Antibiotic use in non-university regional acute care general hospitals in southwestern Germany, 2001-2002

A previous study from Germany showed high antibiotic use in university hospitals, particularly in intensive care units (ICU) and hematology-oncology services, but there has been no information about recent antibiotic use in non-university hospitals. In the present study, we collected data from 40 no...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Infection 2005-10, Vol.33 (5-6), p.333-339
Hauptverfasser: Kern, W V, de With, Katja, Steib-Bauert, Michaela, Fellhauer, M, Plangger, A, Probst, W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 339
container_issue 5-6
container_start_page 333
container_title Infection
container_volume 33
creator Kern, W V
de With, Katja
Steib-Bauert, Michaela
Fellhauer, M
Plangger, A
Probst, W
description A previous study from Germany showed high antibiotic use in university hospitals, particularly in intensive care units (ICU) and hematology-oncology services, but there has been no information about recent antibiotic use in non-university hospitals. In the present study, we collected data from 40 non-university regional general hospitals located in the southwestern part of the country, and analyzed use density in the medical and surgical services of these hospitals. Hospital pharmacy records for the calendar years 2001 and 2002 were evaluated. The number of defined daily doses (DDD, definition according to the WHO/ATC 2001 index) and prescribed daily doses (PDD) per 100 patient days (DDD/100 or PDD/100, respectively) were calculated to compare antibiotic use densities in medical and surgical services. Data for surgery included various subspecialties and gynecology. Antibiotic use in the participating hospitals increased minimally between 2001 and 2002 both in medicine as well as in surgery. Use density in internal medicine (ICU areas excluded) in the year 2002 ranged between 13.5 and 93.7 DDD/100 with a weighted mean of 49.9 DDD/100 (corresponding to 28.6 PDD/100, respectively). Values for surgery were lower with a weighted mean of 43.4 DDD/100 (corresponding to 26.1 PDD/100, range, 10 to 65.4 DDD/100), respectively. Hospital size was not a strong predictor of use density, while large differences were observed between intensive care areas and normal wards. Mean use densities in intensive care areas in 2002 were 105.6 DDD/100 (or 49.7 PDD/100) in medical intensive care units, 116.9 DDD/100 (or 61.2 PDD/100) in surgical intensive care units, and 112.7 DDD/100 (or 66.7 PDD/100) in mixed, interdisciplinary intensive care units. Betalactams made up > 50% of all PDDs, while fluoroquinolones were the second most frequently prescribed drugs (15% of all PDDs). Fluoroquinolones were usually given orally. Overall glycopeptide and aminoglycoside use was < 1 PDD/100. This recent data from a large regional nonuniversity acute care hospital sample confirms that hospital antibiotic use density largely depends on patient care areas and less on hospital size. Surprisingly low use was observed for glycopeptides and aminoglycosides. The data may be useful as a benchmark for further pharmaco-epidemiologic evaluation and focused drug use control interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s15010-005-5059-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68741957</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>923919311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-689bed47f7d673e4465dcdfa9872ef13fec2f6739c671d6bea123f5c7ccfbdef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFqHDEMhk1JaTZJH6CXYHLoKW6s8dgeH0No00Kgl_ZsPB45cdi1N_ZMwr59vexCIRcJpO8Xkn5CvgD_BpzrmwqSA2ecSya5NEx8ICvohWHcaHFCVlxwzgbo1Ck5q_WZN9D0-hM5BdXJYVBiReJtmuMY8xw9XSrSmGjKiS0pvmKpcd7Rgo8xJ7emzi8zUu8K0kdMWFrpKddtnN267nU1L_PTG9YZS6L3WDYu7a5pxzmwFroL8jE0Ej8f8zn5--P7n7uf7OH3_a-72wfmhYSZqcGMOPU66ElpgX2v5OSn4MygOwwgAvoutI7xSsOkRnTQiSC99j6MEwZxTr4e5m5LflnaOnYTq8f12iXMS7Vq0D0YqRt49Q58zktpl1bbgVQgBmMaBAfIl1xrwWC3JW5c2Vngdm-CPZhg22_t3gQrmubyOHgZNzj9Vxy_Lv4Boc6C2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215613899</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antibiotic use in non-university regional acute care general hospitals in southwestern Germany, 2001-2002</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Kern, W V ; de With, Katja ; Steib-Bauert, Michaela ; Fellhauer, M ; Plangger, A ; Probst, W</creator><creatorcontrib>Kern, W V ; de With, Katja ; Steib-Bauert, Michaela ; Fellhauer, M ; Plangger, A ; Probst, W ; MABUSE-INTERREGIO-II Project Team ; and the MABUSE–INTERREGIO–II Project Team</creatorcontrib><description>A previous study from Germany showed high antibiotic use in university hospitals, particularly in intensive care units (ICU) and hematology-oncology services, but there has been no information about recent antibiotic use in non-university hospitals. In the present study, we collected data from 40 non-university regional general hospitals located in the southwestern part of the country, and analyzed use density in the medical and surgical services of these hospitals. Hospital pharmacy records for the calendar years 2001 and 2002 were evaluated. The number of defined daily doses (DDD, definition according to the WHO/ATC 2001 index) and prescribed daily doses (PDD) per 100 patient days (DDD/100 or PDD/100, respectively) were calculated to compare antibiotic use densities in medical and surgical services. Data for surgery included various subspecialties and gynecology. Antibiotic use in the participating hospitals increased minimally between 2001 and 2002 both in medicine as well as in surgery. Use density in internal medicine (ICU areas excluded) in the year 2002 ranged between 13.5 and 93.7 DDD/100 with a weighted mean of 49.9 DDD/100 (corresponding to 28.6 PDD/100, respectively). Values for surgery were lower with a weighted mean of 43.4 DDD/100 (corresponding to 26.1 PDD/100, range, 10 to 65.4 DDD/100), respectively. Hospital size was not a strong predictor of use density, while large differences were observed between intensive care areas and normal wards. Mean use densities in intensive care areas in 2002 were 105.6 DDD/100 (or 49.7 PDD/100) in medical intensive care units, 116.9 DDD/100 (or 61.2 PDD/100) in surgical intensive care units, and 112.7 DDD/100 (or 66.7 PDD/100) in mixed, interdisciplinary intensive care units. Betalactams made up &gt; 50% of all PDDs, while fluoroquinolones were the second most frequently prescribed drugs (15% of all PDDs). Fluoroquinolones were usually given orally. Overall glycopeptide and aminoglycoside use was &lt; 1 PDD/100. This recent data from a large regional nonuniversity acute care hospital sample confirms that hospital antibiotic use density largely depends on patient care areas and less on hospital size. Surprisingly low use was observed for glycopeptides and aminoglycosides. The data may be useful as a benchmark for further pharmaco-epidemiologic evaluation and focused drug use control interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-8126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s15010-005-5059-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16258863</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Aminoglycosides - therapeutic use ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; beta-Lactams - therapeutic use ; Drug Utilization ; Fluoroquinolones - therapeutic use ; Germany ; Glycopeptides - therapeutic use ; Health Facility Size ; Hospital Departments ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, General ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Internal Medicine ; Surgery Department, Hospital</subject><ispartof>Infection, 2005-10, Vol.33 (5-6), p.333-339</ispartof><rights>Urban &amp; Vogel München 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-689bed47f7d673e4465dcdfa9872ef13fec2f6739c671d6bea123f5c7ccfbdef3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16258863$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kern, W V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de With, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steib-Bauert, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fellhauer, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plangger, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Probst, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MABUSE-INTERREGIO-II Project Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>and the MABUSE–INTERREGIO–II Project Team</creatorcontrib><title>Antibiotic use in non-university regional acute care general hospitals in southwestern Germany, 2001-2002</title><title>Infection</title><addtitle>Infection</addtitle><description>A previous study from Germany showed high antibiotic use in university hospitals, particularly in intensive care units (ICU) and hematology-oncology services, but there has been no information about recent antibiotic use in non-university hospitals. In the present study, we collected data from 40 non-university regional general hospitals located in the southwestern part of the country, and analyzed use density in the medical and surgical services of these hospitals. Hospital pharmacy records for the calendar years 2001 and 2002 were evaluated. The number of defined daily doses (DDD, definition according to the WHO/ATC 2001 index) and prescribed daily doses (PDD) per 100 patient days (DDD/100 or PDD/100, respectively) were calculated to compare antibiotic use densities in medical and surgical services. Data for surgery included various subspecialties and gynecology. Antibiotic use in the participating hospitals increased minimally between 2001 and 2002 both in medicine as well as in surgery. Use density in internal medicine (ICU areas excluded) in the year 2002 ranged between 13.5 and 93.7 DDD/100 with a weighted mean of 49.9 DDD/100 (corresponding to 28.6 PDD/100, respectively). Values for surgery were lower with a weighted mean of 43.4 DDD/100 (corresponding to 26.1 PDD/100, range, 10 to 65.4 DDD/100), respectively. Hospital size was not a strong predictor of use density, while large differences were observed between intensive care areas and normal wards. Mean use densities in intensive care areas in 2002 were 105.6 DDD/100 (or 49.7 PDD/100) in medical intensive care units, 116.9 DDD/100 (or 61.2 PDD/100) in surgical intensive care units, and 112.7 DDD/100 (or 66.7 PDD/100) in mixed, interdisciplinary intensive care units. Betalactams made up &gt; 50% of all PDDs, while fluoroquinolones were the second most frequently prescribed drugs (15% of all PDDs). Fluoroquinolones were usually given orally. Overall glycopeptide and aminoglycoside use was &lt; 1 PDD/100. This recent data from a large regional nonuniversity acute care hospital sample confirms that hospital antibiotic use density largely depends on patient care areas and less on hospital size. Surprisingly low use was observed for glycopeptides and aminoglycosides. The data may be useful as a benchmark for further pharmaco-epidemiologic evaluation and focused drug use control interventions.</description><subject>Aminoglycosides - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>beta-Lactams - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Drug Utilization</subject><subject>Fluoroquinolones - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Glycopeptides - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Health Facility Size</subject><subject>Hospital Departments</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals, General</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Surgery Department, Hospital</subject><issn>0300-8126</issn><issn>1439-0973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkcFqHDEMhk1JaTZJH6CXYHLoKW6s8dgeH0No00Kgl_ZsPB45cdi1N_ZMwr59vexCIRcJpO8Xkn5CvgD_BpzrmwqSA2ecSya5NEx8ICvohWHcaHFCVlxwzgbo1Ck5q_WZN9D0-hM5BdXJYVBiReJtmuMY8xw9XSrSmGjKiS0pvmKpcd7Rgo8xJ7emzi8zUu8K0kdMWFrpKddtnN267nU1L_PTG9YZS6L3WDYu7a5pxzmwFroL8jE0Ej8f8zn5--P7n7uf7OH3_a-72wfmhYSZqcGMOPU66ElpgX2v5OSn4MygOwwgAvoutI7xSsOkRnTQiSC99j6MEwZxTr4e5m5LflnaOnYTq8f12iXMS7Vq0D0YqRt49Q58zktpl1bbgVQgBmMaBAfIl1xrwWC3JW5c2Vngdm-CPZhg22_t3gQrmubyOHgZNzj9Vxy_Lv4Boc6C2g</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Kern, W V</creator><creator>de With, Katja</creator><creator>Steib-Bauert, Michaela</creator><creator>Fellhauer, M</creator><creator>Plangger, A</creator><creator>Probst, W</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Antibiotic use in non-university regional acute care general hospitals in southwestern Germany, 2001-2002</title><author>Kern, W V ; de With, Katja ; Steib-Bauert, Michaela ; Fellhauer, M ; Plangger, A ; Probst, W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-689bed47f7d673e4465dcdfa9872ef13fec2f6739c671d6bea123f5c7ccfbdef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Aminoglycosides - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>beta-Lactams - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Drug Utilization</topic><topic>Fluoroquinolones - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Glycopeptides - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Health Facility Size</topic><topic>Hospital Departments</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals, General</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Surgery Department, Hospital</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kern, W V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de With, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steib-Bauert, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fellhauer, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plangger, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Probst, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MABUSE-INTERREGIO-II Project Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>and the MABUSE–INTERREGIO–II Project Team</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kern, W V</au><au>de With, Katja</au><au>Steib-Bauert, Michaela</au><au>Fellhauer, M</au><au>Plangger, A</au><au>Probst, W</au><aucorp>MABUSE-INTERREGIO-II Project Team</aucorp><aucorp>and the MABUSE–INTERREGIO–II Project Team</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antibiotic use in non-university regional acute care general hospitals in southwestern Germany, 2001-2002</atitle><jtitle>Infection</jtitle><addtitle>Infection</addtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>333</spage><epage>339</epage><pages>333-339</pages><issn>0300-8126</issn><eissn>1439-0973</eissn><abstract>A previous study from Germany showed high antibiotic use in university hospitals, particularly in intensive care units (ICU) and hematology-oncology services, but there has been no information about recent antibiotic use in non-university hospitals. In the present study, we collected data from 40 non-university regional general hospitals located in the southwestern part of the country, and analyzed use density in the medical and surgical services of these hospitals. Hospital pharmacy records for the calendar years 2001 and 2002 were evaluated. The number of defined daily doses (DDD, definition according to the WHO/ATC 2001 index) and prescribed daily doses (PDD) per 100 patient days (DDD/100 or PDD/100, respectively) were calculated to compare antibiotic use densities in medical and surgical services. Data for surgery included various subspecialties and gynecology. Antibiotic use in the participating hospitals increased minimally between 2001 and 2002 both in medicine as well as in surgery. Use density in internal medicine (ICU areas excluded) in the year 2002 ranged between 13.5 and 93.7 DDD/100 with a weighted mean of 49.9 DDD/100 (corresponding to 28.6 PDD/100, respectively). Values for surgery were lower with a weighted mean of 43.4 DDD/100 (corresponding to 26.1 PDD/100, range, 10 to 65.4 DDD/100), respectively. Hospital size was not a strong predictor of use density, while large differences were observed between intensive care areas and normal wards. Mean use densities in intensive care areas in 2002 were 105.6 DDD/100 (or 49.7 PDD/100) in medical intensive care units, 116.9 DDD/100 (or 61.2 PDD/100) in surgical intensive care units, and 112.7 DDD/100 (or 66.7 PDD/100) in mixed, interdisciplinary intensive care units. Betalactams made up &gt; 50% of all PDDs, while fluoroquinolones were the second most frequently prescribed drugs (15% of all PDDs). Fluoroquinolones were usually given orally. Overall glycopeptide and aminoglycoside use was &lt; 1 PDD/100. This recent data from a large regional nonuniversity acute care hospital sample confirms that hospital antibiotic use density largely depends on patient care areas and less on hospital size. Surprisingly low use was observed for glycopeptides and aminoglycosides. The data may be useful as a benchmark for further pharmaco-epidemiologic evaluation and focused drug use control interventions.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>16258863</pmid><doi>10.1007/s15010-005-5059-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-8126
ispartof Infection, 2005-10, Vol.33 (5-6), p.333-339
issn 0300-8126
1439-0973
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68741957
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Aminoglycosides - therapeutic use
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
beta-Lactams - therapeutic use
Drug Utilization
Fluoroquinolones - therapeutic use
Germany
Glycopeptides - therapeutic use
Health Facility Size
Hospital Departments
Hospitals
Hospitals, General
Humans
Intensive Care Units
Internal Medicine
Surgery Department, Hospital
title Antibiotic use in non-university regional acute care general hospitals in southwestern Germany, 2001-2002
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T03%3A49%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antibiotic%20use%20in%20non-university%20regional%20acute%20care%20general%20hospitals%20in%20southwestern%20Germany,%202001-2002&rft.jtitle=Infection&rft.au=Kern,%20W%20V&rft.aucorp=MABUSE-INTERREGIO-II%20Project%20Team&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=333&rft.epage=339&rft.pages=333-339&rft.issn=0300-8126&rft.eissn=1439-0973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s15010-005-5059-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E923919311%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215613899&rft_id=info:pmid/16258863&rfr_iscdi=true