invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for primary invasive EOC were 99.8% (95% CI, 99.7 to 99.9) and 19% (95% CI, 4.1 to 45.6), respectively. An OCS strategy using the ROC algorithm is feasible and can achieve high specificity and PPV in postmenopausal women. It is being used in the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening and in the United States in both the Cancer Genetics Network and the Gynecology Oncology Group trials of high-risk women.
doi_str_mv 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.6642
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68742148</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68742148</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-4e64ad1c9c0ae3cdff7dfbffa963a85cd019f26c548e327aa7cd99caf5ba2f663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMoWqt7V5KNupqaxySZWUrxiVCxCroKt5mkjc6jJtOK_94ZWhBcnc13D_d8CJ1QMqKMkMuH8WTUpRgROpIyZTtoQAVTiVJC7KIBUZwlNONvB-gwxg9CaJpxsY8OqGQiIzkdoPen0MSlNa1fWzxtV8UPfo2-nuN2YfGzj5-4cXiyhuChxmOojQ34qpw3wbeLCrcNnppgbY1dE_5hR2jPQRnt8TaH6PXm-mV8lzxObu_HV4-JSaVqk9TKFApqckPAclM4pwo3cw5yySETpiA0d0wakWaWMwWgTJHnBpyYAXNS8iE63_QuQ_O1srHVlY_GliXUtllFLTOVsn74EJENaLrJMVinl8FXEH40JbrXqTudutepCdW9zu7kdNu9mlW2-DvY-uuAsy0A0UDpQjfdxz9OsYyKtH_yYsMt_Hzx7YPVsYKy7GqZ_jAN45pTrXKa819O6Yur</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68742148</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective Study Using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm to Screen for Ovarian Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>MENON, Usha ; SKATES, Steven J ; ORAM, David ; JACOBS, Ian J ; LEWIS, Sara ; ROSENTHAL, Adam N ; RUFFORD, Barnaby ; SIBLEY, Karen ; MACDONALD, Nicola ; DAWNAY, Anne ; JEYARAJAH, Arjun ; BAST, Robert C</creator><creatorcontrib>MENON, Usha ; SKATES, Steven J ; ORAM, David ; JACOBS, Ian J ; LEWIS, Sara ; ROSENTHAL, Adam N ; RUFFORD, Barnaby ; SIBLEY, Karen ; MACDONALD, Nicola ; DAWNAY, Anne ; JEYARAJAH, Arjun ; BAST, Robert C</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate prevalence screening in the first prospective trial of a new ovarian cancer screening (OCS) strategy (risk of ovarian cancer or ROC algorithm) on the basis of age and CA125 profile. Postmenopausal women, &gt; or = 50 years were randomly assigned to a control group or screen group. Screening involved serum CA125, interpreted using the ROC algorithm. Participants with normal results returned to annual screening; those with intermediate results had repeat CA125 testing; and those with elevated values underwent transvaginal ultrasound (TVS). Women with abnormal or persistently equivocal TVS were referred for a gynecologic opinion. Thirteen thousand five hundred eighty-two women were recruited. Of 6,682 women randomly assigned to screening, 6,532 women underwent the first screen. After the initial CA125, 5,213 women were classified as normal risk, 91 women elevated, and 1,228 women intermediate. On repeat CA125 testing of the latter, a further 53 women were classified as elevated risk. All 144 women with elevated risk had TVS. Sixteen women underwent surgery. Eleven women had benign pathology; one woman had ovarian recurrence of breast cancer; one woman had borderline; and three women had primary invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for primary invasive EOC were 99.8% (95% CI, 99.7 to 99.9) and 19% (95% CI, 4.1 to 45.6), respectively. An OCS strategy using the ROC algorithm is feasible and can achieve high specificity and PPV in postmenopausal women. It is being used in the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening and in the United States in both the Cancer Genetics Network and the Gynecology Oncology Group trials of high-risk women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.6642</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16258091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore, MD: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Biological and medical sciences ; CA-125 Antigen - metabolism ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Female genital diseases ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Mass Screening ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Ovarian Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Ovarian Neoplasms - metabolism ; Postmenopause ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Tumors ; United Kingdom - epidemiology ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2005-11, Vol.23 (31), p.7919-7926</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-4e64ad1c9c0ae3cdff7dfbffa963a85cd019f26c548e327aa7cd99caf5ba2f663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-4e64ad1c9c0ae3cdff7dfbffa963a85cd019f26c548e327aa7cd99caf5ba2f663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3716,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17281546$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16258091$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MENON, Usha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SKATES, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ORAM, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JACOBS, Ian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEWIS, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSENTHAL, Adam N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUFFORD, Barnaby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIBLEY, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACDONALD, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAWNAY, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JEYARAJAH, Arjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAST, Robert C</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective Study Using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm to Screen for Ovarian Cancer</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>To evaluate prevalence screening in the first prospective trial of a new ovarian cancer screening (OCS) strategy (risk of ovarian cancer or ROC algorithm) on the basis of age and CA125 profile. Postmenopausal women, &gt; or = 50 years were randomly assigned to a control group or screen group. Screening involved serum CA125, interpreted using the ROC algorithm. Participants with normal results returned to annual screening; those with intermediate results had repeat CA125 testing; and those with elevated values underwent transvaginal ultrasound (TVS). Women with abnormal or persistently equivocal TVS were referred for a gynecologic opinion. Thirteen thousand five hundred eighty-two women were recruited. Of 6,682 women randomly assigned to screening, 6,532 women underwent the first screen. After the initial CA125, 5,213 women were classified as normal risk, 91 women elevated, and 1,228 women intermediate. On repeat CA125 testing of the latter, a further 53 women were classified as elevated risk. All 144 women with elevated risk had TVS. Sixteen women underwent surgery. Eleven women had benign pathology; one woman had ovarian recurrence of breast cancer; one woman had borderline; and three women had primary invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for primary invasive EOC were 99.8% (95% CI, 99.7 to 99.9) and 19% (95% CI, 4.1 to 45.6), respectively. An OCS strategy using the ROC algorithm is feasible and can achieve high specificity and PPV in postmenopausal women. It is being used in the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening and in the United States in both the Cancer Genetics Network and the Gynecology Oncology Group trials of high-risk women.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>CA-125 Antigen - metabolism</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female genital diseases</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Postmenopause</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMoWqt7V5KNupqaxySZWUrxiVCxCroKt5mkjc6jJtOK_94ZWhBcnc13D_d8CJ1QMqKMkMuH8WTUpRgROpIyZTtoQAVTiVJC7KIBUZwlNONvB-gwxg9CaJpxsY8OqGQiIzkdoPen0MSlNa1fWzxtV8UPfo2-nuN2YfGzj5-4cXiyhuChxmOojQ34qpw3wbeLCrcNnppgbY1dE_5hR2jPQRnt8TaH6PXm-mV8lzxObu_HV4-JSaVqk9TKFApqckPAclM4pwo3cw5yySETpiA0d0wakWaWMwWgTJHnBpyYAXNS8iE63_QuQ_O1srHVlY_GliXUtllFLTOVsn74EJENaLrJMVinl8FXEH40JbrXqTudutepCdW9zu7kdNu9mlW2-DvY-uuAsy0A0UDpQjfdxz9OsYyKtH_yYsMt_Hzx7YPVsYKy7GqZ_jAN45pTrXKa819O6Yur</recordid><startdate>20051101</startdate><enddate>20051101</enddate><creator>MENON, Usha</creator><creator>SKATES, Steven J</creator><creator>ORAM, David</creator><creator>JACOBS, Ian J</creator><creator>LEWIS, Sara</creator><creator>ROSENTHAL, Adam N</creator><creator>RUFFORD, Barnaby</creator><creator>SIBLEY, Karen</creator><creator>MACDONALD, Nicola</creator><creator>DAWNAY, Anne</creator><creator>JEYARAJAH, Arjun</creator><creator>BAST, Robert C</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051101</creationdate><title>Prospective Study Using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm to Screen for Ovarian Cancer</title><author>MENON, Usha ; SKATES, Steven J ; ORAM, David ; JACOBS, Ian J ; LEWIS, Sara ; ROSENTHAL, Adam N ; RUFFORD, Barnaby ; SIBLEY, Karen ; MACDONALD, Nicola ; DAWNAY, Anne ; JEYARAJAH, Arjun ; BAST, Robert C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-4e64ad1c9c0ae3cdff7dfbffa963a85cd019f26c548e327aa7cd99caf5ba2f663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>CA-125 Antigen - metabolism</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female genital diseases</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Postmenopause</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MENON, Usha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SKATES, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ORAM, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JACOBS, Ian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEWIS, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSENTHAL, Adam N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUFFORD, Barnaby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIBLEY, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACDONALD, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAWNAY, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JEYARAJAH, Arjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAST, Robert C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MENON, Usha</au><au>SKATES, Steven J</au><au>ORAM, David</au><au>JACOBS, Ian J</au><au>LEWIS, Sara</au><au>ROSENTHAL, Adam N</au><au>RUFFORD, Barnaby</au><au>SIBLEY, Karen</au><au>MACDONALD, Nicola</au><au>DAWNAY, Anne</au><au>JEYARAJAH, Arjun</au><au>BAST, Robert C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective Study Using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm to Screen for Ovarian Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2005-11-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>31</issue><spage>7919</spage><epage>7926</epage><pages>7919-7926</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>To evaluate prevalence screening in the first prospective trial of a new ovarian cancer screening (OCS) strategy (risk of ovarian cancer or ROC algorithm) on the basis of age and CA125 profile. Postmenopausal women, &gt; or = 50 years were randomly assigned to a control group or screen group. Screening involved serum CA125, interpreted using the ROC algorithm. Participants with normal results returned to annual screening; those with intermediate results had repeat CA125 testing; and those with elevated values underwent transvaginal ultrasound (TVS). Women with abnormal or persistently equivocal TVS were referred for a gynecologic opinion. Thirteen thousand five hundred eighty-two women were recruited. Of 6,682 women randomly assigned to screening, 6,532 women underwent the first screen. After the initial CA125, 5,213 women were classified as normal risk, 91 women elevated, and 1,228 women intermediate. On repeat CA125 testing of the latter, a further 53 women were classified as elevated risk. All 144 women with elevated risk had TVS. Sixteen women underwent surgery. Eleven women had benign pathology; one woman had ovarian recurrence of breast cancer; one woman had borderline; and three women had primary invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for primary invasive EOC were 99.8% (95% CI, 99.7 to 99.9) and 19% (95% CI, 4.1 to 45.6), respectively. An OCS strategy using the ROC algorithm is feasible and can achieve high specificity and PPV in postmenopausal women. It is being used in the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening and in the United States in both the Cancer Genetics Network and the Gynecology Oncology Group trials of high-risk women.</abstract><cop>Baltimore, MD</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>16258091</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.2005.01.6642</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-183X
ispartof Journal of clinical oncology, 2005-11, Vol.23 (31), p.7919-7926
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68742148
source MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Algorithms
Biological and medical sciences
CA-125 Antigen - metabolism
Feasibility Studies
Female
Female genital diseases
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Mass Screening
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis
Ovarian Neoplasms - epidemiology
Ovarian Neoplasms - metabolism
Postmenopause
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Tumors
United Kingdom - epidemiology
United States - epidemiology
title Prospective Study Using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm to Screen for Ovarian Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T05%3A12%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20Study%20Using%20the%20Risk%20of%20Ovarian%20Cancer%20Algorithm%20to%20Screen%20for%20Ovarian%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=MENON,%20Usha&rft.date=2005-11-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=31&rft.spage=7919&rft.epage=7926&rft.pages=7919-7926&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2005.01.6642&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68742148%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68742148&rft_id=info:pmid/16258091&rfr_iscdi=true